Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<div class="home-content__buttons"> | <div class="home-content__buttons"> | ||
<a href="#GrowthinLiquidMedia" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | <a href="#GrowthinLiquidMedia" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | ||
− | Growth in | + | Growth in LB |
</a> | </a> | ||
<a href="#NaringeninMIC" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | <a href="#NaringeninMIC" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | ||
− | + | Naringenin and Growth | |
</a> | </a> | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<a href="#Microscopy" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | <a href="#Microscopy" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | ||
− | Microscopy | + | Microscopy |
</a> | </a> | ||
<a href="#AgarChemotaxis" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | <a href="#AgarChemotaxis" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke"> | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
<h3 class="subhead"></h3> | <h3 class="subhead"></h3> | ||
− | <h1 class="display-2"> | + | <h1 class="display-2">Naringenin Chemotaxis</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>We examined how three species of free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria respond to the presence of the flavonoid naringenin. The three species, Azorhizobium caulinodans (ORS571), Azospirillum brasilense (SP245), and Herbaspirillum seropedicae (Z67), were selected because they all have potential to form different types of interactions with plant roots. A. caulinodans has been shown to fix nitrogen both as a free-living microbe and when in symbiosis with the semi-aquatic leguminous tree Sesbania rostrata [1]. H. seropedicae is a root endophyte and has shown potential to colonise popular crops such as wheat and maize [2]. </p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
<div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | <div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Before commencing chemotaxis studies, we needed to understand the growth characteristics of the three free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria to be used in our project. We first examined the colony morphology of these three species in the absence of any chemoattractants. Familiarisation with the bacteria allows identification of abnormal behaviour and contamination. For colony morphology, the size after a minimum of 24 hours and morphology (shape and pigmentation) was recorded (Table 1, Figs 1-3). </p> |
<font size="2">Table 1: Qualitative analysis of <i>Azorhizobium caulinodans</i>, <i>Azospirillum brasilense</i>, <i>Herbaspirillum seropedicae</i> colonies grown on solid media.</font> | <font size="2">Table 1: Qualitative analysis of <i>Azorhizobium caulinodans</i>, <i>Azospirillum brasilense</i>, <i>Herbaspirillum seropedicae</i> colonies grown on solid media.</font> | ||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p><i>Azorhizobium caulinodans</i> (Figure 1): Colonies do not grow to a measurable size within 24 hours at 30 ˚C on Yeast Extract Broth agar. Colonies contain white pigmentation and are raised in elevation with an entire margin – a continuous, uninterrupted border of the colony. Colonies rarely grow larger than 2 mm whilst smaller colonies, which are much more numerous, could not be accurately measured. </p> |
− | <p><i>Azospirillum brasilense</i> (Figure 2) | + | <p><i>Azospirillum brasilense</i> (Figure 2): Colonies are distinguishable by their distinctive orange/pink pigmentation though both immature and dead colonies lack this pigmentation. Older colonies became ingrained into the agar, making them hard to remove without damaging the agar. Older colonies also began to wrinkle with time. The average diameter for a colony of this species after 24 hours incubation at 37 ˚C on Tryptone Soya Agar was 3 mm, making A. brasilense the fastest growing of our nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Young A. brasilense colonies were shiny, round and with entire margins. These young colonies may have some pigmentation near the centre as the colony matures. This is in contrast to older colonies which maintain a different phenotype; losing their shine and gaining the odd wrinkle. Wrinkling often leads to the loss of the round shape. </p> |
− | <p> | + | <p><i>H. seropedicae</i> (Figure 3): the colonies take different forms depending on how the plate is inoculated. If the plate is stab-inoculated, the colony takes a rhizoid appearance (Figure 3a). If the culture is spread across the plate, then it typically takes a circular or irregular form (Figure 3b). Colonies possess a green-cream pigmentation and are raised from the surface. Most colonies were shiny and typically 1.5 mm in diameter after 24 hours at 30 ˚C. </p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 196: | Line 194: | ||
<div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | <div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Initial research for the Alternative Roots project noted that naringenin possesses antimicrobial properties, particularly towards E. coli [3] [link to the notebook data where you observed this]. As E. coli (DH5α) was to be used as both a control in our chemotaxis assays and as the organism in which our naringenin biosynthesis operon would first be assembled, it was deemed important to characterise the effect of increasing naringenin concentrations on growth rates of both our free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and E. coli in LB medium. This was essential to guide the chemotaxis assays enabling an understanding of naringenin concentrations which would not have detrimental impacts upon the cell. If cell health is impaired, then there is potential for cell death to lead to the appearance of chemorepulsion. This is particularly problematic when applying the response index as a semi-quantitative measure of chemotactic response as the method utilises ratios between colony edges to determine the significance of chemotaxis [4].</p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | <font size="2">Figure 4: Absorbance at 600 nm of four bacterial species (<i>A. brasilense</i>, <i>A. caulinodans</i>, <i>H. seropedicae</i>, and <i>E. coli</i>) after 24 hours of growth when grown in liquid media containing different concentrations of naringenin. </font> | |
− | + | ||
− | <font size="2">Figure 4: | + | <p>All species successfully grew in the presence of 0-150 μM naringenin (Figure 4). However, it was noted that E. coli showed a reduced growth rate even at lower concentrations of naringenin. When the concentration of naringenin exceeded 100 μM, there exists greater flux in all species suggesting that naringenin begins to have a greater impact on some, but not all, bacteria. As such, naringenin concentrations of <100 μM were used as part of subsequent chemotaxis assays to avoid negatively impacting bacterial growth. </p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 226: | Line 224: | ||
<div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | <div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
− | <p>To | + | <p>To characterise chemotactic behaviour in response to naringenin, a quantitative approach is desirable. This allows for direct comparison of the strength of the response between different species. Results from a quantitative assay would also be better suited for our community model [link to modelling page] as it allows a ranking of bacterial responses to naringenin. </p> |
− | < | + | <font size="2">Table 2: Colony forming units of four bacterial species from capillaries containing 1 µl 100 µM naringenin or motility buffer solution (10 mM potassium phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM glucose, pH 7.0) after 60 minutes open-end submersion in sterile conditions at room temperature/pressure. Values are mean cfu.μl<sup>-1</sup>. Difference between colony counts from capillaries containing naringenin or motility buffer was non-significant for all species (P>0.05). </font> |
− | + | <table id="protocols"> | |
− | + | <thead> | |
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Species (Strain)</th> | ||
+ | <th>Colony Count (Naringenin)</th> | ||
+ | <th>± Standard Error</th> | ||
+ | <th>Colony Count (Control)</th> | ||
+ | <th>± Standard Error</th> | ||
+ | <th>Significant Difference</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </thead> | ||
+ | <tbody> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>A. caulinodans</i> (ORS571)</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>No</td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>A. brasilense</i> (SP245)</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>No</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>H. seropedicae</i> (Z67)</td> | ||
+ | <td>145.33</td> | ||
+ | <td>85.58</td> | ||
+ | <td>109.78</td> | ||
+ | <td>117.44</td> | ||
+ | <td>No</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>E. coli</i></td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>No</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>After 24 hours incubation at either 30 °C (A. caulinodans and H. seropedicae) or 37 °C (A. brasilense and E. coli), the number of colonies which grew on the LB agar plate was counted (Table 2). The results showed that of the four test bacterial species, only one was able to move into the capillary. This species was H. seropedicae which was able to move successfully into capillaries containing either the control (buffer solution) or the chemoattractant. This was demonstrated by the growth of colonies on LB agar from the contents of each capillary (Figure 5). Both methods of agar inoculation (spreading and pipetteing) lead to colony growth.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>After counting colonies from the contents of both the control and naringenin capillaries, no significant difference between mean colony count of the two conditions was observed (P>0.05). The results therefore show no evidence for positive chemotaxis using this method. It should be considered, however, that H. seropedicae was the only species that demonstrated growth on agar, and therefore the only one able to enter the capillaries. We concluded that this methodology is not yet sufficiently optimised for our application and may be having a confounding effect upon chemotactic response. Further details of these potential factors can be found here:</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <font size="2">Figure 5: a) Growth of H. seropedicae on 1 % LB agar inoculated with contents of a 1 µl capillary containing 100 µM naringenin after 60 minutes open-end submersion in bacterial solution. Plate was incubated for 24 hours at 30 °C. b) Growth of H. seropedicae on 1 % LB agar inoculated with contents of a 1 µl capillary containing motility buffer after 60 minutes open-end submersion in bacterial solution. Plates were incubated for 24 hours at 30 °C. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 237: | Line 288: | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
− | <section id=' | + | <section id='Microscopy' class="s-services"> |
<div class="row section-header has-bottom-sep" data-aos="fade-up"> | <div class="row section-header has-bottom-sep" data-aos="fade-up"> | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
− | <h3 class="subhead"></h3> | + | <h3 class="subhead">Microscopy Observations</h3> |
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 251: | Line 302: | ||
<div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | <div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
− | + | <p> An alternative method of observing chemotactic responses is through the use of microscopy. Brightfield microscopy allows direct observations of bacterial responses. This will allow comparisons of motility and morphology from our experimental data to that of the published literature that was used to underpin our first iteration of the community model [link to modelling]. Using microscopy enables the development of a cell density:optical density index (CD:OD index), a method of converting the two values. This index was also used in the community model to adapt the growth curve data collected during bacterial characterisation in standard laboratory conditions.</p> | |
− | < | + | <font size="2">Figure 6: Example of haemocytometer square at 40x objective containing <i>H. seropedicae</i> utilised for cell counting, cells along the bottom and/or right lines were not counted to avoid double counting. </font> |
+ | <p>The CD:OD index was produced utilising data collected from a haemocytometer. A haemocytometer is a specialised microscopy slide of a known volume, it also contains a grid at the centre. By counting the number of cells in 16 squares at the top right (Figure 6) and performing a series of mathematical calculations (<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Protocols">[x]</a>, we were able to determine cell density. By utilising a spectrophotometer, we were also able to take a reading of the absorbance (600 nm) and thus link the two together (Table 3).</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 16:34, 15 October 2018