(Prototype team page) |
Tugbainanc (Talk | contribs) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{METU_HS_Ankara}} | + | {{METU_HS_Ankara/Inner_Header}} |
<html> | <html> | ||
+ | <header class="ct-pageHeader ct-pageHeader--type2 ct-u-shadowBottom--type2 ct-pageHeader--motive ct-pageHeader--hasDescription ct-u-paddingBoth10"> | ||
+ | <div class="container ct-u-triangleBottomLeft"> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-md-12"> | ||
+ | <h1 class="text-capitalize ct-fw-600 ct-u-colorWhite"> | ||
+ | InterLab | ||
+ | </h1> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </header> | ||
− | < | + | <section class="ct-u-paddingBoth100"> |
− | < | + | <div class="container"> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/35/T--METU_HS_Ankara--interlab01.jpg" alt="InterLab"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Interlab is a peculiar work that aims to decrease lab to lab variety. Due to different conditions in labs, the results | ||
+ | obtained from years of work are sometimes considered unreliable. Thus, it is important to improve the measurement tools | ||
+ | available for everyone. In order to support this project, we followed the standard | ||
+ | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/09/2018_InterLab_Plate_Reader_Protocol.pdf">iGEM protocol.</a> This protocol | ||
+ | is used to calculate the difference between OD and CFU. GFP and fluorescein was used in the experiments and measurements with | ||
+ | suggested tools. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <h3>Our Journey</h3> |
+ | <p> | ||
+ | We began Interlab Measurements in 25.06.2018 | ||
+ | Ph. D. student Evrim Elçin helped us with the protocols and constructing our experiments. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <h5><strong>Reference Point</strong></h5> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | In order to convert our density readings to OD600, we constructed the first experiment of the Plate Reader and CFU Protocol. | ||
+ | The given LUDOX CL-X (45% colloidal silica suspension) were added into wells A1, B1, C1, D1 in the amount of 100 μL. Then, we | ||
+ | added 100 μL of dd H2O into wells A2, B2, C2, D2 and measured the absorbance at 600 nm of all samples in Thermo Scientific | ||
+ | Multiskan Go spectrophotometer. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <h5><strong>Standard Curve</strong></h5> |
− | < | + | <p> |
− | + | After the first experiment of the protocol, we constructed an experiment to find Particle Standard Curve with the use of | |
− | <p> | + | Microspheres. Thus, we prepared a dilution series of monodisperse silica microspheres by following the Microsphere Protocol. |
− | + | We used 300 μL of Silica beads, dd H2O and a white 96 well plate with clear flat bottom and measured the absorbance at 600nm. | |
− | + | All the settings of the spectrophotometer and materials used were same with the ones in the first experiment. | |
+ | </p> | ||
− | </p> | + | <h5><strong>Fluorescein Standard Curve</strong></h5> |
− | </ | + | <p> |
+ | The third measurement of the Protocol was fluorescein standard curve. Because the fluorescein that was supplied by iGEM was | ||
+ | sensitive to light, we used a black 96 well plate with clear flat bottom. We have payed extreme attention to the sensitivity | ||
+ | of the fluorescein while constructing the experiment. Thus, we conducted it with minimum light exposure as possible. At first, | ||
+ | we prepared a fluorescein stock solution with 1x PBS and 10x fluorescein. Then, we began the serial dilutions of fluorescein | ||
+ | in 96 well plate to measure fluorescein in the plate reader with the settings suggested by iGEM. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <h5><strong>CELL Measurement Protocol</strong></h5> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | After we were finished with all the calibration protocols, we moved on to the Cell Measurement protocol. The calibration | ||
+ | protocols made us feel certain about the measurement of both fluorescence and OD600. Hence, we immediately began to perform | ||
+ | our experiments as suggested in iGEM Interlab Plate Reader Protocol. On our first day, we transformed the given plasmids into | ||
+ | our competent E. coli DH5-α with the help of iGEM Transformation protocol. Therefore, our bacteria were grown perfectly so | ||
+ | we were able to pick two colonies from each of the transformation plates. We especially payed attention to select the colonies | ||
+ | which were away from the others. Then, we inoculated our single colonies in LB medium and Chloramphenicol. Our cells were grown | ||
+ | overnight (16-18h) at 37 degrees Celsius and 220 rounds per minute in LB medium and Chloramphenicol. The blur in the broth was | ||
+ | the assurance that the plasmids were successfully transformed. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The last day was a little confusing and hard but we were able to construct the experiment according to the given protocol. | ||
+ | At first, we made a 1:10 dilution of our overnight cultures in LB+Chloramphenicol. Then measured the OD600 values of the diluted | ||
+ | cultures. Thanks to the results, we were able to set the OD600 values to 0.02 in a final volume of 12 ml LB medium + Chloramphenicol | ||
+ | by diluting further in 50 ml falcon tube. In order to be sure that our last diluted colonies had an OD600 of 0.02, we measured them | ||
+ | and observed that the dilution worked properly. The next step was taking 500 μL samples of the each diluted cultures at 0 hours and | ||
+ | 6 hours. Thus we measured OD600 of 32 samples and imported the data into Excel sheet. Our plate reader’s setting was 25 degrees Celsius | ||
+ | at 600nm and the pathway correction was turned off. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Furthermore, we were so ambitious to finish the protocol and make it perfect. Thus, we specially tried to prevent every single | ||
+ | contamination risk. We worked in a hood and close to fire. Every material we used such as pipette tips and Eppendorfs were sterilized. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | After we were sure that we were working on a sterile environment and we were ready, the starting sample preparation of Colony | ||
+ | Forming Units per 0.1 OD600 E.coli cultures protocol was set. We made a 1:10 dilution of the cell cultures of positive controls and | ||
+ | negative controls. Then we measured the OD600 of the cultures and used LB + Chloramphenicol as blank media. The next step was just | ||
+ | calculations. The cultures were diluted to 0.1 ABS at 600 nm in 1 ml LB + Chloramphenicol for each culture of each Control device. | ||
+ | At the end, we had three starting samples of each control devices’ cultures. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The math was perfect but it was just the beginning. We made a serial dilution of all the starting samples. It took us so long. | ||
+ | We prepared three tubes of 1900 μL LB + Chloramphenicol and two tubes of 900 μL LB + Chloramphenicol for each serial dilutions. | ||
+ | Then started from the beginning and add 100 μL starting sample into 1900 μL LB + Chloramphenicol. The serial dilution was constructed | ||
+ | as suggested in the protocol. These steps were done for each starting samples. After the serial dilutions, we spread plate 100 μL on LB + | ||
+ | Chloramphenicol for Dilutions 3,4,5 and incubate at 37 degrees Celsius overnight. After approximately 20 hours of incubation, we counted | ||
+ | the colonies and multiplied by the final dilution factor. The results were imported into plate reader forms, and submitted to iGEM. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/9b/T--METU_HS_Ankara--interlab.pdf" class="btn ct-btn--huge ct-btn--perspective btn-primary"> | ||
+ | <i class="fas fa-angle-double-right"></i>Click to see cell measurement results | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
− | + | {{METU_HS_Ankara/footer}} | |
− | + | ||
− | + |
Latest revision as of 00:57, 16 October 2018