Budiman.bela (Talk | contribs) |
Budiman.bela (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
<div class="w3-content w3-container w3-padding-64"> | <div class="w3-content w3-container w3-padding-64"> | ||
<h5>In accordance to the iGEM safety rules, our team used organism classified in the Risk Group 1, such as Escherichia coli K-12-strain derivates. To ensure the safety of ourselves and the project, our lab team worked in a BSL-1 (Biosafety Level 1) laboratory, certified internationally by WHO and CEN, in the Institute of Human Virology and Cancer Biology of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia. The safety criteria of this lab include risk assessment for each project, safety trainings, and standard operational procedures. Several lab administrative strategies are available such as medical surveillance and vaccination for those working with potentially infected human tissues, accident report, and safety drills.</h5> | <h5>In accordance to the iGEM safety rules, our team used organism classified in the Risk Group 1, such as Escherichia coli K-12-strain derivates. To ensure the safety of ourselves and the project, our lab team worked in a BSL-1 (Biosafety Level 1) laboratory, certified internationally by WHO and CEN, in the Institute of Human Virology and Cancer Biology of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia. The safety criteria of this lab include risk assessment for each project, safety trainings, and standard operational procedures. Several lab administrative strategies are available such as medical surveillance and vaccination for those working with potentially infected human tissues, accident report, and safety drills.</h5> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<h5> One of our part which raised concern about security is the DiphTox part. The details regarding this part is discussed in <b><a href ="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2607000">the following page</a></b> (http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2607000). The fact that this part originates from the modification of diphtheria toxin raises concern about safety and security, including the possibility of dual-use. Regarding safety issues, one of the main purposes of the creation of this part is to eliminate the toxic domain of the protein, leaving only the binding domain to be used as test device for HB-EGF/Tar chimeric receptor. However, this still leaves a security issue regarding dual-use possibilities. The dual-use potential of the part meant that the proteomic sequence becomes sensitive data. In managing the data, our laboratory had applied several safeguards, such as restricted informational access or password-locked computer. We have also discussed this matter with our PI, dr. Budiman Bela, and also with the Lab Biosafety Officer, Mrs. Aroem Naroeni, which also shared the safety aspects of our laboratory.</h5> | <h5> One of our part which raised concern about security is the DiphTox part. The details regarding this part is discussed in <b><a href ="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2607000">the following page</a></b> (http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2607000). The fact that this part originates from the modification of diphtheria toxin raises concern about safety and security, including the possibility of dual-use. Regarding safety issues, one of the main purposes of the creation of this part is to eliminate the toxic domain of the protein, leaving only the binding domain to be used as test device for HB-EGF/Tar chimeric receptor. However, this still leaves a security issue regarding dual-use possibilities. The dual-use potential of the part meant that the proteomic sequence becomes sensitive data. In managing the data, our laboratory had applied several safeguards, such as restricted informational access or password-locked computer. We have also discussed this matter with our PI, dr. Budiman Bela, and also with the Lab Biosafety Officer, Mrs. Aroem Naroeni, which also shared the safety aspects of our laboratory.</h5> |
Revision as of 10:35, 16 October 2018
SAFETY AND SECURITY ASPECTS