Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<div id="wrapper"> | <div id="wrapper"> | ||
<div class="section"> | <div class="section"> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
<h2>Integrated Human Practices</h2> | <h2>Integrated Human Practices</h2> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a9/T--UC_San_Diego--ihpcentral.png" class="entreImg" /> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <h3>Incorporating a Novel Communication Paradigm for iGEM Teams</h3> | ||
+ | <p> As a new team, we looked to past teams who had engaged in stakeholder interactions and Integrated Human Practices to guide our own intuition. Our team quickly realized that often times, other teams simply spoke to other domain experts or end users without having a fully thought-out approach that would allow for integration of advice into project design and deployment. It was also important to realize that a lot of the narratives that teams put forward were extremely linear: the interactions did not invite the team to consider the impact of their decisions or help them optimize their overall design. </p> | ||
+ | <p> In our day-to-day operations, we also experienced the struggles of cross-team discussion. It was quite difficult for people in the wetlab to keep track of what the drylab team was doing, or to keep track of what the entrepreneurship group was trying to deploy. It was also sometimes difficult to ascertain the broad-scale impact of our interactions with certain experts or stakeholders. We were also sure that our team was not the only one to experience such difficulties. To resolve these issues, our team came up with a novel paradigm that we believe will help streamline project issues for future teams. </p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/44/T--UC_San_Diego--ihpflowchart.png" class="entreImg" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/44/T--UC_San_Diego--ihpflowchart.png" class="entreImg" /> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 11:39, 17 October 2018
Integrated Human Practices
Incorporating a Novel Communication Paradigm for iGEM Teams
As a new team, we looked to past teams who had engaged in stakeholder interactions and Integrated Human Practices to guide our own intuition. Our team quickly realized that often times, other teams simply spoke to other domain experts or end users without having a fully thought-out approach that would allow for integration of advice into project design and deployment. It was also important to realize that a lot of the narratives that teams put forward were extremely linear: the interactions did not invite the team to consider the impact of their decisions or help them optimize their overall design.
In our day-to-day operations, we also experienced the struggles of cross-team discussion. It was quite difficult for people in the wetlab to keep track of what the drylab team was doing, or to keep track of what the entrepreneurship group was trying to deploy. It was also sometimes difficult to ascertain the broad-scale impact of our interactions with certain experts or stakeholders. We were also sure that our team was not the only one to experience such difficulties. To resolve these issues, our team came up with a novel paradigm that we believe will help streamline project issues for future teams.