(Created page with "{{Newcastle/navbar2}} <html> <head> <!-- Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-123258115-2"></scr...") |
|||
(19 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head> | <head> | ||
<!-- Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics --> | <!-- Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics --> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<title>Alternative Roots/Notebook</title> | <title>Alternative Roots/Notebook</title> | ||
Line 20: | Line 13: | ||
<!-- home | <!-- home | ||
================================================== --> | ================================================== --> | ||
− | <section id="home" class="s-home target-section" data-parallax="scroll" data-image-src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/ | + | <section id="home" class="s-home target-section" data-parallax="scroll" data-image-src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/51/T--Newcastle--EndophyticChassisDNotebookCover.png" data-natural-width=3000 data-natural-height=2200 data-position-y=center> |
<div class="overlay"></div> | <div class="overlay"></div> | ||
Line 32: | Line 25: | ||
<h1> | <h1> | ||
− | Endophytic Chassis | + | Endophytic Chassis |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
</h1> | </h1> | ||
Line 72: | Line 65: | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
<h3 class="subhead">NOTEBOOK</h3> | <h3 class="subhead">NOTEBOOK</h3> | ||
− | <h1 class="display-2"> | + | <h1 class="display-2">Endophytic Chassis</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> <!-- end section-header --> | </div> <!-- end section-header --> | ||
Line 82: | Line 75: | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 30/07</h3> | <h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 30/07</h3> | ||
− | <p><font size="3">Development of our new endophytic chassis began on the 1st of August with the arrival of root colonising <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. CT 364 (DSM25356 from DSMZ in Germany). The strain arrived in a glass ampoule and was | + | <p><font size="3">Development of our new endophytic chassis began on the 1st of August with the arrival of root colonising <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. CT 364 (DSM25356 from DSMZ in Germany). The strain arrived in a glass ampoule and was revived onto tryptone soy agar (TSA) plates using methods outlined by DSMZ. The plates were incubated at 28 ℃ for 24 hours after which emergent colonies were used to inoculate liquid cultures grown in tryptone soy broth (TSB) for initial growth characterisation and antibiotic testing.</font></p> |
Line 100: | Line 85: | ||
<h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 06/08</h3> | <h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 06/08</h3> | ||
− | <p><font size="3">In order to select transformants when introducing foreign DNA, we first needed to determine antibiotics active against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. We initially planned to transform <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. with | + | <p><font size="3">In order to select transformants when introducing foreign DNA, we first needed to determine antibiotics active against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. We initially planned to transform <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. with one of the InterLab test devices that had been modified to contain mNeonGreen instead of GFP. Creating a mutant <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. with strong fluorescence would be useful for identification and visualisation when carrying out microscopy on roots inoculated with <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. As the test devices are in a pSB1C3 backbone, activity of chloramphenicol against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. had to be characterised. To test activity, 200 µl of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. TSB overnight culture was spread onto TSA containing 50 and 100 µg/ml of chloramphenicol and plates were incubated at 28 ℃ for 24 hours. Following incubation, growth was observed on all plates indicating resistance to chloramphenicol at the concentrations tested.</font></p> |
Line 106: | Line 91: | ||
<h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 13/08</h3> | <h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 13/08</h3> | ||
− | <p><font size="3">As <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. was found to be resistant to chloramphenicol, a selection of four further antibiotics (kanamycin, | + | <p><font size="3">As <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. was found to be resistant to chloramphenicol, a selection of four further antibiotics (kanamycin, gentamicin, streptomycin and carbenicillin) were tested for activity against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. 20 ml of stock solution was prepared for each of the antibiotics at concentrations show in Table 1 and water or an ethanol solution was used as the solvent. Stocks were distributed into 1 ml aliquots and frozen at -20 °C.</font></p> |
<p><font size="3"><center>Table 1. Antibiotic concentration and solvent of stock solutions prepared.<center></font></p> | <p><font size="3"><center>Table 1. Antibiotic concentration and solvent of stock solutions prepared.<center></font></p> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/04/T--Newcastle--AntibioticStockTable%282%29.png"> |
− | <p><font size="3">TSA plates were prepared containing 50 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml of each antibiotic for screening of activity against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. Two replicates were prepared | + | <p><font size="3"><br>TSA plates were prepared containing 50 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml of each antibiotic for screening of activity against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. These two concentrations were either equal to or above working concentrations suggested by Addgene. Two replicates were prepared at both concentrations for each of the four antibiotics. 200 µl of overnight culture was spread onto each plate which were subsequently incubated overnight at 28 °C. Following incubation, growth inhibition was only observed on plates supplemented with streptomycin and gentamicin.</font></p> |
Line 121: | Line 106: | ||
− | <p><font size="3">After identifying streptomycin and | + | <p><font size="3">After identifying streptomycin and gentamicin as active against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. the next step was to characterise the susceptibility to each antibiotic by identifying the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each antibiotic. To do this, a range of concentrations were tested in 96-well plate format to produce a ‘kill curve’. To improve the accuracy of these experiments, the Opentrons OT-2 liquid handling robot (won by the Newcastle iGEM 2018 team) was used for experimental set-up. To do this, bespoke python code for the robot had to be designed specific to these experiments. Much of this week was spent outside of the lab working on the code. The code was designed in order to distribute liquid from 4 different sources into a 96-well plate. These four sources were sterile tryptone soy broth, <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. liquid culture, antibiotic solution and sterile distilled water. The code used a list function to define the volume of each of the four solutions distributed into each well. These experiments also utilised the universal racks designed, 3D printed and assembled by the team originally for carrying out heat-shock transformations using the OT-2.</font></p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Line 136: | Line 113: | ||
<h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 03/09</h3> | <h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 03/09</h3> | ||
− | <p><font size="3">This week started with the first testing of our python code for the | + | <p><font size="3">This week started with the first testing of our python code for the MIC experiments. An initial problem encountered with the code was that when using the 10 µl tip the robot was not completely dispensing all the liquid out of the tip and subsequently dripping into other wells causing contamination. This problem was fixed by adding a blow-out function to the code, this pushed air through the tip after the initial distribution to remove any remaining fluid. A second problem encountered was that the working volume of the 20 ml universals used to hold each of the four solutions was not sufficient for the volume of sterile broth required. As the OT-2 pipette returns to the same position for each aspiration rather aspirating from a lower position as the solution is used up the working volume of the universal is limited by the height of the pipette tip. This equated to a working volume of approximately 8 ml, we therefore added two more universal containers to the labware to hold sterile broth. The perimeter wells were not used for the assay and were each filled with 200 µl of sterile broth due to reduced accuracy when measuring absorbance in these wells. Experiments were performed in triplicate for each antibiotic at a range of three concentrations. The assays used an antibiotic stock concentration of 1.0 mg/ml, 100 µg/ml and 10 µg/ml. Suitable working concentrations in liquid culture were identified for each antibiotic. </font></p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Line 145: | Line 120: | ||
<h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 10/09</h3> | <h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 10/09</h3> | ||
− | <p><font size="3">Following on from successful characterisation of the | + | <p><font size="3">Following on from successful characterisation of the MICs in both liquid and solid culture for each antibiotic, transformations were attempted. Addgene plasmid number 79813 was selected for introduction into <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. This plasmid was selected as it was the only plasmid found that was isolated from a <i>Pseudomonas</i> species and contained either a gentamicin or a streptomycin resistance gene. The plasmid arrived from Addgene in <i>E. coli</i> and was streaked onto LB agar containing streptomycin (50 µg/ml). Liquid cultures were incubated overnight at 37 °C and two samples of the plasmid were isolated from <i>E. coli</i> using a Qiagen QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. The DNA concentration of each sample was then quantified using a Qubit fluorometer. Each sample was then split into two aliquots and one aliquot from each sample was concentrated using a DNA Speedvac resulting in four samples with a range of DNA concentrations.</font></p> |
− | <p><font size="3">Electroporation was chosen as the first method of transformation | + | <p><font size="3">Electroporation was chosen as the first method of transformation to attempt as it was the most documented method for <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. Electrocompetent cells were made by washing an overnight culture of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. cells with 300 mM sucrose solution. Electroporation was performed with three different DNA concentrations along with a control containing only sterile water. Electroporated cells were resuspended in TSB and incubated at 28 °C for 3 hours before spreading onto TSA containing gentamicin (10 µg/ml).</font></p> |
− | <p><font size="3">During this week the team also designed a streptomycin resistance gene that could be used in <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp | + | <p><font size="3">During this week the team also designed a streptomycin resistance gene that could be used in <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. The design consisted of an aadA gene under the control of a strong Anderson promoter and strong RBS, a native terminator new to the iGEM registry was also included to prevent any readthrough.</font></p> |
− | |||
<h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 17/09</h3> | <h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 17/09</h3> | ||
− | <p><font size="3">The streptomycin resistance gBlock was assembled into a pSB1C3 backbone by Gibson assembly. The | + | <p><font size="3">The streptomycin resistance gBlock (IDT) was assembled into a pSB1C3 backbone by Gibson assembly. The reaction mix contained 8.09 µl of DNA solution and an equal volume of Gibson assembly master mix. A positive control reaction mix was also prepared containing 10 µl of DNA and 10 µl of Gibson assembly master mix. Each sample was incubated at 50 °C for 60 minutes on a heat block and stored at room temperature until transformation.</font></p> |
+ | <p><font size="3">Prior to transformation, <i>E. coli</i> DH5α cells were tested for susceptibility to streptomycin. LB agar plates containing streptomycin at concentrations of 10, 50 and 100 µg/ml of streptomycin and a control plate containing no antibiotic were prepared. Each plate was inoculated with overnight culture and incubated at 37 °C for 20 hours.</font></p> | ||
− | |||
− | + | <p><font size="3">Heat shock transformations were performed using commercial chemically competent <i>E. coli</i> DH5α cells. Three separate heat shock reactions were carried out, the positive control (consisting of a standard NEBuilder reaction mix containing a backbone and and two gBlocks (IDT)), the streptomycin resistance gene assembly, and a negative control containing only molecular grade water and competent cells. </font></p> | |
− | <p><font size="3">Heat shock transformations were performed using | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Line 176: | Line 142: | ||
<h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 24/09</h3> | <h3 class="h2">Week Beginning 24/09</h3> | ||
− | <p><font size="3">The assembled plasmid containing the streptomycin gene was isolated from <i>E. coli </i>DH5α cells again using a Qiagen QIAprep | + | <p><font size="3">The assembled plasmid containing the streptomycin gene was isolated from <i>E. coli</i> DH5α cells again using a Qiagen QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. The resultant plasmid was sent for sequencing (Eurofins Genomics) using primers verification forward (VF2) and verification reverse (VR). Sequence data confirmed that the assembly had been successful.</font></p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | <p><font size="3">The streptomycin resistant part was characterised by comparing growth rates of the transformant and wild-type <i>E. coli</i> at a range of streptomycin concentrations on a 96-well plate. Serial dilutions were performed from wells containing streptomycin (64 µg/ml) and inoculated with transformant and wild-type overnight culture. The plate was subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours with a slow double orbital shake during which absorbance was measured at 600 nm. The transformant was found to be resistant to streptomycin at the highest concentration tested (64 µg/m).</font></p> | ||
Line 187: | Line 150: | ||
− | <p><font size="3">The | + | <p><font size="3">The gentamicin resistant transformant <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. was characterised to quantify the strength of resistance. Transformant growth rates were compared to wild-type <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. at gentamicin concentrations of 0.0 µg/ml, 5.0 µg/ml and 50 µg/ml on a 96-well plate. The plate was subsequently incubated at 28 °C for 24 hours with a slow double orbital shake during which absorbance was measured at 600 nm.</font></p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Line 211: | Line 172: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<h3 class="subhead"></h3> | <h3 class="subhead"></h3> | ||
− | <h1 class="display-2"> | + | <h1 class="display-2">References & Attributions</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 262: | Line 223: | ||
} | } | ||
</script> | </script> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</body> | </body> |
Latest revision as of 16:20, 17 October 2018
Alternative Roots
Endophytic Chassis
NOTEBOOK
Endophytic Chassis
Week Beginning 30/07
Development of our new endophytic chassis began on the 1st of August with the arrival of root colonising Pseudomonas sp. CT 364 (DSM25356 from DSMZ in Germany). The strain arrived in a glass ampoule and was revived onto tryptone soy agar (TSA) plates using methods outlined by DSMZ. The plates were incubated at 28 ℃ for 24 hours after which emergent colonies were used to inoculate liquid cultures grown in tryptone soy broth (TSB) for initial growth characterisation and antibiotic testing.
Week Beginning 06/08
In order to select transformants when introducing foreign DNA, we first needed to determine antibiotics active against Pseudomonas sp. We initially planned to transform Pseudomonas sp. with one of the InterLab test devices that had been modified to contain mNeonGreen instead of GFP. Creating a mutant Pseudomonas sp. with strong fluorescence would be useful for identification and visualisation when carrying out microscopy on roots inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. As the test devices are in a pSB1C3 backbone, activity of chloramphenicol against Pseudomonas sp. had to be characterised. To test activity, 200 µl of Pseudomonas sp. TSB overnight culture was spread onto TSA containing 50 and 100 µg/ml of chloramphenicol and plates were incubated at 28 ℃ for 24 hours. Following incubation, growth was observed on all plates indicating resistance to chloramphenicol at the concentrations tested.
Week Beginning 13/08
As Pseudomonas sp. was found to be resistant to chloramphenicol, a selection of four further antibiotics (kanamycin, gentamicin, streptomycin and carbenicillin) were tested for activity against Pseudomonas sp. 20 ml of stock solution was prepared for each of the antibiotics at concentrations show in Table 1 and water or an ethanol solution was used as the solvent. Stocks were distributed into 1 ml aliquots and frozen at -20 °C.
TSA plates were prepared containing 50 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml of each antibiotic for screening of activity against Pseudomonas sp. These two concentrations were either equal to or above working concentrations suggested by Addgene. Two replicates were prepared at both concentrations for each of the four antibiotics. 200 µl of overnight culture was spread onto each plate which were subsequently incubated overnight at 28 °C. Following incubation, growth inhibition was only observed on plates supplemented with streptomycin and gentamicin.
Week Beginning 27/08
After identifying streptomycin and gentamicin as active against Pseudomonas sp. the next step was to characterise the susceptibility to each antibiotic by identifying the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each antibiotic. To do this, a range of concentrations were tested in 96-well plate format to produce a ‘kill curve’. To improve the accuracy of these experiments, the Opentrons OT-2 liquid handling robot (won by the Newcastle iGEM 2018 team) was used for experimental set-up. To do this, bespoke python code for the robot had to be designed specific to these experiments. Much of this week was spent outside of the lab working on the code. The code was designed in order to distribute liquid from 4 different sources into a 96-well plate. These four sources were sterile tryptone soy broth, Pseudomonas sp. liquid culture, antibiotic solution and sterile distilled water. The code used a list function to define the volume of each of the four solutions distributed into each well. These experiments also utilised the universal racks designed, 3D printed and assembled by the team originally for carrying out heat-shock transformations using the OT-2.
Week Beginning 03/09
This week started with the first testing of our python code for the MIC experiments. An initial problem encountered with the code was that when using the 10 µl tip the robot was not completely dispensing all the liquid out of the tip and subsequently dripping into other wells causing contamination. This problem was fixed by adding a blow-out function to the code, this pushed air through the tip after the initial distribution to remove any remaining fluid. A second problem encountered was that the working volume of the 20 ml universals used to hold each of the four solutions was not sufficient for the volume of sterile broth required. As the OT-2 pipette returns to the same position for each aspiration rather aspirating from a lower position as the solution is used up the working volume of the universal is limited by the height of the pipette tip. This equated to a working volume of approximately 8 ml, we therefore added two more universal containers to the labware to hold sterile broth. The perimeter wells were not used for the assay and were each filled with 200 µl of sterile broth due to reduced accuracy when measuring absorbance in these wells. Experiments were performed in triplicate for each antibiotic at a range of three concentrations. The assays used an antibiotic stock concentration of 1.0 mg/ml, 100 µg/ml and 10 µg/ml. Suitable working concentrations in liquid culture were identified for each antibiotic.
Week Beginning 10/09
Following on from successful characterisation of the MICs in both liquid and solid culture for each antibiotic, transformations were attempted. Addgene plasmid number 79813 was selected for introduction into Pseudomonas sp. This plasmid was selected as it was the only plasmid found that was isolated from a Pseudomonas species and contained either a gentamicin or a streptomycin resistance gene. The plasmid arrived from Addgene in E. coli and was streaked onto LB agar containing streptomycin (50 µg/ml). Liquid cultures were incubated overnight at 37 °C and two samples of the plasmid were isolated from E. coli using a Qiagen QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. The DNA concentration of each sample was then quantified using a Qubit fluorometer. Each sample was then split into two aliquots and one aliquot from each sample was concentrated using a DNA Speedvac resulting in four samples with a range of DNA concentrations.
Electroporation was chosen as the first method of transformation to attempt as it was the most documented method for Pseudomonas sp. Electrocompetent cells were made by washing an overnight culture of Pseudomonas sp. cells with 300 mM sucrose solution. Electroporation was performed with three different DNA concentrations along with a control containing only sterile water. Electroporated cells were resuspended in TSB and incubated at 28 °C for 3 hours before spreading onto TSA containing gentamicin (10 µg/ml).
During this week the team also designed a streptomycin resistance gene that could be used in Pseudomonas sp. The design consisted of an aadA gene under the control of a strong Anderson promoter and strong RBS, a native terminator new to the iGEM registry was also included to prevent any readthrough.
Week Beginning 17/09
The streptomycin resistance gBlock (IDT) was assembled into a pSB1C3 backbone by Gibson assembly. The reaction mix contained 8.09 µl of DNA solution and an equal volume of Gibson assembly master mix. A positive control reaction mix was also prepared containing 10 µl of DNA and 10 µl of Gibson assembly master mix. Each sample was incubated at 50 °C for 60 minutes on a heat block and stored at room temperature until transformation.
Prior to transformation, E. coli DH5α cells were tested for susceptibility to streptomycin. LB agar plates containing streptomycin at concentrations of 10, 50 and 100 µg/ml of streptomycin and a control plate containing no antibiotic were prepared. Each plate was inoculated with overnight culture and incubated at 37 °C for 20 hours.
Heat shock transformations were performed using commercial chemically competent E. coli DH5α cells. Three separate heat shock reactions were carried out, the positive control (consisting of a standard NEBuilder reaction mix containing a backbone and and two gBlocks (IDT)), the streptomycin resistance gene assembly, and a negative control containing only molecular grade water and competent cells.
Week Beginning 24/09
The assembled plasmid containing the streptomycin gene was isolated from E. coli DH5α cells again using a Qiagen QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. The resultant plasmid was sent for sequencing (Eurofins Genomics) using primers verification forward (VF2) and verification reverse (VR). Sequence data confirmed that the assembly had been successful.
The streptomycin resistant part was characterised by comparing growth rates of the transformant and wild-type E. coli at a range of streptomycin concentrations on a 96-well plate. Serial dilutions were performed from wells containing streptomycin (64 µg/ml) and inoculated with transformant and wild-type overnight culture. The plate was subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours with a slow double orbital shake during which absorbance was measured at 600 nm. The transformant was found to be resistant to streptomycin at the highest concentration tested (64 µg/m).
Week Beginning 01/10
The gentamicin resistant transformant Pseudomonas sp. was characterised to quantify the strength of resistance. Transformant growth rates were compared to wild-type Pseudomonas sp. at gentamicin concentrations of 0.0 µg/ml, 5.0 µg/ml and 50 µg/ml on a 96-well plate. The plate was subsequently incubated at 28 °C for 24 hours with a slow double orbital shake during which absorbance was measured at 600 nm.
References & Attributions
Attributions: Frank Eardley and Lewis Tomlinson