Difference between revisions of "Team:Jilin China/Improve"
Rebekah1264 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| (57 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<style> | <style> | ||
.s1{ | .s1{ | ||
| − | background: url() | + | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/41/T--Jilin_China--Project--Improve--Banner.jpeg) bottom no-repeat ; |
background-size: cover; | background-size: cover; | ||
} | } | ||
.bodycontent section h2{ | .bodycontent section h2{ | ||
| − | color: # | + | color: #009245; |
} | } | ||
.navborder{ | .navborder{ | ||
| − | border-bottom:3px solid #ff52c1; | + | /*border-bottom:3px solid #ff52c1;*/ |
} | } | ||
.sidenav li{ | .sidenav li{ | ||
| − | border: # | + | border: #009245 3px solid; |
} | } | ||
.sidenav li:hover{ | .sidenav li:hover{ | ||
| − | background: rgba( | + | background: rgba(0,146,69,0.75); |
} | } | ||
.sidenav_selected{ | .sidenav_selected{ | ||
| − | background: rgba( | + | background: rgba(0,146,69,1) !important; |
} | } | ||
.bottom_stemloop{ | .bottom_stemloop{ | ||
| − | filter:hue-rotate( | + | filter:hue-rotate(-43deg) saturate(100%) brightness(100%) |
} | } | ||
footer{ | footer{ | ||
| − | background:# | + | background:#009245 !important; |
} | } | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
@media screen and (min-width:768px){ | @media screen and (min-width:768px){ | ||
.bodycontent .s2 > ul > li:nth-of-type(even){ | .bodycontent .s2 > ul > li:nth-of-type(even){ | ||
| − | background: | + | background: white; |
} | } | ||
.bodycontent .s2 h2:before { | .bodycontent .s2 h2:before { | ||
| − | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/ | + | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/37/T--Jilin_China--Common--Icons--TherometerIcon--Improve.svg) no-repeat left; |
background-size:auto 3rem ; | background-size:auto 3rem ; | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 46: | Line 44: | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
| − | |||
<html> | <html> | ||
| − | <section class=" | + | <section class="s1"> |
<div class="title_con"> | <div class="title_con"> | ||
<p>IMPROVE</p> | <p>IMPROVE</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="clear:both;"></div> | <div style="clear:both;"></div> | ||
| − | <div class="title_nav"><h2> | + | <div class="title_nav"><h2>Improvement</h2></div> |
</section> | </section> | ||
| Line 61: | Line 58: | ||
<!--ul class="sidenav"> | <!--ul class="sidenav"> | ||
<li><a href="#paragraph_1">Support</a></li> | <li><a href="#paragraph_1">Support</a></li> | ||
| + | |||
</ul--> | </ul--> | ||
| Line 68: | Line 66: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<h2>Improvement</h2> | <h2>Improvement</h2> | ||
| − | <p>This year, we choose | + | <p>This year, we choose Golden Gate assembly especially for construction. (Learn about our <b>Construction</b>? See our <a href="/Team:Jilin_China/Construction">Construction Page</a>) BsaI and BbsI are used as Type IIs restriction endonucleases in our construction device. At the same time, we decided to use sfGFP as our reporter protein due to its faster folded feature and higher fluorescence intensity. However, sfGFP in iGEM part registry (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I746916">BBa_I746916</a>) has a BbsI recognition site, which could be affected during Golden Gate assembly. Hence, first coming into our mind was to do a site mutagenesis, BbsI recognition site GAAGAC was altered into GAGGAT while amino acids sequence kept the same. Then we got our sfGFP(BbsI free) part(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2541401">BBa_K2541401</a>), a BbsI-free sfGFP and especially for Golden Gate assembly(<b>figure 1.</b>). </p> |
<center> | <center> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/72/SfGFP_BbsI_free-1.svg" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/72/SfGFP_BbsI_free-1.svg" width="50%" /></center> |
| − | <p> | + | <p class="figure">Figure 1. Site mutagenesis for sfGFP BbsI free.</p> |
| − | + | <p>Because we cannot guarantee the mutated sfGFP has the same fluorescence expression as the previous one, after further study, we found a codon optimized sfGFP<sup>[1,2]</sup> (<b>sfGFP_optimism</b>, <a href="HTTP://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2541400">BBa_K2541400</a>), which removed the BbsI site and had a functional improvement upon an existing superfolder GFP(BBa_I746916).</p> | |
| − | + | <center> | |
| − | <p>Because we cannot guarantee the mutated sfGFP has the same fluorescence expression as the previous one, after further study, we found a codon optimized sfGFP<sup>[1,2]</sup> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4a/T--Jilin_China--aaaa.png" width="35%" /></center> |
| + | |||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <h3>Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis</h3> |
| + | <p>Free of the BbsI cleavage site was confirmed by nucleic acid electrophoresis(<b>figure 2.</b>). </p> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/27/SfGFP_optimism_f1_new1.png" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/27/SfGFP_optimism_f1_new1.png" width="30%" /></center> |
| − | <p> | + | <p class="figure">Figure 2. L1: 1kb DNA marker; L2: BBa_I746916; L3: BBa_I746916+BbsI; L4: BBa_K2541401; L5: BBa_K2541401+BbsI; L6: BBa_K2541400; L7: BBa_K2541400+BbsI; L8: 1kb DNA marker.</p> |
| − | + | ||
| − | L5: BBa_K2541401+BbsI; L6: BBa_K2541400; L7: BBa_K2541400+BbsI; L8: 1kb DNA marker. | + | |
| − | + | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
| − | <p>Next, we got three types of sfGFP emission and excitation spectra.(<b> | + | <h3>Emission and Excitation Spectra</h3> |
| + | <p>Next, we got three types of sfGFP emission and excitation spectra. We have set the excitation and emission wavelength range from 400nm to 600nm. For these three types of sfGFP, the excitation wavelength is around 495nm and the emission wavelength is around 510nm. (<b>figure 3.</b>)</p> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/1e/SfGFP-1.svg" width="60%"/></center> |
| − | < | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e3/SfGFP_BbsI_free.svg" width="60%"/></center> |
| − | Figure 3. Three types of sfGFP emission and excitation spectra | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/50/SfGFP_op.svg" width="60%"/></center> |
| − | < | + | <p class="figure">Figure 3. Three types of sfGFP emission and excitation spectra</p> |
| − | <p>For further characterization, we detected the expression intensity of these three types of sfGFP. According to the results(<b> | + | <h3>Fluorescence Intensity</h3> |
| + | <p>For further characterization, we detected the expression intensity of these three types of sfGFP. According to the results(<b>figure 4.</b>), we found out that the expression intensity of sfGFP_optimism is nearly 2.6 as much as the other two types. As a result, we finally choose sfGFP_optimism as our reporter protein.</p> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/8/83/Jilin_China-sfGFP-fluorescence-01.svg" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/8/83/Jilin_China-sfGFP-fluorescence-01.svg" width="60%" /></center> |
| − | <p> | + | <p class="figure">Figure 4. Three Types of sfGFP expression in <i>E.coli</i>.</p> |
| − | + | <li class="pragraph_3" id="pragraph_3"> | |
| − | < | + | <div> |
| − | < | + | <h2>Reference</h2> |
| − | + | <ul> | |
| + | <li>[1]Segall-Shapiro, Thomas H., Eduardo D. Sontag, and Christopher A. Voigt. "Engineered promoters enable constant gene expression at any copy number in bacteria." Nature biotechnology 36.4 (2018): 352.</li> | ||
| + | <li>[2]Overkamp, Wout, et al. "Benchmarking various GFP variants in Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Lactococcus lactis for live cell imaging." Applied and Environmental Microbiology (2013): AEM-02033.</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:02, 17 October 2018
IMPROVE
Improvement
-
Improvement
This year, we choose Golden Gate assembly especially for construction. (Learn about our Construction? See our Construction Page) BsaI and BbsI are used as Type IIs restriction endonucleases in our construction device. At the same time, we decided to use sfGFP as our reporter protein due to its faster folded feature and higher fluorescence intensity. However, sfGFP in iGEM part registry (BBa_I746916) has a BbsI recognition site, which could be affected during Golden Gate assembly. Hence, first coming into our mind was to do a site mutagenesis, BbsI recognition site GAAGAC was altered into GAGGAT while amino acids sequence kept the same. Then we got our sfGFP(BbsI free) part(BBa_K2541401), a BbsI-free sfGFP and especially for Golden Gate assembly(figure 1.).
Figure 1. Site mutagenesis for sfGFP BbsI free.
Because we cannot guarantee the mutated sfGFP has the same fluorescence expression as the previous one, after further study, we found a codon optimized sfGFP[1,2] (sfGFP_optimism, BBa_K2541400), which removed the BbsI site and had a functional improvement upon an existing superfolder GFP(BBa_I746916).
Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis
Free of the BbsI cleavage site was confirmed by nucleic acid electrophoresis(figure 2.).
Figure 2. L1: 1kb DNA marker; L2: BBa_I746916; L3: BBa_I746916+BbsI; L4: BBa_K2541401; L5: BBa_K2541401+BbsI; L6: BBa_K2541400; L7: BBa_K2541400+BbsI; L8: 1kb DNA marker.
Emission and Excitation Spectra
Next, we got three types of sfGFP emission and excitation spectra. We have set the excitation and emission wavelength range from 400nm to 600nm. For these three types of sfGFP, the excitation wavelength is around 495nm and the emission wavelength is around 510nm. (figure 3.)
Figure 3. Three types of sfGFP emission and excitation spectra
Fluorescence Intensity
For further characterization, we detected the expression intensity of these three types of sfGFP. According to the results(figure 4.), we found out that the expression intensity of sfGFP_optimism is nearly 2.6 as much as the other two types. As a result, we finally choose sfGFP_optimism as our reporter protein.
Figure 4. Three Types of sfGFP expression in E.coli.
Reference
- [1]Segall-Shapiro, Thomas H., Eduardo D. Sontag, and Christopher A. Voigt. "Engineered promoters enable constant gene expression at any copy number in bacteria." Nature biotechnology 36.4 (2018): 352.
- [2]Overkamp, Wout, et al. "Benchmarking various GFP variants in Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Lactococcus lactis for live cell imaging." Applied and Environmental Microbiology (2013): AEM-02033.