Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<li>Estimate the carbon fixation amount with our experiment result.</li> | <li>Estimate the carbon fixation amount with our experiment result.</li> | ||
<li>Characterize the pH sensing promoter P<sub>asr</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1231000" | <li>Characterize the pH sensing promoter P<sub>asr</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1231000" | ||
− | style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K1231000</a>), and improve P<sub>gadA</sub> biobrick (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1962013" | + | style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K1231000</a>), and improve P<sub>gadA</sub> biobrick (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1962013" |
style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K1962013</a>).</li> | style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K1962013</a>).</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
We tested PRK in different strains. We first cloned <i>prk</i> into pSB1C3 and | We tested PRK in different strains. We first cloned <i>prk</i> into pSB1C3 and | ||
− | transformed into BL21(DE3). After 12 hours, the strain without plasmid could | + | transformed into BL21 (DE3). After 12 hours, the strain without plasmid could |
grow up to 1.4 O.D.600 in altered M9 xylose medium. The strain that contains | grow up to 1.4 O.D.600 in altered M9 xylose medium. The strain that contains | ||
PRK can grow up to 0.75 O.D.600 in normal M9 medium either. In contrast, the | PRK can grow up to 0.75 O.D.600 in normal M9 medium either. In contrast, the | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
− | Fig 3. The result of PRK test in BL21(DE3). The PRK expressing strain is | + | Fig 3. The result of PRK test in BL21 (DE3). The PRK expressing strain is |
incubated | incubated | ||
in both normal M9 medium and altered M9 xylose medium to compare with the | in both normal M9 medium and altered M9 xylose medium to compare with the | ||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
We also transformed pSB3K3-<i>prk</i> into W3110 strain. W3110 is reported to have | We also transformed pSB3K3-<i>prk</i> into W3110 strain. W3110 is reported to have | ||
higher pressure tolerance. The trend of the results is similar to that of the | higher pressure tolerance. The trend of the results is similar to that of the | ||
− | BL21(DE3) but there is no statistically significant between the experiment and | + | BL21 (DE3) but there is no statistically significant between the experiment and |
the control group. We deduce that PRK can still function in W3110 since the | the control group. We deduce that PRK can still function in W3110 since the | ||
trend matches our expectation. As pSB3K3 is a low copy number plasmid, the | trend matches our expectation. As pSB3K3 is a low copy number plasmid, the | ||
Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
− | <li>Construct the <i>ca</i> and transform it into BL21(DE3)</li> | + | <li>Construct the <i>ca</i> and transform it into BL21 (DE3)</li> |
<li>Run the SDS-PAGE to confirm its expression</li> | <li>Run the SDS-PAGE to confirm its expression</li> | ||
Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762008</a>) into pSB1C3 plasmid after the gene | style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762008</a>) into pSB1C3 plasmid after the gene | ||
is amplified | is amplified | ||
− | with PCR. We transform the plasmid into DH5 alpha and BL21(DE3). Next, we | + | with PCR. We transform the plasmid into DH5 alpha and BL21 (DE3). Next, we |
confirm its protein expression with SDS-PAGE. | confirm its protein expression with SDS-PAGE. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
Fig 6. Confirmation of <i>ca</i> digestion</br> | Fig 6. Confirmation of <i>ca</i> digestion</br> | ||
− | Fig 7. Confirmation of CA expression in BL21(DE3). The expected protein size is | + | Fig 7. Confirmation of CA expression in BL21 (DE3). The expected protein size is |
27.9kDa. | 27.9kDa. | ||
</p></br> | </p></br> | ||
Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
We then ran the activity test of CA. In our bypass pathway, the function of CA | We then ran the activity test of CA. In our bypass pathway, the function of CA | ||
is to | is to | ||
− | convert proton and bicarbonate into water and carbon dioxide. CA activity was | + | convert proton and bicarbonate into water and carbon dioxide. CA activity was determined using the Wilbur-Anderson assay. Briefly, 9 mL ice-cold Tris−HCl (20 |
− | + | ||
mM, pH8.3) buffer and 0.2 mL enzyme were mixed and transferred to a 20 mL | mM, pH8.3) buffer and 0.2 mL enzyme were mixed and transferred to a 20 mL | ||
sample bottle, with further incubation at 0 °C with stirring. Then, 6 mL of | sample bottle, with further incubation at 0 °C with stirring. Then, 6 mL of | ||
Line 250: | Line 249: | ||
Fig 8. Confirmation of <i>rbcX</i> and <i>rbcS</i> digestion | Fig 8. Confirmation of <i>rbcX</i> and <i>rbcS</i> digestion | ||
− | Fig 9. Confirmation of RbcX and RbcS expression in BL21(DE3) The expected protein | + | Fig 9. Confirmation of RbcX and RbcS expression in BL21 (DE3) The expected protein |
size is 15.3 kDA and 13.8kDA respectively. | size is 15.3 kDA and 13.8kDA respectively. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 294: | Line 293: | ||
<li>Check the growth and carbon fixation enhancement of CA enzyme</li> | <li>Check the growth and carbon fixation enhancement of CA enzyme</li> | ||
− | <li>Compare the carbon fixation rate of W3110 and BL21(DE3) <i>E. coli</i> | + | <li>Compare the carbon fixation rate of W3110 and BL21 (DE3) <i>E. coli</i> |
strains</li> | strains</li> | ||
Line 343: | Line 342: | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
− | <li>O.D. 600 of the sample has a linear relationship to dry cell weight | + | <li>O.D. 600 of the sample has a linear relationship to dry cell weight |
(biomass). Optical density is frequently used as a means of describing the | (biomass). Optical density is frequently used as a means of describing the | ||
cell density in the broth. We measured the dry cell weight of samples in | cell density in the broth. We measured the dry cell weight of samples in | ||
different O.D. value and discovered that it has a linear relationship. We | different O.D. value and discovered that it has a linear relationship. We | ||
conclude that we can utilize O.D. value to estimate the dry cell weight. 1 | conclude that we can utilize O.D. value to estimate the dry cell weight. 1 | ||
− | 0.D. of BL21(DE3) strain per litter yields the dry cell weight of 0.8 gram.</li> | + | 0.D. of BL21 (DE3) strain per litter yields the dry cell weight of 0.8 gram.</li> |
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Line 354: | Line 353: | ||
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
− | Fig 12. shows the dry cell weight of BL21(DE3) incubated in altered M9 xylose | + | Fig 12. shows the dry cell weight of BL21 (DE3) incubated in altered M9 xylose |
medium. | medium. | ||
A linear relationship between O.D. and dry cell weight is observed. | A linear relationship between O.D. and dry cell weight is observed. | ||
Line 409: | Line 408: | ||
Before measuring the XUI, we observe the growth curve of each strain. We found | Before measuring the XUI, we observe the growth curve of each strain. We found | ||
out | out | ||
− | that W3110(L5T7) constructed strain cannot grow in altered M9 solution. | + | that W3110 (L5T7) constructed strain cannot grow in altered M9 solution. |
− | W3110(L5T7) | + | W3110 (L5T7) |
is a newly constructed strain, we are not quite certain its characteristic. We | is a newly constructed strain, we are not quite certain its characteristic. We | ||
− | eliminate this strain from the following experiment. BL21(DE3) and W3110 | + | eliminate this strain from the following experiment. BL21 (DE3) and W3110 |
constructed strains show little growth after 24 hours. | constructed strains show little growth after 24 hours. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 418: | Line 417: | ||
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
− | Fig 14. shows the growth of engineered (contains Rubisco and PRK) W3110(L5T7), BL21(DE3), W3110 incubated in normal | + | Fig 14. shows the growth of engineered (contains Rubisco and PRK) W3110 (L5T7), BL21(DE3), W3110 incubated in normal |
− | incubator for 24 hours. The growth of W3110(L5T7) is not obvious while other | + | incubator for 24 hours. The growth of W3110 (L5T7) is not obvious while other |
strains show growth after 24hours. | strains show growth after 24hours. | ||
</p></br> | </p></br> | ||
Line 429: | Line 428: | ||
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
We then utilized XUI to evaluate the function of each enzyme in the pathway. We | We then utilized XUI to evaluate the function of each enzyme in the pathway. We | ||
− | first check the function of Rubisco in BL21(DE3) strain. Rubisco enzyme with | + | first check the function of Rubisco in BL21 (DE3) strain. Rubisco enzyme with |
promoter P<sub>T7</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2762011" | promoter P<sub>T7</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2762011" | ||
style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762011</a>) was cloned into pSB1C3 and PRK | style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762011</a>) was cloned into pSB1C3 and PRK | ||
with promoter P<sub>LacI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2762007" | with promoter P<sub>LacI</sub> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2762007" | ||
style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762007</a>) was cloned into pSB3K3. Both | style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762007</a>) was cloned into pSB3K3. Both | ||
− | plasmids were then co-transformed into BL21(DE3). We | + | plasmids were then co-transformed into BL21 (DE3). We |
measure the XUI of the strain and compare to the control that IPTG was not | measure the XUI of the strain and compare to the control that IPTG was not | ||
− | added and BL21(DE3) without plasmid. IPTG can induce the promoter | + | added and BL21 (DE3) without plasmid. IPTG can induce the promoter |
P<sub>T7</sub> to produce the downstream enzyme. The growth of each strain is | P<sub>T7</sub> to produce the downstream enzyme. The growth of each strain is | ||
first examined. The IPTG induced strain showed growth retard. We assume the | first examined. The IPTG induced strain showed growth retard. We assume the | ||
Line 470: | Line 469: | ||
style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762011</a>) into pSB1C3 and | style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762011</a>) into pSB1C3 and | ||
cloned PRK with P<sub>LacI</sub> promoter and CA with P<sub>T7</sub> | cloned PRK with P<sub>LacI</sub> promoter and CA with P<sub>T7</sub> | ||
− | promoter(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2762013" style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762013</a>) | + | promoter (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2762013" style="color:#28ff28;">BBa_K2762013</a>) |
− | into pSB3K3. Two plasmids are then co-transformed into BL21(DE3). We measured | + | into pSB3K3. Two plasmids are then co-transformed into BL21 (DE3). We measured |
the | the | ||
XUI of this strain and compare with the previous strain that only contains PRK | XUI of this strain and compare with the previous strain that only contains PRK | ||
Line 496: | Line 495: | ||
</p></br> | </p></br> | ||
− | <h8>XUI Comparison between BL21(DE3) and W3110</h8></br></br> | + | <h8>XUI Comparison between BL21 (DE3) and W3110</h8></br></br> |
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
− | We then compare the XUI value between BL21(DE3) and W3110 constructed strain. | + | We then compare the XUI value between BL21 (DE3) and W3110 constructed strain. |
When we design our IDT sequence, we link the CA directly to the promoter P<sub>LacI</sub>, | When we design our IDT sequence, we link the CA directly to the promoter P<sub>LacI</sub>, | ||
so we could not transform CA construct into W3110 strain. We thus compare the | so we could not transform CA construct into W3110 strain. We thus compare the | ||
Line 510: | Line 509: | ||
the difference of XUI between two <i>E. coli</i> strain. We found out that both | the difference of XUI between two <i>E. coli</i> strain. We found out that both | ||
strain | strain | ||
− | shows similar trend: the XUI will be lower with the expression of the | + | shows similar trend: the XUI will be lower with the expression of the constructed protein. HoweverW3110 has a higher XUI compared with BL21 (DE3) in |
− | + | ||
constructed strain as well as the strain without plasmid. We infer two reasons | constructed strain as well as the strain without plasmid. We infer two reasons | ||
that cause the difference of XUI: | that cause the difference of XUI: | ||
Line 518: | Line 516: | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
<li>W3110 “wildtype” strain has more flexible metabolic network but consumes | <li>W3110 “wildtype” strain has more flexible metabolic network but consumes | ||
− | more xylose compare to lab strains such as BL21(DE3).</li> | + | more xylose compare to lab strains such as BL21 (DE3).</li> |
− | <li>The constructed protein expression in W3110 may be less than BL21(DE3) lab | + | <li>The constructed protein expression in W3110 may be less than BL21 (DE3) lab |
− | strain. BL21(DE3) commonly used to express protein. We inferred that with | + | strain. BL21 (DE3) commonly used to express protein. We inferred that with |
− | more protein been expressed, the bypass pathway in BL21(DE3) will be more | + | more protein been expressed, the bypass pathway in BL21 (DE3) will be more |
favored than the W3110 strain.</li> | favored than the W3110 strain.</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Line 531: | Line 529: | ||
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
− | Fig 17. Shows the growth and the XUI of BL21(DE3) and W3110 strains. | + | Fig 17. Shows the growth and the XUI of BL21 (DE3) and W3110 strains. |
</p></br> | </p></br> | ||
<p class="pcontent"> | <p class="pcontent"> | ||
− | We finally concluded that the efficiency of the bypass pathway in BL21(DE3) is | + | We finally concluded that the efficiency of the bypass pathway in BL21 (DE3) is |
better than that in the W3110 strain. | better than that in the W3110 strain. | ||
</p></br> | </p></br> |
Revision as of 13:03, 17 October 2018
Results