Difference between revisions of "Team:Pasteur Paris/Medals"

(Undo revision 223802 by ThomasStarck (talk))
Line 145: Line 145:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td><b>Improve a Previous Part or Project</b</td>
 
<td><b>Improve a Previous Part or Project</b</td>
<td>We plane to make the competition deliverables met on time.</td>
+
<td></td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>

Revision as of 09:44, 13 October 2018

""

Bronze medal criteria

Explanation Criteria achieved
Registration and Giant Jamboree Attendance We registered for iGEM then had a great summer time and are now waiting to attend the Giant Jamboree.
Competition Deliverables We plan to make the competition deliverables met on time.
Attributions We completed the attributions page on our wiki.
Characterization / Contribution We successfully completed the InterLab Measurement Study.

Silver medal criteria

Explanation Criteria achieved
Validated Part / Validated Contribution We created a new BioBrick part as expected : BBa_K2616001. This part allows to produce RIP after IPTG induction, and export it to the periplasmic space of E. coli throughType II Secretion system.
Collaboration We hosted the 4th Parisian Meet-Up where we organised a Tiny Jamboree in order to practice with all the French teams for the Giant. We also attended round tables about bioethics.
We collaborated with other teams, you can read about them on this page.
Human Practices Ethics and safety:
Security: The Institut Pasteur is a highly restricted area so we had ID badges to enter every building and unity. + substances we used
Sustainability: ? Kill switch ?
Social justice: ?
Intellectual property rights: account of state of the art, no infrigement of IP laws.

Gold medal criteria

Explanation Criteria achieved
Integrated Human Practices Integrated HP
Improve a Previous Part or Project
Model Your Project We modelled how NGF is produced in our modified E. Coli, its diffusion in an environment and its consequences on neurons growth. It helped to predict how to use NGF in our experiments.