Difference between revisions of "Team:Grenoble-Alpes/Safety"

Line 93: Line 93:
 
  <p>All along the project, we have to keep in mind security issues even when we work on the theoretical aspect. We made a double risk assessment: one for our detection device (FMECA method), and one for the risks of a contamination of our phages and modified e.coli on the lab, and on the environment if they escape the lab (Safety form).</p>
 
  <p>All along the project, we have to keep in mind security issues even when we work on the theoretical aspect. We made a double risk assessment: one for our detection device (FMECA method), and one for the risks of a contamination of our phages and modified e.coli on the lab, and on the environment if they escape the lab (Safety form).</p>
  
<center><h3> For more information, click on the books !</h3></center>
+
<center><h3><font size ="5"> For more information, click on the books !</font></h3></center>
 +
<br>
  
 
<div><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5a/T--Grenoble-Alpes--bureau1.png" id="schema">
 
<div><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5a/T--Grenoble-Alpes--bureau1.png" id="schema">

Revision as of 18:30, 15 October 2018

Template loop detected: Template:Grenoble-Alpes

SAFETY AND SECURITY

All along the project, we have to keep in mind security issues even when we work on the theoretical aspect. We made a double risk assessment: one for our detection device (FMECA method), and one for the risks of a contamination of our phages and modified e.coli on the lab, and on the environment if they escape the lab (Safety form).

For more information, click on the books !