Line 300: | Line 300: | ||
</ol></br> | </ol></br> | ||
− | < | + | <div class="row"> |
− | <p class="pcontent"> | + | <a class="btn col-md-12" data-toggle="collapse" href="#Total_solution_overview" role="button" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="multiCollapseExample1"> |
− | + | Overview | |
− | + | <i class="fa fa-arrow-down fa-10" aria-hidden="true"></i> | |
− | + | </a> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <div class="collapse multi-collapse" id="Total_solution_overview"> | |
− | + | <div class="card card-body"> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | In the total solution experiment, we strive to measure the carbon fixation | |
− | + | amount of each sample. After reading numerous publications, we found out that | |
− | + | previous researches determine the efficiency of carbon fixation via measuring | |
− | + | the decrease of carbon dioxide concentration in the closed system or measure | |
− | + | the weight | |
− | + | percentage of C14 radioisotope in the dry cell. However, due to biosafety | |
− | + | constrain of our lab, we can barely use the radioisotope. Measuring the | |
− | + | decrease of carbon dioxide concentration in the closed system is also | |
+ | impractical for us since we have too much test samples. A new method to measure | ||
+ | multiple samples in the short period of time is developed by our team. We are | ||
+ | able to evaluate the fixation efficiency of each sample with the optical | ||
+ | density | ||
+ | O.D. 600 and xylose consumption. We have measure various construction to prove | ||
+ | that the enzyme of our construction is necessary for carbon fixation. | ||
+ | </p></br> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | The test samples below were incubated in an altered M9 medium which substitutes | |
− | + | glucose to xylose. 1/1000 of LB medium was added to support some rare elements. | |
− | + | Since the concentration of LB medium is too low, it doesn’t contribute the | |
− | + | carbon source of the bacteria. | |
− | + | </p></br> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | We defined a new index, Xylose Utilization Index, to describe the potential of | |
− | + | carbon fixation. We can compare this index of each strain to find out the | |
− | + | strain that has the highest capacity of carbon fixing. | |
− | + | </p></br> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | To define the XUI index, we firstly made two assumptions: | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <ol> | |
− | + | <li>O.D. 600 of the sample has a linear relationship to dry cell weight | |
− | + | (biomass). Optical density is frequently used as a means of describing the | |
− | + | cell density in the broth. We measured the dry cell weight of samples in | |
− | + | different O.D. value and discovered that it has a linear relationship. We | |
− | + | conclude that we can utilize O.D. value to estimate the dry cell weight. 1 | |
− | + | 0.D. of BL21(DE3) strain per litter yields the dry cell weight of 0.8 gram.</li> | |
− | + | </ol> | |
− | + | <img class="contentimg fig10" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/64/T--NCKU_Tainan--Results_fig_10.png"> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | Fig 12. shows the dry cell weight of BL21(DE3) incubated in altered M9 xylose | |
− | + | medium. | |
− | + | A linear relationship between O.D. and dry cell weight is observed. | |
− | + | </p></br> | |
− | + | <ol start="2"> | |
− | + | <li>The elemental formula of <i>E. coli</i> should be fixed or varies within a | |
− | + | small range. Although there may exist slightly different in different | |
− | + | growth condition, we assume that such error can be ignored during the | |
− | + | following calculation.</li> | |
− | + | </ol></br> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | After these two assumptions, the Xylose Consumption Index is designed to | |
− | + | evaluate | |
− | + | the carbon fixation ability of each strain. The definition of the index is | |
− | + | xylose | |
− | + | consumption over O.D. 600. O.D. 600 measurement can be viewed as the weight of | |
− | + | carbon of the bacteria. The index shows the ratio of xylose consumption per | |
− | + | biomass. For wild-type <i>E. coli</i>, it only consumes xylose (the sole carbon | |
− | + | source | |
− | + | provided in our medium) as its carbon source. Although some native <i>E. coli</i> | |
− | + | pathway | |
− | + | may utilize CO<sub>2</sub> (such as lipid synthesis), the amount is too small | |
− | + | to consider. | |
− | + | As | |
− | + | for engineered strain, carbon dioxide can be utilized as it’s carbon source. By | |
− | + | producing the same amount of carbon biomass, it requires less xylose. We can | |
− | + | thus | |
− | + | compare the XUI of each strain to determine the possible strain that fixes | |
− | + | carbon. | |
− | + | The less the XUI in the sample, the more possibility that it fixes carbon. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <img class="contentimg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/1b/T--NCKU_Tainan--CO2_results.gif"> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | We use the Dinitrosalicylic Acid (DNS) reducing sugar assay to measure the | |
− | + | xylose | |
− | + | concentration in the medium. Under base solution, DNS will turn to brown color | |
− | + | while reacting with reductive sugar in high temperature. In the specific | |
− | + | temperature range, the color will have a linear relationship with the reductive | |
− | + | sugar | |
− | + | concentration. We can thus measure the xylose concentration at O.D.540. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <img class="contentimg fig11" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/3f/T--NCKU_Tainan--Results_Fig_10.PNG"> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | Fig 13. Shows the calibration line of DNS assay kit. | |
− | + | </p></br> | |
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | Before measuring the XUI, we observe the growth curve of each strain. We found | |
− | + | out | |
− | + | that W3110(L5T7) constructed strain cannot grow in altered M9 solution. | |
− | + | W3110(L5T7) | |
− | + | is a newly constructed strain, we are not quite certain its characteristic. We | |
− | + | eliminate this strain from the following experiment. BL21(DE3) and W3110 | |
− | + | constructed strains show little growth after 24 hours. | |
− | + | </p> | |
+ | <img class="contentimg fig12" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/51/T--NCKU_Tainan--Results_Fig_11.PNG"> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent"> | |
− | + | Fig 14. shows the growth of engineered (contains Rubisco and PRK) W3110(L5T7), BL21(DE3), W3110 incubated in normal | |
− | + | incubator for 24 hours. The growth of W3110(L5T7) is not obvious while other | |
− | + | strains show growth after 24hours. | |
− | + | </p></br> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<h8>Total solution check: Function of Rubisco</h8></br></br> | <h8>Total solution check: Function of Rubisco</h8></br></br> |
Revision as of 09:49, 17 October 2018
Results