Entrepreneurship
Product Design
Fig.1 Flow chart of E. coli carbon utilization system
- Overview
- Enterprise interview
In this project, we, the NCKU Tainan Team, have proposed an alternative way to reduce the emission of Carbon dioxide (CO2). Referring to the opinions and feedbacks from many industry experts and professors, we design a new factory flow to capture CO2 by E. coli Not only our device meets the specs to commercialize, but it also demonstrates high cost performance.
The emission of CO2 has been a serious problem for a century that causes global warming and severe climate change. Even though many ways have been tried to reduce it, the generation of CO2 primarily from industry is still overwhelming. Therefore, scientists and governments have been working hard to find solutions to tackle the problem.
We complete the whole product design and propose to several industrial. Through the interview the feedback form the industrial, we were able to stand in the site of customer and then improve our product. We found out what we were weak in the design and then figured out the solutions with the enterprise support.
Out major potential client china steel coporation, which has a large amount of CO2 emission every year.
The national science research and development institute in Taiwan Industrial Technology Research Institute, which has the advance technology solving excess CO2 emission problem.
An industry-university cooperative research projectBiofixation of flue gas CO2 with microalgae , which is a relative project to us in Bio-method dealing CO2 problem.
Business Model
The business model describes how an organization creates, delivers, and captures value in an economic, social, cultural, or other environment. Therefore, we introduce this business model as the basis for assessing the integrity and effectiveness of our ideas to work with our industry and even national research . First, we ask questions about this, and beyond the solution, we also explain why we chose this question. Second, we analyzed future developments, including the advantages of using this approach. Next , we introduce our plan to many relevant departments and discuss with the national research . I hope that this plan can be used to promote this plan in the future.
Target issue
More and more people are now paying attention to the impact of CO2. The trend of environmental degradation is gradually increasing. Scientist and national worldwide contribute to capture those excessive CO2. However, how to reduce carbon and use it has become a major problem today. Challenges against carbon process are complicate. Except the technique and implement problem, social acceptability and policy are other key factors about carbon process technology.
In general, planting is a method of carbon process, and the current use of green algae as a method of carbon utilization. This year, we hope to combine synthetic biology with the most advanced technologies. We want to draw people's attention to the environment and reuse these environmentally stimulating projects.
Business model analysis
Cost Evaluation
The cost evaluation is always crucial for product being on the market. To compare our engineered E. coli to microalgae, we calculate how much the cost it would be when capturing 1000 kilograms CO2.
Volume
Table 1 Volume require in capturing 1000 kg CO2
Organisms | CO2-fixation rate (mg/L*hr) | Biomass concentration (gDCW/L) | Specific CO2-fixation rate | Volume needed (L) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Engineered E. coli | 19.6 | 0.87 | 22.5 | 51000 |
Chlorella vulgaris | 53 | 5.7 | 9.3 | 19000 |
Cost
The most expensive source in the medium of our engineered E. coli is xylose. 1 mole xylose will capture 0.17 mole CO2, so it would need 20.0535 kilograms xylose and 1 kilogram xylose is cost 2 USD. The total cost for our engineered E. coli is require 40.107 USD for capture 1 kilogram CO2. In contrast, microalgae need 1000 liter to capture 250 gram CO2, so it need 4000 liter (about 4 Tons) water and 1 tons is cost 9.78 USD (300NT). The total cost for microalgae is require 39.13 USD.
Table 2 Cost require in capturing 1000 kg CO2
Item | Microalgae | Engineered E. coli |
---|---|---|
CO2 utilizing rate | 250g/m3/day | 19.6 mg/g (DRY cell weight) |
source required for 1kg CO2 utilization | 4 tons of water | 20.0535kg xylose |
Cost | 39.13USD | 40.107USD |
Source | NCKU Annan campus | Adjust reference[1] and experiment |
According to our research of mircoalgae culture in AN-nan campus, we list the data of its cost and CO2 utilization rate to help us optimize our project. As a result, we conclude that Engineered E. coli has a strong competitive advantage with proper cost to apply it.
Reference
- Fuyu G, Guoxia L, Xiaoyun Z, Jie Z, Zhen C and Yin L. Quantitative analysis of an engineered CO2-fixing Escherichia coli reveals great potential of heterotrophic CO2 fixation. Gong et al. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2015, 8:86.
- 張嘉修、陳俊延、林志生、楊勝仲、周德珍、郭子禎、顏宏偉、李澤民 (2015), 二氧化碳再利用─微藻養殖, 科學發展 2015 年 6 月│ 510 期
- Lawrence Irlam (2017), GLOBAL COSTS OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE, Global CCS Institute, Senior Adviser Policy & Economics, Asia-Pacific Region
- Jin Hwan Park, Jae Eun Oh, Kwang Ho Lee, Ji Young Kim, and Sang Yup Lee. Rational Design of Escherichia coli for L‑Isoleucine Production. [ACS Synth Biol.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656230#) 2012
- M. KUNDAK, L. LAZI], J. RNKO. CO2 EMISSIONS IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY. METALURGIJA 48, 2009
- V. N. Kalpana, D. Sathya Prabhu, S. Vinodhini and Devirajeswari V. Biomedical waste and its management. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2016
- Qian Ma, Quanwei Zhang, Qingyang Xu, Chenglin Zhang, Yanjun Li, Xiaoguang Fan, Xixian Xie, Ning Chen. Systems metabolic engineering strategies for the production of amino acids. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology 2 (2017)
- Jørgen Barsett Magnus, Daniel Hollwedel, Marco Oldiges, and Ralf Takors. Monitoring and Modeling of the Reaction Dynamics in the Valine/Leucine Synthesis Pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006
- Isao Kusumoto. Industrial Production of L-Glutamine. American Society for Nutritional Sciences, 2001