Difference between revisions of "Team:ICT-Mumbai/Safety"

 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
<h3> Chassis organisms </h3>
 
<h3> Chassis organisms </h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
For the purpose of construction of our circuit, we used <i>E. coli</i> DH5 &alpha; as our chassis organism. For testing the circuit in our final chassis organism of choice, we transformed the plasmids into <i>B. subtilis</i> as well. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies Bacillus subtilis as a GRAS (Generally Regarded As Safe) organism. Both these organisms are generally recognized as safe and can be used in S1 laboratories without problems.  
+
For construction of the amplification circuit and all cloning experiments, we used <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH5α. For testing the circuit in our final chassis organism of choice, we transformed the plasmids into <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i> as GRAS (Generally Regarded As Safe) organisms, and can be handled in a Biosafety Level 1 facility.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 
<h3>Safe Laboratory Practices</h3>
 
<h3>Safe Laboratory Practices</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
All our experimental work was carried out in DBT-ICT Center for Energy Biosciences, which boasts of state-of-the art equipment for facilitating Microbiological research. As a responsible team, we ensured that all safety regulations are complied with and our experimentation does not pose a risk to us and others around us.
+
All our experimental work was carried out at DBT-ICT Centre for Energy Biosciences, which boasts of state-of-the art equipment for facilitating microbiological and synthetic biology research. As a responsible team, we ensure that all safety regulations are complied with and our experimentation does not pose a risk to us and others around us.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
<h4>Ensuring a contamination Free Environment</h4>
+
<h4>Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)</h4>
<p>Handling of all bacteria was carried out in Biosafety Laminar air flow units. This ensured a contamination free as well as a contained working environment.</p>
+
<p> Appropriate PPE were used in the lab which include lab coats, closed shoes and safety glasses. </p>
 +
 
 +
<h4>Sterilization</h4>
 +
<p>All pipette tips, microcentrifuge tubes, media and glassware were autoclaved prior to use.</p>
 +
<img id="eqp" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/db/T--ICT-Mumbai--Safety-Autoclave.jpg"></img>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<h4>Ensuring a contamination-free environment</h4>
 +
<p>Handling of bacteria was done in laminar air flow units. This ensures a contamination-free as well as a contained working environment.</p>
  
 
<img id="eqp" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/1a/T--ICT-Mumbai--Safety_LAF.jpg"></img>
 
<img id="eqp" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/1a/T--ICT-Mumbai--Safety_LAF.jpg"></img>
Line 53: Line 62:
 
<h4>Dealing with hazardous materials</h4>
 
<h4>Dealing with hazardous materials</h4>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Latex gloves and spatulas were used to handle Ethidium Bromide (ETBr) -containing agarose gels since it is a known carcinogen. Used gels were put in labelled bags that were handed over to a contractor for disposal by incineration at a municipal facility. Gels are viewed under UV light only with the protective barrier of a glass visor.
+
Disposable nitrile gloves were used to handle ethidium bromide (EtBr) containing agarose gels as it is a known carcinogen. Used gels as well as EtBr-contaminated pipette tips were put in labelled bags that are handed over to a contractor for disposal by incineration at a municipal facility. A UV-protective face shield was used to view gels using a UV Transilluminator.  
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<img id="eqp2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/de/T--ICT-Mumbai--faceshield.jpeg"></img>
 
<img id="eqp2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/de/T--ICT-Mumbai--faceshield.jpeg"></img>
 
</p>
 
</p>
<h4>Disposal of waste</h4>
+
<h4>Disposal of bacterial cultures</h4>
 
<p>
 
<p>
All bacterial waste was discarded plastic containers and autoclaved before disposal. This included bacterial cultures and plates.
+
Bacterial cultures, used tips and microfuge tubes were discarded in labelled plastic containers and autoclaved before disposal. Used agar plates were autoclaved before discarding them.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
<h3>Safe Project Design</h3>
+
<h3>Institutional Biosafety Committee</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
We chose <i>B. subtilis</i> as our chassis organism. This was done keeping in mind that it is a common soil bacterium and a GRAS organism.
+
The Institutional Biosafety Committee is responsible for ensuring that safe biological practices are followed in all laboratories in the Institute. The Committee meets twice a year to review and recommend biosafety measures. The Primary PI of the team, Prof. Arvind Lali, is the Member Secretary of the Committee.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
<h4>Safety regulation in our country on the release of GMOs</h4>
+
<h3>Biosafety regulations in India</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
While there are tremendous applications of synthetic biology which can benefit the society, risks
+
While there are many applications of synthetic biology which can benefit society, there are significant risks
associated with using such genetically modified organisms in the wild are significantly alarming. But
+
associated with releasing genetically modified organisms into the environment. But
risks are ubiquitous and unavoidable. Our modus operandi should be minimization of risks. One way
+
risks are ubiquitous and unavoidable. Our primary goal must be minimization of risks. One way
 
to manage such risk is governmental oversight <a href="https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2011/369573/"><u>(Dhan Prakash, 2011)</u></a>.
 
to manage such risk is governmental oversight <a href="https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2011/369573/"><u>(Dhan Prakash, 2011)</u></a>.
In India, there are 6 different committees which regulate the release of GMO into wild. The one with
+
 
ultimate power to allow the release or not is GEAC (Genetic Engineering Approval Committee). No
+
In India, manufacture, transport, use, and sale of GMOs is approved by the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC). State-, district- and institutional-level committees are tasked with providing information to the GEAC. The Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RDAC) takes note of developments in biotechnology at the national and international levels and prepares suitable recommendations for the government.</p>
person can manufacture, transport, use, process or sell GMOs without the approval from GEAC.
+
State, Institutional, District level committees,The Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RDAC)
+
takes note of developments in biotechnology at national and international level and prepares suitable
+
recommendations. </p>
+
  
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 17:26, 17 October 2018

Simply





Safety

Chassis organisms

For construction of the amplification circuit and all cloning experiments, we used Escherichia coli DH5α. For testing the circuit in our final chassis organism of choice, we transformed the plasmids into Bacillus subtilis. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies both E. coli and B. subtilis as GRAS (Generally Regarded As Safe) organisms, and can be handled in a Biosafety Level 1 facility.

Safe Laboratory Practices

All our experimental work was carried out at DBT-ICT Centre for Energy Biosciences, which boasts of state-of-the art equipment for facilitating microbiological and synthetic biology research. As a responsible team, we ensure that all safety regulations are complied with and our experimentation does not pose a risk to us and others around us.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Appropriate PPE were used in the lab which include lab coats, closed shoes and safety glasses.

Sterilization

All pipette tips, microcentrifuge tubes, media and glassware were autoclaved prior to use.




Ensuring a contamination-free environment

Handling of bacteria was done in laminar air flow units. This ensures a contamination-free as well as a contained working environment.



Dealing with hazardous materials

Disposable nitrile gloves were used to handle ethidium bromide (EtBr) containing agarose gels as it is a known carcinogen. Used gels as well as EtBr-contaminated pipette tips were put in labelled bags that are handed over to a contractor for disposal by incineration at a municipal facility. A UV-protective face shield was used to view gels using a UV Transilluminator.


Disposal of bacterial cultures

Bacterial cultures, used tips and microfuge tubes were discarded in labelled plastic containers and autoclaved before disposal. Used agar plates were autoclaved before discarding them.

Institutional Biosafety Committee

The Institutional Biosafety Committee is responsible for ensuring that safe biological practices are followed in all laboratories in the Institute. The Committee meets twice a year to review and recommend biosafety measures. The Primary PI of the team, Prof. Arvind Lali, is the Member Secretary of the Committee.

Biosafety regulations in India

While there are many applications of synthetic biology which can benefit society, there are significant risks associated with releasing genetically modified organisms into the environment. But risks are ubiquitous and unavoidable. Our primary goal must be minimization of risks. One way to manage such risk is governmental oversight (Dhan Prakash, 2011). In India, manufacture, transport, use, and sale of GMOs is approved by the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC). State-, district- and institutional-level committees are tasked with providing information to the GEAC. The Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RDAC) takes note of developments in biotechnology at the national and international levels and prepares suitable recommendations for the government.