Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Description"

Line 272: Line 272:
 
             <div class="row section-header has-bottom-sep light-sep" data-aos="fade-up">
 
             <div class="row section-header has-bottom-sep light-sep" data-aos="fade-up">
 
                 <div class="col-full">
 
                 <div class="col-full">
                             <h3 class=><font color="white">Project Description</font></h3>
+
                             <h3 class=><font color="white">PROJECT DESCRIPTION</font></h3>
 
                 <h1 class="display-2"><font color="white">The Idea</font></h1>
 
                 <h1 class="display-2"><font color="white">The Idea</font></h1>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
Line 282: Line 282:
 
                 <div class="col-full">
 
                 <div class="col-full">
  
 +
 +
 +
This method means that one application is all that is needed to improve the nutrient availability for a plants life-time. This combined with the other protective roles of P. fluorescens acts to improve crop yields without genetically modifying plants and without Nitrogen/Phosphorus fertilisers. Even if we only reduce fertiliser use by a tiny amount, globally this would make a huge difference in terms of energy usage and pollution.
  
                   <p><font size="3">The effects of climate change are becoming more noticeable as time progresses; we are losing staggering amounts of valuable farmland due to mass flooding, freak weather events, soil erosion, infectious diseases and deforestation. Over the next 50 years, farming is going to become even more marginalised [21].</p>
+
                   <p><font size="3">By engineering P. fluorescens to express novel genes the team aims to manipulate the soil microbial community via chemical attraction/repulsion to achieve desired processes. In our case this is a nutrient sustaining soil but there are no limits! From soil remediation to pest control, this project aims to create an engineerable chassis out of Pseudomonas fluorescens so future scientists can manipulate the soil community in any way they like.</p>
 
+
                    <p><font size="3">One way of protecting our crops and the land we use for agriculture is by growing within controlled, contained environments. Growing indoors is already a well-established practice; greenhouses are widely used and guarantee a safer, and more predictable method of growing all year round. There are many benefits of applying the contained, controlled environments found in greenhouses into urban spaces, these include:</p>
+
 
+
<ul style="list-style-type:circle; overflow:visible; display:grid; text-align:left;">
+
<li>Providing cities with fresh produce all year round.</li>
+
<li>Reducing the Carbon footprint of crop production due to reduced food millage.</li>
+
<li>No agricultural run-off.</li>
+
<li>Limited need for pesticides and herbicides.</li>
+
<li>Safer crops as there is less risk of contamination.</li>
+
<li>Reduced spoilage because of shorter transportation times and reduced handling.</li>
+
<li>Less agricultural pollution.</li></ul>
+
 
+
                    <p><font size="3"><br>With developing technologies in the field of sustainable energy, it could one day be possible to engineer contained growth systems that are self-sustaining in regards to its energy usage. By carefully controlling the parameters within these environments, we are able to emulate perfect surroundings that allow the crops to grow to their full potential, maximising yield.</p>
+
 
+
 
+
                    <p><font size="3">Our project plans to use genetically modified bacteria, which means we will be working with GMO’s, but what are GMO’s? - “Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be defined as organisms (i.e. plants, animals or microorganisms) in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination.”[22]</p>
+
 
+
                    <p><font size="3">Integrations of GMO’s into the natural environment pose many concerns to both science and ecological communities. Introducing gm crops into the wild holds the potential to introduce engineered genes into foreign species. The effects of GMO release are widely unidentified, this is the main area of concern as there so many unknowns.</p>
+
 
+
                    <p><font size="3">The use of GM bacteria means that we have to take precautions when integrating it into the real world. We have identified the ways to ensure systems are enclosed and risk of GM run-off is minimised on our  <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Safety" class="white">Safety Page</a>.</p>
+
 
+
  
 +
                    <p><font size="3">Our prototype focuses on sustaining the amount of Nitrogen present in soils without adding fertiliser or causing run-off. To combat this, we have introduced flavonoids to Pseudomonas fluorescens that attract free-living/non-nodulating nitrogen fixing bacteria to improve the nitrogen content of the soil.</p>
  
 +
                    <p><font size="3">This method means that one application is all that is needed to improve the nutrient availability for a plants life-time. This combined with the other protective roles of P. fluorescens acts to improve crop yields without genetically modifying plants and without Nitrogen/Phosphorus fertilisers. Even if we only reduce fertiliser use by a tiny amount, globally this would make a huge difference in terms of energy usage and pollution. </p>
  
  

Revision as of 22:28, 16 October 2018

Description

IGEM 2018

Description

================================================== -->

Context

1 / 15
Soils contain diverse microbial communities
2 / 15
Within these communities are microbes with useful properties
3 / 15
Endophytes are microbes that live harmlessly within plant tissues
4 / 15
Can we programme endophytes to influence the wider microbial community?
5 / 15
Could they synthesise chemicals to attract beneficial soil microbes?
6 / 15
Attracting bacteria to fix nitrogen and reducing the need for chemical fertilisers
7 / 15
Or maybe the endophytes can synthesise chemicals that deter pests or pathogens?
7 / 15


Alternative Roots: engineering endophytes for smart agricultural solutions

Problems With Fertiliser





Project Description

Introduction

Sustainability is a topic of increasing concern in the fields of agriculture, food security and rural development. There is a dire need for innovation in this field; primarily driven by predictions of substantial global population increase coupled with severe pressure on non-renewable resources. The result is a necessity to increase food production whilst reducing our impact on the environment. As such, our aim is to find sustainable solutions that address some of these issues.

Inorganic nitrogen fertiliser production is extremely energy-intensive, accounting for ~1% of all global energy use (Smith 2002 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/297/5587/1654.long ). These fertilisers require persistent application as they are rapidly leeched out of the soil shortly after application causing mass pollution worldwide.

The problems with inorganic fertilisers are that they do not last long, they take masses of energy to produce and cause pollution, the most common fertilisers are Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, the Newcastle 2018 team aim to provide a source of these nutrients that is sustainable and non-polluting.




Project Description

Introducing Pseudomonas fluorescens

The organism used by the team is a gram-negative bacterium called Pseudomonas fluorescens. P. fluorescens lives in soil and water, and is capable of colonising roots. Naturally Pseudomonas fluorescens in known as a plant growth promoter for multiple reasons;

  • It produces a siderophore that liberates iron [14], consequentially liberating phosphorus too. [15]
  • It has anti-fungal properties (protecting from pathogens). [16]
  • It is nematophagous, protecting plants from parasitic nematode worms. [17]
  • Produces anti-insectal toxins, protecting from pests. [18]
  • t is thought to induce systemic resistance and/or tolerance. [19]

With all these features,Pseudomonas fluorescens was already an ideal organism for improving crop yields, but the Newcastle iGEM team wanted to take this is a step further.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Idea

This method means that one application is all that is needed to improve the nutrient availability for a plants life-time. This combined with the other protective roles of P. fluorescens acts to improve crop yields without genetically modifying plants and without Nitrogen/Phosphorus fertilisers. Even if we only reduce fertiliser use by a tiny amount, globally this would make a huge difference in terms of energy usage and pollution.

By engineering P. fluorescens to express novel genes the team aims to manipulate the soil microbial community via chemical attraction/repulsion to achieve desired processes. In our case this is a nutrient sustaining soil but there are no limits! From soil remediation to pest control, this project aims to create an engineerable chassis out of Pseudomonas fluorescens so future scientists can manipulate the soil community in any way they like.

Our prototype focuses on sustaining the amount of Nitrogen present in soils without adding fertiliser or causing run-off. To combat this, we have introduced flavonoids to Pseudomonas fluorescens that attract free-living/non-nodulating nitrogen fixing bacteria to improve the nitrogen content of the soil.

This method means that one application is all that is needed to improve the nutrient availability for a plants life-time. This combined with the other protective roles of P. fluorescens acts to improve crop yields without genetically modifying plants and without Nitrogen/Phosphorus fertilisers. Even if we only reduce fertiliser use by a tiny amount, globally this would make a huge difference in terms of energy usage and pollution.





Description

REFERENCES

1. Jousset, A., et al. (2009). "Predators promote defence of rhizosphere bacterial populations by selective feeding on non-toxic cheaters." The Isme Journal 3: 666

2. Jousset, A., et al. (2009). "Predators promote defence of rhizosphere bacterial populations by selective feeding on non-toxic cheaters." The Isme Journal 3: 666

3. Vanitha SC & Umesha S (2011) Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated systemic resistance in tomato is driven through an elevated synthesis of defense enzymes. Biologia Plantarum 55(2):317-322.

4. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017) World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_KeyFindings.pdf

5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2018. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4324e.pdf

6. Usman MN, MG; Musa, I (2015) Effect of Three Levels of NPK Fertilizer on Growth Parameters and Yield of Maize-Soybean Intercrop. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 5(9).

7. Pfromm PH (2017) Towards sustainable agriculture: Fossil-free ammonia. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 9(3):034702.

8. Bitew YA, M (2017) Impact of Crop Production Inputs on Soil Health: A Review. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 16(3):109-131.

9. Yang X-e, Wu X, Hao H-l, & He Z-l (2008) Mechanisms and assessment of water eutrophication. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 9(3):197-209.

10. Carmichael WW (2001) Health Effects of Toxin-Producing Cyanobacteria: “The CyanoHABs”. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 7(5):1393-1407.

11. New Partnership for Africa's Development (2013) Agriculture in Africa - Transformation and Outlook. http://www.un.org/en/africa/osaa/pdf/pubs/2013africanagricultures.pdf

12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017) World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2020. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6895e.pdf

13. Bergey, D. H., et al. (1984). Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore, MD, Williams & Wilkins.

14. Gómez-Lama Cabanás C, Schilirò E, Valverde-Corredor A, & Mercado-Blanco J (2014) The biocontrol endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 induces systemic defense responses in aerial tissues upon colonization of olive roots. Frontiers in Microbiology 5:427.

15. Gross, H. and J. Loper (2009). Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp.

16. Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, & Gobi TA (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus 2:587.

17. Ruffner, B., et al. (2013). "Oral insecticidal activity of plant-associated pseudomonads." Environmental Microbiology 15(3): 751-763.

18. Jousset, A., et al. (2009). "Predators promote defence of rhizosphere bacterial populations by selective feeding on non-toxic cheaters." The Isme Journal 3: 666

19. Vanitha SC & Umesha S (2011) Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated systemic resistance in tomato is driven through an elevated synthesis of defense enzymes. Biologia Plantarum 55(2):317-322.

20. Maheshwari DK (2012) Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Probiotics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg).

21. Despommier D (2011) The vertical farm: Controlled environment agriculture carried out in tall buildings would create greater food safety and security for large urban populations. J fur Verbraucherschutz und Leb 6(2):233–236.

22.World Health Organization. (2018). Q&A: genetically modified food. [online] Available at: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/food-technology/faq-genetically-modified-food/en/ [Accessed 13 Sep. 2018].