Difference between revisions of "Team:ICT-Mumbai/Results"

 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
<h3>Extraction of Exudates</h3>
 
<h3>Extraction of Exudates</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Our first aim was to identify the different promoters the would be expressed in presence of root exudates. We sought out to observe differences in gene expression in <I>Bacillus subtilis</I> in the presence of root exudates of 4 different crops. Tomato, Wheat, Rice, and Soybean are the most commonly grown crops in Maharashtra, India. Therefore, exudates of these four crops were extracted using protocol explained in Experiments tab.<br>
+
Our first aim was to identify promoters the would be expressed in presence of root exudates. We sought out to observe differences in gene expression in <I>Bacillus subtilis</I> in the presence of root exudates of four different crops. Tomato, wheat, rice and soybean are the most commonly grown crops in Maharashtra, India. Therefore, exudates of these four crops were extracted using protocol explained in Experiments tab.<br>
To collect the exudates, these crops were grown in sterilized soil for three weeks, and the exudates were extracted using water as solvent. Though most of the literature that we referred to suggested the use of artificial media such as Murashige & Skoog medium (MS medium), we decided to go use soil as our medium for plant growth to replicate natural condition to the highest extent possible. Presence of other microbial flora would have caused disturbances during the collection of exudates and RNA sequencing, hence the soil was sterilized using autoclave before sowing the seeds. <br>
+
To collect the exudates, these crops were grown in sterilized soil for three weeks, and the exudates were extracted using water as solvent. Though most of the literature that we referred to suggested the use of artificial media such as Murashige and Skoog medium (MS medium), we decided to use soil as our medium for plant growth to replicate natural conditions. Presence of other microbial flora would have caused disturbances during the collection of exudates and RNA sequencing, hence the soil was sterilized using autoclave before sowing the seeds. <br>
Seeds were procured from S.U.B. Agro Pvt. Ltd., Pune. Collected exudate mixture with water was concentrated using evaporation under vacuum using rotary evaporator. Some of the chemical moieties in exudate mixtures were expected to be heat sensitive, hence the application of vacuum. (Please click <a href=#><u>here for detailed protocol</u></a>).
+
Seeds were germinated in sterile soil and grown for three weeks. Water-soluble root exudates were collected and concentrated using evaporation under vacuum using a rotary evaporator. Some of the chemical moieties in exudate mixtures were expected to be heat sensitive, hence the application of vacuum. (Please click <a href=#><u>here for detailed protocol</u></a>).
Concentrated exudates were stored at 40C place for further experiments.
+
Exudates were stored at -80 degC.<br>
 +
<i>B. subtilis</i> 168 was grown in presence of the exudates. RNA sequencing is being carried out to identify promoters that are induced in the presence of the exudates.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h3>Construction of Amplification Circuit</h3>
 
<h3>Construction of Amplification Circuit</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
As discussed in <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:ICT-Mumbai/Design"><u>design</u></a>, as a case study, we worked towards developing a positive feedback circuit which can act as genetic amplifier. Various steps towards building the construct as well as the parts used in the process are documented below. <br>
+
As discussed in <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:ICT-Mumbai/Design"><u>Design</u></a>, as a case study, we worked towards developing a positive feedback circuit which can act as genetic amplification circuit. Various steps towards building the construct as well as the parts used in the process are documented below. <br>
 
We started building our construct from the last element in the circuit and sequentially added required elements upstream of the sequence.  
 
We started building our construct from the last element in the circuit and sequentially added required elements upstream of the sequence.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
Line 46: Line 47:
 
<h4>Expected output (Choice of reporter gene):</h4>
 
<h4>Expected output (Choice of reporter gene):</h4>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The aim was to build a positive feedback amplifier circuit for with an aim of release of <I>phosphodiesterase (phoD)</I> enzyme. <I>phoD</I> gene was isolated from the genomic DNA of B. subtilis 168 strain by PCR.<br>
+
The aim was to build a positive feedback amplification circuit for production of phosphodiesterase enzyme. <I>phoD</I> gene was isolated from the genomic DNA of <i>B. subtilis</i> 168 strain using PCR.<br>
We selected the reporter gene, Red Fluorescent Protein (<I>rfp</I>), as output for our amplifier circuit because of ease in quantification by measurement of fluorescence. This part was obtained from iGEM 2018 Distribution Kit (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450"><u>Part #BBa_J04450</u></a>).
+
We selected the reporter gene, Red Fluorescent Protein (<I>rfp</I>), as output for our amplification circuit because of ease in quantification by measurement of fluorescence. This part was obtained from the iGEM 2018 Distribution Kit (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450"><u>Part #BBa_J04450</u></a>).
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
Line 56: Line 57:
 
<h4>Transcription activator (TA):</h4>
 
<h4>Transcription activator (TA):</h4>
 
<p>
 
<p>
In order to construct the positive feedback amplifier, we required a transcription activator which did not interfere with native gene regulation in either <I>B. subtilis</I> or <I>E. coli</I>.<br>
+
In order to construct the positive feedback amplification circuit, we required a transcription activator which did not interfere with native gene regulation in either <I>B. subtilis</I> or <I>E. coli</I>.<br>
We chose two such transcription activators from the iGEM distribution kit:  
+
We chose two such transcription activators from the iGEM 2018 distribution kit:  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<ol>
 
<ol>
 
<li>
 
<li>
Pag activator from phage PSP3 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I746351"><u>Part #BBa_I746351</u></a>): This is a transcriptional unit containing Pav activator and a ribosome binding site (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034"><u>Part #BBa_B0034</u></a>) upstream of it.
+
Pag activator from phage PSP3 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I746351"><u>Part #BBa_I746351</u></a>): This is a transcriptional unit containing Pag activator and a ribosome binding site (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034"><u>Part #BBa_B0034</u></a>) upstream of it.
 
<li>
 
<li>
 
Ogr activator from phage P2 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I746350"><u>Part #BBa_I746350</u></a>): This is a transcriptional unit containing Ogr activator and a ribosome binding site (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034"><u>Part #BBa_B0034</u></a>) upstream of it.
 
Ogr activator from phage P2 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I746350"><u>Part #BBa_I746350</u></a>): This is a transcriptional unit containing Ogr activator and a ribosome binding site (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034"><u>Part #BBa_B0034</u></a>) upstream of it.
Line 112: Line 113:
 
<h3>Inducible Promoter:</h3>
 
<h3>Inducible Promoter:</h3>
  
<p>The aim of this case study is to use the promoters which are induced by the root exudates of crops for the activation of genetic amplifier. But while the results of RNA sequencing were awaited, we decided to test and characterize our circuit with other inducible promoters readily available in iGEM parts registry.  
+
<p>The aim of this case study is to use the promoters which are induced by the root exudates of crops for the activation of genetic amplifier. But while the results of RNA sequencing were awaited, we decided to test and characterize our circuit with other inducible promoters readily available in the iGEM Parts Registry.  
Although there are several promoters for <I>B. subtilis</I> reported in iGEM Registry, there are limited number of inducible promoters available. P<sub>LiaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a> ) is bacitracin-inducible promoter. We decided to go ahead with this promoter as the chances of leaky expression for an antibiotic-inducible promoter are very low.  
+
Although there are several promoters for <I>B. subtilis</I> reported in iGEM Registry, there are limited number of inducible promoters available. P<sub>liaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a> ) is bacitracin-inducible promoter. We decided to go ahead with this promoter as the chances of leaky expression for an antibiotic-inducible promoter are very low.  
 
We cloned promoter upstream of the constructs shown in Figure 2, </p>
 
We cloned promoter upstream of the constructs shown in Figure 2, </p>
  
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c5/T--ICT-Mumbai--Results-Img7.png"></img>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c5/T--ICT-Mumbai--Results-Img7.png"></img>
<figcaption>Figure 6: (a) Construct in figure 3(a) with bacitracin-inducible promoter P<sub>LiaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a> ) cloned upstream of it. This construct is the full positive feedback amplifier circuit. (b) Construct in figure 3(b) with bacitracin-inducible promoter <sub>PLiaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a> ) cloned upstream of it. This construct is the full positive feedback amplifier circuit.
+
<figcaption>Figure 6: (a) Construct in figure 3(a) with bacitracin-inducible promoter P<sub>liaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a> ) cloned upstream of it. This construct is the full positive feedback amplifier circuit. (b) Construct in figure 3(b) with bacitracin-inducible promoter <sub>PliaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a> ) cloned upstream of it. This construct is the full positive feedback amplification circuit.
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
These whole constructs were then transformed into <I>B. subtilis</I>, using the protocol mentioned <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:ICT-Mumbai/Experiments"><u>here</u></a>.<br>
 
These whole constructs were then transformed into <I>B. subtilis</I>, using the protocol mentioned <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:ICT-Mumbai/Experiments"><u>here</u></a>.<br>
As Rfp is the transcription readout for these constructs, red colonies were expected to be observed on agar + bacitracin plates. But at the concentration of 10 &mu L/mL, we did not observe any red colonies. We carried out same experiments in various concentrations of bacitracin ranging from 10 to 200 <p>&#x03BC</p> L/mL. At such high concentrations of antibiotic, though we were able to see colonies, none of them were observed to be red. <br>
+
As Rfp is the transcription readout for these constructs, red colonies were expected to be observed on agar + bacitracin plates. But at the concentration of 10 uL/mL, we did not observe any red colonies. We carried out same experiments in various concentrations of bacitracin ranging from 10 to 200 uL/mL. At such high concentrations of antibiotic, though we were able to see colonies, none of them were observed to be red. <br>
 
To troubleshoot this issue, we tried out this promoter with only reporter gene downstream of it. We did not see any red colonies with this construct as well. We concluded that this promoter is not able to express any gene downstream of it and decided to try out different inducible promoters.
 
To troubleshoot this issue, we tried out this promoter with only reporter gene downstream of it. We did not see any red colonies with this construct as well. We concluded that this promoter is not able to express any gene downstream of it and decided to try out different inducible promoters.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/3c/T--ICT-Mumbai--Results-Img8.png"></img>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/3c/T--ICT-Mumbai--Results-Img8.png"></img>
<figcaption> Figure 7: Construct for troubleshooting. rfp (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450"><u>Part #BBa_J04450</u></a>) cloned downstream of bacitracin-inducible promoter P<sub>LiaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a>). </figcaption>
+
<figcaption> Figure 7: Construct for troubleshooting.<I> rfp</I> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450"><u>Part #BBa_J04450</u></a>) cloned downstream of bacitracin-inducible promoter P<sub>LiaI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823001 "><u>Part #BBa_K823001</u></a>). </figcaption>
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 132: Line 133:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<ol>
 
<ol>
<li>P<sub>XylA</sub>: Xylose inducible promoter
+
<li>P<sub>xylA</sub>: Xylose inducible promoter
<li>P<sub>MtlA</sub>: Mannitol inducible promoter
+
<li>P<sub>mtlA</sub>: Mannitol inducible promoter
<li>P<sub>MalA</sub>: Maltose inducible promoter
+
<li>P<sub>malA</sub>: Maltose inducible promoter
 
</ol>
 
</ol>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 140: Line 141:
 
PCR was carried out using the oligos (each 90 bp long) and Taq polymerase enzyme to construct the promoter sequences. DNA of desired length (160 bp) was not observed on agarose gel. <br>
 
PCR was carried out using the oligos (each 90 bp long) and Taq polymerase enzyme to construct the promoter sequences. DNA of desired length (160 bp) was not observed on agarose gel. <br>
 
Experiments to construct promoters using PCR were retried by changing various parameters of the polymerase chain reactions such as annealing temperature, annealing time, number of cycles. Experiment to isolate promoter sequences from the genomic DNA of <I>B. subtilis</I> 168 using same oligos was also carried out. We did not get a part of desired size from any of the trials. <br>
 
Experiments to construct promoters using PCR were retried by changing various parameters of the polymerase chain reactions such as annealing temperature, annealing time, number of cycles. Experiment to isolate promoter sequences from the genomic DNA of <I>B. subtilis</I> 168 using same oligos was also carried out. We did not get a part of desired size from any of the trials. <br>
We decided to check the validity of the construct constitutive promoter for <I>B. subtilis</I> available in the iGEM Distribution Kit (Promoter veg: <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K143012  "><u>Part #BBa_K143012</u></a>). But because of lack of time, we were unable to ligate this promoter with our construct and characterize our whole circuit.
+
We decided to check the validity of the construct constitutive promoter for <I>B. subtilis</I> available in the iGEM 2018 Distribution Kit (Promoter veg: <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K143012  "><u>Part #BBa_K143012</u></a>). But because of lack of time, we were unable to ligate this promoter with our construct and characterize our whole circuit.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  

Latest revision as of 03:50, 18 October 2018

Simply





Results

Extraction of Exudates

Our first aim was to identify promoters the would be expressed in presence of root exudates. We sought out to observe differences in gene expression in Bacillus subtilis in the presence of root exudates of four different crops. Tomato, wheat, rice and soybean are the most commonly grown crops in Maharashtra, India. Therefore, exudates of these four crops were extracted using protocol explained in Experiments tab.
To collect the exudates, these crops were grown in sterilized soil for three weeks, and the exudates were extracted using water as solvent. Though most of the literature that we referred to suggested the use of artificial media such as Murashige and Skoog medium (MS medium), we decided to use soil as our medium for plant growth to replicate natural conditions. Presence of other microbial flora would have caused disturbances during the collection of exudates and RNA sequencing, hence the soil was sterilized using autoclave before sowing the seeds.
Seeds were germinated in sterile soil and grown for three weeks. Water-soluble root exudates were collected and concentrated using evaporation under vacuum using a rotary evaporator. Some of the chemical moieties in exudate mixtures were expected to be heat sensitive, hence the application of vacuum. (Please click here for detailed protocol). Exudates were stored at -80 degC.
B. subtilis 168 was grown in presence of the exudates. RNA sequencing is being carried out to identify promoters that are induced in the presence of the exudates.

Construction of Amplification Circuit

As discussed in Design, as a case study, we worked towards developing a positive feedback circuit which can act as genetic amplification circuit. Various steps towards building the construct as well as the parts used in the process are documented below.
We started building our construct from the last element in the circuit and sequentially added required elements upstream of the sequence.

Expected output (Choice of reporter gene):

The aim was to build a positive feedback amplification circuit for production of phosphodiesterase enzyme. phoD gene was isolated from the genomic DNA of B. subtilis 168 strain using PCR.
We selected the reporter gene, Red Fluorescent Protein (rfp), as output for our amplification circuit because of ease in quantification by measurement of fluorescence. This part was obtained from the iGEM 2018 Distribution Kit (Part #BBa_J04450).

Figure 1: Reporter gene

Transcription activator (TA):

In order to construct the positive feedback amplification circuit, we required a transcription activator which did not interfere with native gene regulation in either B. subtilis or E. coli.
We chose two such transcription activators from the iGEM 2018 distribution kit:

  1. Pag activator from phage PSP3 (Part #BBa_I746351): This is a transcriptional unit containing Pag activator and a ribosome binding site (Part #BBa_B0034) upstream of it.
  2. Ogr activator from phage P2 (Part #BBa_I746350): This is a transcriptional unit containing Ogr activator and a ribosome binding site (Part #BBa_B0034) upstream of it.

These parts were cloned upstream of rfp. Positive clones were screened by performing double digestion with EcoRI and PstI and were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Figure 2: Construct after cloning of transcription activator with rfp.

Promoter induced by transcription activator:

Promoter which is inducible by transcription activator is pivotal part in the circuit as it regulates the transcription of its inducer, i.e. transcription activator itself (See Design). Hence, for these constructs, choice of promoters is those that are induced by transcription activators Pag and/or Ogr activators. PF (Part #BBa_I746360) and PO (Part #BBa_I746361) are such promoters, both isolated form phage P2, which can be induced by transcription activators, Pag and Ogr. As both of these are not native to B. subtilis, they are not expected to interfere with native gene transcription.
We chose following two composite parts which contain promoters with the transcription activators upstream of them:

  1. Part #BBa_K274380: Promoter PF (Part #BBa_I746360), with Pag activator (Part #BBa_I746351) upstream of it.
  2. Part #BBa_K274371: Promoter PO (Part #BBa_I746361), with Ogr activator (Part #BBa_I746350) upstream of it.

  Part #BBa_K274380                               Part #BBa_K274371


These parts were successfully cloned upstream of the constructs in Figure 1.

Figure 3: (a) rfp (Part #BBa_J04450) cloned with Ogr transcription activator (Part #BBa_I746350) and composite part (Part #BBa_K274371) containing PO promoter and Ogr transcription activator upstream of it. This whole composite part is submitted to iGEM registry as Part #BBa_K2802003. (b) rfp (Part #BBa_J04450) cloned with Pag transcription activator (Part #BBa_I746351) and composite part (Part #BBa_K274380) containing PF promoter and Pag transcription activator upstream of it. This whole composite part is submitted to iGEM registry as Part #BBa_K2802001.



Figure 4: Part #BBa_K2802001 (lane 3) of length 1554 is double digested with enzymes EcoRI and PstI and screened for correct size using agarose gel electrophoresis.


Figure 5:Part #BBa_K2802003 (lane 3) of length 1555 base pairs is double digested with enzymes EcoRI and PstI and screened for correct size using agarose gel electrophoresis.


Inducible Promoter:

The aim of this case study is to use the promoters which are induced by the root exudates of crops for the activation of genetic amplifier. But while the results of RNA sequencing were awaited, we decided to test and characterize our circuit with other inducible promoters readily available in the iGEM Parts Registry. Although there are several promoters for B. subtilis reported in iGEM Registry, there are limited number of inducible promoters available. PliaI (Part #BBa_K823001 ) is bacitracin-inducible promoter. We decided to go ahead with this promoter as the chances of leaky expression for an antibiotic-inducible promoter are very low. We cloned promoter upstream of the constructs shown in Figure 2,

Figure 6: (a) Construct in figure 3(a) with bacitracin-inducible promoter PliaI (Part #BBa_K823001 ) cloned upstream of it. This construct is the full positive feedback amplifier circuit. (b) Construct in figure 3(b) with bacitracin-inducible promoter PliaI (Part #BBa_K823001 ) cloned upstream of it. This construct is the full positive feedback amplification circuit.

These whole constructs were then transformed into B. subtilis, using the protocol mentioned here.
As Rfp is the transcription readout for these constructs, red colonies were expected to be observed on agar + bacitracin plates. But at the concentration of 10 uL/mL, we did not observe any red colonies. We carried out same experiments in various concentrations of bacitracin ranging from 10 to 200 uL/mL. At such high concentrations of antibiotic, though we were able to see colonies, none of them were observed to be red.
To troubleshoot this issue, we tried out this promoter with only reporter gene downstream of it. We did not see any red colonies with this construct as well. We concluded that this promoter is not able to express any gene downstream of it and decided to try out different inducible promoters.

Figure 7: Construct for troubleshooting. rfp (Part #BBa_J04450) cloned downstream of bacitracin-inducible promoter PLiaI (Part #BBa_K823001).

Because of lack of any other inducible promoter from B. subtilis in registry, we decided to isolate them from B. subtilis 168 genomic DNA. We chose the following promoters:

  1. PxylA: Xylose inducible promoter
  2. PmtlA: Mannitol inducible promoter
  3. PmalA: Maltose inducible promoter

As the sizes of these sequences were very low (160 bp), experiments were carried out to construct these promoters from synthetic oligos with overlap region. PCR was carried out using the oligos (each 90 bp long) and Taq polymerase enzyme to construct the promoter sequences. DNA of desired length (160 bp) was not observed on agarose gel.
Experiments to construct promoters using PCR were retried by changing various parameters of the polymerase chain reactions such as annealing temperature, annealing time, number of cycles. Experiment to isolate promoter sequences from the genomic DNA of B. subtilis 168 using same oligos was also carried out. We did not get a part of desired size from any of the trials.
We decided to check the validity of the construct constitutive promoter for B. subtilis available in the iGEM 2018 Distribution Kit (Promoter veg: Part #BBa_K143012). But because of lack of time, we were unable to ligate this promoter with our construct and characterize our whole circuit.