The aim of the Fifth International InterLab measurement study is to determine if we can
reduce lab-to-lab variability related to fluorescence measurements, by normalizing to absolute cell count or colony forming units rather than OD measurements which are highly variable between different labs.
To answer this question two approaches were used. First, the absorbance of dilution of monodisperse silica microspheres were measured as they have the same size as Esherichia coli cells and the second approach consisted in counting the colony forming units
(CFU) in positive and negative control samples.
Timeline of Interlab Measurement study. Click on each day to see what we did!
Calibration with Ludox, Microspheres and Fluorescein (day 1)
Three sets of measurements calibrations were performed:
First, the absorbance of LUDOX CL-X (45% colloidal silica suspension) at 600 nm was measured and used to acquire a conversion factor which is the result of the ratio between the corrected Absorbance at 600 nm (Arith. Mean absorbance of LUDOX CL-X - Arith. Mean absorbance of water) and a reference A600. When multiplying this factor by the measured A600, comparable A600 values are obtained as they take into account the variations of volumes in the different wells
The second calibration was performed through a serial dilution of “monodisperse silica microspheres”. These microspheres were used since they have similar size and optical properties as cells, and the number of particles per volume is precisely set. We obtained a standard curve for particles (Figure 1) allowing the conversion of the A600 into an approximate number of cells.
The last calibration was performed through series dilution of fluorescein. The fluorescence standard curve (
Figure 2) obtained, allowed the normalization of the quantity of GFP fluorescence in our transformed cells due to the analogous excitation and emission properties of the two molecules.
Colony-Picking and Inoculation (Day 2)
Cell Growth, Sampling and Assay - CFU protocols (Day 3)
Cell Growth, Sampling and Assay
Cell measurements were done to convert the absorbance of the cell suspensions into the absorbance of a known concentration of beads. Then the Colony-Forming Units (CFU) were determined and allowed to obtain a conversion factor from absorbance to CFU.
The results showed an increase in the fluorescence and the absorbance after 6 hours compared to the values at 0 hours, indicating an increase in the number of cells (Figure 3). Devices 1 and 4 showed the highest fluorescence while the device 3 was within the same range as the negative control (Figure 3A). Devices 2, 5 and 6 displayed fluorescence levels similar to the positive control. However, we saw no significant difference in absorbance among the cells expressing the different devices and the controls at t = 0 h and t = 6 h (Figure 3B). This observation confirms that the fluorescein level observed were not due to a difference in cell number but rather due to different expression levels of the GFP reporter of the devices.
In order to know the number of cells in solution with an A600 = 0.1, the overnight cultures of the negative and positive controls were diluted to this A600, and the absorbance was measured in triplicates of each diluted culture. Serial dilutions of this cell suspension were then performed and 3 dilutions were plated on LB medium (+ Chloramphenicol) and incubated overnight at 37°C.
Counting cells (Day 4)
The number of colonies on each plate were counted, and assuming that one colony comes from one original cell, we calculated the Colony Forming Units (CFU) in 1 mL for the original culture (A600 = 0.1). As expected, the number of colonies formed in inversely proportional to the dilution excepted in the second and third replicates of the positive control from colony 1. This is probably due to a mistake during the manipulations.
Since the purpose of InterLab study relies on the data coming from the different teams, only then would the results be mostly interesting to analyze and discuss. This 2018 InterLab study was a great opportunity for us to learn many skills through some of the challenges we faced while following the protocol. And we hope to have contributed with our results to decrease the lab-to-lab variability