Difference between revisions of "Team:Goettingen/Demonstrate"
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<p>Until now our detection method worked perfectly under laboratory conditions, so the next step was inevitably to test it under “real life conditions”, or more precisely, we put our method under trial. Hence, we purchased the product Roundup<sup>®</sup> from our local home improvement store. It has to be considered, that even though glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup<sup>®</sup>, it contains additional substances (actually it is a soap to facilitate the contact between glyphosate and the plant surface) that could pose negative side effects. | <p>Until now our detection method worked perfectly under laboratory conditions, so the next step was inevitably to test it under “real life conditions”, or more precisely, we put our method under trial. Hence, we purchased the product Roundup<sup>®</sup> from our local home improvement store. It has to be considered, that even though glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup<sup>®</sup>, it contains additional substances (actually it is a soap to facilitate the contact between glyphosate and the plant surface) that could pose negative side effects. | ||
| − | In a first trial phase, we wanted to investigate if Roundup<sup>®</sup> affects our modified <i>B. subtilis</i> strains in a similar way as pure glyphosate (see Figure 1).</p> | + | In a first trial phase, we wanted to investigate if Roundup<sup>®</sup> affects our modified <i>B. subtilis</i> strains in a similar way as pure glyphosate (see Figure 1).</p> |
<div class="article_picture"> | <div class="article_picture"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/9e/T--Goettingen--growth_with_roundup_roundup.png"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/9e/T--Goettingen--growth_with_roundup_roundup.png"> | ||
| − | <p>Figure 1. Growth of the <em>B. subtilis</em> wild type strain 168 with increasing amounts of the herbicidal mixture Roundup<sup>®</sup>. The optical density was measured at a wavelength of λ=600 nm.</p> | + | <p>Figure 1. Growth of the <em>B. subtilis</em> wild type strain 168 with increasing amounts of the herbicidal mixture Roundup<sup>®</sup>. The optical density was measured at a wavelength of λ=600 nm.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | <p>As shown in Figure 1, growth of <em>B. subtilis</em> was severely inhibited in the presence of low amounts of Roundup<sup>®</sup> as it was the case with pure glyphosate!</p> | + | <p>As shown in Figure 1, growth of <em>B. subtilis</em> was severely inhibited in the presence of low amounts of Roundup<sup>®</sup> as it was the case with pure glyphosate!</p> |
<p> | <p> | ||
Furthermore, we repeated our competition experiments with Roundup<sup>®</sup> and compared it to our previous results (see Figure 2). The signals from GFP and mOrange fit with the experiments where pure glyphosate was used. | Furthermore, we repeated our competition experiments with Roundup<sup>®</sup> and compared it to our previous results (see Figure 2). The signals from GFP and mOrange fit with the experiments where pure glyphosate was used. | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Firstly, Roundup<sup>®</sup> has to be sprayed on top of a soil sample. In a second step, water has to be applied to extract glyphosate from the soil sample. The solution will then be filtered through a filter device to remove soil fragments and microorganisms. Fourth, the sample will be applied onto solid media powder with all necessary ingredients including spores of the two competing <em>B. subtilis</em> strains. The sample has to be incubated for 10 h at 37°C with agitation. Finally, the blue color of the bacterial solution will be compared to a test strip. The intensity of the blue color roughly determines the concentration of glyphosate in the sample.</p> | Firstly, Roundup<sup>®</sup> has to be sprayed on top of a soil sample. In a second step, water has to be applied to extract glyphosate from the soil sample. The solution will then be filtered through a filter device to remove soil fragments and microorganisms. Fourth, the sample will be applied onto solid media powder with all necessary ingredients including spores of the two competing <em>B. subtilis</em> strains. The sample has to be incubated for 10 h at 37°C with agitation. Finally, the blue color of the bacterial solution will be compared to a test strip. The intensity of the blue color roughly determines the concentration of glyphosate in the sample.</p> | ||
| − | <p>The | + | <p>The application of our product is illustrated in the following movie:</p> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<video id="main-content_glyphvideo" autoplay muted controls="false" loop controls width="640" controls="buffered"> | <video id="main-content_glyphvideo" autoplay muted controls="false" loop controls width="640" controls="buffered"> | ||
| − | <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/ | + | <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6f/T--Goettingen--video2.mp4" media="all and (min-width:680px)"> |
| − | <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/ | + | <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6f/T--Goettingen--video2.mp4" media="all and (min-width:180px)"> |
<track src="beschreibung_de.vtt" kind="descriptions" > | <track src="beschreibung_de.vtt" kind="descriptions" > | ||
Latest revision as of 12:56, 17 October 2018
Team Göttingen
iGEM 2018
Glyphosate on my plate?
| E-mail: | igem2018@gwdg.de |
|---|---|
| Adress: | c/o iGEM 2018 |
| Department of General Microbiology | |
| Grisebachstraße 8 | |
| 37077 Göttingen | |
| Germany |
We are especially grateful to our numerous sponsors on gofundme, who supported our project and made it possible.
Every public donor, who helped us to achieve our goals got a special place on our bacterial wall of fame and a handdrawn microbe to show our appreciation. A link to that wall can be found here:
Real life conditions
Until now our detection method worked perfectly under laboratory conditions, so the next step was inevitably to test it under “real life conditions”, or more precisely, we put our method under trial. Hence, we purchased the product Roundup® from our local home improvement store. It has to be considered, that even though glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup®, it contains additional substances (actually it is a soap to facilitate the contact between glyphosate and the plant surface) that could pose negative side effects. In a first trial phase, we wanted to investigate if Roundup® affects our modified B. subtilis strains in a similar way as pure glyphosate (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Growth of the B. subtilis wild type strain 168 with increasing amounts of the herbicidal mixture Roundup®. The optical density was measured at a wavelength of λ=600 nm.
As shown in Figure 1, growth of B. subtilis was severely inhibited in the presence of low amounts of Roundup® as it was the case with pure glyphosate!
Furthermore, we repeated our competition experiments with Roundup® and compared it to our previous results (see Figure 2). The signals from GFP and mOrange fit with the experiments where pure glyphosate was used.
Figure 2. The effect of Roundup® on the competition assay that we have performed previously. GFP was excited at λ=488 nm and emission was measured at 509 nm. mOrange was excited at λ=529 nm, emission was recorded at λ=562 nm. (A) Fluorescence of GFP. With increasing amounts of Roundup®, the fluorescence of GFP decreases. (B) Fluorescence of mOrange. With increasing amounts of Roundup®, the fluorescence increases.
As we created a glyphosate detection system, we wanted to test our competition assay with a "sample" (Figure 3). The "sample" had a concentration of 0.6 mM.
Figure 3. The competition assay is a 1:1 mixture of strains iGEM23 and iGEM36. Both strains were cultivated in CS-Glc minimal medium with increasing glyphosate concentrations (0–2 mM). The fluorophore GFP was excited at λ=488 nm, the emission was recorded at λ=509 nm. mOrange was excited at λ=529 nm, the emission was measured at λ=562 nm.
A. Fluorescence of GFP, intensity decreases with higher glyphosate concentrations. The sample fits between 0.5 and 0.75 mM.
B. Fluorescence of mOrange, intensity increases with higher glyphosate concentration.
This results enable us to detect the amount of glyphosate in a sample highly accurate.
These results show that our detection method works perfectly with the commercially available product Roundup®!
The overall aim of our project was to develop a procedure that allows to determine if a sample is contaminated with glyphosate. Consequently, we analyzed soil samples that were previously treated with Roundup®. Our product is based on the intraspecies competition of a sensitive strain constitutively expressing the lacZ gene encoding the β–galactosidase and a non-labelled glyphosate-resistant strain. The principle of our product is depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Workflow describing the detection of glyphosate by intraspecies competition. Glyphosate is extracted from the soil using water. The solution is applied to the vial containing a bacterial cell suspension using the Claristep® Filtration System. After incubation of the vial the coloration of the solution will indicate the amount of glyphosate that was present in the sample.
Firstly, Roundup® has to be sprayed on top of a soil sample. In a second step, water has to be applied to extract glyphosate from the soil sample. The solution will then be filtered through a filter device to remove soil fragments and microorganisms. Fourth, the sample will be applied onto solid media powder with all necessary ingredients including spores of the two competing B. subtilis strains. The sample has to be incubated for 10 h at 37°C with agitation. Finally, the blue color of the bacterial solution will be compared to a test strip. The intensity of the blue color roughly determines the concentration of glyphosate in the sample.
The application of our product is illustrated in the following movie: