Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Results/Endophyte1"
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
<h3 class="subhead">RESULTS</h3> | <h3 class="subhead">RESULTS</h3> | ||
| − | <h1 class="display-2"> | + | <h1 class="display-2">Visualising <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i></h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> <!-- end section-header --> | </div> <!-- end section-header --> | ||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
| + | <p><font size="3"> The first result obtained in regards to endophyte colonisation was obtained following engagement with GrowUp Urban Farms. This stakeholder engagement brought two issues to our attention, firstly root wounding methods (as we initially intended) are not accessible to farmers and suggested a seed coating may be more appropriate. Secondly that from a commercial point of view, there is a concern that the genetically modified <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i> would be present in the leaves which may be harvested and eaten.</p> | ||
<p><font size="3"> Using seedlings inoculated with wild type <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i>, DAPI staining and bright field microscopy were used to visualise the relationship between plant and bacteria. This revealed a biofilm was present on the surface of the root however it was unclear if the bacteria was inside the root, so seedlings were washed in distilled water. Examination of the cleaned seedlings revealed clear signs of colonisation and <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i> was present in intercellular spaces along both the root and hypocotyl. The bacteria were still motile and we could see them moving in real time.</p> | <p><font size="3"> Using seedlings inoculated with wild type <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i>, DAPI staining and bright field microscopy were used to visualise the relationship between plant and bacteria. This revealed a biofilm was present on the surface of the root however it was unclear if the bacteria was inside the root, so seedlings were washed in distilled water. Examination of the cleaned seedlings revealed clear signs of colonisation and <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i> was present in intercellular spaces along both the root and hypocotyl. The bacteria were still motile and we could see them moving in real time.</p> | ||
Revision as of 14:56, 15 October 2018
RESULTS
Visualising Pseudomonas sp.
The first result obtained in regards to endophyte colonisation was obtained following engagement with GrowUp Urban Farms. This stakeholder engagement brought two issues to our attention, firstly root wounding methods (as we initially intended) are not accessible to farmers and suggested a seed coating may be more appropriate. Secondly that from a commercial point of view, there is a concern that the genetically modified Pseudomonas sp. would be present in the leaves which may be harvested and eaten.
Using seedlings inoculated with wild type Pseudomonas sp., DAPI staining and bright field microscopy were used to visualise the relationship between plant and bacteria. This revealed a biofilm was present on the surface of the root however it was unclear if the bacteria was inside the root, so seedlings were washed in distilled water. Examination of the cleaned seedlings revealed clear signs of colonisation and Pseudomonas sp. was present in intercellular spaces along both the root and hypocotyl. The bacteria were still motile and we could see them moving in real time.
Figure 14. Bright field microscopy of a DAPI stained Arabidopsis thaliana root at 40x magnification. Wild type Pseudomonas sp. is visible in the intercellular spaces.
A selection of Pseudomonas sp. transformant-inoculated seedlings were taken for microscopy, again seedlings were washed and DAPI stained.Endophytic bacteria were visible inside the root and hypocotyl of both Arabidopsis thaliana and Eruca sativa seedlings showing that transformation had not altered the bacteria’s ability to colonise.
Figure 21. Bright field microscopy of an Arabidopsis thaliana seedling root at x100 magnification,showing transformed Pseudomonas sp. living as an endophyte in the intercellular spaces.
A selection of seedlings were again selected for microscopy, this time negative control E. coli DH5α inoculated seedlings were examined. Microscopy revealed that though E. coli was present on the root surface, there was no sign of endophytic relationship like that of Pseudomonas sp.. Further images were taken of transformant Pseudomonas sp. inoculated seedlings to aid visual demonstration of our transformed endophyte working.
Figure 23.Bright field microscopy showing the root of our negative control Arabidopsis thaliana at100x magnification, where E. coli DH5α was visible on the surface of the root in small numbers but not inside the root as an endophyte.
REFERENCES & Attributions
Attributions: Frank Eardley and Lewis Tomlinson