Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
<h1>Vector construction of Lock and Information:</h1><br> | <h1>Vector construction of Lock and Information:</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. CYC promoter, CYC1 terminator were amplified from genomic DNA of <I>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</I> YPH499 with corresponding primers respectively. And the DNA of the lock and information fragment was synthesized by company with restriction enzyme cutting sites | + | 1. CYC promoter, CYC1 terminator were amplified from genomic DNA of <I>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</I> YPH499 with corresponding primers respectively. And the DNA of the lock and information fragment was synthesized by company with restriction enzyme cutting sites HindIII, EcoRI and EcoRI, NheI.<br> |
2. Modified CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator by adding the HA1 or HA2 by using PCR.<br> | 2. Modified CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator by adding the HA1 or HA2 by using PCR.<br> | ||
− | 3. Four fragments of HA1-CYC promoter, Stem loop(the lock), Information and Cyc1 terminator-HA2 the were double-digested with SacI-HindIII, HindIII-EcoRI, EcoRI-NheI, and NheI-BamHI, respectively.<br> | + | 3. Four fragments of HA1-CYC promoter, Stem loop (the lock), Information and Cyc1 terminator-HA2 the were double-digested with SacI-HindIII, HindIII-EcoRI, EcoRI-NheI, and NheI-BamHI, respectively.<br> |
4. Ligated them into an expression vector pesc-Ura by T4 ligase.<br> | 4. Ligated them into an expression vector pesc-Ura by T4 ligase.<br> | ||
5. To detemine whether the vector is constructed successfully, conoly PCR and sequencing were done.<br><br> | 5. To detemine whether the vector is constructed successfully, conoly PCR and sequencing were done.<br><br> | ||
<h1>Vector construction of Lock and EGFP:</h1><br> | <h1>Vector construction of Lock and EGFP:</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. CYC promoter, CYC1 terminator were amplified from genomic DNA of <I>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</I> YPH499 with corresponding primers respectively. And the DNA of the lock was synthesized by company with restriction enzyme cutting sites | + | 1. CYC promoter, CYC1 terminator were amplified from genomic DNA of <I>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</I> YPH499 with corresponding primers respectively. And the DNA of the lock was synthesized by company with restriction enzyme cutting sites HindIII, EcoRI. The EGFP gene was amplified from palsmid pEGFP-N2, and modified it by adding EcoRI and NheI respectively.<br> |
2. Modified CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator by adding the HA1 or HA2 by using PCR.<br> | 2. Modified CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator by adding the HA1 or HA2 by using PCR.<br> | ||
− | 3. Four fragments of HA1-CYC promoter, Stem loop(the lock), EGFP and Cyc1 terminator-HA2 the were double-digested with SacI-HindIII, HindIII-EcoRI, EcoRI-NheI, and NheI-BamHI, respectively.<br> | + | 3. Four fragments of HA1-CYC promoter, Stem loop (the lock), EGFP and Cyc1 terminator-HA2 the were double-digested with SacI-HindIII, HindIII-EcoRI, EcoRI-NheI, and NheI-BamHI, respectively.<br> |
4. Ligated them into an expression vector pesc-Ura by T4 ligase.<br> | 4. Ligated them into an expression vector pesc-Ura by T4 ligase.<br> | ||
5. To detemine whether the vector is constructed successfully, conoly PCR and sequencing were done.<br><br> | 5. To detemine whether the vector is constructed successfully, conoly PCR and sequencing were done.<br><br> | ||
<h1>Vector construction of Lock and Gluc:</h1><br> | <h1>Vector construction of Lock and Gluc:</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. CYC promoter, CYC1 terminator were amplified from genomic DNA of <I>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</I> YPH499 with corresponding primers respectively. And the DNA of the lock was synthesized by company with restriction enzyme cutting sites HindIII, EcoRI . The Gluc gene was amplified from palsmid pGluc-Basic2, and modified it by adding EcoRI and NheI respectively.<br> | + | 1. CYC promoter, CYC1 terminator were amplified from genomic DNA of <I>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</I> YPH499 with corresponding primers respectively. And the DNA of the lock was synthesized by company with restriction enzyme cutting sites HindIII, EcoRI. The Gluc gene was amplified from palsmid pGluc-Basic2, and modified it by adding EcoRI and NheI respectively.<br> |
2. Modified CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator by adding the HA1 or HA2 by using PCR.<br> | 2. Modified CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator by adding the HA1 or HA2 by using PCR.<br> | ||
− | 3. Four fragments of HA1-CYC promoter, Stem loop(the lock), Gluc and Cyc1 terminator-HA2 the were double-digested with SacI-HindIII, HindIII-EcoRI, EcoRI-NheI, and NheI-BamHI, respectively.<br> | + | 3. Four fragments of HA1-CYC promoter, Stem loop (the lock), Gluc and Cyc1 terminator-HA2 the were double-digested with SacI-HindIII, HindIII-EcoRI, EcoRI-NheI, and NheI-BamHI, respectively.<br> |
4. Ligated them into an expression vector pesc-Ura by T4 ligase.<br> | 4. Ligated them into an expression vector pesc-Ura by T4 ligase.<br> | ||
5. To detemine whether the vector is constructed successfully, conoly PCR and sequencing were done.<br><br> | 5. To detemine whether the vector is constructed successfully, conoly PCR and sequencing were done.<br><br> | ||
Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
<h1>Vector construction of suicide switch:</h1><br> | <h1>Vector construction of suicide switch:</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. Bax(alpha) Gene was amplified from genomic DNA of 293T cell with corresponding primers respectively.<br> Fig2C promoter fragment was from iGEM parts registry.<br> | + | 1. Bax (alpha) Gene was amplified from genomic DNA of 293T cell with corresponding primers respectively.<br> Fig2C promoter fragment was from iGEM parts registry.<br> |
2. Modified Bax fragment by adding SpeI and HindIII by using PCR.<br> | 2. Modified Bax fragment by adding SpeI and HindIII by using PCR.<br> | ||
3. Two fragments of Fig2C promoter, Bax gene were double-digested with EcoRI-SpeI, and SpeI-HindIII, respectively.<br> | 3. Two fragments of Fig2C promoter, Bax gene were double-digested with EcoRI-SpeI, and SpeI-HindIII, respectively.<br> | ||
Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
<h1>Qualitative verification using EGFP</h1><br> | <h1>Qualitative verification using EGFP</h1><br> | ||
1. Transform expression plasmid pRPR1-Key and pCYC-Lock-EGFP<br> | 1. Transform expression plasmid pRPR1-Key and pCYC-Lock-EGFP<br> | ||
− | into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at | + | into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at 30℃ for 36 hours.<br> |
2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | 2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | ||
− | 3. Shake at | + | 3. Shake at 30℃ to OD600nm = 0.6<br> |
− | 4. | + | 4. 500ul of the bacterial solution was taken out, a picture was prepared, and the expression of EGFP was observed with a fluorescence microscope.<br><br> |
<h1>Quantitative verification using Gluc</h1><br> | <h1>Quantitative verification using Gluc</h1><br> | ||
1. Transform expression plasmid pRPR1-Key and pCYC-Lock-Gluc<br> | 1. Transform expression plasmid pRPR1-Key and pCYC-Lock-Gluc<br> | ||
− | into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at | + | into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at 30℃ for 36 hours.<br> |
2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium<br> | 2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium<br> | ||
− | 3. Shake at | + | 3. Shake at 30℃ to OD600nm = 0.6<br> |
− | 4. | + | 4. 500ul of bacterial solution was taken for ultrasonic cell disruption, and luciferase substrate Coelenterazine was added to detect the expression of luciferase Gluc.<br><br> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 317: | Line 317: | ||
<h1>Qualitative verification</h1><br> | <h1>Qualitative verification</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. Transform expression plasmid pFig2C-EGFP into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at | + | 1. Transform expression plasmid pFig2C-EGFP into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at 30℃ for 36 hours.<br> |
2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | 2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | ||
− | 3. Shake at | + | 3. Shake at 30℃ to OD600nm = 0.6<br> |
4. 500ul of the bacterial solution was taken out, a picture was prepared, and the expression of EGFP was observed with a fluorescence microscope.<br><br> | 4. 500ul of the bacterial solution was taken out, a picture was prepared, and the expression of EGFP was observed with a fluorescence microscope.<br><br> | ||
<h1>Quantitative verification by q-PCR</h1><br> | <h1>Quantitative verification by q-PCR</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. Transform expression plasmid pFig2C-EGFP into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at | + | 1. Transform expression plasmid pFig2C-EGFP into YPH499. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at 30℃ for 36 hours.<br> |
2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | 2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | ||
− | 3. Shake at | + | 3. Shake at 30℃ to OD600nm = 0.6<br> |
4. Take 1ml of bacterial solution to extract RNA, perform reverse transcription.<br> | 4. Take 1ml of bacterial solution to extract RNA, perform reverse transcription.<br> | ||
5. Perform quantitative PCR using reverse transcription products as templates.<br><br> | 5. Perform quantitative PCR using reverse transcription products as templates.<br><br> | ||
Line 340: | Line 340: | ||
<h1>Qualitative verification using EGFP</h1><br> | <h1>Qualitative verification using EGFP</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. The constructed plasmid pCYC-Lock-EGFP was subjected to PCR to obtain a HA1-pCYC-Lock-EGFP-tCYC-HA2 fragment. | + | 1. The constructed plasmid pCYC-Lock-EGFP was subjected to PCR to obtain a HA1-pCYC-Lock-EGFP-tCYC-HA2 fragment. 10ul of PCR product was taken, purified and transformed. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at 30℃ for 36 hours.<br> |
2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | 2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | ||
− | 3. Shake at | + | 3. Shake at 30℃ to OD600nm = 0.6<br> |
− | 4. | + | 4. 500ul of the bacterial solution was taken out, a picture was prepared, and the expression of EGFP was observed with a fluorescence microscope.<br><br> |
<h1>PCR verification</h1><br> | <h1>PCR verification</h1><br> | ||
− | 1. The constructed plasmid pCYC-Lock-EGFP was subjected to PCR to obtain a HA1-pCYC-Lock-EGFP-tCYC-HA2 fragment. | + | 1. The constructed plasmid pCYC-Lock-EGFP was subjected to PCR to obtain a HA1-pCYC-Lock-EGFP-tCYC-HA2 fragment. 10ul of PCR product was taken, purified and transformed. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at 30℃ for 36 hours.<br> |
2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | 2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | ||
− | 3. Shake at | + | 3. Shake at 30℃ to OD600nm = 0.6<br> |
4. 1 ml of the bacterial solution was taken for DNA extraction.<br> | 4. 1 ml of the bacterial solution was taken for DNA extraction.<br> | ||
5. The obtained genomic DNA was subjected to PCR using a specific primer to verify whether the homologous recombination was successful.<br><br> | 5. The obtained genomic DNA was subjected to PCR using a specific primer to verify whether the homologous recombination was successful.<br><br> | ||
Line 362: | Line 362: | ||
<div class="widget"> | <div class="widget"> | ||
<div class="widget-content"> | <div class="widget-content"> | ||
− | 1. The constructed plasmid pCYC-Lock-EGFP was subjected to PCR to obtain a HA1-pCYC-Lock-EGFP-tCYC-HA2 fragment. | + | 1. The constructed plasmid pCYC-Lock-EGFP was subjected to PCR to obtain a HA1-pCYC-Lock-EGFP-tCYC-HA2 fragment. 10ul of PCR product was taken, purified and transformed. Plate on SD/-Leu-Ura selection plates and incubate at 30℃ for 36 hours.<br> |
2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | 2. Resupend a single colony in 10ml SD/-Ura liquid medium <br> | ||
− | 3. Shake at | + | 3. Shake at 30℃ to OD600nm = 0.6<br> |
4. 1 ml of the bacterial solution was taken for DNA extraction.<br> | 4. 1 ml of the bacterial solution was taken for DNA extraction.<br> | ||
5. The obtained genomic DNA was subjected to PCR using a specific primer to verify whether the homologous recombination was successful.<br> | 5. The obtained genomic DNA was subjected to PCR using a specific primer to verify whether the homologous recombination was successful.<br> |
Revision as of 14:16, 17 October 2018