Difference between revisions of "Team:UCSC/Demonstrate"

Line 42: Line 42:
 
       <div class="imageCont">
 
       <div class="imageCont">
 
         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/85/T--UCSC--Quantification-prog.jpg" class="image-inpage large noBorder">
 
         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/85/T--UCSC--Quantification-prog.jpg" class="image-inpage large noBorder">
         <p>Fig: Dot blot of progesterone re-suspended in DMSO, isolated from colonies grown on leucine-deficient media after YMC with progesterone pathway genes. Primary antibody used was anti-progesterone-HRP, blocked with BSA in TBS, washed with TBS/TWEEN. Positive controls are 1mg/100uL progesterone in DMSO with 1:10 dilutions. Negative control is Y. lipolytica transformed with pD17 with no pathway genes which underwent same extraction protocol as all other samples.</p>
+
         <p>Fig: Dot blot of progesterone re-suspended in DMSO, isolated from colonies grown on leucine-deficient media after YMC with progesterone pathway genes. Negative control circled in black and marked with a dash (-). Positive controls circled in blue. Experimental samples circled in pink. Primary antibody used was anti-progesterone-HRP, blocked with BSA in TBS, washed with TBS/TWEEN. Positive controls are 1mg/100uL progesterone in DMSO with 1:100 dilutions. Negative control is Y. lipolytica transformed with pD17 with no pathway genes which underwent same extraction protocol as all other samples. </p>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <p>Our dot blot shows that we have high luminescence in multiple colonies, YL 10, YL 20, YL 21, and YL 25. We performed the extraction protocol on +1 positive control, and our negative control. The +1 positive is 1mg of pure progesterone extract from Sigma Aldrich (P8783 Sigma) that we added 1mL of MilliQ water and 1mL of hexane to, and then followed the rest of the extraction protocol for. The positive controls +3, +4 and +5 are 1:10 dilutions from +2 positive control of 1mg/1mL of pure progesterone in DMSO. These positives were not subjected to the extraction protocol. We believe that they may show no luminescence due to +2 being one order of magnitude less than detection is possible for the antibodies. The negative control is pD17 transformed into Y. lipolytica with no pathway genes, and then subjected to the same extraction protocol.</p>
 
       <p>Our dot blot shows that we have high luminescence in multiple colonies, YL 10, YL 20, YL 21, and YL 25. We performed the extraction protocol on +1 positive control, and our negative control. The +1 positive is 1mg of pure progesterone extract from Sigma Aldrich (P8783 Sigma) that we added 1mL of MilliQ water and 1mL of hexane to, and then followed the rest of the extraction protocol for. The positive controls +3, +4 and +5 are 1:10 dilutions from +2 positive control of 1mg/1mL of pure progesterone in DMSO. These positives were not subjected to the extraction protocol. We believe that they may show no luminescence due to +2 being one order of magnitude less than detection is possible for the antibodies. The negative control is pD17 transformed into Y. lipolytica with no pathway genes, and then subjected to the same extraction protocol.</p>

Revision as of 03:28, 18 October 2018

Demonstrate

  • Demonstration

  • Overview
  • Overview

    Our goal was to engineer the progesterone pathway genes into a plasmid and produce progesterone in Y. lipolytica. We proved that we can create progesterone in Y. lipolytica under real world conditions.

    We used yeast-mediated cloning (YMC) to assemble the plasmid pOPPY-XRL2-yP. The auxotrophic marker we used for this detection in our yeast strain Y. lipolytica str. FKP393 is leucine (matA; leu2-270; ura3; xpr2-332; axp-2; ku70::hph+). We inserted the progesterone pathway genes ∆7-sterol reductase, ADR, FDX1, P450scc, and 3β-HSD, and using YMC, we assembled them into the linearized plasmid backbone pXRL2 which contains the gene for leucine.

    FIG OF POPPY-XRL2-YP

    These cells produced colonies on leucine-deficient media, demonstrating that our plasmid pOPPY-XRL2-yP was successfully assembled. We miniprepped these plasmids and ran them on a gel; the results showed that the plasmids were above 15kb, which is the correct size for the plasmid containing the pathway genes with the plasmid backbone. This further shows that we successfully assembled our plasmid.

    FIG OF GEL WITH PLASMIDS ABOVE 15KB FROM YMC

    To test these colonies for progesterone, we grew six of them up in leucine-deficient liquid media, then performed the Progesterone Extraction protocol listed on our protocols page. We “dot blotted” the progesterone purified out of our cells on nitrocellulose membranes, and detected it using anti-progesterone antibodies conjugated to HRP (sc-53423 HRP) which was gifted from Santa Cruz Biotech (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., TX, USA). Our results are promising.

    Fig: Dot blot of progesterone re-suspended in DMSO, isolated from colonies grown on leucine-deficient media after YMC with progesterone pathway genes. Negative control circled in black and marked with a dash (-). Positive controls circled in blue. Experimental samples circled in pink. Primary antibody used was anti-progesterone-HRP, blocked with BSA in TBS, washed with TBS/TWEEN. Positive controls are 1mg/100uL progesterone in DMSO with 1:100 dilutions. Negative control is Y. lipolytica transformed with pD17 with no pathway genes which underwent same extraction protocol as all other samples.

    Our dot blot shows that we have high luminescence in multiple colonies, YL 10, YL 20, YL 21, and YL 25. We performed the extraction protocol on +1 positive control, and our negative control. The +1 positive is 1mg of pure progesterone extract from Sigma Aldrich (P8783 Sigma) that we added 1mL of MilliQ water and 1mL of hexane to, and then followed the rest of the extraction protocol for. The positive controls +3, +4 and +5 are 1:10 dilutions from +2 positive control of 1mg/1mL of pure progesterone in DMSO. These positives were not subjected to the extraction protocol. We believe that they may show no luminescence due to +2 being one order of magnitude less than detection is possible for the antibodies. The negative control is pD17 transformed into Y. lipolytica with no pathway genes, and then subjected to the same extraction protocol.

    These results suggest that we have at least four progesterone producing Y. lipolytica colonies. The positive control shows the level of luminescence for 1mg of progesterone, and the colonies that show luminescence as well are of similar magnitude.

    While we were not able to reach the goal of inserting the progesterone biosynthesis pathway into the genome of our Y. lipolytica, we believe that we have demonstrated that our project worked under real world conditions.

    Due to the ability of our hexane extraction protocol to apparently purify our samples so greatly, we will perform mass spectrometry on these samples in later work, and continue to work on engineering the pathway directly into the genome.