Difference between revisions of "Team:Rheda Bielefeld/OverviewExperiment"

Line 25: Line 25:
 
<br> <br>
 
<br> <br>
 
After cracking the pollen, we were capable to duplicate the DNA of different pollen by doing a PCR <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Rheda_Bielefeld/Methods" style="color:yellow;"> [1] </a> <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Rheda_Bielefeld/PCR" style="color:yellow;"> [3] </a>. Afterwards we could "inject" the duplicated DNA into a gelelectrophoresis to show which pollen we used before.
 
After cracking the pollen, we were capable to duplicate the DNA of different pollen by doing a PCR <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Rheda_Bielefeld/Methods" style="color:yellow;"> [1] </a> <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Rheda_Bielefeld/PCR" style="color:yellow;"> [3] </a>. Afterwards we could "inject" the duplicated DNA into a gelelectrophoresis to show which pollen we used before.
 +
<br> <br>
 +
Our team also dealed with searching for DNA sequences saved in the database of NGBI.
 
</article>
 
</article>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 14:05, 16 October 2018

Overview Experiments

For our project, we needed to do a lot of experiments. At first, it was a bit difficult to find some well working methods, but after a while of researching we were finally able to get very good results.

We did two assays [1] [2] to prove the occurence of pectin; we were able to crack pollen and to clone Escherichia coli.

After cracking the pollen, we were capable to duplicate the DNA of different pollen by doing a PCR [1] [3] . Afterwards we could "inject" the duplicated DNA into a gelelectrophoresis to show which pollen we used before.

Our team also dealed with searching for DNA sequences saved in the database of NGBI.

Pictures



Working at the assays