Keithaiken (Talk | contribs) |
Keithaiken (Talk | contribs) |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d6/T--Lethbridge--banner_Model.png" width=100% alt="Model Banner Image"> | ||
<div class="content"> <!--everything added for content goes after this line--> | <div class="content"> <!--everything added for content goes after this line--> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | |||
<div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | <div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | ||
<div class="oneText-Text"> | <div class="oneText-Text"> | ||
− | <p class=" | + | <p class="f12">While VLPs will be useful components of VINCEnT, we wanted to focus on development of a novel non-immunogenic PNC with RNA packaging capabilities. Such a tool could enable simpler transfection of mammalian cell lines for fellow iGEMers and other researchers.<br><br>To do this, we identified the <i>Rattus norvegicus</i> Arc protein as a candidate for modelling a minimal packaging protein. Arc is an activity-regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein that has recently been recognized as a repurposed Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposon. A bi-lobar domain within Arc has significant homology to Gag proteins, which are the major capsid proteins of many viruses including Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1), Rous-Sarcoma Virus (RSV), and Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV). In response to synaptic activity in neurons, Arc proteins self-assemble via this Gag domain (similar to the related viral particles) to encapsulate Arc mRNA and shuttle it to neighbouring cells (Pastuzyn <i>et al.,</i> 2018; Ashley <i>et al.,</i> 2018).<br><br> |
To ensure we would not retain any native Arc functionality that might impact cellular activity, we designed a “minimal” Arc Gag protein based on homology with other known Gag domains. We used template-based structural predictions to model this minimal Arc Gag and its predicted assembly into higher-order structures.</p> | To ensure we would not retain any native Arc functionality that might impact cellular activity, we designed a “minimal” Arc Gag protein based on homology with other known Gag domains. We used template-based structural predictions to model this minimal Arc Gag and its predicted assembly into higher-order structures.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <h1> | + | <div style="clear: both"></div><br><br> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>Sequence Design</h1> | ||
<div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | <div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | ||
<div class="oneText-Text"> | <div class="oneText-Text"> | ||
− | <p class=" | + | <p class="f12">Using the <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/">EMBL-EBI Clustal Omega tool,</a>we aligned the protein sequences of HIV-1 (GenBank BAF32552.1), BLV (GenBank BAA00543.1), and RSV (PDB 5A9E) Gag proteins to <i>R. norvegicus</i> Arc (NCBI Ref NP_062234.1). The most closely conserved sequences are shown below:</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<div style="clear: both"></div> | <div style="clear: both"></div> | ||
− | + | <div class="oneImage-Wrapper"> | |
− | + | <div class="oneImage-Image"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6d/T--Lethbridge--ArcHomology.png" alt="" style=""></center> | |
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | <div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | ||
<div class="oneText-Text"> | <div class="oneText-Text"> | ||
− | <p class=" | + | <p class="f12">Based on HIV-1 homology to Arc, Zhang <i>et al.</i> (2015) similarly predicted a conserved Gag domain to span <i>R. norvegicus</i> Arc amino acids 207-278 (Gag N-lobe) and 278-370 (Gag C-lobe).<br><br>We then compared this conserved bi-lobar Gag region with the predicted RNA binding region for Gag gene products to ensure RNA packaging functionality would be maintained (Clever, Sassetti, & Parslow, 1995). A portion of the 4 stem loop RNA secondary structure in HIV-1 strongly aligns with a sequence located within the Arc Gag N-lobe:</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<div style="clear: both"></div> | <div style="clear: both"></div> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/ | + | <div class="oneImage-Wrapper"> |
+ | <div class="oneImage-Image"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/ae/T--Lethbridge--ArcMinRNAHomology.png" alt="" style="width: 600px"></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style="clear: both"></div><br><br> | ||
<h1>Structural Model of Minimal Arc</h1> | <h1>Structural Model of Minimal Arc</h1> | ||
<div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | <div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | ||
<div class="oneText-Text"> | <div class="oneText-Text"> | ||
− | <p class=" | + | <p class="f12">Using <a href="https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/">I-TASSER</a>(Roy, Kucukural, & Zhang, 2010; Yang <i>et al.,</i> 2015; Zhang, 2008), we then predicted and modeled the secondary and tertiary structure of this minimal Arc Gag protein (where a higher score indicates a more confident prediction of secondary structure):</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div | + | <div class="oneImage-Wrapper"> |
− | < | + | <div class="oneImage-Image"> |
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/92/T--Lethbridge--ArcMinSecondaryStructure.png" alt="" style=""></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | <div class=" | + | |
− | + | <div style="clear: both"></div><br> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="twoText-Wrapper"> | |
− | + | <div class="twoText-Text"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c3/T--Lethbridge--ArcMinModel.gif" alt=""style="width: 500px"></center> | |
− | + | <p class="f10"><br><b>Figure 1:</b> Minimal Arc Gag (rainbow ribbon indicating red N-terminus to blue C-terminus). Model produced with I-TASSER.<br></p> | |
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="twoText-Text"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/31/T--Lethbridge--ArcMinHIVOverlay.gif" alt=""style="width: 500px"></center> | ||
+ | <p class="f10"><b>Figure 2:</b> Minimal Arc Gag (rainbow ribbon indicating red N-terminus to blue C-terminus) overlaid with HIV-1 Gag (purple backbone; PDB ID: 3DIK). Model produced with I-TASSER using the TM-align structural alignment algorithm. </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div style="clear: both"></div> | + | |
+ | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
<h1>Higher-Order Assembly</h1> | <h1>Higher-Order Assembly</h1> | ||
<div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | <div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | ||
<div class="oneText-Text"> | <div class="oneText-Text"> | ||
− | <p class=" | + | <p class="f12">This Arc Gag subunit was predicted to form a hexamer from C-terminal subunit interactions and confirmed using <a href="http://galaxy.seoklab.org/cgi-bin/submit.cgi?type=HOMOMER">GalaxyHomomer</a> (a GalaxyWEB server for prediction of homomeric protein structures; Ko <i>et al.,</i> 2012; Shin <i>et al.,</i> 2014). HIV-1 and RSV Gag proteins similarly interact at the C-terminus to form hexamers for assembly of higher-order spherical multi-subunit structures (de Marco <i>et al.,</i> 2010). Thus, we were confident that the minimal Arc Gag would similarly be capable of forming a spherical or pseudo-icosahedral nanocompartment.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="oneImage-Wrapper"> | ||
+ | <div class="oneImage-Image"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bf/T--Lethbridge--ArcMinHexamer.png" alt=""style="width: 600px"></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div style="clear: both"></div> | <div style="clear: both"></div> | ||
− | <br><br> | + | |
+ | <div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | ||
+ | <div class="oneText-Text"> | ||
+ | <center><p class="f10"><b>Figure 3:</b> Based on structural homology with RSV (PDB ID: 3TIR), minimal Arc Gag proteins are predicted to form a hexameric subunit (each monomer indicated by a different colour). Model produced with GalaxyWEB using template-based oligomer modeling.</p></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style="clear: both"></div><br><br> | ||
+ | |||
<h1>References</h1> | <h1>References</h1> | ||
Line 93: | Line 123: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | </div> | + | </div><br><br> |
</div> <!--this closes off the content div--> | </div> <!--this closes off the content div--> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 00:00, 18 October 2018
While VLPs will be useful components of VINCEnT, we wanted to focus on development of a novel non-immunogenic PNC with RNA packaging capabilities. Such a tool could enable simpler transfection of mammalian cell lines for fellow iGEMers and other researchers.
To do this, we identified the Rattus norvegicus Arc protein as a candidate for modelling a minimal packaging protein. Arc is an activity-regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein that has recently been recognized as a repurposed Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposon. A bi-lobar domain within Arc has significant homology to Gag proteins, which are the major capsid proteins of many viruses including Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1), Rous-Sarcoma Virus (RSV), and Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV). In response to synaptic activity in neurons, Arc proteins self-assemble via this Gag domain (similar to the related viral particles) to encapsulate Arc mRNA and shuttle it to neighbouring cells (Pastuzyn et al., 2018; Ashley et al., 2018).
To ensure we would not retain any native Arc functionality that might impact cellular activity, we designed a “minimal” Arc Gag protein based on homology with other known Gag domains. We used template-based structural predictions to model this minimal Arc Gag and its predicted assembly into higher-order structures.
Sequence Design
Using the EMBL-EBI Clustal Omega tool,we aligned the protein sequences of HIV-1 (GenBank BAF32552.1), BLV (GenBank BAA00543.1), and RSV (PDB 5A9E) Gag proteins to R. norvegicus Arc (NCBI Ref NP_062234.1). The most closely conserved sequences are shown below:
Based on HIV-1 homology to Arc, Zhang et al. (2015) similarly predicted a conserved Gag domain to span R. norvegicus Arc amino acids 207-278 (Gag N-lobe) and 278-370 (Gag C-lobe).
We then compared this conserved bi-lobar Gag region with the predicted RNA binding region for Gag gene products to ensure RNA packaging functionality would be maintained (Clever, Sassetti, & Parslow, 1995). A portion of the 4 stem loop RNA secondary structure in HIV-1 strongly aligns with a sequence located within the Arc Gag N-lobe:
Structural Model of Minimal Arc
Using I-TASSER(Roy, Kucukural, & Zhang, 2010; Yang et al., 2015; Zhang, 2008), we then predicted and modeled the secondary and tertiary structure of this minimal Arc Gag protein (where a higher score indicates a more confident prediction of secondary structure):
Figure 1: Minimal Arc Gag (rainbow ribbon indicating red N-terminus to blue C-terminus). Model produced with I-TASSER.
Figure 2: Minimal Arc Gag (rainbow ribbon indicating red N-terminus to blue C-terminus) overlaid with HIV-1 Gag (purple backbone; PDB ID: 3DIK). Model produced with I-TASSER using the TM-align structural alignment algorithm.
Higher-Order Assembly
This Arc Gag subunit was predicted to form a hexamer from C-terminal subunit interactions and confirmed using GalaxyHomomer (a GalaxyWEB server for prediction of homomeric protein structures; Ko et al., 2012; Shin et al., 2014). HIV-1 and RSV Gag proteins similarly interact at the C-terminus to form hexamers for assembly of higher-order spherical multi-subunit structures (de Marco et al., 2010). Thus, we were confident that the minimal Arc Gag would similarly be capable of forming a spherical or pseudo-icosahedral nanocompartment.
Figure 3: Based on structural homology with RSV (PDB ID: 3TIR), minimal Arc Gag proteins are predicted to form a hexameric subunit (each monomer indicated by a different colour). Model produced with GalaxyWEB using template-based oligomer modeling.
References
- Ashley, J., Cordy, B., Lucia, D., Fradkin, L. G., Budnik, V., & Thomson, T. (2018). Retrovirus-like Gag protein Arc1 binds RNA and traffics across synaptic boutons. Cell, 172, 262-274.
- Clever, J., Sassetti, C., & Parslow, T. G. (1995). RNA secondary structure and binding sites for gag gene products in the 5' packaging signal of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol, 69, 2101-2109.
- de Marco, A., Davey, N. E., Ulbrich, P., Phillips, J. M., Lux, V., Riches, J. D., Fuzik, T., Ruml, T., Kräusslich, H.-G., Vogt, V. M., & Briggs, J. A. G. (2010). Conserved and variable features of Gag structure and arrangement in immature retrovirus particles. J Virol, 84, 11729-11736.
- Ko, J., Park, H., Heo, L., & Seok, C. (2012). GalaxyWEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, W294-W297.
- Pastuzyn, E. D., Day, C. E., Kearns, R. B., Kyrke-Smith, M., Taibi, A. V., McCormick, J., Yoder, N., Belnap, D. M., Erlendsson, S., Morado, D. R., Briggs, J. A. G., Feschotte, C., & Shepherd, J. D. (2018). The neuronal gene Arc encodes a repurposed retrotransposon Gag protein that mediates intercellular RNA transfer. Cell, 172, 275-288.
- Roy, A., Kucukural, A., Zhang, Y. (2010). I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5, 725-738.
- Shin, W.-H., Lee, G. R., Heo, L., Lee, H., & Seok, C. (2014). Prediction of protein structure and interaction by GALAXY protein modeling programs. Bio Design, 2, 1-11.
- Yang, J., Yan, R., Roy, A., Xu, D., Poisson, J., Zhang, Y. (2015). The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12, 7-8.
- Zhang, W., Wu, J., Ward, M. D., Yang, S., Chuang, Y.-A., Xiao, M., Li, R., Leahy, D. J., & Worley, P. F. (2015). Structural basis of Arc binding to synaptic proteins: implications for cognitive disease. Neuron, 86, 490-500.
- Zhang, Y. (2008). I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 40.