(Created page with "{{SZU-China/Nav}} <html> <body data-spy="scroll" data-target="#myScrollspy" data-offset="10"> <div class="container-fluid"> <div class="row"> <div class="col-9 offs...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{SZU-China/ | + | {{SZU-China/header}} |
<html> | <html> | ||
Revision as of 03:57, 13 October 2018
Simulation
Because we have learned that the chemical method has a certain driving effect on killing, the driving efficiency in the home environment will cause great trouble to the neighbors. At present, the driving effect of biopharmaceutics is not clear. To compare the killing effect and driving effect of chemical agents and our biopharmaceuticals in a simulation experiment, we chose the two best-selling and best- evaluated chemicals on the market for testing, namely chalk and Bactericide.
Statistical Analysis Results
Our data were subjected to statistical analysis to determine whether there are significant differences using one-way ANOVA. Levene’s test, gave us results that each group is homogeneity at P-value of 0.05, indicating we can assume they have equal variances. T-test for pooled data gave us results that: migration rate infected by M.anisopliae emulsifiable powder was significantly lower than that by cockroach killing chalk or BAYER-Premise (P<0.05). While, there was no significant difference in migration rate between cockroach killing chalk and BAYER-Premise (P>0.05). Similarly, gnawing rate in M.anisopliae group was significantly higher than that in cockroach killing chalk or BAYER-Premise group (P<0.05), while between the latter two groups, there was no significant difference(P>0.05). As for mortality within three days, there was no significant difference between each two groups (P>0.05).
The results above show that M.anisopliae emulsifiable powder has higher efficiency than other traditional cockroach-killing methods. It has significantly lower migration rate, higher gnawing rate, and has similar mortality after using