Difference between revisions of "Team:Pasteur Paris/Composite Part"

(Undo revision 181472 by ThomasStarck (talk))
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
<div id="banner">
 
<div id="banner">
<h1>GROWING BACK NERVES</h1>
+
<h1>COMPOSITE PARTS</h1>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 30: Line 30:
 
<div id="index" class="block">
 
<div id="index" class="block">
 
<div id="indexContent">
 
<div id="indexContent">
<p><a href="#RIP" class="link">Neurotrophins</a></p>
+
<p><a href="#RIP" class="link">RIP</a></p>
<p><a href="#NGF" class="link">NGF / Pro-NGF</a></p>
+
<p><a href="#NGF" class="link">NGF</a></p>
<p><a href="#Kill" class="link">Production & Secretion</a></p>
+
<p><a href="#Kill" class="link">Kill Switch</a></p>
 
<p><a href="#References" class="link">References</a></p>
 
<p><a href="#References" class="link">References</a></p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 40: Line 40:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div id="MainContent">
 
<div id="MainContent">
<div class="block title">
+
<div class="block title" id="RIP"><h1>RIP (RNA III INHIBITING PEPTIDE)</h1></div>
<h1>RECONNECT NERVES (OUR SOLUTION)</h1>
+
<div class="block title"><h3 style="text-align: left;">RIP secretion : BBa_K2616001</h3></div>
<p><i>The central idea of our project is to find a way to have motor nerves of amputees grow back and connect to our interface. Literature studies led us to think of neurotrophins as the perfect molecules to start our research on. Indeed, this family of peptides are growth factors specialized in the regulation of neuronal development, survival, plasticity and nervous system function [1].</i></p>
+
</div>
+
<div class="block title"><h3 style="text-align: left;">What are neurotrophins? </h3></div>
+
 
<div class="block full">
 
<div class="block full">
<p>The first neurotrophin to be discovered was the Nerve Growth Factor (NGF). It was described in 1952 by Rita Levy Montalcini and Viktor Hamburger[2]. Since then, many other neurotrophins were discovered (BDNF, NT-3, NT-4, NT-6)[3] and much progress has been achieved towards understanding how they work. Yet, NGF is still considered a “prototype neurotrophin”[1] and is generally used as an example to describe their function. For this reason, we chose to clone this polypeptide into our bacteria, creating the NeuronArch. </p>
+
<p>To measure easily the effect of RIP on <i>S. aureus</i>, we designed a initial construct allowing us to simply produce RIP after IPTG induction. We thus designed a part containing a T7 promotor, ribosome binding site (RBS) upstream, and followed by a signal sequence for secretion fused to RIP sequence downstream of the coding sequence.<br><br></p>
</div>
+
<p>
<div class="block title"><h3 style="text-align: left;">The ambiguity between NGF and pro-NGF.</h3></div>
+
Eight different secretion systems have currently been identified in <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and more generally in Gram-negative bacteria (Ref.). Type I and type II secretion systems are the most commonly used for production of recombinant protein, and we used Type II to secrete RIP.<br>
<div class="block half">
+
Type II secretion system is a two-step system: proteins are first exported to the periplasmic space, between <i>E. coli</i>’s two membranes, and then secreted to the medium.<br>
<p>The mature-NGF protein (or β-NGF) results of the cleavage of β-NGF from a bigger protein called pro-NGF, which contains both a pro-sequence and β-NGF (see figure 1). Both pro-NGF and β-NGF proteins are biologically active, and there is, to this date, some sort of uncertainty about the exact effect of pro-NGF. </p>
+
We target RIP to the periplasm using the Sec-dependent secretion system (Ref.). Our peptide is fused to an amino-terminal signal sequence that gets recognized by the chaperone SecB, then addressed to SecA and then translocated accross the inner membrane through the SecYEG complex. One advantage of this system is that the signal sequence gets cleaved during translocation through SecYEG (Ref.). Several different signal sequences have been characterized (all formed of between 18 and 30 amino acids (Ref.). <br>
</div>
+
Following the advice of <b>Dr. Jean-Michel Betton</b>, in the Structural Biology Department at Institut Pasteur, we chose to try two different signal sequences to export our peptides, which he knew about and known to be efficient: <b>MalE</b> and <b>DsbA</b> (Ref.). A secretion machinery called secreton then enables the release of proteins extracellularly. However, this system is not very well characterized yet, and it is a complex machinery composed of more than 10 proteins, so we did not plan to use it. However, since RIP is only a 7 amino acid protein (Ref.), leaky release from periplasm to the medium should be sufficient to obtain RIP in the medium.
<div class="block half">
+
</p>
<img src="">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/35/T--Pasteur_Paris--Parts1.png" style="max-width: 800px;">
<div class="legend"><b>Figure 1: </b>Structure of the Pro-NGF gene. Adapted from Ivanisevic, 2013.</div>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<div class="block title"><h3 style="text-align: left;">RIP secretion following <i>S. aureus detection</i>: BBa_K2616003</h3></div>
 
<div class="block full">
 
<div class="block full">
<p>Indeed, if there is no doubt that β-NGF is a neurotrophic factor, it has still not been determined exactly whether pro-NGF is a neurotrophic or an apoptotic factor [4]. Many articles are still in contradiction on this matter and part of the reason comes from the biological pathways by which both proteins act on neurons. Two receptors are involved in their signaling: tropomyosin-related kinase A (TrkA) and the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75<sup>NTR</sup>). The two proteins (proNGF and β-NGF) are able to bind both receptors, but it is globally accepted that β-NGF has a higher affinity for TrkA and pro-NGF has a higher affinity for p75<sup>NTR</sup>. Figure 2 shows a big picture of how the two signaling pathways are thought to work (adapted from[5]).</p>
+
<p>In order not to produce RIP continuously but only in presence of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, we engineered a <b>sensor< device</b> in our modified <i>E. coli</i> capable of detecting <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and producing RIP after detection.</p>
</div>
+
<p>Our modified <i>E. coli</i> expresses under a constitutive Ptrc promoter the sensor device of <i>S. aureus</i> <b>agr operon</b>. It is composed of <i>agrA</i>  and <i>agrC</i>. <i>Staphylococcus</i> communicate through a quorum sensing mechanism, which consists in producing and detecting signaling peptides called AIP (Auto-Inducing Peptide). If <i>S. aureus</i> approaches our system, AIP will be detected by the transmembrane protein <i>agrC</i>, launching the phosphorylation of <i>agrA</i> which then activates promotor P2 (see below). Our RIP sequence fused to a signal sequence for periplasmic export is placed after promotor P2 and will consequently be expressed only if <i>S. aureus</i> approaches our biofilm. </p>
<div class="block two-third center">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/33/T--Pasteur_Paris--Parts2.png" style="max-width: 800px;">
<img src="">
+
<div class="legend"><b>Figure 2: </b>NGF versus pro-NGF signaling pathways. Adapted from Wang, 2014.</div>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<div class="block separator-mark"></div>
 +
 +
<div class="block title" id="NGF"><h1>NGF (NERF GROWTH FACTOR): BBa_K2616000</h1></div>
 +
<div class="block title"><h3 style="text-align: left;">Part description</h3></div>
 
<div class="block full">
 
<div class="block full">
<p>
+
<p>We built a part that should be integrated in our final device, and permits to <b>secrete NGF</b> directly in the extracellular medium using <i>E. coli</i> type I secretion system. We used an inducible promoter T7 in order to control NGF production thanks to IPTG induction. We added an His-tag in order to purify it.</p>
At this point, it might seem that choosing to clone β-NGF in the bacteria of our interface would be a better idea than pro-NGF. Yet, a few other information led us to think the other way. <br>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c2/T--Pasteur_Paris--Parts3.png" style="max-width: 800px">
First, even despite of the existing controversy, pro-NGF has been proven to exhibit a neurotrophic activity on some neural cells, even though it is not as strong as mature β-NGF (there is a fivefold activity difference) [6]. This neurotrophic activity is likely generated by a p75<sup>NTR</sup>-dependant mechanism, and depends on the proportion of TrkA and p75<sup>NTR</sup> in the neural cells [7]. Moreover, TrkA is mainly expressed in three types of neurons: peripheral sensory neurons, sympathetic neurons and basal forebrain cholinergic neurons, whereas p75<sup>NTR</sup>  is more evenly dispersed in different types of neurons [5]. Thus, expressing pro-NGF in our case seems like a good choice. <br>
+
Furthermore, several articles support the idea that the pro-sequence of NGF facilitates, and is even absolutely necessary, for the proper folding of the protein when cloned into bacteria, which is particularly relevant as this protein contains three disulfide bonds and is particularly difficult to express using synthetic biology while keeping its function [8],[9].<br><br></p>
+
<p>Considering all this information, we finally chose to clone pro-NGF in our interface.</p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
<div class="block title"><h3 style="text-align: left;">How to produce and secrete pro-NGF from an E. coli biofilm?</h3></div>
+
<div class="block title"><h3 style="text-align: left;">Secretion</h3></div>
 
<div class="block full">
 
<div class="block full">
<img src="">
+
<p><b>Type I secretion system</b> transports proteins in one step across the two cellular membranes (Ref.). It is composed of an inner membrane protein <i>HlyB</i>, a periplasmic channel protein <i>HlyD</i> and an outer membrane protein <i>TolC</i>. As every secretion system, secretion through this one too is mediated by the specific recognition of a signal sequence, which in this case are the sixty C-terminal amino acids of alpha-haemolysin <i>HlyA</i>. This sequence binds with the <i>HlyB-HlyD</i> complex and is then translocated into the channel (Ref.).</p>
<div class="legend"><b>Figure 3: </b>pro-NGF production and secretion from <i>E. coli</i></div>
+
<p>
<p>The composition of our final composite biobrick <b>Bb… (mettre un lien hypertexte vers la partie PARTS)</b> is detailed in the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Pasteur_Paris/Composite_Part">PARTS</a> submenu of this wiki. </p>
+
<br>There are several problems to address when secreting recombinant proteins through the Type I secretion system:<br>
<p>Concretely, it expresses two main proteins:
+
 
<ul style="text-align: left;">
 
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>pro-NGF, linked to HlyA, a type I secretion system export signal in <i>E. coli.</i> Between the two, we added a TEVprotease cleavage site. </li>
+
<li>First, the signal sequence <i>HlyA</i> is not cleaved when crossing the channel, but it needs to be cleaved to obtain a functional protein in the medium. That is why we fused the NGF sequence with this sixty-amino acid long sequence, separated by the cleavage site for Tobacco Etch Virus protease (TEV). As we co-express <b>TEV protease</b>, the signal sequence will be eliminated once it is out the cell, and our NGF can be active.</li>
<li>TEV protease, a protein from Tobacco Etch Virus that recognizes a specific sequence and cleaves it. We also linked the TEV protease to the same export signal.</li>
+
<li>Secondly, only if <i>TolC</i> endogenously exists within <i>Escherichia coli</i>. But this is not the case of the transporter complex <i>HlyB-HlyD</i>. We have thus co-transformed our bacteria with another plasmid pVDL 9.3, generously provided by <b>Dr. Victor de Lorenzo</b>, from Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia of Madrid, bearing <i>HlyB</i> and <i>HlyD</i> sequences, in order to get a chance to secrete NGF out of the cell.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</p>
 
</p>
<p>Once exported from the cell, the TEV protease can cleave the pro-NGF from HlyA and free the pro-neurotrophin in the external medium.</p>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="block separator-mark"></div>
 
<div class="block separator-mark"></div>
<div class="block title"><h1>REFERENCES</h1></div>
+
 
 +
<div class="block title" id="Kill"><h1>KILL SWITCH : BBa_K2616002</h1></div>
 
<div class="block full">
 
<div class="block full">
<ul style="text-align: left;">
+
<p>Since we imagined a technology which requires to integrate engineered bacteria in humans, we need to ensure that the engineered bacteria are contained in the specific environment they are designed for. That is why we thought of using a <b>“kill switch”</b> that cause them to die if they are released in the environment. Our kill switch is based on temperature: it enables bacteria to survive at human body temperature (37°C) but die at lower temperatures.</p>
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">L. Ivanisevic and H. U. Saragovi, “Neurotrophins,” in <i>Handbook of Biologically Active Peptides</i>, Elsevier, 2013, pp. 1639–1646.<br><br></li>
+
<p>The kill-switch we use is based on a toxin/antitoxin combination, <b>CcdB/CcdA</b> (Ref.). CcdB is a lethal toxin for <i>E. coli</i> and its production is placed under the regulation of a temperature-sensitive promoter (Ref.). In permissive conditions, i.e. in human body, the expression of the toxin is repressed and the antitoxin is expressed at a constitutive low level in order to counteract any leaky expression of the toxin. When the temperature goes lower, the repression is lifted and toxin expression increases. The constitutive low level of antitoxin is no longer sufficient to counter the effects of the toxin, and the bacteria die.</p>
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">S. Cohen, R. Levi-Montalcini, and V. Hamburger, “A nerve growth-stimulating factor isolated from sarcom AS 37 and 180,” <i>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</i>, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1014–8, Oct. 1954.<br><br></li>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bb/T--Pasteur_Paris--Parts4.png" style="max-width: 800px;">
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">S. Razavi, G. Nazem, M. Mardani, E. Esfandiari, S. Esfahani, and H. Salehi, “Neurotrophic factors and their effects in the treatment of multiple sclerosis,” <i>Adv. Biomed. Res.</i>, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 53, 2015.v<br><br></li>
+
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">M. Fahnestock, G. Yu, and M. D. Coughlin, “ProNGF: a neurotrophic or an apoptotic molecule?,” 2004, pp. 101–110.<br><br></li>
+
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">H. Wang et al., “The Nerve Growth Factor Signaling and Its Potential as Therapeutic Target for Glaucoma,” <i>Biomed Res. Int.</i>, vol. 2014, pp. 1–10, 2014.<br><br></li>
+
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">M. Fahnestock et al., “The nerve growth factor precursor proNGF exhibits neurotrophic activity but is less active than mature nerve growth factor,” <i>J. Neurochem.</i>, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 581–592, 2004.<br><br></li>
+
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">L. Howard, S. Wyatt, G. Nagappan, and A. M. Davies, “ProNGF promotes neurite growth from a subset of NGF-dependent neurons by a p75<sup>NTR</sup>-dependent mechanism,” <i>Development</i>, vol. 140, no. 10, pp. 2108–2117, 2013.<br><br></li>
+
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">A. Rattenholl, H. Lilie, A. Grossmann, A. Stern, E. Schwarz, and R. Rudolph, “The pro-sequence facilitates folding of human nerve growth factor from <i>Escherichia coli</i> inclusion bodies,” <i>Eur. J. Biochem.</i>, vol. 268, no. 11, pp. 3296–3303, 2001.<br><br></li>
+
<li style="list-style-type: decimal;">M. Kliemannel et al., “The mature part of proNGF induces the structure of its pro-peptide,” <i>FEBS Lett.</i>, vol. 566, no. 1–3, pp. 207–212, May 2004.<br><br></li>
+
</ul>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<div class="block separator-mark"></div>
 +
 +
<div class="block title" id="References"><h1>REFERENCES</h1></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 12:19, 30 September 2018

""

RIP (RNA III INHIBITING PEPTIDE)

RIP secretion : BBa_K2616001

To measure easily the effect of RIP on S. aureus, we designed a initial construct allowing us to simply produce RIP after IPTG induction. We thus designed a part containing a T7 promotor, ribosome binding site (RBS) upstream, and followed by a signal sequence for secretion fused to RIP sequence downstream of the coding sequence.

Eight different secretion systems have currently been identified in Escherichia coli, and more generally in Gram-negative bacteria (Ref.). Type I and type II secretion systems are the most commonly used for production of recombinant protein, and we used Type II to secrete RIP.
Type II secretion system is a two-step system: proteins are first exported to the periplasmic space, between E. coli’s two membranes, and then secreted to the medium.
We target RIP to the periplasm using the Sec-dependent secretion system (Ref.). Our peptide is fused to an amino-terminal signal sequence that gets recognized by the chaperone SecB, then addressed to SecA and then translocated accross the inner membrane through the SecYEG complex. One advantage of this system is that the signal sequence gets cleaved during translocation through SecYEG (Ref.). Several different signal sequences have been characterized (all formed of between 18 and 30 amino acids (Ref.).
Following the advice of Dr. Jean-Michel Betton, in the Structural Biology Department at Institut Pasteur, we chose to try two different signal sequences to export our peptides, which he knew about and known to be efficient: MalE and DsbA (Ref.). A secretion machinery called secreton then enables the release of proteins extracellularly. However, this system is not very well characterized yet, and it is a complex machinery composed of more than 10 proteins, so we did not plan to use it. However, since RIP is only a 7 amino acid protein (Ref.), leaky release from periplasm to the medium should be sufficient to obtain RIP in the medium.

RIP secretion following S. aureus detection: BBa_K2616003

In order not to produce RIP continuously but only in presence of Staphylococcus aureus, we engineered a sensor< device in our modified E. coli capable of detecting Staphylococcus aureus and producing RIP after detection.

Our modified E. coli expresses under a constitutive Ptrc promoter the sensor device of S. aureus agr operon. It is composed of agrA and agrC. Staphylococcus communicate through a quorum sensing mechanism, which consists in producing and detecting signaling peptides called AIP (Auto-Inducing Peptide). If S. aureus approaches our system, AIP will be detected by the transmembrane protein agrC, launching the phosphorylation of agrA which then activates promotor P2 (see below). Our RIP sequence fused to a signal sequence for periplasmic export is placed after promotor P2 and will consequently be expressed only if S. aureus approaches our biofilm.

NGF (NERF GROWTH FACTOR): BBa_K2616000

Part description

We built a part that should be integrated in our final device, and permits to secrete NGF directly in the extracellular medium using E. coli type I secretion system. We used an inducible promoter T7 in order to control NGF production thanks to IPTG induction. We added an His-tag in order to purify it.

Secretion

Type I secretion system transports proteins in one step across the two cellular membranes (Ref.). It is composed of an inner membrane protein HlyB, a periplasmic channel protein HlyD and an outer membrane protein TolC. As every secretion system, secretion through this one too is mediated by the specific recognition of a signal sequence, which in this case are the sixty C-terminal amino acids of alpha-haemolysin HlyA. This sequence binds with the HlyB-HlyD complex and is then translocated into the channel (Ref.).


There are several problems to address when secreting recombinant proteins through the Type I secretion system:

  • First, the signal sequence HlyA is not cleaved when crossing the channel, but it needs to be cleaved to obtain a functional protein in the medium. That is why we fused the NGF sequence with this sixty-amino acid long sequence, separated by the cleavage site for Tobacco Etch Virus protease (TEV). As we co-express TEV protease, the signal sequence will be eliminated once it is out the cell, and our NGF can be active.
  • Secondly, only if TolC endogenously exists within Escherichia coli. But this is not the case of the transporter complex HlyB-HlyD. We have thus co-transformed our bacteria with another plasmid pVDL 9.3, generously provided by Dr. Victor de Lorenzo, from Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia of Madrid, bearing HlyB and HlyD sequences, in order to get a chance to secrete NGF out of the cell.

KILL SWITCH : BBa_K2616002

Since we imagined a technology which requires to integrate engineered bacteria in humans, we need to ensure that the engineered bacteria are contained in the specific environment they are designed for. That is why we thought of using a “kill switch” that cause them to die if they are released in the environment. Our kill switch is based on temperature: it enables bacteria to survive at human body temperature (37°C) but die at lower temperatures.

The kill-switch we use is based on a toxin/antitoxin combination, CcdB/CcdA (Ref.). CcdB is a lethal toxin for E. coli and its production is placed under the regulation of a temperature-sensitive promoter (Ref.). In permissive conditions, i.e. in human body, the expression of the toxin is repressed and the antitoxin is expressed at a constitutive low level in order to counteract any leaky expression of the toxin. When the temperature goes lower, the repression is lifted and toxin expression increases. The constitutive low level of antitoxin is no longer sufficient to counter the effects of the toxin, and the bacteria die.

REFERENCES