Microfluidics/Membrane
07.10.2018
Institut Curie’s lab MMBM (Macromolécules et Microsystèmes en Biologie et en Médecine) at IPGG (Institut Pierre Gilles de Gennes) handed us the molds for the microchannel chip and granted us access to their lab. We have been taught the basic steps for the fabrication of the microfluidic microchannel chip: PDMS preparation, molding, demolding, punching, bonding.
Basic steps protocols here .
07.11.2018
4 microchannel chips have been made. Molds for the PDMS well chip have been received. Glass microscopic slides coated with 2 nm chromium and 50 nm gold have been received for use in PDMS well chip. Glass slides have been cut into small strips with a diamond tip. Processing damaged the gold coating.
Microchannel chip fabrication protocols here .
07.12.2018
First pieces of the well chip have been successfully molded. 8 microchannel chips have been made.
Microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
07.13.2018
Tested the conductivity of gold coated strips of glass. Current doesn't seem to pass through the strips. It is supposed that the numerous scratches caused by the cutting process are the cause for the non-conductivity of the strips. It was realized after the cutting process, that the conductivity should also have been measured before cutting.
![Figure 1: Strips before cutting](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/80/T--Pasteur_Paris--Gold-Strip-Before-Cut.jpg)
![Figure 2: Cut strip with scratches](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a8/T--Pasteur_Paris--Gold-Strip-After-Cut.jpg)
Second successful set of PDMS pieces of the well chip molded. 4 microchannel chips have been made. 1 microchannel successfully bonded to an imaging dish, and filled with fluorescein. Observation under a microscope revealed that it is fully functional.
![Figure 3: Microchannel chip bonded to imaging dish](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/18/T--Pasteur_Paris--Microchannel-Chip-Fluo.jpg)
Bonding protocol here .
Microchannel chip protocol here .
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
07.16.2018
We transformed pET 43.1a and pSB1C3 in DH5-α competent cells, in order to constitute a stock of empty vectors for our manipulation.
Plasmid | C (ng/μl) | Volume (μl) | Competent cell | Medium |
pET 43.1.a | 4.95 | 1 | DH5-α | LB/carbenicilline |
pSB1C3 | 40 | 1 | DH5-α | LB/chloramphenicol |
See here the transformation of E. coli DH5-alpha protocol We let the transformed bacteria grow overnight (16 hours).
07.17.2018
Results: We went to see our bacterial culture:
- Bacteria transformed with pET 43.1 had not grown.
- Bacteria transformed with pSB1C3 had formed colonies.
Interpretations: Bacteria transformed with pET 43.1 did not grow. We found a non-commercial tube of pET 43.1 in the freezer from last year team, and we decided to try to amplify it because we did not have any commercial tubes of pET 43.1. Transformation did not work as expected, probably because:
- There was no DNA left in the tube.
- The concentration of DNA was too low .
We cultivated the transformed pSB1C3 bacteria in liquid medium 2 x 25ml + Chloramphenicol (25µg/ml) overnight at 37°C, 180 rpm.
Results: Bacteria successfully transformed with pSB1C3. (See here the liquid culture protocol)
07.18.2018
Extraction: We extracted the pSB1C3 plasmid from the bacterial culture. The protocol used was the Qiagen Plasmid Purification Kit (See Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol here ) Measure of the DNA concentration in each tube thanks to the NanoDrop (Blank used : TE.1) (See the NanoDrop protocol here)
Results: We used the Nanodrop to quantify the purified DNA.
Sample | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Volume (µl) | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
C (ng/µl) | -7.8 | -8.5 | 54.8 | 5.6 | 237.4 | -7.9 | -7.2 | -7.5 | -6.9 | -6.5 |
Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.97 | 3.04 | 1.85 | 1.32 | 1.47 | 1.56 | 1.35 | 1.44 |
Remarks: [DNA] < 0 = no DNA [DNA] > 200 good Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) [1;2]
Interpretations:
- Tube 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 did not contain DNA at all. This problem can be due to the fact that we failed the precipitation with ethanol, meaning that when we removed all the supernatant, we also removed the DNA, or that we removed by mistake the DNA pellet when removing all the supernatant after precipitation (the pellet was so small that we couldn’t see it with the naked eye).
- Tube 3, 4 and 5 had DNA inside. The amount of DNA obtained is enough for us. These tubes have been placed in the freezer for later use.
Transformation: We received from Eurofins our first sequences:
- 3a_NGF construction Part1 (Seq1)
- 3a_NGF construction Part2 (Seq2)
- T7 RIP construction (Seq8)
In order to constitute a stock of this commercial vectors, we transformed DH5-α competent cells with the plasmid we received, and then we cultivated them on agar plates covered with LB medium and carbenicillin. As the bacteria transformed with pET 43.1a did not grow, we tried again to transform the bacteria with pET 43.1a in a higher quantity than previously.
Plasmid | C (ng/μl) | Volume (μl) | Competent cell | Medium |
pEX-A258 Seq1 | 10 | 1 | DH5-α | SOC/carbenicilline |
pEX-A258 Seq2 | 10 | 1 | DH5-α | SOC/carbenicilline |
pEX-A258 Seq8 | 10 | 1 | DH5-α | SOC/carbenicilline |
pET 43.1a | 4.95 | 5 | DH5-α | SOC/carbenicilline |
See here the transformation of E. coli DH5-alpha protocol
07.19.2018
Results: We went to see our overnight bacterial culture plates:
SEQ#1 3a_NGF_Part1 | SEQ#2 3a_NGF_Part2 | SEQ#8 T7_RIP | Pet43.1a(+) | |
Selection | Amp | Amp | Amp | Amp |
Growth | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Liquid Culture | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
![Figure 1: Seq #8 – T7_RIP](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/91/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week24_Seq-T7_RIP.png)
![Figure 2: Seq#1 – 3a_NGF_Part1](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7b/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week24_Seq1.png)
![Figure 3: Seq#2 – 3a_NGF_Part2](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c1/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week24_Seq2.png)
Interpretations: Transformation of Seq#1 – 3a_NGF_Part1, Seq#2 – 3a_NGF_Part2 and Seq #8 – T7_RIP did work as expected. Transformation of Pet43.1a (+) did not work again. As mentioned before, the tube of pET43.1a (+) was a non-commercial tube that we found in the freezer from last year’s team, and we decided to try to amplify it because we did not have any commercial tubes of pET 43.1. We tried to transform our bacteria twice, with no results, so the most probable hypothesis is that the tube did not contain DNA anymore. After this experiment, we decided to buy a tube pET43.1a(+). We cultivated two different colonies from each plate (seq#1, seq#2, seq#8):
- One in an Erlenmeyer in 25 ml LB medium + Carbenicillin (100µg/ml) overnight at 37°C, 180 rpm.
- One in two Falcon tube in 15 ml LB medium + Carbenicillin (100µg/ml) overnight at 37°C, 180 rpm.
(See here the liquid culture protocol)
07.20.2018
Results of the liquid culture are good.
Extraction - MidiPrep: We extracted the 3 plasmids Seq#1 – 3a_NGF_Part1, Seq#2 – 3a_NGF_Part2 and Seq #8 – T7_RIP from the bacterial cultures. The protocol used was the Qiagen Plasmid Purification Kit (See Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol here ) Measure of the DNA concentration in each tube thanks to the NanoDrop (Blank used : TE.1) (See the NanoDrop protocol here)
Results: We used the Nanodrop to quantify the purified DNA.
For NGF part1, Colony 1:
[DNA] (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
3569.2 | 1.9 |
1578.7 | 1.89 |
848.1 | 1.90 |
2322.1 | 1.89 |
For NGF part1, Colony 2:
ng/µL [DNA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
488.1 | 1.89 |
493.7 | 1.90 |
445.1 | 1.89 |
644.6 | 1.86 |
For NGF part2, Colony 1:
ng/µL [DNA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1555.0 | 1.88 |
493.7 | 1.88 |
666.2 | 1.87 |
367 | 1.90 |
For NGF part2, Colony 2:
ng/µL [DNA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
463.7 | 1.89 |
420.8 | 1.88 |
461.4 | 1.89 |
420.6 | 1.89 |
For RIP, Colony 1:
ng/µL [DNA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
694.4 | 1.84 |
1028.9 | 1.87 |
1408.7 | 1.88 |
466.8 | 1.88 |
For RIP, Colony 2:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
228.4 | 1.89 |
325.2 | 1.89 |
379.4 | 1.89 |
427.2 | 1.89 |
Remarks: [NA] < 0 = no DNA [NA] > 200 good Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) [1;2]
Interpretations: We have DNA in our tubes. The DNA is too concentrated so we will have to dilute them before next use. We froze the tubes at -20°C until next use.
Something was done one that day
18.07.2018
1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip has been made. One of the pieces broke while demolding. It was discarded. 4 microchannel chips made.
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
Microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
19.07.2018
1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made. 4 microchannel chips made.
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
Microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
07.24.2018
Culture of strain HB2151 transformed with pVDL 9.3 (received on 23.07.2018 from Dr. Victor de Lorenzo) Material:
- LB agar plate supplemented with chloramphenicol (25 mg/mL)
- Bacteria HB 2151 transformed with pVDL9.3
The bacteria we received was in the form of a stock: LB + agar media containing the bacteria and the plasmid in an Eppendorf tube. Sample from the solid stock was streaked on LB agar plate complemented with chloramphenicol, and secondly grown in an Erlenmeyer with 25 mL LB medium and 25 μL chloramphenicol at 25 mg/mL.
Biofilm culture on filter (0.2 μm) Material:
- Bacteria DH5α transformed with pSB1C3
- Filters - 0.2 μm Milipore (5 cm diameter)
- Petri-dishes
- Sterile Clamps
- Sterile Rakes
- Pipets
- LB media
- Falcon tubes
- Chloramphenicol (25 mg/mL)
- Make a liquid culture of DH5α transformed with pSB1C3 from colonies we had on a petri dish made on the 07.16.2017 and stored at 4°C. Let grow over night at 37°C under agitation. Made the 07.23.2017 (See here the liquid culture protocol)
- Auto-cleavage of the 0.2 μm filters
- Deposit the filters on a petri dish with a clamp. Wait until the filter is totally “wet” with LB media.
- Deposit the bacteria culture in the center of the filter with a micropipette and spread with a rake. We made 3 different petri dishes with 3 different volumes.
DH5α-pSB1C3- biofilm culture – 1 | DH5α-pSB1C3- biofilm culture – 2 | DH5α-pSB1C3- biofilm culture – 3 | |
Volume of culture deposit (μL) | 50 | 100 | 150 |
![Figure 1: Picture of the 3 petri dishes at t = 0.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fc/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week30_Vignette1.jpg)
- Incubate at 37°C overnight.
Transformation of seq5, seq7 from Eurofins Genomics, pET 43.1 and pBR322 Material:
- LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin
- Sterile LB medium
- pET 43.1a: 42.36 pg/μL
- pBR322: 65.00 ng/μL
- Seq5 > AGR-RIP Part1: 1.1 μg
- Seq7 > AGR-RIP Part3: 1.9 μg
Sequences received on the 07.24.2018. Gene synthesis products are in the form of lyophilized powder, so we need to re-suspend them. Seq5 > AGR-RIP Part1: 1.1 μg Seq7 > AGR-RIP Part3: 1.9 μg
- Centrifuge in order to make sure that all the plasmids are at the bottom of the tube and not in the lid.
- Re-suspend the powder in TE 1X. Seq5: add 110 μL to have a final concentration of 10 ng/μL Seq7: add 190 μL to have a final concentration of 10 ng/μL
- Transformation of the 4 plasmids in DH5α competent cells:
- Seq5, Seq7 and pBR322: 1 μL
- pET 43.1a: 10 μL
(See here the transformation of E. coli DH5-alpha protocol) - Culture on petri dishes overnight at 37°C
07.25.2018
Transformed bacteria cultures: We went to see our overnight bacterial culture plates:
Seq5 RIP_Part1 | Seq7 RIP_Part3 | pBR322 | Pet43.1a(+) | |
Selection | Amp | Amp | Amp | Amp |
Growth | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
CFU | 2 816 | 2 492 | 2 628 | - |
Liquid Culture | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
![Figure 2: Seq5 – RIP_Part1](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/12/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week30_Fig2.png)
![Figure 3: Seq7 – RIP_Part3](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e0/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week30_Fig3.png)
![Figure 4: pBR322](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b2/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week30_Fig4.png)
Interpretations: Transformation of Seq5 – RIP_Part1, Seq7 – RIP_Part3 and pBR322 did work as expected. Transformation of Pet43.1a (+) did not work again. The tube of pET43.1a (+) was another non-commercial tube that we found in the freezer from last year’s team, and we decided to try to amplify it because we did not have any commercial tubes of pET 43.1. We tried to transform our bacteria twice, with no results, so the most probable hypothesis is that the tube did not contain DNA anymore. We are still waiting for the commercial pET43.1a(+) (we ordered it last week).
Bacteria transformed pVDL 9.3: The culture on agar plate did work, but we were not able to isolate one colony. We stopped the liquid culture and measured the OD600 of the culture medium.
Biofilm culture:
pSB1C3-DH5α-biofilm culture – 1 | pSB1C3-DH5α-biofilm culture – 2 | pSB1C3-DH5α-biofilm culture – 3 | |
Volume of culture deposit (μL) | 50 | 100 | 150 |
Biofilm formation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
![Figure 5: Picture of the 3 petri dishes at t = 24.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/82/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week30_Fig5.png)
We did a biofilm transfer. We took our filter with the biofilm and transferred it on another porous filter placed on a new petri dish LB + Cm. Then we removed the filter containing the biofilm and incubated the plate overnight at 37°C.
Liquid culture: We cultivated two different colonies from each plate (Seq5, Seq7 and pBR322):
- One in an Erlenmeyer in 25 mL LB medium + Carbenicillin (100 µg/ml) overnight at 37°C, 180 rpm.
- One in two Falcon tube in 15 mL LB medium + Carbenicillin (100 µg/ml) overnight at 37°C, 180 rpm.
Moreover, for each colony of each DNA part we did some streaks on a plate and incubated them at 37°C. (See here the liquid culture protocol)
Midiprep pVDL 9.3: We extracted the pVDL 9.3 plasmid from the HB2151 strain. The protocol use was the Qiagen Plasmid Purification Kit (See Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol here ) We divided the eluted DNA into 8 tubes before centrifugation. Measure of the DNA concentration in each tube by the NanoDrop. Blank used : TE.1 (See the NanoDrop protocol here)
Results: We used the Nanodrop to quantify the purified DNA for SEQ: pVDL 9.3 1.
Sample | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
ng/µL [NA] | 3.7 | 111.2 | 140 | 0 | 1.9 | 47 | 108 | 8.3 |
Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | 1.93 | 1.87 | 1.88 | - | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.91 |
07.26.2018
Results: Transfer of our biofilm growth on a filter (07.24.2018 loading of 50 µl of pSB1C3 liquid culture on a filter) on another filter on a plate and incubation overnight at 37°C:
![Figure 6: Picture of the petri dish (with 50 μL of culture) 24 hours after transfer on another filter.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f1/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week30_Fig6.jpg)
Observations: The biofilm is able to grow again after a transfer from one filter to another as seen by the red color.
Midiprep Seq5, Seq7, pBR322: We extracted Seq5, Seq7 and pBR322 plasmid from transformed DH5α strain. The protocol used was the Qiagen Plasmid Purification Kit (See Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol here ) We divided the eluted DNA into 4 tubes before centrifugation. Measure of the DNA concentration in each tube with NanoDrop. Blank used: TE.1 (See the NanoDrop protocol here)
Results: We used the Nanodrop to quantify the purified DNA.
For Seq, 5 Colony 1:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
245.7 | 1.87 |
349 | 1.87 |
353.2 | 1.87 |
306.7 | 1.87 |
For Seq 5, Colony 2:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
258 | 1.88 |
281 | 1.86 |
260 | 1.86 |
295 | 1.86 |
For Seq 7, Colony 1:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
293 | 1.88 |
299 | 1.88 |
305 | 1.87 |
288 | 1.87 |
For Seq 7, Colony 2:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
217 | 1.87 |
212 | 1.87 |
175 | 1.88 |
244 | 1.83 |
For pBR322, Colony 1:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
3.8 | 1.68 |
55.8 | 1.86 |
54 | 1.9 |
68 | 1.84 |
For RIP, Colony 2:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
32 | 1.82 |
28 | 1.75 |
41 | 1.88 |
30 | 1.88 |
Interpretations: There is DNA in all the tubes. For Seq5 and Seq7, we obtain high DNA concentrations, which is good. For pBR322, the DNA concentration is lower. This is probably due to the fact that pB322 is a low copy plasmid. However, the quantity of DNA is enough.
Preparing cultures for stocks: We set some pre-cultures of Seq5, Seq7 and pBR322, in order to make some stocks to store at -80°C. In a 15 mL Falcon tube, we placed 5 mL of LB media, and 10 μL of antibiotic (Carbenicillin). We added one of each colony inside each Falcon and placed the Falcon tubes inside the incubator (37°C – 180 rpm) and let grow overnight.
Something was done one that day
07.24.2018
Membrane filters from Sterlitechreceived. 8 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made.
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
Microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
07.25.2018
Platinum wires received and conductivity tested. Function generator was set on sine. The physical quantities measured here are Eg, the generator's tension amplitude and Ep, the voltage difference between the two extremities of a platinum wire. the quantity calculated here is 20*log(Ep/Eg) for different frequencies.
Results
![Figure 1: Conductivity of a platinum wire for different frequencies](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c4/T--Pasteur_Paris--Conductivity-platinum-wire.jpg)
Interpretation
Voltage difference calculated is extremely low, indicating a very good conductivity for the platinum wires, so its resistance (in low frequencies) can be neglected at first glance when it will be used in PDMS well chips. Resistance increases in higher frequencies, because of the skin-effect in metals: the strip transforms into an antenna. But as we are going to use only low frequencies, this doesn't affect us.
Conductivity measurement protocol (section 2, replace chip by platinum wire, no resistor) here .
07.27.2018
4 microchannel chips have been made. 1 microchannel chip bonded for imaging test purposes.
Microchannel chip fabrication and bonding protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
07.30.2018
Digestion of Seq8 and pBR322: We cut the commercial plasmid containing our Seq8 (T7-RIP) with restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI, and pBR322 with AvaI and BsmI, in order then to insert our sequence into the plasmid pBR322. Material:
- Water baths at 37°C and 80°C
- Eppendorf tubes
- Pipets and cones
Reagents:
- pBR322 [68 ng/μL]
- commercial plasmid containing Seq8 [466,8 ng/μL]
- Restriction enzymes: AvaI, BsmI, XbaI, SpeI
- 10X Cut Smart
- Distilled water
- Mix the following volumes of reagents and incubate at 37°C for 15 minutes.
Volume (μL) | |
pBR322 | 22 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 20 |
Bsml | 1.5 |
Aval | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Eurofins plasmid with Seq8 | 20 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 22 |
Xbal | 1.5 |
Spel | 1.5 |
- Inactivate the digestion by heating the mixture in a heat block at 80 °C for 20 minutes.
Electrophoresis on agarose gel We prepared an Agarose gel. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- 1 well with the digested pBR322 (n°1)
- 2 wells with the digested plasmids containing Seq8 (n°2 and 3)
- 1 well with a DNA ladder (n°4)
We let the DNA migrate for 10 minutes at 85 V and then 40 minutes at 125 V. We then revealed the gel under UV lamp. Results:
![Figure 1:](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/90/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig1.png)
Interpretations:
- pBR322 (4361 bp) has been successfully linearized
- pEXA258 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (459 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2909 bp)
DNA Gel extraction: Here is the same gel after DNA extraction of pBR322 and of Seq8.
![Figure 1-2: gel after DNA extraction of pBR322 and of Seq8](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5b/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig1-2.png)
Sequence name | Eppendorf weight (g) | Eppendorf + gel weights (g) | Gel weight (g) |
Seq8 (1) | 1.08 | 1.29 | 0.21 |
Seq8 (2) | 1.08 | 1.37 | 0.29 |
pBR322 | 1.08 | 1.27 | 0.19 |
It is useful to know how the weight of the gel to adapt de volumes of buffer to the amount of gel we have. (See here the Gel Extraction protocol) Results: after extracting the DNA from the gel, we measured the DNA concentration using the Nanodrop.
Sequence name | DNA concentration (ng/μL)) | Abs(260nm)/Abs(280nm) (g) | Total extracted DNA (ng) |
Seq8 (1) | 6.4 | 1.87 | 294.4 (620.8) |
Seq8 (2) | 6.8 | 2.07 | 326.4 (620.8) |
Linearized pBR322 | 9.9 | 1.97 | 475.2 |
Interpretations: The initial amount of each DNA fragment before digestion was 1500 ng. We can therefore evaluate the efficiency of our digestion and extraction:
- for Seq8 insert: r = 0.414
- for pBR322 plasmid: r = 0.317
Ligation of linearized pBR322 and our insert Seq8 We used the In-Fusion cloning kit provided by Ozyme in order to clone our insert into the linearized pBR322.
- We mixed the following volumes into 1.5 mL tubes.
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) | Positive control (μL) |
Purified fragment | 4 | - | 2 (control) |
Linearized vector | 4 | 1 | 1 (control) |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Deionized water | - | 7 | 5 |
- Incubate for 15 min in a water bath at 50°C
- Ligation See here the Ligation protocol)
- Set in ice
- Transformation of the 3 plasmids into Stellar competent cells (provided with the cloning kit)
- Competent cell volume : 33 μL
- DNA volume: 2 μL
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar gel supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C
Transformation of Seq6 from Eurofins Material:
- LB agar plates supplemented with carbenicillin (25 μg/mL)
- LB medium
- Seq6 > AGR-RIP Part1: 4.6 μg
Sequences are under the form of lyophilized powder, so we need to re-suspend it.
- Centrifuge in order to make sure that all the plasmids are at the bottom of the tube and not in the lid.
- Re-suspend the powder in TE 1X. We resuspended it into 460 μL TE, to obtain a concentration of 10 ng/μL.
- Transformation of the plasmid in DH5α competent cells (See here the transformation of E. coli DH5-alpha protocol)
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar gel supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C
07.31.2018
Results: ligation cultures
Liquid culture of DH5-α with Seq6 We cultivated 2 different colonies in 250 mL Erlenmeyer containing:
- 25 mL LB medium
- 25 μL carbenicillin (25 mg/mL)
We cultivated it overnight in a shaking incubator at 37°C, 180 rpm. (See here the liquid culture protocol)
Liquid culture of Stellar transformed with pBR322-Seq8 We cultivated 20 different colonies in order to maximize our chance to get one successful ligated plasmid. Each colony was cultivated in a 15 mL Falcon tube containing:
- 5 mL LB medium
- 5 μL carbenicillin (25 mg/mL)
We cultivated it overnight in a shaking incubator at 37°C, 180 rpm. We also cultivated each colony on petri dishes LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C.
Transformation of Seq3 from Eurofins Genomics and commercial pET43.1a Material:
- LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin
- Seq3 : NGF-GFP Part1 : 4.0 μg
- pET 43.1a : 0.5 μg/μL
Sequence from Eurofins Genomics under the form of lyophilized powder so we need to re-suspend it.
- Centrifuge in order to make sure that all the plasmids are at the bottom of the tube and not in the lid.
- Re-suspend the powder in TE 1X. We resuspended it into 400 μL TE, in order to obtain a concentration of 10 ng/μL.
- Transformation of the plasmids in DH5α competent cells:
- volume of competent cells: 50 μL
- pET 43.1a: 50 pg (1 μL of commercial plasmid diluted 1/10000)
- Seq3 : 10 ng (1 μL)
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C.
08.01.2018
We went to see our cultures:
- All the colonies of our ligation (pBR322 + Seq8) grew except one.
- DH5α transformed with Seq3 grew.
- DH5α transformed with pET 43.1a did not grow.
![Figure 5:](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/10/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig5.png)
Hypothesis:
- We might have diluted the plasmid or the bacteria too much.
- We did not homogenize the solution enough during the dilution of the commercial solution.
- We did not pipet correctly the 1 μL of plasmid from the commercial tube.
Extraction of the ligated plasmid (pBR322 + Seq8) from Stellar (miniprep) (See here the Gel Extraction protocol) Results: (tube 8 did not grow) From NanoDrop
Sample | DNA CONCENTRATION (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 94.8 | 2.05 |
2 | 105.8 | 2.06 |
3 | 106.3 | 2.04 |
4 | 84.8 | 2.02 |
5 | 100.1 | 2.02 |
6 | 79.9 | 2.00 |
7 | 08.9 | 2.04 |
8 | - | - |
9 | 115.1 | 2.02 |
10 | 116.7 | 1.96 |
11 | 76.6 | 2.00 |
12 | 69.5 | 1.99 |
13 | 80.7 | 1.94 |
14 | 63.0 | 1.98 |
15 | 78.4 | 2.03 |
16 | 153.1 | 1.94 |
17 | 90.7 | 2.00 |
18 | 119.3 | 2.02 |
19 | 100.8 | 1.97 |
20 | 85.3 | 2.03 |
We chose to verify which colony had acquired the plasmid containing the Seq8 insert. To do so, we digested the plasmid with the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI and ran a 1% agarose gel. The size of the plasmid pBR322 is 4361 bp. Once we cut the sequence between the sites EcoRI (bp position 4359) and PstI (bp position 3611), this leaves us with an empty backbone of 3613 bp. The size of the insert Seq8 is 461 bp. Here we made a mistake, by confusing the right restriction enzymes to use. Indeed, we should have used XbaI and SpeI instead of EcoRI and PstI. Moreover, as these two restriction sites are present in the pBR322 backbone (748 bp away), this digestion should show two DNA fragments.
1% Agarose gel of the miniprep of the ligated plasmid (pBR322 + Seq8) from Stellar Only the first half of the samples (1 to 11) were deposed today. The preparation of the gel was done according to the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol. The samples were made according to the following proportions:
- 5 µL DNA
- 3 µL 10X Cutsmart Buffer
- 1 µL EcoRI
- 1 µL PstI
- 20 µL H2O
These samples were then incubated for 10 min at 37°C to allow digestion by the enzymes. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 6 µL of 6X Loading Dye. Results:
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/62/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig6.png)
This resulting gel shows the two DNA fragments we expected. Moreover, the column 3 shows a lower molecular weight (MW) than others for the plasmid part. As this part is supposed to contain our insert, it might suggest that colony 3 doesn’t possess the insert, but all others do. However, we will need to make the right experiment using restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI (see date 08.02.2018) to verify that our insert was correctly put into the plasmid.
Extraction of Seq6 plasmid from DH5α (midiprep) We extracted the plasmids containing Seq6 from the DH5-α cells. (See Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol here ) Results from NanoDrop: (Blank: TE.1)
For the colony 1:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
1 | 1572.9 | 1.88 |
2 | 2800.1 | 1.88 |
3 | 2598.7 | 1.88 |
4 | 2285.1 | 1.89 |
For the colony 2:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
1 | 4996.8 | 1.87 |
2 | 3263.2 | 1.89 |
3 | 3625.0 | 1.90 |
4 | 2339.7 | 1.90 |
The DNA concentrations were too high and so did not answer to the Beer-Lambert’s law. We needed to dilute the samples before using the nanodrop again. We did 1/10 dilutions and obtained average concentrations of 34 ng/µL, with Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) ratios of 1.92.
Digestion of pET 43.1a, NGF_Part1 (Seq1) and NGF_Part2 (Seq2) Digestion of the following plasmids:
- pET43.1a (500 ng/µl)
- Commercial plasmid containing Seq1 (445.1 ng/μL)
- Commercial plasmid containing Seq2 (420.6 ng/μL)
- Restriction enzymes: NdeI, PacI, NheI, BamHI, MscI, HindIII
- Mix the following volumes of reagents and incubate at 37°C for 15 min.
Volume (μL) | |
pET43.1a | 1.6 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 40.4 |
Ndell | 1.5 |
Pacl | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Eurofins plasmid with Seq1 | 4.3 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 37.7 |
Nhel | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Eurofins plasmid with Seq2 | 4.4 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 37.6 |
Mscl | 1.5 |
MindIII | 1.5 |
- Inactivate the digestion by heating the mixture in a heat block at 80 °C for 20 min.
Electrophoresis on agarose gel We prepared an 0.8 % agarose gel to separate the different fragments of the cut plasmids. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- 2 wells with digested pET43.1a (n°1 and n°2)
- 2 wells with insert Seq1 (n°3 and n°4)
- 2 wells with insert Seq2 (n°5 and n°6)
- 1 well with the DNA ladder
We let the DNA migrate for 10 minutes at 85 V on order to let the DNA penetrate the gel, and then 40 min at 125 V to efficiently separate the fragments. We then revealed the gel under UV lamp.
![Figure 7: Electrophoresis gel 0.8% (1. 2. pET43.1a / 3. 4. Seq1 / 5. 6. Seq2) before DNA extraction](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/82/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig7.png)
Interpretations:
- pET43.1a (7275 bp) has been successfully linearized into two fragments (5 kb and 2 kb)
- pEXA258 – Seq1 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (1105 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2446 bp)
- pEXA258 – Seq2 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (1159 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2446 bp)
DNA Gel extraction: We cut the gel to extract our inserts and linearized plasmid:
![Figure 8: 0.8% Agarose gel after excision of the DNA](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/50/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig8.png)
Eppendorf weight (g) | Eppendorf + gel weights (g) | Gel weight (g) | |
pET43.1a (1) | 1.13 | 1.365 | 0.23 |
pET43.1a (2) | 1.08 | 1.286 | 0.21 |
Seq1 (1) | 1.07 | 1.265 | 0.20 |
Seq1 (2) | 1.08 | 1.306 | 0.23 |
Seq2 (1) | 1.07 | 1.303 | 0.23 |
Seq2 (2) | 1.07 | 1.284 | 0.21 |
It is useful to know how the weight of the gel to adapt de volumes of buffer to the amount of gel we have. (See here the Gel Extraction protocol) Results: After extracting the DNA from the gel, we measured the DNA concentration using the Nanodrop.
C (ng/μL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
pET43.1a (+) (1) | 5.5 | 3.14 |
pET43.1a (+) (2)) | 7.1 | 2.50 |
Seq1 (1) | 5.1 | 2.71 |
Seq1 (2) | 7.8 | 1.90 |
Seq2 (1) | 6.9 | 2.92 |
Seq2 (2) | 6.0 | 3.11 |
Ligation of linearized pET43.1a and our inserts Seq1,2 /br> We used the In-Fusion cloning kit provided by Ozyme to clone our two inserts together in linearized pET43.1a.
- We mixed the following volumes into 1.5 mL tubes.
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) | Positive control (μL) |
Purified Seq1 | 6 | - | 2 (control) |
Purified Seq2 | 6 | - | 2 (control) |
Linearized vector | 3 | 1 | 1 (control) |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Deionized water | 1 | 7 | 5 |
- Incubate for 15 min in a water bath at 50°C
- Ligation (See Ligation protocol)
- Set on ice
- Transformation of the 3 plasmids into Stellar competent cells (provided with the cloning kit):
- Competent cell volume: 50 μL
- DNA volume: 2 μL
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C
08.02.2018
2nd Agarose gel of the miniprep of the ligated plasmid (pBR322 + Seq8) from Stellar, using the correct enzymes Yesterday we made a mistake, so today we carried out exactly the same protocol but with restriction enzymes SpeI and XbaI. As a negative control, we also deposited a sample we called 1x, without digesting it with restriction enzymes.
Liquid culture of pET43 1.a We cultivated 2 different colonies in 250 mL Erlenmeyer containing:
- 25 mL LB medium
- 25 μL carbenicillin (25 mg/mL)
We cultivated it overnight in a shaking incubator at 37°C, 180 rpm. (See here Liquid Culture protocol)
Liquid culture of Stellar transformed with pET43 1.a-Seq1-Seq2 We cultivated 20 different colonies in order to maximize our chance to get one successful ligated plasmid. Each colony was cultivated in a 15 mL Falcon tube containing:
- 5 mL LB medium
- 5 μL carbenicillin (25 mg/mL)
We cultivated it overnight in a shaking incubator at 37°C, 180 rpm.< We also cultivated each colony in an LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin.
Extraction of Seq3 plasmid from Stellar (midiprep) We extracted the plasmids containing Seq3 from the stellar cells (See here the Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop (with Blank: TE.1) For the colony 1:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
153.3 | 1.90 |
155.2 | 1.90 |
164.6 | 1.89 |
179.1 | 1.91 |
For the colony 2:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
166.4 | 1.91 |
150.4 | 1.90 |
177.1 | 1.91 |
188.6 | 1.89 |
Interpretations: There is DNA in all the tubes
Digestion of pBR322, Agr-RIP-Part1 (Seq5), Agr-RIP-Part2 (Seq6) and Agr-RIP-Part3 (Seq7) Material:
- Water baths at 37°C and heating block of 80°C
- Eppendorf tubes
- Pipets and cones
Reagents:
- PBR322 (conc. 68 ng/μL)
- Eurofins Genomics plasmid containing Seq5 (conc. 353 ng/ μL)
- Eurofins Genomics plasmid containing Seq6 (conc. 350 ng/ μL)
- Eurofins Genomics plasmid containing Seq7 (conc. 305 ng/ μL)
- Restriction enzymes: BsmI, AvaI, XbaI, BamHI, MscI, SphI, HindIII, SpeI
- 10X Cut Smart
- Distilled water
- Mix the following volumes of reagents and incubate at 37°C for 15 min
Volume (μL) | |
pBR322 | 22 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 20 |
BsmI | 1.5 |
Aval | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Plasmid containing Seq5 | 12 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 30 |
Xbal | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Plasmid containing Seq7 | 21 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 21 |
HindIIIl | 1.5 |
Spel | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Plasmid | 16 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 26 |
Mscl | 1.5 |
Sphl | 1.5 |
- Inactivate the digestion by heating the mixture in a heat block at 80 °C for 20 min.
Electrophoresis on agarose gel We prepared an 0.8 % agarose gel to separate the different fragments of the cut plasmids. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- 2 wells with digested pBR322 (n°1 and n°2)
- 2 wells with insert Seq5 (n°3 and n°4)
- 2 wells with insert Seq6 (n°5 and n°6)
- 2 wells with insert Seq7 (n°7 and n°8)
- 1 well with the DNA ladder
We let the DNA migrate for 10 minutes at 85 V on order to let the DNA penetrate the gel, and then 40 min at 125 V to efficiently separate the fragments. We then revealed the gel under UV lamp.
![Figure 9: Electrophoresis gel 0.8 % before DNA extraction of pBR322, Seq5, Seq6, Seq7](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/01/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig9.png)
- 1. 2. : pBR322
- 3. 4. : Seq5
- 5. 6. : Seq6
- 7. 8. : Seq7
- pET43.1a (7275 bp) has been successfully linearized into two fragments
- pEXA258 – Seq5 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (1422 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2.5 kb)
- pEXA258 – Seq6 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (960 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2.5 kb)
- pEXA258 – Seq7 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (762 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2.5 kb)
- We mixed the following volumes into 1.5 mL tubes.
- Incubate for 15 min in a water bath at 50°C
- Ligation See here the Ligation protocol)
- Set in ice
- Transformation of the 3 plasmids into Stellar competent cells (provided with the cloning kit)
- Competent cell volume : 33 μL
- DNA volume: 2 μL
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar gel supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C
- 5 mL of LB
- 10 µL of Carbenicillin (25 mg/mL)
Interpretations:
DNA Gel extraction We cut the gel to extract our inserts and linearized plasmid:
![Figure 10: Agarose gel electrophoresis after excision of the DNA](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b2/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig10.png)
We extract the DNA (our linearized vector and our plasmid) from the agarose gel. (See here the Gel Extraction protocol)
Results: After extracting the DNA from the gel, we measured the DNA concentration using the Nanodrop
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
pBR322 | 10.3 | 2.07 |
Seq5 | 8.3 | 3.07 |
Seq6 | 14.0 | 2.06 |
Seq7 | 7.6 | 1.97 |
Ligation of linearized pBR322 and our insert Seq5,6,7 We used the In-Fusion cloning kit provided by Ozyme (See here theLigation protocol) in order to clone our insert into the linearized pBR322.
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) | Positive control (μL) |
Purified Seq 5 | 5 | - | 2 (control) |
Purified Seq 6 | 3 | - | 2 (control) |
Purified Seq 7 | 5 | - | 2 (control) |
Linearized vector | 3 | 1 | 1 (control) |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Deionized water | - | 7 | 5 |
08.03.2018
Midiprep pET43.1a: (See here the Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol) 2 colonies from pET43.1a petri dish (08.01.2018 – pET43.1a) were placed in liquid culture the day before Results from NanoDrop (with Blank: TE.1) For the colony 1:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
71.7 | 1.88 |
75.2 | 1.88 |
73.6 | 1.84 |
70.2 | 1.87 |
For the colony 2:
ng/µL [NA] | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
65.0 | 1.85 |
34.7 | 1.80 |
64.9 | 1.86 |
55.5 | 1.82 |
Observations: Enough concentrations for further uses
Miniprep pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2
(See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol)
20 colonies from pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 from petri dish (08.01.2018) were placed in liquid culture the day before (5 mL of LB + 10 µL of Carbenicillin).
Results from NanoDrop (Blank used is Buffer EB):
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 170.9 | 1.86 |
2 | 120.8 | 1.88 |
3 | 73.1 | 1.87 |
4 | 89.8 | 1.84 |
5 | 75.4 | 1.97 |
6 | 136.6 | 1.87 |
7 | 101.4 | 1.88 |
8 | 99.0 | 1.91 |
9 | 72.7 | 1.88 |
10 | 172.8 | 1.87 |
11 | 107.8 | 1.86 |
12 | 151.1 | 1.86 |
13 | 92.6 | 1.92 |
14 | 78.7 | 1.93 |
15 | 101.2 | 1.87 |
16 | 223.9 | 1.97 |
17 | 145.5 | 1.85 |
18 | 149.8 | 1.86 |
19 | 68.1 | 1.89 |
20 | 87.8 | 1.93 |
Observations: Samples were not transferred to the micro tubes at the right moment, so it is very probable that the samples are contaminated with genomic DNA.
08.05.2018
Liquid culture of pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 (See here the Liquid Culture protocol) 6 colonies from the petri dish (pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 – 08.02.2018) were placed in a liquid culture containing:
Cultures were incubated at 37°C, 180 rpm overnight. Observations: All the colonies grew.
![Figure 11: Petri dish with the 6 colonies that were placed in liquid culture](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fd/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week31_Fig11.png)
Something was done one that day
07.30.2018
First PDMS well chip entirely assembled and bonded, with platinum wire and gold membrane filter. Leaking problems required us to seal the leaks with additional PDMS. 4 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made.
Well chip fabrication protocol (the chip assembled on that day is slightly different but doesn't work) here .
Microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
07.31.2018
2 additional PDMS wells assembled with gold-coated membranes. First PDMS vertical chip PDMS pieces prepared (cut and punched, silver paste applied and membrane filter glued). 4 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made.
Well chip fabrication protocol (the chip assembled on that day is slightly different but doesn't work) here .
Vertical chip fabrication protocol here .
Microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
08.01.2018
Conductivity tests on membranes assembled on chips. Well chips not functional: tension is applied on top of the membrane, but no current flow is detected. We conclude from that, that the current can't pass from one side of the gold-coated membrane to the other. It was decided for the well chips to stop using silver paste for connecting the platinum wire to the membrane and instead mount the wire on top of the membrane.
Bonding of the vertical chip PDMS pieces failed.
Well chip conductivity protocol (section 2) here .
Vertical chip fabrication protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
08.06.2018
Miniprep pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop (Blank used is buffer EB):
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 61.2 | 2.00 |
2 | 86.3 | 2.03 |
3 | 58.8 | 1.98 |
4 | 65.9 | 2.00 |
5 | 74.5 | 2.03 |
6 | 84.4 | 2.07 |
Observations: Enough concentrations for further use.
Digestion of pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzymes used: NdeI and XbaI Expected results:
pET43.1a | linearized | 7.3 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1 | 1 fragment | 6.63 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq2 | 2 fragments | 6.63 kB + 0.1 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1+ Seq2 | 2 fragments | 6.63 kB + 1 kB |
We digested 10 samples of our cloning products, and we also did some controls:
- Colony 10 with no enzyme (well 11)
- Plasmid pET43.1a + enzyme (well 12)
- Plasmid pET43.1a + no enzyme (well 13)
Well 1 to 10: samples from colony 1 to 10 Well 14: ladder Procedure:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 5 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
Ndel | 1 |
Xbal | 1 |
H2O | 20 |
- Digestion at 37°C for 15 min
- Addition of 6 µL of loading dye
We deposited all the samples in an agarose gel previously made. We let the gel run for 10 min at 85 V + 80 min at 125 V. Results:
![Figure 1: Agarose gel](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d6/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week32_Fig1.png)
Observations: For samples 1 to 11, we can only see DNA streaks. In wells 12 and 13, we can clearly see the plasmid pET43.1a linearized (well 12) and circular (well 13). In the well 14 we can clearly see the ladder. Interpretations: The streaks observed on the gel are probably due to the genomic DNA contamination. As mentioned the 08.03.2018, there was an error in the Miniprep of pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2.
Digestion of pBR322+ Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzyme used: EcoRI Expected results:
pBR322 | linearized | 4 kB |
pBR322 + Seq5 | 1 fragment | 5.4 kB |
pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 | 2 fragments | 6.3 kB |
pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 | 2 fragments | 7 kB |
Procedure:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 5 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
EcoRI | 1 |
H2O | 20 |
- Digestion at 37°C for 15 min
- Addition of 6 µL of loading dye
We digested 6 samples of our cloning products, and we also did some controls.
- Colony 6 with no enzyme (well 7)
- Plasmid pBR322 + enzyme (well 8)
- Plasmid pBR322 + no enzyme (well 9)
Wells 1 to 6: samples from colony 1 to 6 Well 10: ladder We deposited all the samples in an agarose gel previously made. We let the gel run for 10 min at 85 V + 90 min at 125 V. Results:
![Figure 2: Agarose gel](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e6/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week32_Fig2.png)
Observations: The 6 samples are linearized and migrated exactly like the plasmid pBR322 + Enzyme. Moreover, sample 6 without enzyme migrated like pBR322 without enzyme. Interpretations: This leads to the conclusion that none of the colonies were transformed with the plasmid AND the insert.
Liquid culture of pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 (See here the liquid culture protocol) 8 colonies from the petri dish (pET43.1a + Seq1,2 from 08.01.2018) were placed in a liquid culture containing:
- 5 mL of LB
- 5 µL of Carbenicillin (25 mg/mL)
Cultures were incubated at 37°C, 180 rpm overnight.
Cloning pBR322 + Seq8 We used the In-Fusion cloning kit provided by Ozyme in order to clone our insert in the linearized pET 43.1a.
- We mixed the following volumes into 1.5mL tubes.
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) | Positive control (μL) |
Purified Seq8 | 4 | - | 2 (control) |
Linearized vector | 15 | 1 | 1 (control) |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Deionized water | - | 7 | 5 |
- Incubate for 15 minutes in a water bath at 50°C
- Ligation (See Ligation protocol)
- Set in ice
- Transformation of the 3 plasmids into Stellar competent cells (provided with the clonage kit):
- Competent cell volume: 50 μL
- DNA volume: 2 μL
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C
08.07.2018
<+br>Miniprep pET43.1a + Seq 1 + Seq 2 (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop (Blank used is buffer EB):
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 141.2 | 1.84 |
2 | 173.3 | 1.86 |
3 | 155.2 | 1.83 |
4 | 151.9 | 1.85 |
5 | 106.9 | 1.85 |
6 | 143.0 | 1.88 |
7 | 151.1 | 1.89 |
Observations: Enough concentrations for further use.
Digestion of pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzymes used: NdeI and XbaI Expected results:
pET43.1a | linearized | 7.3 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1 | 1 fragment | 6.63 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq2 | 2 fragments | 6.63 kB + 0.1 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1+ Seq2 | 2 fragments | 6.63 kB + 1 kB |
We digested 10 samples of our cloning products, and we also did some controls:
- Colony 8 with no enzyme (well 8)
- Plasmid pET43.1a + enzyme (well 9)
- Plasmid pET43.1a + no enzyme (well 10)
Well 1 to 7: samples from colony 1 to 8 Well 11: ladder Procedure:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 5 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
Ndel | 1 |
Xbal | 1 |
H2O | 20 |
- Digestion at 37°C for 15 min
- Addition of 6 µL of loading dye
We deposited all the samples in an agarose gel previously made. We let the gel run for 10 min at 85 V + 80 min at 125 V.
Liquid culture of pBR322 + Seq8 (See here the liquid culture protocol) We cultivated:
- 8 colonies of Stellar bacteria transformed with the result of our cloning
- 2 colonies from the negative control
Each colony is cultivated in a 15 mL Falcon tube with 5 mL LB medium and 5 μL carbenicillin. In parallel, we set each colony to grow on a LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C.
08.08.2018
Miniprep pBR322 + Seq8 (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop (Blank used is buffer EB):
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 93.0 | 1.97 |
2 | 101.8 | 1.83 |
3 | 121.7 | 1.98 |
4 | 112.1 | 2.00 |
5 | 101.9 | 1.98 |
6 | 97.5 | 1.98 |
7 | 113.4 | 1.98 |
8 | 97.0 | 2.02 |
Control (-) 1 | 91.9 | 2.01 |
Control (-) 2 | 73.5 | 1.90 |
Observations: Concentrations are good for further use.
Digestion of BR322 + Seq8 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzymes used: NdeI Expected results:
pET43.1a | linearized | 4 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq8 | 2 fragments | 4 kB + 0.9 kB |
We digested 8 samples of our cloning products, and we also did some controls:
- Colony 8 with no enzyme (well 8)
- Two colonies from the negative control of the cloning with enzyme
We filled the wells with:
- Plasmid extracted from colonies 1 to 8 and digested with NdeI (n°1 to n°8)
- Plasmid extracted from the negative control digested with NdeI (n°9 and n°10)
- Plasmid extracted from colony 8 without enzyme (n°11)
Results:
- A too low initial amount of linearized vector before cloning, resulting in all the Stellar bacteria being transformed with an empty and uncut vector.
- Too long overlaps, or too GC rich overlaps.
Digestion of pBR322, PET 43.1, AND PLASMIDS CONTAINING Seq1, Seq2 and Seq8 We plan to try cloning again with longer digestion and longer electrophoresis migration, in order to digest all the vector and to increase the efficiency of our separation. Reagents:
- pBR322 (conc. 54 ng/μl)
- pET 43.1a (conc. 65 ng/μl)
- Seq1 (conc. 445 ng/μl)
- Seq2 (conc. 460 ng/μl)
- Seq8 (conc. 379 ng/μl)
We digest the 5 plasmids by mixing the following amounts:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 22 |
Cut Smart | 3.2 |
Enzyme 1 | 1 |
Enzyme 2 | 1 |
DNA | Enzyme 1 | Enzyme 2 |
pET 43.1a | Ndel | Pacl |
pBR322 | Aval | Bsml |
Seq 1 | Nhal | BamHI |
Seq 2 | Mscl | HindIII |
Seq 8 | Xbal | Spel |
Incubation time at 37°C : 1 hour Inactivation time at 80°C : 20 min After digestion, we added 8 μL 6X Loading dye to each tube.
Electrophoresis on agarose gel< We prepared a 0.8% agarose gel in order to separate the different fragments of the cut plasmids. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- 2 wells with digested pBR322 (n°1 and n°2)
- 2 wells with digested pET 43.1a (n°3 and n°4)
- 2 wells with insert Seq1 (n°5 and n°6)
- 2 wells with insert Seq2 (n°7 and n°8)
- 2 wells with insert Seq8 (n°9 and n°10)
We let the DNA migrate for 10 min at 85 V on order to let the DNA penetrate the gel, and then 80 min at 125 V to efficiently separate the fragments. We then revealed the gel under UV lamp. Results: DNA Gel extraction We cut the gel to extract our inserts and linearized plasmid: (See here the Gel Extraction protocol) Results: After extracting the DNA from the gel, we measured the DNA concentration using the Nanodrop.
Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
pBR322 | 7.0 | 3.85 |
pET43.1a | 5.1 | 3.40 |
Seq1 | 5.7 | 3.40 |
Seq2 | 6.3 | 10.55 |
Seq8 | 5.0 | 4.48 |
Interpretations: Values of the ratio Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) are very high, indicating that our DNA is highly contaminated. Moreover, the concentrations obtained are too low for further use for cloning. We have several hypotheses to explain why our experiment did not work:
- The Gel extraction kit we used might be expired (particularly the final buffer with which we elute DNA might have turned unusable)
- We need to check the wavelength of the nanodrop
We are going to try the digestion and extraction again tomorrow in order to try having better concentrations before proceeding to cloning.
08.09.2018
The digestion and extraction of yesterday did not work well (the obtained concentrations of plasmid and insert were still too low to proceed to the cloning step with a suitable volume). Today, we will proceed again with the digestion, extraction and then try the cloning again, using this time the right amount of insert and vector (as recommended by Clontech molar ratio tool) and following the pieces of advice given to us by Takara Clontech technician we called.Digestion of pET 43.1a, pBR322, Seq1, Seq2 and Seq8 Material:
- Water baths at 37°C and heating block of 80°C
- Eppendorf tubes
- Pipets and cones
Reagents:
- pET 43.1a (conc. 74.1 ng/μL)
- pBR322 (conc. 29.6 ng/μL)
- Eurofins Genomics plasmid containing Seq1 (conc. 1430.1 ng/ μL)
- Eurofins Genomics plasmid containing Seq2 (conc. 780.6 ng/ μL)
- Eurofins Genomics plasmid containing Seq8 (conc. 714.6 ng/ μL)
- Restriction enzymes : NdeI, PacI, NheI, BamHI, MscI, HindIII, BsmI, AvaI, SpeI, XbaI
- 10X Cut Smart
- Distilled water
- Mix the following volumes of reagents and incubate at 37°C for 20 min
Volume (μL) | |
pET 43.1a | 42 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | - |
Nhel | 1.5 |
Pacl | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
pBR322 | 42 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | - |
Bsml | 1.5 |
Aval | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq1 | 4.5 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 31.5 |
Nhel | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq2 | 8 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 32 |
Mscl | 1.5 |
HindIII | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq8 | 17.8 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 24.2 |
Xbal | 1.5 |
Spel | 1.5 |
- Inactivate the digestion by heating the mixture in a water bath at 80 °C for 20 min
Electrophoresis on agarose gel We prepared a 0.8 % agar gel in order to separate the different fragments of the cut plasmids. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- 2 wells with digested pBR322 (n°1 and n°2)
- 2 wells with digested pET 43.1a (n°3 and n°4)
- 2 wells with insert Seq1 (n°5 and n°6)
- 2 wells with insert Seq2 (n°7 and n°8)
- 2 wells with insert Seq8 (n°9 and n°10)
We let the DNA migrate for 10 min at 85 V on order to let the DNA penetrate the gel, and then 80 min at 125 V to efficiently separate the fragments. We then revealed the gel under UV lamp. Results of the agarose gel after migration:
![Figure 4: Agarose gel 1% after electrophoresis](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d7/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week32_Fig4.png)
Interpretations:
- pBR322 has been linearized, and we observe one fragment corresponding to the linearized plasmid
- pET 43.1a (7275 bp) has been successfully linearized into two fragments (5 kb and 2 kb)
- pEX A258 – Seq1 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (1105 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2446 bp)
- pEX A258 – Seq2 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (1159 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2446 bp)
- pEX A258 – Seq8 from Eurofins Genomics has also been successfully digested. We obtained two fragments corresponding to our insert (459 bp) and the linearized plasmid (2446 bp)
![Figure 5: Agarose gel 1% after electrophoresis of digested pBR322, pET43.1a, seq#1, seq#2 and seq#8 and extraction of the sequences of interest.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/31/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week32_Fig5.png)
Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
pBR322 | 11.1 | 2.19 |
pET43.1a | 17.0 | 2.00 |
Seq1 | 16.9 | 2.19 |
Seq2 | 14.8 | 2.61 |
Seq8 | 15.7 | 2.17 |
Cloning : We used the In-Fusion cloning kit provided by Ozyme in order to clone:
- Our two inserts Seq1 and Seq2 together in linearized pET 43.1a.
- Our insert Seq8 into linearized pBR322
- Following the advice of the Takara Clontech technician we contacted, we first incubated the linearized vectors and inserts at 50°C for 5 min
- We then placed it on ice for 3 min
- We mixed the following volumes into 1.5 mL tubes.
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) | Positive control (μL) |
Purified Seq1 | 5 | - | 2 (control) |
Purified Seq2 | 6 | - | 2 (control) |
Linearized vector | 9 | 9 | 1 (control) |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Deionized water | - | 9 | 5 |
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) |
Purified Seq8 | 4.5 | - |
Linearized vector | 13.5 | 13.5 |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 4 | 2 |
Deionized water | - | 4.5 |
- Incubate for 15 minutes in a water bath at 50°C.
- Set in ice.
- Ligation (See here the Ligation protocol)
- Transformation of the 5 plasmids into Stellar competent cells (provided with the cloning kit):
- Competent cell volume: 40 μL
- DNA volume: 2 μL
- Culture on LB agar plate supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C (with 1/5 dilution)
08.10.2018
Observation overnight plate culture of pBR322 + Seq8 and pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 after InFusion
![Figure 6: pBR322 + NegControl and pBR322 Seq8.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/70/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week32_Fig6.png)
![Figure 7: pET43.1 + Seq1+2 and pET43.1_ NegControl.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/ce/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week32_Fig7.png)
pBR322 Neg Control | pBR322 + Seq8 | pET43.1 Neg Control | pET43.1 + Seq1 + Seq2 | |
CFU | 46 | 136 | 27 | 59 |
Liquid culture of pBR322 + Seq8 and pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 We did 12 liquid cultures of 5 mL (6 of each).
08.11.2018
Miniprep pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 and pBR322 + Seq8 We extracted our plasmids from the colonies set in liquid culture yesterday. We had:
- 5 colonies of pET43.1a + Seq1+ Seq2
- 6 colonies of pBR322 + Seq8
- 1 colony from negative control of pET43.1
- 1 colony from negative control of pBR322
Colony | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 116.5 | 1.99 |
2 | 124.8 | 1.95 |
3 | 98.1 | 2.01 |
4 | 114.3 | 1.95 |
5 | 96.8 | 1.96 |
For pBR322 + Seq8
Colony | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 88.7 | 2.03 |
2 | 105.6 | 1.95 |
3 | 84.0 | 2.12 |
4 | 104.0 | 1.97 |
5 | 95.6 | 2.08 |
6 | 90.1 | 2.01 |
Colony | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
pET 43.1 negative control | 110.6 | 1.98 |
pBR322 negative control | 106.2 | 2.02 |
Observations: Concentrations are good enough for further use.
Digestion of pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzymes used: NdeI Expected results:
pET43.1a | linearized | 7.3 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1 | 1 fragment | 6.63 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq2 | 2 fragments | 6.63 kB + 0.1 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1+ Seq2 | 2 fragments | 6.63 kB + 1 kB |
We digested 5 samples of our cloning products, and we also did some controls. Procedure:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 5 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
Ndel | 1 |
H2O | 21 |
Digestion of pBR322 + Seq8 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzymes used: NdeI Expected results:
pBR322 | linearized | 4 kB |
pBR322 + Seq8 | 2 fragments | 4 kB + 0.9 kB |
We digested 6 samples of our cloning products, and 1 negative control. Procedure:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 5 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
Ndel | 1 |
H2O | 21 |
- Digestion at 37°C for 15 min
- Addition of 6 µL of 6X loading dye in each tube
Electrophoresis on agarose gel We prepared an Agarose gel. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- Wells 1 to 6: pBR322 + Seq8 (colonies 1 to 6)
- Well 7: pBR322 negative control
- Wells 8 to 12: pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 (colonies 1 to 5)
- Well 13: pET 43.1 negative control
We let the DNA migrate for 10 minutes at 85 V and then 40 minutes at 125 V. Results:
![Figure 8:](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/84/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week32_Fig8.png)
Remark: Date shift -2 days on photograph Interpretations:
- For pBR322 + Seq8: On lanes corresponding to Col 1,3,4,5,6 two bands are clearly visible. One at 4 kb and another one at 1 kb, meaning that the plasmid digested by NdeI contained the insert Seq8. One band is visible on lane 2, Col 2 did not contain the insert. The control on lane 7 shows the plasmid digested without the insert at a higher molecular weight. The cloning worked for this construction, because bands observed between 700 bp and 1000 bp.
- For pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2: From lanes 8 to 11, only one band is visible, and bands are visible at the same molecular weight as the control one (pET43.1a w/o insert and digested with NdeI). On lane 12, the band is lightly lower than the others but no other band corresponding to an insert is visible on lane 12. The cloning did not work for this construction.
Liquid culture pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 and pBR322 + Seq8 Colonies transformed with pET43.1a+Seq1+Seq2 (Colonies 7 to 25) were cultured in 5 mL LB media + 5 µL carbenicillin each (50 mg/mL) Two culture of pBR322+ Seq8 (Col 3 and Col 4) were cultured in 25 mL LB media + 25 µl carbenicillin each (50 mg/mL) (See here the Liquid Culture protocol)
Something was done one that day
08.06.2018
20 microchannel chips bonded to imaging dishes. 8 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made.
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
Microchannel chip fabrication and bonding protocol here .
08.07.2018
20 bonded microchannel chips sterilized by UV exposure. 8 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made. Preparation of vertical chip PDMS pieces.
Well chip fabrication protocol (the chip assembled on that day is slightly different but doesn't work) here .
Vertical chip fabrication protocol here .
Microchannel chip fabrication and sterilization protocol here .
08.09.2018
10 membrane microchannel chips have been made. Leaks made this a difficult operation. 8 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made. Preparation of vertical chip PDMS pieces.
Membrane microchannel chip and basic microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
Vertical chip fabrication protocol here .
08.10.2018
Membrane microchannel chips sterilized by UV exposure. Vertical chips bonded. 8 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made. First successful vertical chip bonding, by modifying silver paste path.
Microchannel chip fabrication and sterilization protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
08.13.2018
Miniprep pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2
(See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol)
20 colonies from pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 from petri dish (08.01.2018) were placed in liquid culture the day before (5 mL of LB + 10 µL of Carbenicillin).
Results from NanoDrop (Blank used is Buffer EB):
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 96.6 | 1.97 |
2 | 83.5 | 1.81 |
3 | 109.8 | 1.97 |
4 | 89.8 | 1.84 |
5 | 85.2 | 1.95 |
6 | 113.6 | 1.96 |
7 | 91.9 | 1.96 |
8 | 96.6 | 1.97 |
9 | 82.3 | 1.96 |
10 | 89.3 | 1.96 |
11 | 133 | 1.98 |
12 | 67.7 | 1.90 |
13 | 94.6 | 1.94 |
14 | 87.3 | 1.95 |
15 | 80.5 | 1.94 |
16 | 94.2 | 1.98 |
17 | 94.2 | 1.93 |
18 | 103 | 1.95 |
19 | 90.4 | 1.95 |
20 | 131.5 | 1.96 |
Digestion of pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 Reagents:
- pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2
- Restriction enzymes : NdeI, PacI, BsmI, AvaI, NheI, BamHI, MscI, HindIII, XbaI, SpeI
- 10X Cut Smart
- Distilled water
- Mix the following volumes of reagents and incubate at 37°C for 20 min
Volume (μL) | |
pET 43.1a | 42 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | - |
Ndel | 1.5 |
Pacl | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
pBR322 | 42 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | - |
Bsml | 1.5 |
Aval | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq1 | 4.5 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 31.5 |
Nhel | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq2 | 8 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 32 |
Mscl | 1.5 |
HindIII | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq8 | 17.8 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 24.2 |
Hhel | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
- Inactivate the digestion by heating the mixture in a water bath at 80 °C for 20 min
Electrophoresis on agarose gel We prepared a 1 % agarose gel in order to separate the different fragments of the cut plasmids. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- 2 wells with digested pET43.1a (n°1 and n°2)
- 10 wells with digested pET43.1a with NdeI (n°4 until n°13)
We let the DNA migrate for 10 min at 85 V on order to let the DNA penetrate the gel, and then 80 min at 125 V to efficiently separate the fragments. We then revealed the gel under UV lamp. Results of the agarose gel after migration:
![Figure 1: Agarose gel 1% after electrophoresis of digested pBR322, pET43.1a, seq#1, seq#2 and seq#8.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/61/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week33_Fig1.png)
Interpretations:
- pET43.1a has correctly been cut/linearized (lane 1 and 2). It was excised from the gel and extracted using Quiaquick Gel extraction kit.
- pET43.1a+ Seq1+seq2 cloning worked successfully on these colonies. We observed two bands as expected: one at ~ 6-7 kb and one at 1 kb.
We choose to do a Midiprep with sample 10 and 11 in order to have enough DNA for preparing samples for sequencing. We also transformed sample 11 in BL21(DE3) pLysS, our chassis. Results from Nanodrop for pET43.1a
Concentration (ng/μL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
11.3 | 2.19 |
10.8 | 2.22 |
Midiprep pBR322+Seq8: (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) We extracted the plasmid from Col 3 and Col 4 from the cloning of pBR322+Seq8 (25 mL) from the 08.11.2018. Results from Nanodrop: For colony 3
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 41.0 | 1.86 |
2 | 2.6 | 1.90 |
3 | 38.3 | 1.91 |
4 | -0.4 | 0.41 |
5 | -1.1 | 0.67 |
6 | 1.0 | 1.44 |
7 | -0.6 | 1.19 |
8 | 27.2 | 1.92 |
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 0.2 | 1.67 |
2 | -0.6 | 0.99 |
3 | 52.5 | 1.92 |
4 | -0.2 | 0.31 |
5 | 53.7 | 1.87 |
6 | 53.1 | 1.91 |
7 | -0.6 | 1.67 |
8 | -0.4 | 0.52 |
Sample 1,3,8 from Col 3 and sample 3,5,6 from Col 4 are kept for future sequencing. The other samples are thrown away. However, the concentrations are too low. Samples are put in liquid culture again for new DNA extraction. The low concentrations can be due to a problem during the centrifugation steps, or to a too slow manipulation.
Bacterial transformation (See here the Transformation of E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS protocol) (See here the Transformation of E. coli DH5-alpha protocol) 3 transformations were processed:
- In BL21 (DE3)pLysS: pBR322 + Seq8 (Sample 11) and pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 (Sample 3, Col4)
- In DH5α: Seq4
Bacterial stock preparation (See here the Bacterial Stock protocol) Launch of pre-cultures of DH5α strains (5 mL LB + carbenicillin (50 μg /mL) or 5 mL LB + chloramphenicol (25 μg/mL)). Seq1, Seq2, Seq3, Seq5, Seq6, Seq7, Seq8, pET43, pBR322 and pVDL9.3
08.14.2018
Digestion of pBR322, Seq5, Seq6, Seq7 Reagents:
- pBR322, Seq5, Seq6, Seq7
- Restriction enzymes : XbaI, BamHI, MscI, SphI, HindIII, SpeI, BsmI, AvaI.
- 10X Cut Smart
- Distilled water
- Mix the following volumes of reagents and incubate at 37°C for 20 min
Volume (μL) | |
pBR322 (29.6 ng/μL) | 42 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | - |
Bsml | 1.5 |
Aval | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq5 (345 ng/μL) | 12 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 30 |
Nhel | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq6 (1572 ng/μL) | 6 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 36 |
Mscl | 1.5 |
HindIII | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq7 (1572 ng/μL) | 36 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 6 |
Hhel | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
- Inactivate the digestion by heating the mixture in a water bath at 80 °C for 20 min
We let the gel run for 10 min at 85 V and then for 80 min at 125 V. We revealed the gel with a UV light. Results:
![Figure 2: Agarose 0.8% gel after electrophoresis of digested pET43.1+Seq1+Seq2](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/51/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week33_Fig2.png )
Observations: Digestion went well for all samples. We excised the interesting bands (inserts or plasmids) form the gel and did a gel extraction. Results after excision:
![Figure 3: Agarose 0.8% gel after electrophoresis of digested pET43.1+Seq1+Seq2 after excision](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week33_Fig3.png )
Caption for fig 3:
- Wells 1-2: pBR322 cut
- Wells 4-5: Seq5 cut
- Wells 7-8: Seq6 cut
- Wells 10-11: Seq7 cut
(See here the Gel Extraction protocol) Results from Nanodrop:
[DNA] (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
pBR322 | 11.4 | 2.49 |
Seq5 | 18.1 | 2.05 |
Seq6 | 11.9 | 3.10 |
Seq7 | 10.1 | 2.14 |
Bacterial stock preparation
(See here the Bacterial Stock protocol)
Culture of Seq1, Seq2, Seq3, Seq5, Seq6, Seq7, Seq8, pET43, pBR322 and pVDL9.3.
Measure the OD and when 0.6 Midiprep pBR322 + Seq8 and pET43.1 + Seq1 + Seq2
We extracted our plasmids from the colonies set in liquid culture yesterday. We had:
(See here the Midiprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop (Blank used is buffer EB): pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 Col 10
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 7.4 | 2.11 |
2 | 58.5 | 1.91 |
3 | 0.8 | 3.57 |
4 | 3.2 | 1.26 |
5 | 64.5 | 1.90 |
6 | 2.8 | 1.72 |
pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2 Col 11
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 1.2 | 3.17 |
2 | 0.2 | -0.33 |
3 | 0.1 | -0.2 |
4 | 1.0 | 1.63 |
5 | 0.7 | 3.02 |
6 | 79.9 | -0.38 |
pBR322 + Seq8 Col 3
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 2.9 | 2.29 |
2 | 0 | 0.18 |
3 | 12.1 | 2.28 |
4 | 3.9 | 2.26 |
5 | 41.3 | 1.89 |
6 | 35.2 | 1.97 |
pBR322 + Seq8 Col 4
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 0.3 | -0.84 |
2 | 33.8 | 1.93 |
3 | 33.2 | 1.88 |
4 | 34.1 | 1.93 |
5 | 0.8 | 4.15 |
6 | 27.8 | 1.92 |
Observations: Concentrations are not good.
- pET43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2, Col 10: Samples 2 and 5 have enough concentration.
- pBR322 + Seq8, Col 4: Samples 2,3,4,6 have enough concentration.
IN-FUSION ligation PBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 We used the In-Fusion cloning kit provided by Ozyme in order to clone our three inserts Seq5 and Seq6 and Seq7 together in linearized pBR322. (see above).
- Following the advice of the Takara Clontech technician we contacted, we first incubated the linearized vectors and inserts at 80°C for 5 min
- We then placed it on ice for 3 minutes.
- We mixed the following volumes into 1.5mL tubes.
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) | Positive control (μL) |
90 ng Purified Seq5 (18.1ng/µl) | 5 | - | 2 (control) |
70 ng Purified Seq6 (14ng/µl) | 5 | - | 2 (control) | 70 ng Purified Seq7 (10.1ng/µl) | 7 | - | - |
Linearized vector | 10.5 | 1 | 1 (control) |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Deionized water | - | 7 | 5 |
- Incubate for 15 min in a water bath at 50°C
- Ligation See here the Ligation protocol)
- Set in ice
- Transformation of the 3 plasmids into Stellar competent cells (provided with the cloning kit)
- Competent cell volume : 33 μL
- DNA volume: 2 μL
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar gel supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C
Liquid culture (See here the Liquid Culture protocol) We cultivated 2 colonies from the transformation of DH5α with commercial plasmid containing Seq4.
- One colony is cultivated in an Erlenmeyer in 25 mL LB medium + 25 μL carbenicillin (50 mg/mL)
- One colony is cultivated in two Falcon tubes, each containing 15 mL LB medium + 15 μL carbenicillin (50 mg/mL)
Since the results from this morning’s midiprep were not high enough, we cultivated again the results from cloning pBR322 + Seq8 and pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2. We cultivated:
- Colony 3 of pBR322 + Seq8
- Colony 4 of pBR322 + Seq8
- Colony 11 of pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2
- Colony 12 of pET 43.1a + Seq1 + Seq2
Each colony is cultivated in two Falcon tubes, each containing 15 mL LB medium + 15 μL carbenicillin (50 mg/mL), in order to do a midiprep. The bacteria are cultivated overnight in a rotative incubator at 37°C, 180 rpm.
08.16.2018
Miniprep pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 We extracted our plasmids from the colonies set in liquid culture yesterday. We had 8 colonies of pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7. (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop (Blank used is buffer EB):
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 117.6 | 2.00 |
2 | 122.0 | 2.00 |
3 | 152.4 | 1.97 |
4 | 148.0 | 2.01 |
5 | 111.6 | 2.00 |
6 | 328.9 | 1.93 |
7 | 108 | 2.03 |
8 | 121.7 | 2.01 |
Observations: Concentrations are good, these samples can be saved for sequencing. (stored in the “SEQUENCING” box)
Digestion of pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzymes used: BamHI Expected results:
pBR322 | linearized | 4 kB |
pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + 7 | 2 fragments | 4.8 kB + 2.3 kB |
We digested 8 samples of our clonage products, and we also did some controls: pBR322 with BamHI, pBR322 w/o BamHI, Col 8 w/o BamHI.
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 5 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
BamHI | 1 |
H2O | 20 |
- Digestion at 37°C for 15 min
- Inactivation 80°C for 20 min.
- Addition of 6 µL of loading dye
Electrophoresis on agarose gel PBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 We prepared a 1% agarose gel. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We deposited all the samples in the wells:
- Wells 1 to 8: pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 (colonies 1 to 8)
- Well 10: pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 Colony 8 w/o Enzyme
- Well 11: pBR322
- Well 12: pBR322 w/o enzyme
We let the gel run for 10 min at 85 V and 80 min at 125 V. The gel was revealed with UV light.
![Figure 4: Agarose gel](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/96/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week33_Fig4.png )
Digested DNA from colonies migrated to the same molecular weight as the control one. No expected fragments were visible representing a digestion of our construction with BamHI. None of the colonies contained the final construction. The cloning did not succeed. We performed another ligation.
IN-FUSION ligation PBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 We used the In-Fusion cloning kit provided by Ozyme in order to clone our three inserts Seq5 and Seq6 and Seq7 together in linearized pBR322. (see above).
- We mixed the vector pBR322 and Seq5 and Seq7 and incubate at 80°C for 5 min. Then we add Seq7 and incubate 5 min at 70°C
- We then placed it on ice for 3 minutes
- We add the Enzyme Mix
Component | Cloning (μL) | Negative control (μL) | Positive control (μL) |
90 ng Purified Seq5 (18.1ng/µl) | 5 | - | 2 (control insert) |
70 ng Purified Seq6 (14ng/µl) | 5 | - | 2 (control) | 70 ng Purified Seq7 (10.1ng/µl) | 7 | - | - |
Linearized vector | 10.5 | 1 | 1 (control vector) |
5X In-Fusion enzyme premix | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Deionized water | - | 7 | 5 |
- Incubate for 15 min in a water bath at 50°C
- Ligation See here the Ligation protocol)
- Set in ice
- Transformation of the 3 plasmids into Stellar competent cells (provided with the cloning kit)
- Competent cell volume : 33 μL
- DNA volume: 2 μL
- Culture on petri dishes LB agar gel supplemented with carbenicillin overnight at 37°C
Digestion of pET43 + Seq3 + Seq4/br> Aim: Obtain higher concentration of DNA after the gel extraction in order to perform efficiently the ozyme IN-FUSION kit.
- Mix the following volumes of reagents and incubate at 37°C for 15 min
Volume (μL) | |
pET43.1a | 26 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 16 |
Ndel | 1.5 |
Pacl | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq3 | 29 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 13 |
Nhel | 1.5 |
BamHI | 1.5 |
Volume (μL) | |
Seq4 | 18 |
10X Cut Smart | 5 |
Distilled water | 24 |
Mscl | 1.5 |
HindIII | 1.5 |
- Inactivate the digestion by heating the mixture in a water bath at 80 °C for 20 min.
Electrophoresis on agarose gel We prepared a 0.8% agarose gel to separate the different fragments of the cut plasmids. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We filled:
- 2 wells with digested pET43.1a (n°3 and n°4)
- 2 wells with digested Seq3 (n°6 and n°7)
- 2 wells with digested Seq4 (n°9 and n°10)
We let the DNA migrate for 8 min at 85 V on order to let the DNA penetrate the gel, and then 65 min at 125 V to efficiently separate the fragments.
We then revealed the gel under UV lamp.
Interpretations:
- pET43.1a has not correctly been cut/linearized (lane 3 and 4). It was not excised from the gel and not extracted using Quiaquick Gel extraction kit.
- Seq3 has correctly been cut/linearized (lane 3 and 4). It was excised from the gel and extracted using Quiaquick Gel extraction kit.
- Seq4 has not correctly been cut/linearized (lane 3 and 4). It was not excised from the gel and not extracted using Quiaquick Gel extraction kit. /
- Digestion at 37°C for 20 min
- Inactivation 80°C for 20 min
- Addition of 6 µL of 6X loading dye in each tube
We choose to repeat the experiment for pET43, Seq3 and Seq4
08.17.2018
Miniprep pET 43.1a (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results:
Colony | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 54.4 | 2.07 |
2 | 35.9 | 2.01 |
3 | 93.4 | 2.06 |
4 | 96.3 | 2.05 |
5 | 92.8 | 2.03 |
6 | 80.9 | 1.99 |
7 | 59.0 | 2.02 |
8 | 53.6 | 2.03 |
9 | 52.4 | 1.99 |
Transformation pBR322 + Seq5,6,7
Colony | Control + | Control - | Cloning |
CFU | 760 | 233 | 2 |
Liquid cultures (See here the Liquid Culture protocol) Culture of BL21(DE3)pLysS + pBR322+Seq8 (25 mL) + carbenicillin (50 μg/mL) Culture of DH5alpha + pSB1C3 (25 ml) + chloramphenicol (25 μg/mL) We also did some cultures on plate. Culture of colonies 1 and 2 from ligation pBR322+Seq5,6,7 in 5 mL Falcon tubes
08.18.2018
Miniprep pBR322+Seq5,6,7 (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results:
Colony | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 74 | 2.08 |
2 | 72.2 | 2.02 |
Digestion of pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked. Restriction enzymes used: BamHI, HindIII, SphI Expected results:
pBR322 | linearized | 4 kB | |
BamHI | pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 | 2 fragments | 4.8 kB + 2.3 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1 | pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 | 2 fragments | 3.2 kB + 4.2 kB |
pET43.1a + Seq1 | pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 | 2 fragments | 3.7 kB + 3.6 kB |
We digested 1 samples of our cloning products, and we also did some controls pBR322 with BamHI. Procedure:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 7 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
Ndel | 1 |
H2O | 19 |
Electrophoresis on agarose gel PBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 We prepared a 1% agarose gel. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We let the gel run for 10 min at 85 V and 80 min at 125 V.
![Figure 7: Agarose gel](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e6/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week33_Fig7.png )
Digested DNA from colonies migrated to the same molecular weight as the control one. No expected fragments are visible representing a digestion of our construction with BamHI. None of the colonies contain the final construction. The cloning did not succeed.
Antibiotic test on liquid culture Aim: Evaluate the effect of an overnight culture media containing carbenicillin on a non-resistant strain. BL21- pBR322 + Seq8 were cultivated overnight on LB media containing carbenicillin. After centrifugation the supernatant was transferred into a new Erlenmeyer with 5 mL new LB media final volume 25 mL. 250 µL of overnight culture of DH5alpha – pSB1C3 were added to each media a OD was monitored.
LB overnight culture | LB + CAM (chloramphenicol) | LB + CARB (carbenicillin) | |
Add DH5alpha-pSB1C3 liquid culture | 250 µl | 250 µl | 250 µl |
Expected growth | - | Yes | No |
OD | LB overnight culture | LB + CAM | LB + CARB |
t=0 | 0.092 | 0.049 | 0.039 |
t = 30 min | 0.102 | 0.079 | 0.052 |
t = 1h | 0.108 | 0.128 | 0.098 |
t = 1h30 | 0.115 | 0.242 | 0.142 |
t = 2h | 0.124 | 0.390 | 0.127 |
t = 2h30 | 0.131 | 0.630 | 0.108 |
t = 3h | 0.147 | 0.135 | 0.074 |
The antibiotic present in the overnight media did affect the growth of non-resistant bacteria.
Something was done one that day
08.13.2018
4 vertical chips bonded. Gold membrane PDMS well chips modification to enable current transmission.
Well chip fabrication protocol (now the well chips correspond with the protocol) here .
Vertical chip fabrication protocol here .
08.16.2018
Conductivity measurements of 2 gold-membrane PDMS well chips. Function generator was set on sine. The physical quantities measured here are Eg, the generator's tension amplitude and Ep, the voltage difference between the extremity of the platinum wire outside the well chip and a point on the edge of the membrane of the chip. the quantity calculated here is 20*log(Ep/Eg) for different frequencies.
Results
![Figure 1: Gold-coated membrane conductivity for different frequencies](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6e/T--Pasteur_Paris--Gold-membrane-well-chip-conductivity.jpg)
Interpretation
Voltage difference calculated is very low, indicating a very good conductivity for the gold-coated membrane. Technically, we measured the conductivity of the system membrane+platinum wire, but we showed that the wire's conductivity could be neglected. Resistance increases in higher frequencies, because of the skin-effect in metals: the strip transforms into an antenna. But as we are going to use only low frequencies, this doesn't affect us.
Well chip conductivity measurement protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
08.20.2018
Liquid culture BL21 – RIP AND IPTG INDUCTION Two colonies of transformed BL21 containing pBR322 and Seq8 (in order to produce RIP) are cultivated in 25 mL LB medium and 25 μL carbenicillin. OD is followed regularly Results:
OD | Col 3 | Col 4 |
t=0 | 0.004 | 0.011 |
t = 30 min | 0.010 | 0.015 |
t = 60 min | 0.012 | 0.011 |
t = 160 min | 0.019 | 0.029 |
t = 255 min | 0.164 | 0.242 |
t = 300 min | 0.426 | 0.562 |
t = 330 min | 0.809 | 1.057 |
t = 355 min | 1.184 | 1.369 |
Dilution 30 mL LB | Dilution 30 mL LB | |
t = 405 min | 1.285 | 1.491 |
t = 420 min | 1.514 | 1.732 |
When the DO reaches 1.5 (and the bacteria are not in an exponential growth phase any more), we induced RIP production by adding IPTG. (See here the IPTG Induction of protein expression protocol) Different IPTG concentrations are tested for induction:
- 0.05 mM
- 0.1 mM
- 0.2 mM
- 0.5 mM
DO600 is measured every 30 minutes (the sample is diluted 1/10 before each measure) Results:
Time after induction | 0.05 mM | 0.1 mM | 0.2 mM | 0.5 mM |
t=0 min | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.73 | 1.73 |
t = 30 min | 1.754 | 1.746 | 1.874 | 1.879 |
t = 60 min | 2.118 | 2.219 | 2.346 | 2.265 |
t = 90 min | 2.128 | 2.330 | 2.504 | 2.468 |
t = 120 min | 2.552 | 2.025 | 2.630 | 2.493 |
t = 180 min | 2.962 | 2.845 | 2.868 | 2.947 |
At t = 60 min et t = 120 min, 1 mL culture is taken, centrifuged and pellet and supernatant are conserved separately at -20°C, for further use.
Liquid culture of S. aureus (See here the Liquid Culture protocol) Liquid culture of S. aureus in 35 mL LB medium and 35 μL chloramphenicol. We cultivated overnight in 37°C incubator.
Liquid culture (See here the Liquid Culture protocol) Liquid culture of DH5alpha- pSB1C3 and DH5alpha- pBR322 for plasmid stock.
08.21.2018
Digestion of pSB1C3 and sequences from EUROFINS GENOMICS (1 TO 8) Reagents:
- Seq1 (conc. 493,7 ng/μL) : EcoRI and BamHI
- Seq2 (conc. 463,8 ng/μL): MscI and PstI
- Seq3 (conc. 179 ng/μL): EcoRI and BamHI
- Seq4 (conc. 354 ng/μL): MscI and PstI
- Seq5 (conc. 353 ng/μL): EcoRI and BamHI
- Seq6 (conc. 516 ng/μL): MscI and SphI
- Seq7 (conc. 305 ng/μL): HindIII and PstI
- Seq8 (conc. 325 ng/μL): EcoRI and PstI
- pSB1C3 from 2016 team (conc. 40 ng/μL) : XbaI and SpeI
- linearized iGEM plasmid pSB1C3 (conc. 25 ng/μL): XbaI and SpeI
Each digestion was performed in a total volume of 50 μL, containing 1500ng insert, 1.5 μL of each enzyme and 5 μL of CutSmart buffer. Digestion was performed at 37°C for :
- 20 minutes for tubes without MscI
- 60 minutes for tubes containing MscI
Digestion was then inactivated at 80°C for 20 minutes.
Electrophoresis on agarOSE gel A 0.8 % agar gel was prepared. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) 10 μL loading dye is added to each sample and each sample is put in two wells. Results first gel:
![Figure 1: Picture of the 3 petri dishes at t = 0.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/70/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week34_Fig1.png)
Results after excision:
![Figure 2: Picture of the 3 petri dishes at t = 0.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d4/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week34_Fig2.jpg)
Results second gel: a second gel was run with digested Seq3, Seq4, Seq5, Seq6 and Seq7. Migration for 10 minutes at 85V and then 1 hour at 125V.
![Figure 3: Picture of the 3 petri dishes at t = 0.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e2/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week34_Fig3.png)
Interpretations: all commercial plasmids have been successfully digested, except Seq4, for which the band corresponding to the insert we look for is unclear.
Gel extraction (See here the Gel Extraction protocol) Results from Nanodrop:
DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) | |
Seq1 (cut) | 31.6 | 2.00 |
Seq2 (cut) | 23.9 | 1.92 |
Seq3 (cut) | 16.8 | 2.00 |
Seq4 (cut) | 3.3 | 3.11 |
Seq5 (cut) | 32.1 | 1.98 |
Seq6 (cut) | 25.8 | 1.91 |
Seq7 (cut) | 24 | 1.97 |
Seq8 (cut) | 10.8 | 2.25 |
pSB1C3 2016 | 7.6 | 2.7 |
pSB1C3 iGEM | 9.0 | 2.07 |
IN FUSION kit for pSB1C3 + Seq1 +Seq2 and pSB1C3 + Seq8 (See here the Ligation protocol) We used Ozyme cloning kit to insert Seq8 and Seq1 and 2 in iGEM plasmid. Results: the volumes we mixed for the reaction
ng | ng/μL | μL | |
pSB1C3 | 120 | 7.6 | 15 |
Seq1 | 85 | 31.6 | 3 |
Seq2 | 85 | 23.9 | 3.5 |
Enzyme mix | - | - | 4 |
ng | ng/μL | μL | |
pSB1C3 | 150 | 7.6 | 19 |
Seq8 | 70 | 15.7 | 5 |
Enzyme mix | - | - | 4 |
Plasmids and inserts were mixed together and heated at 80°C for 5 min, and then set on ice for 3 min. Then the enzyme mix was added. Samples were heated at 50°C for 15 min and then set on ice for 5 min.
Transformation in stellar competent cells (See here the Transformation of E. coli DH5-alpha protocol)
Miniprep pbr322 + pSB1C3
Results from NanoDrop : Stock plasmid pSB1C3
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 161 | 1.95 |
2 | 143.9 | 1.95 |
3 | 129.1 | 1.95 |
4 | 265.3 | 1.92 |
5 | 290.7 | 1.97 |
6 | 156.3 | 1.96 |
Results from NanoDrop : Stock plasmid pBR322
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 139.4 | 1.98 |
2 | 221.0 | 1.92 |
3 | 139.8 | 1.94 |
4 | 138.4 | 1.99 |
5 | 129.1 | 1.95 |
6 | 120.1 | 1.95 |
Miniprep Cloning pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 Results from NanoDrop :
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 93.7 | 2.00 |
2 | 89.7 | 1.96 |
3 | 93.2 | 1.98 |
4 | 502.4 | 1.89 |
5 | 98.9 | 2.00 |
6 | 105.5 | 1.96 |
7 | 90.5 | 1.98 |
8 | 111.5 | 1.96 |
9 | 238 | 1.93 |
10 | 100.2 | 2.00 |
Digestion of pBR322 + Seq5,6,7 Aim: Check that the ligation has successfully worked on 10 other colonies. Restriction enzymes used: BamHI Expected results:
pBR322 | linearized | 4 kB | |
BamHI | pBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 | 2 fragments | 4.8 kB + 2.3 kB |
We digested 10 colonies of our clonage products, and we also did some controls: pBR322 with BamHI and without. Procedure:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 7 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
Ndel | 1 |
H2O | 19 |
- Digestion at 37°C for 20 min
- Addition of 6 µL of loading dye in each tube
Electrophoresis on agarose gel PBR322 + Seq5 + Seq6 + Seq7 We prepared a 1% agar gel. (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) We let the gel run for 10 min at 85 V and 80min at 125 V. Observations: Digested DNA from colonies migrated to the same molecular weight as the control one. No expecting fragments are visible representing a digestion of our construction with BamHI. None of the colonies contain the final construction. The cloning did not succeed.
08.22.2018
Results from cloning of pSB1C3 + Seq1 + Seq2 and pSB1C3 + Seq8 The two bacteria transformed with cloning results did grow on the agar plates. (See here the Liquid Culture protocol) 10 colonies of each plate were placed in liquid culture and grew overnight.
Digestion pSB1C3 and pBR322
Volume (μL) | |
pSB1C3 | 10.3 |
Cut Smart | 5 |
H2O | 28.7 |
Xbal | 3 |
Spel | 3 |
Volume (μL) | |
pBR322 | 13.6 |
Cut Smart | 5 |
H2O | 25.4 |
Xbal | 3 |
Spel | 3 |
We let the samples digest for 30 minutes.
BL21 – NGF culture and protein induction Yesterday’s preculture was centrifuged at 4500 x g for 15 minutes. Supernatant was discarded and pellet was washed with 5 mL fresh sterile LB medium. We centrifuged again for 10 minutes at 4500 x g and supernatant was discarded. Pellet was resuspended in 10 mL LB medium + 10 μL carbenicillin and 10 μL chloramphenicol. From this suspension, three liquid culture were launched in three 250 mL sterile Erlenmeyer. Each Erlenmeyer contains:
- 35 mL LB medium
- 35 μL carbenicillin
- 35 μL chloramphenicol
- 1 mL resuspended pellet
The Erlenmeyers are incubated in a shaking incubator at 37 °C and DO is followed to induce protein expression when bacteria are in exponential growth phase. At t = 80 min, when OD reaches 0.7, synthesis of the secretion system and NGF is induced by adding IPTG. (See here the IPTG Induction of protein expression protocol) Different IPTG concentrations are tested:
- Erlen 1 : 0.1 mM
- Erlen 2 : 0.5 mM
- Erlen 3 : 1 mM
The Erlenmeyer are incubated again, DO is measured every hour for two hours. Two hours after induction, cultures are stopped and 1 mL of each culture is pipetted and put in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. Tubes are centrifuged, and pellet and supernatant are conserved separately.
Analysis of protein expression We analyzed the protein present in the supernatant and in the cytoplasm of induced cells by SDS-Page gel. (See here the SDS-PAGE protocol) The wells were filled as following:
- Culture medium before induction
- Uninduced supernatant
- Uninduced pellet
- Culture medium after 0.1 mM induction
- Supernatant after 0.1 mM induction
- Pellet after 0.1 mM induction
- Culture medium after 0.5 mM induction
- Supernatant after 0.5 mM induction
- Pellet after 0.5 mM induction
- Culture of BL21 + pBR322 + Seq8 (25 ml) + ampicillin (10 µg/mL)
- Culture of DH5alpha + pSB1C3 (5 ml) + chloramphenicol (50 µg/mL)
- Culture of DH5alpha + pSB1C3 (20 ml) + ampicillin (10 µg/mL)
- Overnight BL21 pBR322 + Seq8 AMP (10 µg/ml): DO = 5.78
- Overnight DH5a pSB1C3 AMP( 10 µg/ml): DO = 0.02
08.23.2018
Miniprep PSB1C3+ Seq8 and pSB1C3 + Seq1&2 Aim: extract plasmid from the colonies put in liquid culture yesterday (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop : plasmid pSB1C3 + Seq8
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 100.6 | 2.07 |
2 | 60 | 2.17 |
3 | 57 | 2.14 |
4 | 57.2 | 2.10 |
5 | 55 | 2.16 |
6 | 52.3 | 2.19 |
7 | 45.4 | 2.16 |
8 | 38.8 | 2.25 |
9 | 56.5 | 2.11 |
10 | 61.5 | 2.09 |
Results from NanoDrop : plasmid pSB1C3 + Seq1+2
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 40.6 | 1.99 |
2 | 49.6 | 1.99 |
3 | 71.5 | 1.95 |
4 | 63.7 | 1.99 |
5 | 55.6 | 2.03 |
6 | 46.8 | 1.98 |
7 | 86.6 | 1.96 |
8 | 74.9 | 1.93 |
9 | 57.1 | 1.97 |
Enzymatic digestion of the extracted plasmids Aim: Verify that the cloning has correctly work for pSB1C3 + Seq8 and pSB1C3 + Seq1 + Seq2. The following volumes have been mixed: For pSB1C3 + Seq8:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 7 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
H2O | 18 |
EcoRI | 1 |
Pstl | 1 |
For pSB1C3 + Seq1 + Seq2:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 7 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
H2O | 18 |
EcoRI | 1 |
Pstl | 1 |
Gel electrophoresis of psb1c3 + Seq8 Digestion enzymes: EcoRI/PstI (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) Expected results:
pSB1C3 | 1 fragment | 2070 bp |
pSB1C3 + Seq8 | 2 fragments | 2000 bp + 500 bp |
![Figure 4: Gel electrophoresis of psb1c3 + Seq8](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/00/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week34_Fig4.png)
Observations: Colony 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 acquired the plasmid and the insert. BL21 cells were transformed with the plasmid form colony 2 and DH5α cells were transformed with plasmids from colony 2 and 4. (See here the Transformation of E. coli DH5-alpha protocol)
Gel electrophoresis of pSB1C3 + Seq1,2 Digestion enzymes: EcoRI/PstI (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) Expected results:
pSB1C3 | 1 fragment | 2070 bp |
pSB1C3 + Seq8 | 2 fragments | 2000 bp + 2260 bp |
![Figure 5: Agarose 1% gel after electrophoresis of digested psb1c3 + Seq1 + Seq2](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d6/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Week34_Fig5.png)
Observations: Colony 3, 7 and 8 did acquire the plasmid and the insert.
Antibiotic test on liquid culture Aim: Evaluate the effect of an overnight culture media containing AMP on a non-resistant strain.
Effect of AMP (10 µg/mL) on non-resistant cells:
At 10 µg/ml Amp do not allow the growth of non-resistant bacteria. After centrifugation the supernatant of Culture of BL21 + pBR322+Seq8 (25 ml) + AMP (50 µg/ml and 10 µg/ml) was transferred into a new erlenmeyer with 5ml new LB media final volume 25ml.` 1/10 of overnight culture of DH5alpha – pSB1C3 were added to each media a OD was monitored. Results:
LB overnight culture AMP (50 µg/ml) | LB overnight culture AMP (10 µg/ml) | LB+ AMP (50 µg/ml) - 20 ml | LB+ AMP (50 µg/ml) - 10 ml | LB + CARB - 20 mL | |
Add DH5alpha-pSB1C3 liquid culture | 250 µl | 250 µl | 200 µl | 200 µl | 200 µl |
Expected growth | - | - | No | No | Yes |
Results:
OD | LB overnight culture AMP (50 µg/ml) | LB overnight culture AMP (10 µg/ml) | LB+ AMP (50 µg/ml) - 20 ml | LB+ AMP (50 µg/ml) - 10 ml | LB + CARB - 20 mL |
t=1h | 0.116 | 0.094 | 0.082 | 0.091 | 0.087 |
t = 2h | 0.2 | 0.172 | 0.043 | 0.231 | 0.258 |
t = 3h | 0.272 | 0.231 | 0.034 | 0.317 | 0.839 |
t = 4h | 0.342 | 0.307 | 0.023 | 0.137 | 0.839 |
t = 5h | 0.369 | 0.349 | 0.021 | 0.092 | 1.33 |
t = 6h | 0.426 | 0.394 | 0.014 | 0.079 | 1.54 |
t = 3h | 0.467 | 0.477 | 0.017 | 0.063 | 1.71 |
The antibiotic present in the overnight media did affect the growth of non-resistant bacteria.
Liquid culture BL21 – NGF Two colonies of BL21 transformed with our plasmid producing NGF were cultivated in 5 mL LB medium + 5 μL carbenicilline and 5 μL chloramphenicol. (See here the Liquid Culture protocol)
08.24.2018
Miniprep PSB1C3+ Seq5,6,7 and Seq4 (See here the Miniprep for plasmid extraction protocol) Results from NanoDrop: pSB1C3 + Seq5,6,7
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 352.9 | 1.93 |
2 | 308.4 | 1.93 |
3 | 336 | 1.93 |
4 | 325.1 | 1.93 |
Sample | DNA Concentration (ng/µL) | Abs(260 nm)/Abs(280 nm) |
1 | 95.8 | 2.05 |
2 | 104.8 | 1.99 |
3 | 87.9 | 2.01 |
4 | 101 | 1.95 |
Enzymatic digestion of PSB1C3 + Seq5,6,7 Aim: Verify that the IN-FUSION kit has correctly work for pSB1C3 + Seq5,6,7:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 7 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
H2O | 18 |
EcoRI | 1 |
Pstl | 1 |
To verify that Seq6 is in the ligation:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA | 7 |
Cut Smart | 3 |
H2O | 18 |
Sphl | 1 |
Pstl | 1 |
Digestion of Seq4:
Volume (μL) | |
DNA (325 ng/µl) | 30 |
Cut Smart | 5 |
H2O | 12 |
Mscl | 1 |
HindIII | 1 |
Gel electrophoresis of pSB1C3 + Seq5,6,7 and Seq4 Digestion enzymes: EcoRI/PstI and SphI/PstI (See here the Agarose Gel Preparation protocol) Expected results:
pSB1C3 | 1 fragment | 2070 bp |
EcoRI/PstI: pSB1C3 + Seq5,6,7 | 2 fragments | 2070 bp + 3144 bp |
EcoRI/PstI: pSB1C3 + Seq5,6,7 | 2 fragments | 4500 bp + 762 bp |
Seq4 | 2 fragments | 2070 bp + 853 bp |
Results :
S. aureus biofilm formation S. aureus alone was plated in a 96-well plate in different concentrations in order to test different methods to wash the wells. Plate is incubated at room temperature over the week end.
Something was done one that day
08.21.2018
Scanning electron microscopy (FEI Magellan 400 microscope) of a gold membrane.
Results
![Figure 1: Gold-coated membrane](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/15/T--Pasteur_Paris--Gold-membrane-micro.jpg)
Interpretation
Membrane imaging confirmed the presence of 0.4 micrometer pores on the surface, enough to confine bacteria like E. coli.
08.22.2018
8 microchannel chips and 1 set of PDMS pieces for the well chip have been made.
Microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
Well chip fabrication protocol here .
08.23.2018
PEDOT:PSS coated on alumina oxide membranes.
Results
![Figure 2: White alumina oxide membranes before coating](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/66/T--Pasteur_Paris--Alumina-oxide-membranes.jpg)
before coating
![Figure 3: PEDOT:PSS coated alumina oxide membranes](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/83/T--Pasteur_Paris--Coated-membranes-1.jpg)
alumina oxide membranes
Interpretation
The color of the alumina oxide membranes changed radically from light grey to black, suggesting the deposit of PEDOT:PSS on the membrane, as expected. Because of the lack of time and equipement, we won't try to verify that it is indeed PEDOT:PSS, however we are going to try to use electronic microscopy to visually evaluate the coating.
PEDOT:PSS coating protocol here .
08.24.2018
PEDOT:Ts and PEDOT:Cl coated on alumina oxide membranes.
Results
![Figure 4: PEDOT:Ts coated membranes](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/33/T--Pasteur_Paris--Coated-membranes-2.jpg)
![Figure 5: PEDOT:Cl <br> coated membranes](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f2/T--Pasteur_Paris--Coated-membranes-3.jpg)
Interpretation
The color of the alumina oxide membranes changed radically from light grey to black with green shades for PEDOT:Cl and blue shades for PEDOT:Ts, suggesting the deposit of the polymers on the membranes, as expected. Because of the lack of time and equipement, we won't try to verify that it is indeed PEDOT:Ts and PEDOT:Cl, however we are going to try to use electronic microscopy to visually evaluate the coating.
PEDOT:Cl and PEDOT:Ts coating protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
Something was done one that day
08.30.2018
Coating of microfluidic chips
Coating of 18 microfluidic chips with PLL, final concentration of 10 µg/mL
Incubation at 37°C overnight
See here the PDMS Chip Coating protocol.
08.31.2018
Neuronal primary culture
See here the PDMS Chip Coating protocol.
PLL is drained from all microfluidic chips. Chips are rinsed one time with PBS 1X and Laminin is added at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL and incubated for 2 h at 37°C.
Laminin is drained from the microfluidic chips. Cortex cells are dissociated following BrainBits.co.UK papain digestion protocol.
See here the Cell Dissociation protocol.
See here the Cell Counting protocol.
Cellular concentration is counted using a Neubauer chamber and put at a final concentration of 40 000 cells / 1.7 μL.
See here the Seeding Neurons into the Microfluidic Chip protocol.
Seeding of the cells is carried out in all microfluidic chips. Different media are then added depending on the experiment and put in culture for 6 days at 37°C, CO2 5%.
Final volume of media | Neurobasal | DMEM | SVF | B27 | Glutamax | Commercial NGF (50ng/mL) | |
Experiment 1 | 1mL | / | 920 μL | 50 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
Experiment 2 | 3 mL | / | 2850 μL | 150 μL | / | / | 15 μL |
Experiment 3 | 3 mL | / | 2850 μL | 150 μL | / | / | 15 μL |
Control + | 1 mL | 970 μL | / | / | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
Control - | 1 mL | / | 950 μL | 50 μL | / | / | / |
Experiment 7 | 1 mL | 970 μL | / | / | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
08.27.2018
4 well chips have been made, each with a different type of membrane alumina oxide membrane filter (bare, PEDOT:PSS, PEDOT:Cl, PEDOT:Ts). 4 vertical chips bonded to tissue culture dishes.
![Figure 1: Bare alumina oxide, PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:Ts membranes on well chips](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/74/T--Pasteur_Paris--PDMS-well-chip-part-1.jpg)
on well chips
Well chip fabrication protocol (the chip assembled on that day is slightly different but doesn't work) here .
08.28.2018
8 double membrane microchannel chips have been bonded to imaging dishes and sterilized by exposure to UV rays. Leaks made this a difficult and time-consuming operation. 8 microchannel chips have been made.
Scanning electron microscopy (FEI Magellan 400 microscope) of a bare alumina oxide membrane and a PEDOT:PSS-coated one.
Results
![Figure 2: bare alumina oxide membrane](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f7/T--Pasteur_Paris--Alumina-oxide-membrane-micro.jpg)
![Figure 3: PEDOT:PSS-coated alumina oxide membrane](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b5/T--Pasteur_Paris--PEDOT-PSS-membrane-micro.jpg)
Interpretation
Bare alumina oxide membrane imaging confirmed the presence of 0.2 micrometer pores on the surface, enough to confine bacteria like E. coli. PEDOT:PSS-coated membrane revealed cluster-like formation of PEDOT:PSS deposits. It is thought that the lack of uniformity of the coating won't give the expected results in matters of biocompatibility and conductivity.
Basic and double membrane microchannel chip fabrication and sterilization protocol here .
Double membrane microchannel chip bonding and sterilization protocol, basic microchannel chip fabrication protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Something was done one that day
09.03.2018
Media change for cell culture
Media is removed from microfluidic chip and fresh media is then added. Type of media used is dependant on the experiment.
Final volume of media | Neurobasal | DMEM | SVF | B27 | Glutamax | Commercial NGF (50ng/mL) | |
Experiment 1 | 1mL | / | 920 μL | 50 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
Experiment 2 | 3 mL | / | 2850 μL | 150 μL | / | / | 15 μL |
Experiment 3 | 3 mL | / | 2850 μL | 150 μL | / | / | 15 μL |
Control + | 1 mL | 970 μL | / | / | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
Control - | 1 mL | / | 950 μL | 50 μL | / | / | / |
Experiment 7 | 1 mL | 970 μL | / | / | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
Incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2
09.06.2018
Fixation of cells remaining in the 9 microfluidic chips
Media is drained from the 9 remaining chips. Cells are fixed using paraformaldehyde (PFA) 4% for 30 min at room temperature. PBS 1X is added. Stored at 4°C overnight
See here the Fixation and Staining Neurons protocol.
09.07.2018
Staining of remaining 9 microfluidic chips
PBS 1X is drained from the 9 remaining chips. Cells are first permeabilized by adding Triton X-100 at 0.5 % for 10 min at room temperature and unspecific sites are saturated using bovine serum albumin (BSA) 1 % for 30 min at room temperature. Cells are stained for 1 h at room temperature using a mix of DAPI 1/20 000, anti MAP2 antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 555 nm 1/500 and 1/500 Anti--tubulin antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 448 nm. Antibody mix is drained, and cells are stored in PBS 1X in the dark at 4°C.
See here the Fixation and Staining Neurons protocol.
Something was done one that day
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
Something was done one that day
09.12.2018
Coating of microfluidic chips
Coating of different types of chips: 10 regular microfluidic chips, 4 microfluidic chips with a membrane and 4 microfluidic chips, used for electrical conductivity measurements with 50 µL per well of PLL (final concentration of 10 µg/mL).
Incubation at 37°C overnight.
See here the PDMS Chip Coating protocol.
09.13.2018
Neuronal primary culture
PLL is drained from all microfluidic chips. Chips are rinsed one time with PBS 1X and Laminin is added at a final concentration of 1 mg/ mL and incubated for 2h at 37°C.
See here the PDMS Chip Coating protocol.
Laminin is drained from microfluidic chips. Cortex cells are dissociated using Trypsin 2.5% and DNAse 1000 U. See here the Digestion protocol.
See here the Cell Dissociation protocol.
Cellular concentration is counted using a Neubauer chamber and put at a final concentration of 40 000 cells / 1.7 μL
See here the Cell Counting protocol.
Seeding of the cell is realized in all microfluidic chips. Different media are then added depending on the experiment and put in culture for 6 days at 37°C, 5% C02.
Types of chips | Final volume of media | Neurobasal | B27 | Glutamax | Commercial NGF (Stock 10 000 ng/mL) | |
Experiment 1 | 1 regular chip | 1 mL | 965 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 50 ng/mL 5 μL |
Experiment 2 | 1 regular chip | 3 mL | 945 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 250 ng/mL 25 μL |
Experiment 3 | 1 regular chip | 3 mL | 920 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 500 ng/mL 50 μL |
Experiment 4 | 1 regular chip | 1 mL | 890 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 750 ng/mL 75 μL |
Experiment 5 | 1 regular chip | 1 mL | 895 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 900 ng/mL 90 μL |
Experiment 6 | 5 regular chips + 2 chips with simple membrane and 2 chips with double membrane + 4 chips for conductivity measurements | 1 mL | 880 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
Incubate 37°C, 5% CO2
See here the Seeding Neurons into the Microfluidic Chip protocol.
09.10.2018
Scanning electron microscopy (FEI Magellan 400) of PEDOT:Cl-coated membranes.
Results
![Figure 1: bare alumina oxide membrane](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f7/T--Pasteur_Paris--Alumina-oxide-membrane-micro.jpg)
![Figure 2: PEDOT:Cl-coated membrane](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/05/T--Pasteur_Paris--PEDOT-membrane-micro.jpg)
Interpretation
Microscopy reveals a uniform thickening of the membrane's surface, suggesting a uniform PEDOT:Cl coating of the membrane. We expect better results from the PEDOT:Cl-coated and PEDOT:Ts-coated membranes than PEDOT:PSS-coated ones
09.11.2018
Bonding to imaging dishes and UV sterilization of 20 microchannel chips.
Microchannel chip bonding and sterilization protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Something was done one that day
09.17.2018
Media change for cell culture
Media is removed from microfluidic chips and fresh media is then supplied. The type of media used is dependent on the experiment.
Final volume of media | Neurobasal | B27 | Glutamax | Commercial NGF (Stock 10 000 ng/mL) | |
Experiment 1 | 1 mL | 965 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 50 ng/mL 5 μL |
Experiment 2 | 3 mL | 945 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 250 ng/mL 25 μL |
Experiment 3 | 3 mL | 920 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 500 ng/mL 50 μL |
Experiment 4 | 1 mL | 890 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 750 ng/mL 75 μL |
Experiment 5 | 1 mL | 895 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | 900 ng/mL 90 μL |
Experiment 6 | 1 mL | 880 μL | 20 μL | 10 μL | / |
Into 6 chips previously put in culture with Neuro / B27 / GlutaMAX (2 without membrane, 2 with simple membrane, 2 with double membrane), remove half the media and addition of the same volume of fresh media: Neurobasal / B27 / GlutaMAX/NGF 900 ng/mL for a final concentration of commercial NGF 450 ng/mL.
Incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2
09.19.2018
Fixation of remaining 13 microfluidic chips
Media is drained from the 13 remaining chips. Cells are fixed using paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4% for 15 min at room temperature. PBS 1X is added.
Staining of remaining 13 microfluidic chips
PBS 1X is drained from the 13 remaining chips. Cells are first permeabilized by adding Triton X-100 at 0.5% for 10 min at room temperature and unspecific sites are saturated using Bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 1% for 30 min at room temperature. Cells are stained for 15 min at room temperature using a mix of DAPI 1/20 000, anti MAP2 antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 555nm 1/500 and 1/500 Anti--tubulin antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 448 nm.
Antibody mix is drained, and cells are stored in PBS 1X in the dark at 4°C.
See here the Fixation and Staining Neurons protocol.
09.20.2018
Electric measurements on 4 remaining chips
Stimulation and measure of the electric signal at the interface of the neuronal system and the conductive membrane using an oscilloscope and a low frequency generator.
Materials: -Vertical chip with PEDOT:Ts membrane (see here the Membrane PEDOT:Ts and PEDOT:Cl coating protocol) seeded with neurons and filled with culture medium (see here the Seeding neurons into the microfluidic chip protocol). -Function generator (GW Intstek SFG-2010) -Oscilloscope (Tektronix TBS 2000 Series) -Phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS)
Procedure: The goal is to measure the output of nerves in presence of a membrane by subjecting them to an electric signal. Function generator is set on sine mode, 240 mV at 50 Hz. The two wires are connected to the silver paste spots on the bottom of the imaging dish and between the two layers of PDMS composing the chip to allow the current to pass through the system. An oscilloscope is then connected to these spots as well. First measurements indicate that the input signal is not being transmitted at all (Figure 1) by the system neurons + membrane, suggesting something is not working well in the setup.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7e/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Biocell_Week38_Fig1.png)
It is hypothesized, the ions in the culture medium might be perturbing the measure, so the decision is taken to remove the culture medium from the chip. The result is the same (Figure 2).
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/44/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Biocell_Week38_Fig2.png )
The chip is then washed with PBS 1X and another measurement is made. Results remained the same (Figure 3).
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a4/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Biocell_Week38_Fig3.png)
Results: Results: It can be concluded from this experiment, that testing the electric conductivity of the system neurons + membrane is harder than expected and might indicate the need for more precautions and more rigorous methods of measurement.
09.21.2018
Cell culture in 96-well plate
In a 96-well plate
-Add 50 μL Poly-L-ornithine 0.01% solution (Sigma Aldrich, ref : P4957) per well
-Incubate the plate 1h at 37°C
-Wash 3 times with 50 μL PBS 1X per well
-Add 50 μL laminin per well
-Incubate the plate 1h at 37°C
-Prepare 10 mL of culture medium at 37°C: 9.7mL neurobasal, 100 μL Glutamax, 200 μL B27, 100 μL P/S
-Prepare dilutions
Final [NGF] (ng/μL) | 0 | 50 | 250 | 500 | 750 | 900 |
Commercial NGF (μL) | 0 | 7.5 | 37.5 | 75 | 112.5 | 135 |
PSB 1X (μL) | 1500 | 1492.5 | 1462.5 | 1425 | 1387.5 | 1365 |
-Defreeze cells at 37°C
-Dillute them in 5 mL of neurobasal medium pre-warmed at 37°C
-Divide the 6 mL in 6 tubes (for the 6 experiments)
-Centrifuge the tubes at 1200 rpm for 4 min
-Remove the supernatant (leave about 100 μL of medium)
-Add 1.5 mL of appropriate medium
-Remove the laminin
-Add 100 μL of culture per well
-Incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2
Guide plate
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/10/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Biocell_Week38_Fig5bis.png)
Imaging of microfluidic chips fixed on 09.06.2018 and 09.19.2018
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/9b/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Biocell_Week38_Fig4.jpg)
The neurons were fixed after 7 days of culture. In green the axon and blue the nucleus. The neurons grew, and we can observe the axon on the left chamber. The axons pass through the microchannels.
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Something was done one that day
09.24.2018
Media change for cell culture in 96-well plate
Media is removed from the plate and fresh media is then supplied. Type of media used is dependent on the experiment (different NGF concentrations).
Final [NGF] (ng/μL) | 0 | 50 | 250 | 500 | 750 | 900 |
Commercial NGF (μL) | 0 | 7.5 | 37.5 | 75 | 112.5 | 135 |
PSB 1X (μL) | 1500 | 1492.5 | 1462.5 | 1425 | 1387.5 | 1365 |
Add 100 μL of culture per well and incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2.
09.27.2018
Media change for cell culture in 96-well plate
Media is removed from the plate and fresh media is then added. Type of media used is dependent on the experiment (different NGF concentrations).
Final [NGF] (ng/μL) | 0 | 50 | 250 | 500 | 750 | 900 |
Commercial NGF (μL) | 0 | 7.5 | 37.5 | 75 | 112.5 | 135 |
PSB 1X (μL) | 1500 | 1492.5 | 1462.5 | 1425 | 1387.5 | 1365 |
Add 100 μL of culture per well and incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2.
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
Something was done one that day
10.02.2018
Fixation of neuronal culture inside 96-well plate
Media is drained from the plate. Cells are fixed using 100 μL paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4% for 15 min at room temperature. PBS 1X is added, cells are conserved at 4°C for the night.
See here the Fixation and Staining Neurons protocol.
10.03.2018
Staining of neuronal culture in 96-well plate
PBS 1X is drained from the plate. Cells are first permeabilized by adding 100 μL Triton X-100 at 0.5% for 10 min at room temperature and unspecific sites are saturated using 100 μL Bovine serum albumin (BSA) 1% for 30 min at room temperature. Cells are stained in 50 μL of a mix of DAPI 1/20 000, anti MAP2 antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 555nm 1/500 and Anti-β-tubulin antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 448nm 1/500 for 15 min at room temperature.
Antibody mix is drained, and cells are rinsed one time in 100 μL of PBS 1X and stored in 50 μL PBS 1X in the dark at 4°C.
See here the Fixation and Staining Neurons protocol.
10.04.2018
Liquid culture of BL21. Biofilm culture on 6 PDMS well chips (membranes: 2 gold, 1 alumina oxide, 1 PEDOT:PSS, 1 PEDOT:Cl and 1 PEDOT:Ts).
(Results on the 10.16.2018)
Biofilm culture protocol here .
Liquid culture protocol here .
10.05.2018
Biofilm growth measurement via measurement of the optical density (see protocol below). Liquid culture of BL21 and biofilm culture on 6 PDMS well chips.
(Results on the 10.16.2018)
Membrane microchannel chip bacteria confinement experiment. Optical density measure of a sample of liquid culture. Liquid culture was poured in a microchannel chip on one side, and optical density of the liquid that flowed to the other side of the microchannnels was measured.
Results
Liquid culture OD: 0.44
OD of liquid after flowing through the chip: 0.41.
Interpretation
We expected a much lower OD after liquid flow through the chip, so this suggests the presence of a leak in the chip, that allows the liquid culture to flow without retaining the bacteria. The decision was taken to investigate further and to observe the flow under a microscope.
Biofilm culture and growth measurement protocol here .
Liquid culture protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
Something was done one that day
Something was done one that day
10.08.2018
Liquid culture of BL21. Biofilm culture on 6 PDMS well chips
Biofilm growth measurement.
(Results on the 10.16.2018)
Biofilm culture and growth measurement protocol here .
Liquid culture protocol here .
10.11.2018
Liquid culture of BL21. Biofilm culture on 6 PDMS well chips
Biofilm growth measurement.
(Results on the 10.16.2018)
Biofilm culture and growth measurement protocol here .
Liquid culture protocol here .
10.12.2018
Liquid culture of BL21. Biofilm culture on 6 PDMS well chips
Biofilm growth measurement.
Measurement of the electrical resistance of the membranes with the biofilm.
(Results on the 10.16.2018)
Biofilm culture and growth measurement protocol, conductivity measurement protocol here .
Liquid culture protocol here .
Bacteriology
Cell culture
Microfluidics/Membrane
Something was done one that day
10.15.2018
Cell culture in 96-well plate
In a 96-well plate
-Add 50 μL Poly-L-ornithine 0.01% solution (Sigma Aldrich, ref: P4957) per well
-Incubate the plate 2h at 37°C
-Wash 3 times with 50 μL distilled water per well
-Add 50 μL laminin per well
-Incubate the plate 1h at 37°C
-Prepare 10mL of culture medium at 37°C: 9,7mL neurobasal, 100 μL Glutamax, 200 μL B27, 100 μL P/S
-Dissociate cortex cells by adding 250 μL of Trypsin 2.5% and DNAse 1000 U
-Incubate 5 min at 37°C
-Rinse three times the cells using 5 mL warm CMF-HBSS
-Centrifugate at 1200 rpm for 4min
-Remove the supernatant (leave about 100 μL of medium)
-Resuspend the pellet by adding 1 mL of culture medium
- x 10 two-way trip with a sterile glass Pasteur pipette with large tip
- x 10 two-way trip with a sterile glass Pasteur pipette with small tip
- Centrifuge at 200 rmp for 1min
-Keep the supernatant in a sterile Falcon
-Count the cells using a Neubauer chamber (20 μL cells and 80 μL Trypan Blue) and dilute in order to obtain a final concentration of 30 000 cells/1.7 μL
-Remove the laminin
-Add 100 μL of culture per well
-Incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2
10.16.2018
Observation of the seeding realized on 10.15.2018
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/03/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Biocell_Week42_Fig1.png )
Interpretations: the cells adhered and grown normally.
Addition of NGF (commercial and lysate) in the 96-well plate
Denaturation of lysate supernatant NGF
1. Defroze the tubes in ice
2. Incubate at 60°C for 5 min
Addition
1. Add the appropriate volume of each condition in each well (see table below)
2. Incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2
Guide plate:
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/8e/T--Pasteur_Paris--Notebook_Biocell_Week42_Fig2bis.png)
10.17.2018
Fixation of neuronal culture inside 96-well plate
Media is drained from the plate and cells are washed 3 times with PBS 1X. Cells are fixed using 100 μL paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4% for 15 min at room temperature. PBS 1X is added, cells are conserved at 4°C for the night.
Staining of neuronal culture in 96-well plate
PBS 1X is drained from the plate. Cells are first permeabilized by adding 100 μL Triton X-100 at 0.5% for 10 min at room temperature and unspecific sites are saturated using 100 μL Bovine serum albumin (BSA) 1% for 30 min at room temperature. Cells are stained in 50 μL of a mix of DAPI 1/20 000, anti MAP2 antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 555nm 1/500 and Anti-β-tubulin antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 448nm 1/500 for 15 min at room temperature.
Antibody mix is drained, and cells are rinsed one time in 100 μL of PBS 1X and stored in 50 μL PBS 1X in the dark at 4°C.
See here the Fixation and Staining Neurons protocol.
10.15.2018
Liquid culture of BL21. Biofilm culture on 6 PDMS well chips
Biofilm growth measurement.
Measurement of the electrical resistance of the membranes with the biofilm.
(Results on the 10.16.2018)
Measurement of the membrane's electrical resistance without biofilm.
Results: membrane conductivity
Function generator was set on square at 200 Hz. The physical quantities measured are Eg, the generator tension amplitude, and Ep, the amplitude of the voltage difference between a point on the membrane inside the well and the extremity of the platinium strip outside the well. Tension amplitude of the resistor is given by Er = Eg - Ep. Current flowing through the electric circuit is calculated with I = Er/R. Conductivity of the membrane is given by I/Ep. Conductivity of each membrane was measured 3 times. Figure 1 shows the mean value for each membrane and the standard deviation.
Interpretation
Bare alumina oxide and PEDOT:PSS-coated membranes show similar conductivies, indicating the incomplete coating of PEDOT:PSS on alumina oxide membranes. On the opposite, PEDOT:Cl and PEDOT:Ts seem to exhibit on average better conductivities, but in the same time, the coating of these membranes revealed by electron microscopy seemed to have covered the alumina oxide membranes in a more uniform way, assuring enhanced conductive capabilities. These results can be criticized because of the high deviation and because the membranes conductivity was measured after several biofilms were grown on them, which may have affected the measurements.
Biofilm culture and growth measurement protocol, conductivity measurement protocol here .
Liquid culture protocol here .
10.16.2018
Measurement of the electrical resistance of the membranes with the biofilm.
Second try of the confinement experiment of bacteria with a membrane microchannel chip. A few drops of RFP expressing DH5alpha E. coli liquid culture were poured in a membrane microchannel chip. Chip was then observed under a microscope.
Results: confinement experiment
![Figure 2: Second confinement test](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7b/T--Pasteur_Paris--Test-Filtre-RFP.jpg)
Interpretation
Membrane is located on the right side, and liquid culture was poured on that side, before the membrane. Bacteria was still able to flow to the left side, but they were not following the microchannels, instead they were just flowing in a single direction, suggesting the membrane lifts the microfluidic chip from below and thus causes massive leakings in the microfluidic circuitry. We concluded that the microchannel chips we designed didn't really meet the requirements they were designed for.
Results: biofilm growth
Biofilm growth was measured 4 times in total. For each series of measure, the measured optical densities were divided by the optical density of the base liquid culture, to normalize the measures. Figure 2 shows the mean value for each type of membrane and the standard deviation.
![Figure 3: Biofilm growth](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/84/T--Pasteur_Paris--Biofilm-Growth.jpg)
Results: biofilm conductivity
For conductivity measurements, function generator was set on square at 200 Hz. The physical quantities measured are Eg, the generator tension amplitude, and Ep, the amplitude of the voltage difference between a point on the biofilm inside the well and the extremity of the platinium strip outside the well. Tension amplitude of the resistor is given by Er = Eg - Ep. Current flowing through the electric circuit is calculated with I = Er/R. Conductivity of the membrane is given by I/Ep. Conductivity of each membrane with a biofilm was repeated 3 times. Figure 4 shows the average conductivity of the membrane with the biofilm, and the standard deviation.
![Figure 4: Membrane conductivity with biofilm](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/83/T--Pasteur_Paris--Conductivity-with-biofilm.jpg)
To approximate very roughly the conductivity of the biofilm, the average conductivity values of the membranes with a biofilm were divided by the corresponding average biofilm growth values, and the conductivity of the membrane was then substracted. Figure 4 shows the estimated biofilm conductivity.
![Figure 5: Biofilm conductivity](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/61/T--Pasteur_Paris--Biofilm-Conductivity.jpg)
Interpretation
As told by the membrane manufacturer, biofilm formation on gold membranes seems indeed to be more difficult than on other membranes. However we expected PEDOT:PSS-coated membranes to stimulate more the growth of biofilm, but perhaps that may be just another indicator of the incomplete coating. Surprisingly, PEDOT:Cl tends to allow better formation of biofilms. We realized only after the experiments the need for a control biofilm culture without membrane.
Conductivity with a biofilm is better with gold membranes, although the conductivity of gold membranes themselves isn't the best. This may be explained by the fact, that because of the thinner biofilm formation on gold membranes, the electrical wires touched not only the biofilm, but also the membrane, bypassing the biofilm and leading to imprecise measurements.
Approximate biofilm conductivity is therefore probably wrong for the gold membrane. However, it is interesting to notice that the biofilm conductivity measured for the bare alumina oxyde, PEDOT:Ts-coated one and PEDOT:PSS-coated give more or less the same value, suggesting that with more measurements, adapted equipement and better methods it would be indeed possible to measure the biofilm's conductivity with our PDMS well chips.
Biofilm culture and growth measurement protocol, conductivity measurement protocol here .
Liquid culture protocol here .
10.17.2018
Third and last try of the confinement experiment of bacteria with a membrane microchannel chip. A few drops of E. coli liquid culture were poured in a membrane microchannel chip. Chip was then observed under a microscope.
Results: confinement experiment
![Figure 6: Third confinement test](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fd/T--Pasteur_Paris--Test-Filtre-2.jpg)
Interpretation
Membrane is located on the left side, and liquid culture was poured on that side, before the membrane. Bacteria this time wasn't able to flow to the right side, the membrane stopped their progression. It is clear on figure 6, that the left side is crowded with bacteria, and the right side is empty (apart from a few PDMS impurities). Final conclusion on the membrane microchannel chips is, that although the integration method of the membrane filter in the chip is complicated and a bit improvised, some chips apparently do fulfill their purpose, demonstrating this way the confinement of the bacteria with a membrane.