Difference between revisions of "Team:Toulouse-INSA-UPS/Description"

Line 51: Line 51:
 
         <!--PART 1 -->
 
         <!--PART 1 -->
 
         <div class="tab-pane fade show active" id="Desc_Part1" role="tabpanel">
 
         <div class="tab-pane fade show active" id="Desc_Part1" role="tabpanel">
             <h2 class="heavy">Cellulose: a material with endless possibilities</h2><hr/>
+
             <h2 class="heavy">Cellulose: a Material with Endless Possibilities</h2><hr/>
 
             <figure class="figure"  style="text-align:center;">
 
             <figure class="figure"  style="text-align:center;">
 
                 <img style="width : 70%; heigth = auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/26/T--Toulouse-INSA-UPS--Desc--Youn--Cellulosemolecule.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
 
                 <img style="width : 70%; heigth = auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/26/T--Toulouse-INSA-UPS--Desc--Youn--Cellulosemolecule.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
 
                 <figcaption class="figure-caption"><strong>Figure 1:</strong> Cellulose melecular model  </figcaption>
 
                 <figcaption class="figure-caption"><strong>Figure 1:</strong> Cellulose melecular model  </figcaption>
 
             </figure>
 
             </figure>
             <p>With approximatively fifty billion tonnes produced yearly, cellulose is one of the most abundant polymers on earth<SUP>1</SUP>. Cellulose is a polysaccharide made of D-glucose units linked together in a linear chain by β-(1-4) bonds. It is mainly produced by plants, but also by bacteria such as <i>Gluconacetobacter hansenii</i>. Nowadays, cellulose and its derivatives (nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, methyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, etc.) are among the first materials that have been exploited in the industry (wood, cotton, textiles, paper, electronics and biomedical devices<SUP>2</SUP>), and they now represent significant economic issues.</p>
+
             <p>With approximatively fifty billion tonnes produced yearly, cellulose is the most abundant bio-polymers on earth. Cellulose is a linear polysaccharide of D-glucose residues linked to each other via &#946;-1,4 bonds. It is mainly synthetized in the plant cell wall, associated with other molecules, in order to shape plant body. However, cellulose is also secreted in the surrounding of aerobic bacteria such as <em>Gluconacetobacter hansenii </em>in order to form a bio-film enabling oxygen uptake. Nowadays, cellulose and its derivatives (nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, methyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, etc…) are among the first materials that have been intensively used in industries (wood, cotton, textiles, paper, electronics and biomedical devices<sup>1</sup>), representing a market size evaluated at USD 20.61 billion in 2015.</p>
            <p>However, today, we mostly use cellulose that is extracted from plants and their wastes. But because it branches with other compounds such as hemicellulose and lignin, it must go through harsh chemical treatments to finally be considered “pure”<SUP>3</SUP>. These purification processes cost a lot in terms of energy, money and time. One solution to this problem could lie in the use of bacterial cellulose. Some acetic acid bacteria naturally produce cellulose as biofilm to protect themselves. This cellulose is purer than the one produced by plants. It shows also interesting properties compared to the latter (unique nanostructure, high water holding capacity, high degree of polymerisation, high mechanical strength and high crystallinity<SUP>3</SUP>) which proves its potential as a promising material and alternative to plant cellulose for the future. Sadly, due to its high cost and low-yield production, bacterial cellulose is not yet widely spread in industries. </p>
+
<p>Bacterial cellulose has also been the target of the research and development in industries. As it is naturally purer than plant cellulose, it doesn’t need to go through harsh purification processes that cost a lot of energy, time and money<sup>2>/sup>. However, different types of cellulose with various properties and degrees of purity are used in the industry, which explains the advantage of having a system that could manage with different type of cellulose.</p>
            <p>By functionalising cellulose, we aim to demonstrate how this widely used material can be more than a simple packaging or textile fibres. By combining it with Cerberus, cellulose can become a source of information and bring new opportunities for industrial applications. </p>
+
<p>By functionalising cellulose, we aim to demonstrate how this widely used material can be more than a simple packaging or textile fibres. By combining it to our protein platform Cerberus, cellulose can become a source of information and bring new opportunities for industrial applications. </p>
          
+
 
 +
           
 +
            <h3>References</h3>
 +
            <ol>
 +
                <li>Keshk SM: Bacterial Cellulose Production and its Industrial Applications. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques 2014, 4;2. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9821.1000150.</li>
 +
                <li>Faezah Esa SMT, Norliza Abd Rahman: Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2 2104:113-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.017.</li>
 +
            </ol>
 +
<i>
 +
         <ol style=" font-size:15px;">
 +
        <li> Serge Perez, (2000), Structure et morphologie de la cellulose.</li>
 +
        <li> Keshk SMAS (2014) Bacterial Cellulose Production and its Industrial Applications. J Bioprocess Biotech 4: 150 doi: 10.4172/2155-9821.1000150
 +
        <li> « Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application », Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia, vol. 2, p. 113-119, janv. 2014.
 +
        </ol>
 +
</i>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
  
Line 74: Line 87:
 
             <p>When brainstorming about the project, we had these different ideas and they all revolved around functionalising several materials. We then realised it could be of great use to have one material that we could functionalise at our discretion. That is how we decided to work on cellulose, especially bacterial cellulose, in hope of developing its use by adding a whole range of exciting possibilities. From conductive paper to anti-infection tissues, applications domains are aplenty (medicine, textile, stationery, etc). The major bottleneck is the complexity to conjugate bioactive molecules to cellulose.</p>
 
             <p>When brainstorming about the project, we had these different ideas and they all revolved around functionalising several materials. We then realised it could be of great use to have one material that we could functionalise at our discretion. That is how we decided to work on cellulose, especially bacterial cellulose, in hope of developing its use by adding a whole range of exciting possibilities. From conductive paper to anti-infection tissues, applications domains are aplenty (medicine, textile, stationery, etc). The major bottleneck is the complexity to conjugate bioactive molecules to cellulose.</p>
 
             <p>To circumvent this limitation and enable a wide range of chemicals to be fixated to cellulose, we designed a three headed linker protein named Cerberus (in reference to the mythological dog). Cerberus is based on the fusion of three fixating protein structures representing the three heads of the system. The first head is a protein domain of the type 3 Carbohydrate Binding Module (CBM3) family to bind cellulose. The second is one of the strongest linkage systems of the living realm, streptavidin, with its high affinity for biotinylated compounds. The last of the heads features a non-natural amino acid, 4-L-azidophenylalanine, catalysing covalent bonds by click chemistry. Therefore, the versatility of our thought-out linker will allow a large variety of organic and inorganic molecules to conjugate with cellulose.</p>
 
             <p>To circumvent this limitation and enable a wide range of chemicals to be fixated to cellulose, we designed a three headed linker protein named Cerberus (in reference to the mythological dog). Cerberus is based on the fusion of three fixating protein structures representing the three heads of the system. The first head is a protein domain of the type 3 Carbohydrate Binding Module (CBM3) family to bind cellulose. The second is one of the strongest linkage systems of the living realm, streptavidin, with its high affinity for biotinylated compounds. The last of the heads features a non-natural amino acid, 4-L-azidophenylalanine, catalysing covalent bonds by click chemistry. Therefore, the versatility of our thought-out linker will allow a large variety of organic and inorganic molecules to conjugate with cellulose.</p>
     
+
           
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
  
Line 84: Line 97:
 
                 <figcaption class="figure-caption"><strong>Figure 1:</strong> Representation of CtCBM3a associated with cellulose microfibrills. CtCBM3a is colored in cyan and orange. Amino acids involved in stacking with glucose units of cellulose is in magenta (from pdb 1NBC). Cellulose is in green (from Perez and Samain, 2010 doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2318(10)64003-6).</figcaption>
 
                 <figcaption class="figure-caption"><strong>Figure 1:</strong> Representation of CtCBM3a associated with cellulose microfibrills. CtCBM3a is colored in cyan and orange. Amino acids involved in stacking with glucose units of cellulose is in magenta (from pdb 1NBC). Cellulose is in green (from Perez and Samain, 2010 doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2318(10)64003-6).</figcaption>
 
             </figure>
 
             </figure>
             <p>The first head is the core of our linker, Cerberus. We chose the Carbohydrate Binding Module type 3a (CBM3a) to bind to cellulose. This domain is found in the cellulosome of <i>Clostridium thermocellum</i><SUP>4</SUP> and its four aromatic amino acids make it the perfect candidate to bind to cellulose through a dipole-dipole interaction between the CBM3a’s aromatic amino acids and the cellulose’s glucose rings.</p>  
+
             <p>The first head is the core of our linker, Cerberus. We chose the Carbohydrate Binding Module type 3a (CBM3a) to bind to cellulose. This domain is found in the cellulosome of <i>Clostridium thermocellum</i><SUP>1</SUP> and its four aromatic amino acids make it the perfect candidate to bind to cellulose through a dipole-dipole interaction between the CBM3a’s aromatic amino acids and the cellulose’s glucose rings.</p>  
 
             <p>Our CBM3a features a long endogenous linker on each end, to which we can attach other structures to functionalise cellulose.</p>
 
             <p>Our CBM3a features a long endogenous linker on each end, to which we can attach other structures to functionalise cellulose.</p>
         
+
            <h3>References</h3>
 +
 +
            <i>
 +
            <ol style=" font-size:15px;">
 +
            <li> E. Morag et al., « Expression, purification, and characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the scaffoldin subunit from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. », Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 61, no 5, p. 1980-1986, mai 1995.
 +
            </ol>
 +
            </i>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
      
 
      
Line 99: Line 118:
 
             <p>The second head of Cerberus is streptavidin, which has been added to cellulose N-Terminus. Streptavidin is a 60 kDa homotetrameric protein, isolated from <i>Streptomyces avidinii</i>, and it is well known for its interaction with biotin and biotinylated proteins. With a dissociation constant of 10<sup>-13</sup> M, the interaction between streptavidin and biotin is the strongest non-covalent one known in Nature<SUP>5</SUP>.</p>  
 
             <p>The second head of Cerberus is streptavidin, which has been added to cellulose N-Terminus. Streptavidin is a 60 kDa homotetrameric protein, isolated from <i>Streptomyces avidinii</i>, and it is well known for its interaction with biotin and biotinylated proteins. With a dissociation constant of 10<sup>-13</sup> M, the interaction between streptavidin and biotin is the strongest non-covalent one known in Nature<SUP>5</SUP>.</p>  
 
             <p>The sequence of streptavidin wild type is used in fusion with the CBM3a. This streptavidin forms a complex with three other streptavidin monomers, hence the unmatched affinity for biotin since it can bind four molecules of biotin per tetramer. We decided to use two versions of streptavidin: the native form which is tetrameric because we have data on its interaction with biotin, and a monomeric version called mSA2<SUP>6</SUP> because we feared that the tetrameric streptavidin would cause agglutination of our  Cerberus protein. In case we needed to release the streptavidin linked to our function into the surrounding medium, we also included a TEV-protease site to cut off this section.</p>
 
             <p>The sequence of streptavidin wild type is used in fusion with the CBM3a. This streptavidin forms a complex with three other streptavidin monomers, hence the unmatched affinity for biotin since it can bind four molecules of biotin per tetramer. We decided to use two versions of streptavidin: the native form which is tetrameric because we have data on its interaction with biotin, and a monomeric version called mSA2<SUP>6</SUP> because we feared that the tetrameric streptavidin would cause agglutination of our  Cerberus protein. In case we needed to release the streptavidin linked to our function into the surrounding medium, we also included a TEV-protease site to cut off this section.</p>
             <p>By adding a 15-residue AviTag, we managed to biotinylate our proteins with the help of BirA<SUP>7</SUP>. For this in-vivo biotinylation, we have transformed our chassis with a plasmid containing the protein BirA.</p>
+
             <p>By adding a 15-residue AviTag, we managed to biotinylate our proteins with the help of BirA<SUP>2</SUP>. For this in-vivo biotinylation, we have transformed our chassis with a plasmid containing the protein BirA.</p>
             
+
            <h3>References</h3>
 +
 +
<i>
 +
        <ol style=" font-size:15px;">
 +
        <li> E.S. Nogueira et al. / Protein Expression and Purification 93 (2014) 54–62
 +
        <li> K. H. Lim, H. Huang, A. Pralle, et S. Park, « Stable, high-affinity streptavidin monomer for protein labeling and monovalent biotin detection », Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 110, no 1, p. 57-67, janv. 2013.
 +
        </ol>
 +
</i>
 
         </div>       
 
         </div>       
  
Line 130: Line 156:
 
          
 
          
 
          
 
          
         <h3>References</h3>
+
          
+
<i>
+
        <ol style=" font-size:15px;">
+
        <li> Serge Perez, (2000), Structure et morphologie de la cellulose.</li>
+
        <li> Keshk SMAS (2014) Bacterial Cellulose Production and its Industrial Applications. J Bioprocess Biotech 4: 150 doi: 10.4172/2155-9821.1000150
+
        <li> « Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application », Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia, vol. 2, p. 113-119, janv. 2014.
+
        <li> E. Morag et al., « Expression, purification, and characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the scaffoldin subunit from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. », Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 61, no 5, p. 1980-1986, mai 1995.
+
        <li> E.S. Nogueira et al. / Protein Expression and Purification 93 (2014) 54–62
+
        <li> K. H. Lim, H. Huang, A. Pralle, et S. Park, « Stable, high-affinity streptavidin monomer for protein labeling and monovalent biotin detection », Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 110, no 1, p. 57-67, janv. 2013.
+
        <li> REFMANQUANTE
+
        <li> T. S. Young et P. G. Schultz, « Beyond the Canonical 20 Amino Acids: Expanding the Genetic Lexicon », J. Biol. Chem., vol. 285, no 15, p. 11039-11044, avr. 2010.
+
        <li> C. J. Pickens, S. N. Johnson, M. M. Pressnall, M. A. Leon, et C. J. Berkland, « Practical Considerations, Challenges, and Limitations of Bioconjugation via Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition », Bioconjug. Chem., vol. 29, no 3, p. 686-701, mars 2018.
+
        </ol>
+
</i>
+
 
        
 
        
  

Revision as of 16:44, 12 October 2018

DESCRIPTION

Cellulose: a Material with Endless Possibilities


A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.
Figure 1: Cellulose melecular model

With approximatively fifty billion tonnes produced yearly, cellulose is the most abundant bio-polymers on earth. Cellulose is a linear polysaccharide of D-glucose residues linked to each other via β-1,4 bonds. It is mainly synthetized in the plant cell wall, associated with other molecules, in order to shape plant body. However, cellulose is also secreted in the surrounding of aerobic bacteria such as Gluconacetobacter hansenii in order to form a bio-film enabling oxygen uptake. Nowadays, cellulose and its derivatives (nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, methyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, etc…) are among the first materials that have been intensively used in industries (wood, cotton, textiles, paper, electronics and biomedical devices1), representing a market size evaluated at USD 20.61 billion in 2015.

Bacterial cellulose has also been the target of the research and development in industries. As it is naturally purer than plant cellulose, it doesn’t need to go through harsh purification processes that cost a lot of energy, time and money2>/sup>. However, different types of cellulose with various properties and degrees of purity are used in the industry, which explains the advantage of having a system that could manage with different type of cellulose.

By functionalising cellulose, we aim to demonstrate how this widely used material can be more than a simple packaging or textile fibres. By combining it to our protein platform Cerberus, cellulose can become a source of information and bring new opportunities for industrial applications.

References

  1. Keshk SM: Bacterial Cellulose Production and its Industrial Applications. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques 2014, 4;2. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9821.1000150.
  2. Faezah Esa SMT, Norliza Abd Rahman: Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2 2104:113-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.017.
  1. Serge Perez, (2000), Structure et morphologie de la cellulose.
  2. Keshk SMAS (2014) Bacterial Cellulose Production and its Industrial Applications. J Bioprocess Biotech 4: 150 doi: 10.4172/2155-9821.1000150
  3. « Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application », Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia, vol. 2, p. 113-119, janv. 2014.

Genesis of our project, Cerberus


When brainstorming about the project, we had these different ideas and they all revolved around functionalising several materials. We then realised it could be of great use to have one material that we could functionalise at our discretion. That is how we decided to work on cellulose, especially bacterial cellulose, in hope of developing its use by adding a whole range of exciting possibilities. From conductive paper to anti-infection tissues, applications domains are aplenty (medicine, textile, stationery, etc). The major bottleneck is the complexity to conjugate bioactive molecules to cellulose.

To circumvent this limitation and enable a wide range of chemicals to be fixated to cellulose, we designed a three headed linker protein named Cerberus (in reference to the mythological dog). Cerberus is based on the fusion of three fixating protein structures representing the three heads of the system. The first head is a protein domain of the type 3 Carbohydrate Binding Module (CBM3) family to bind cellulose. The second is one of the strongest linkage systems of the living realm, streptavidin, with its high affinity for biotinylated compounds. The last of the heads features a non-natural amino acid, 4-L-azidophenylalanine, catalysing covalent bonds by click chemistry. Therefore, the versatility of our thought-out linker will allow a large variety of organic and inorganic molecules to conjugate with cellulose.

One head to bind to cellulose, the CBM3a


A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.
Figure 1: Representation of CtCBM3a associated with cellulose microfibrills. CtCBM3a is colored in cyan and orange. Amino acids involved in stacking with glucose units of cellulose is in magenta (from pdb 1NBC). Cellulose is in green (from Perez and Samain, 2010 doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2318(10)64003-6).

The first head is the core of our linker, Cerberus. We chose the Carbohydrate Binding Module type 3a (CBM3a) to bind to cellulose. This domain is found in the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum1 and its four aromatic amino acids make it the perfect candidate to bind to cellulose through a dipole-dipole interaction between the CBM3a’s aromatic amino acids and the cellulose’s glucose rings.

Our CBM3a features a long endogenous linker on each end, to which we can attach other structures to functionalise cellulose.

References

  1. E. Morag et al., « Expression, purification, and characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the scaffoldin subunit from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. », Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 61, no 5, p. 1980-1986, mai 1995.

One head to bind biological macromolecules, streptavidin


A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.
Figure 1: Surface representation of the monomeric form of streptavidin mSA (in purple) in complex with biotin (colored in yellow). Amino acid residues involved in the complex are in mesh (colored in green). Dash lines represent hydrogen bond with surrounding amino acid sides chains (from pdb 4jnj).

The second head of Cerberus is streptavidin, which has been added to cellulose N-Terminus. Streptavidin is a 60 kDa homotetrameric protein, isolated from Streptomyces avidinii, and it is well known for its interaction with biotin and biotinylated proteins. With a dissociation constant of 10-13 M, the interaction between streptavidin and biotin is the strongest non-covalent one known in Nature5.

The sequence of streptavidin wild type is used in fusion with the CBM3a. This streptavidin forms a complex with three other streptavidin monomers, hence the unmatched affinity for biotin since it can bind four molecules of biotin per tetramer. We decided to use two versions of streptavidin: the native form which is tetrameric because we have data on its interaction with biotin, and a monomeric version called mSA26 because we feared that the tetrameric streptavidin would cause agglutination of our Cerberus protein. In case we needed to release the streptavidin linked to our function into the surrounding medium, we also included a TEV-protease site to cut off this section.

By adding a 15-residue AviTag, we managed to biotinylate our proteins with the help of BirA2. For this in-vivo biotinylation, we have transformed our chassis with a plasmid containing the protein BirA.

References

  1. E.S. Nogueira et al. / Protein Expression and Purification 93 (2014) 54–62
  2. K. H. Lim, H. Huang, A. Pralle, et S. Park, « Stable, high-affinity streptavidin monomer for protein labeling and monovalent biotin detection », Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 110, no 1, p. 57-67, janv. 2013.

One head to bind inorganic molecules, 4-L-azidophenylalanine


A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.
Figure 1: Click reaction detail on AzF and DBCO. a) 4-L-azidophenylalanine molecular structure, b) dibenzocyclooctyne molecular structure, c) DBCO-AzF click product

To expand the versatility of our system, on the C-Terminus of the CBM3a, an unnatural amino acid called 4-L-azidophenylalanine was added. Its structure is like that of a phenylalanine, except that it presents an azide, or N-three, function on its tip, as the name would suggest. When presented with an alkyne function, and in particular dibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO), a reaction called click chemistry allows us to covalently bond these functions to our Cerberus protein in a spontaneous and irreversible way.

The strategy used to incorporate this unnatural amino acid into our protein is to bring an orthogonal pair of tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with our plasmid8. The tRNA will recognize the amber codon TAG and this codon will not stop the translation as it normally does. Instead, it will allow the incorporation of our unnatural amino acid, the 4-L-azidophenylalanine.

There are two types of click chemistry that can be done on 4-L-azidophenylalanine to functionalise our Cerberus. The first one is the copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction (CuAAC). It takes place as its name suggests between the azide group of the unnatural amino acid and an alkyne group; the reaction is catalysed by Cu2+ ions. The main problem of this method is the cytotoxicity of copper on cells limits its use in assays that take place in the cellular environment. The second type of click is the strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction (SPAAC) which proceeds without the need of a catalyst9.

For our experimental plan, we decided to use both types of click chemistry, but we managed to only use the SPAAC during our time in the lab.

Our system


A schematic representation of our system

For further details about our system, please see our Design page.