Difference between revisions of "Team:Sorbonne U Paris/Demonstrate"

 
(25 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris}}
+
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris/Header}}
−
<html>
+
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris/Navbar}}
 +
<html lang="en">
  
−
<html>
+
<head>
−
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"  href="https://2018.igem.org/Template:Sorbonne_U_Paris/CSSBootstrap?action=raw&ctype=text/css" />
+
−
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"  href="https://2018.igem.org/Template:Sorbonne_U_Paris/CSScustom?action=raw&ctype=text/css" />
+
−
<script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:Sorbonne_U_Paris/JSBootstrap?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
+
−
</html>
+
−
 
+
−
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris/Header}}
+
−
<html>
+
 
<style>
 
<style>
−
#globalWrapper{
+
.container p {
−
background-color: #4e4e4e;
+
padding:15px;
 
}
 
}
 +
</style>
  
−
#bodyContent{
+
</head>
  
−
background: url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018//6/66/T--Sorbonne_U_Paris--fondWiki.png') no-repeat center center ;
+
<body id="backtotop">
−
background-size: 100%;
+
<div class="global">
−
  -webkit-background-size: cover;
+
<div class="container"><article class="col-md-10"><h1>Demonstrate</h1>
−
  -moz-background-size: cover;
+
<p class="introduction-text">Our aim on part 1 is to show how we determined whether we succeed a cloning or not. Then
−
  -o-background-size: cover;
+
on part 2 we will explain how we intend to demonstrate that our SugaRevolution system does
−
  background-size: cover;
+
work. </p></article></div>
  
−
  cursor: url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/86/T--Sorbonne_U_Paris--claude_curseur.resized.png'), auto;
+
<div class="container"><article class="col-md-10">
  
−
}
+
<h2 class="title-h2">1. Determination of cloning succes  </h2>
−
@media (max-width: 767px) {
+
−
#bodyContent {
+
−
background-size: cover;
+
−
}
+
−
}
+
  
−
#bodyContent .mw-body{
+
<p>Here is an example of our cloning experiments. You can see below the photo of  the gel on which all our first cloned and digested fragments have migrated.  </p>
−
witdth=100%;
+
−
}
+
  
−
p{
 
−
text-align: justify;
 
−
}
 
  
−
.navbar-toggler,.nav-link, .dropdown-toggle,a{
+
<div class="container d-flex justify-content-center" style="padding:20px">
−
cursor: url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/86/T--Sorbonne_U_Paris--claude_curseur.resized.png'), auto;
+
<figure  style=" width: 100%;">
−
}
+
<img  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cf/T--Sorbonne_U_Paris--Demonstrate.png"alt="Demonstrate" style="width: 100%">
 +
    <figcaption style="padding: 10px;"><b>Figure 1 : Migration of checking ligation. </b>This two pictures above come from the same gel, but the black one is overexposed to show the tiniest band.
  
−
</style>
+
</figcaption>
 +
  </figure>  </div>  
  
−
<div class="column full_size">
 
−
<h1>Demonstrate</h1>
 
−
<h3>Gold Medal Criterion #4</h3>
 
  
−
<p>
+
<p> After we have made our first level 0 cloning, we digested them with the adequate digestion enzyme, cutting next to the insert sites, here BsaI. If the product of the digestion had the expected length we would have collected them, using gel to pcr DNA purification, and would have sent our DNA samples to sequencing. In our case the DNA was not of the correct length, probably because the sequence cloned was not the right one or because something went wrong while cloning.  Then, we performed the cloning procedure once until it works.. </p>
−
Teams that can show their system working under real world conditions are usually good at impressing the judges in iGEM. To achieve gold medal criterion #4, convince the judges that your project works. There are many ways in which your project working could be demonstrated, so there is more than one way to meet this requirement. This gold medal criterion was introduced in 2016, so check our what 2016 teams did to achieve their gold medals!
+
−
</p>
+
  
−
<p>
+
<p>In the picture above (figure 1) you can see that Paro1 (0.8kbp), Paro 2 (0.8kbp), 3’LTR (0.02kbp), 5’3 LTR  (0.07kpb) having the expected length. We sent 3’2 and 3’4 (3’LTR), paro 1, paro 2 and 5’3 LTR to sequencing. Gag/Pol 3 and 5 were the only Gag/Pol subsequences that had the expected length (4.3kbp). These were also sent to sequencing.  
−
Please see the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Medals">2018 Medals Page</a> for more information.
+
−
</p>
+
  
 +
</p>
  
−
</div>
+
<p> To have an otherview of our progression in cloning, please refer to the results page. Precision on parts that were cloned and on their sequence quality are explained there.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>The project is still now on progress. Indeed, cloning experiments and assessment of our retrotransposon activity in Chlamydomonas are conceived and planned for weeks to come. </p>
 +
 
 +
</article></div>
  
−
<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>
+
</div>
  
 +
<!-- --------------------------------------------------------SOCIAL SIDE NAVBAR ------------------------------------------>
 +
<script type="text/javascript">
 +
      jQuery(document).ready(function() {
 +
if(window.matchMedia("(min-width:798px)").matches) {
 +
          $(window).scroll(function(){
 +
abcScroll = $(document).scrollTop();
 +
if(abcScroll >=900)
 +
$('.socialmedia').fadeOut(100);
 +
else
 +
$('.socialmedia').fadeIn(0);         
 +
});  }
 +
          });
  
 +
        </script>
 +
<!-- --------------------------------------------------------SOCIAL SIDE NAVBAR ------------------------------------------>
  
 +
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 +
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris/socialsidenavbar}}
 +
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris/backtotop}}
 
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris/Footer}}
 
{{Sorbonne_U_Paris/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 02:24, 18 October 2018

Demonstrate

Our aim on part 1 is to show how we determined whether we succeed a cloning or not. Then on part 2 we will explain how we intend to demonstrate that our SugaRevolution system does work.

1. Determination of cloning succes

Here is an example of our cloning experiments. You can see below the photo of the gel on which all our first cloned and digested fragments have migrated.

Demonstrate
Figure 1 : Migration of checking ligation. This two pictures above come from the same gel, but the black one is overexposed to show the tiniest band.

After we have made our first level 0 cloning, we digested them with the adequate digestion enzyme, cutting next to the insert sites, here BsaI. If the product of the digestion had the expected length we would have collected them, using gel to pcr DNA purification, and would have sent our DNA samples to sequencing. In our case the DNA was not of the correct length, probably because the sequence cloned was not the right one or because something went wrong while cloning. Then, we performed the cloning procedure once until it works..

In the picture above (figure 1) you can see that Paro1 (0.8kbp), Paro 2 (0.8kbp), 3’LTR (0.02kbp), 5’3 LTR (0.07kpb) having the expected length. We sent 3’2 and 3’4 (3’LTR), paro 1, paro 2 and 5’3 LTR to sequencing. Gag/Pol 3 and 5 were the only Gag/Pol subsequences that had the expected length (4.3kbp). These were also sent to sequencing.

To have an otherview of our progression in cloning, please refer to the results page. Precision on parts that were cloned and on their sequence quality are explained there.

The project is still now on progress. Indeed, cloning experiments and assessment of our retrotransposon activity in Chlamydomonas are conceived and planned for weeks to come.

Back to top