Line 293: | Line 293: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | <div class="col- | + | <div class="col-3 offset-4"> |
<div class="card"> | <div class="card"> | ||
− | <img class="card-img-top" src="" /> | + | <img class="card-img-top" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/93/T--SZU-China--Result-MCL1-4.png" /> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 307: | Line 307: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | In order to verify the ability of immune-avoidance of <i>M.anasopliae</i>, we inject hyphae homogenate into cockroaches, then extract hemolymph, | + | In order to verify the ability of immune-avoidance of <i>M.anasopliae</i>,we inject hyphae homogenate into cockroaches as experimental groups and normal saline as control groups, then extract hemolymph in 0.5h, 1h , 2h, 4h, 8h, 12h and 24h. Meanwhile extract hemolymph from cockroaches that were not injected as group 0h. Count the nodules formed of hemocytes(Criteria: more than 10 hemocytes assemble closely)(Fig.17) and observe hemolymph smear under phase contrast microscope(Fig.18) |
<4> | <4> | ||
Line 323: | Line 323: | ||
<0.05) </caption> | <0.05) </caption> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="accordion" style="width: 100%;" id="accordionExample"> | ||
+ | <div class="card" style="width: 100%;"> | ||
+ | <div class="card-header" id="headingOne"> | ||
+ | <h5 class="mb-0"> | ||
+ | <button class="btn btn-link" style="width: 100%;" type="button" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#collapseOne" aria-expanded="true" aria-controls="collapseOne"> | ||
+ | Fig.18 <i class="fas fa-arrow-down"></i> | ||
+ | </button> | ||
+ | </h5> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div id="collapseOne" class="collapse" aria-labelledby="headingOne" data-parent="#accordionExample"> | ||
+ | <div class="card-body"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-10 offset-1"> | ||
+ | <div class="card"> | ||
+ | <img class="card-img-top" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/74/T--SZU-China--Result-MCL1-6.png" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="col-12"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Fig.18. Immune response of cockroaches’hemocytes to <i>Metarhizium anisopliae</i> spores under phase | ||
+ | contrast microscope.A.B.C. hemolymph without injection. The number of hemocytes is relatively large | ||
+ | and the shape is normal. Almost no nodule formation; D,G,J,M,P,S,V:control,almost no nodules formed; | ||
+ | E:0.5h of WT injection,blood cells aggregated to form nodules,which means immune response on hypha;F: | ||
+ | 0.5h of transformant injection,almost no nodule formed;H:1h of WT injection,more nodules was formed;I | ||
+ | :1h of transformant injection, nodules started to form but was less than WT group;K:2h of WT injection | ||
+ | , nodules were becoming larger;L:2h of transformant injection, nodules were smaller than WT group;N:4h | ||
+ | of WT injection, nodules were less and smaller than 2h;O:4h of transformant injection, almost no | ||
+ | nodules formed;Q:8h of WT injection, nodules were Most disintegrating.R:8h of transformant injection, | ||
+ | Metarhizium anisopliae was growing in the shape of yeast;T:12h of WT injection, the number of | ||
+ | hemocytes and nodules decreased; U:12h of transformant injection, blood cells were | ||
+ | destroyed and cell debris can be seen;W:24h of WT injection, blood cells’ structure were destroyed, | ||
+ | a large amount of cell debris cen be seen; X:24h of transformant injection, Metarhizium aerated in | ||
+ | large numbers and few blood cells left. Wild-type M.anasoplise triggers more intense immune response | ||
+ | than MCL1 transformant, while hemocytes degraded more in transformant groups. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | In conclusion, MCL1 could trigger host immune response less and promote immune-avoidance. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 331: | Line 380: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
In order to confirm the limited concentration of Tryptophan, we did a macro experiment. We put Metarhizium in an L-Tryptophan concentration gradient Petrie dishes from 0.05% to 0.14%. with solid and liquid czapek. After six days of cultivation, it can be seen in the | In order to confirm the limited concentration of Tryptophan, we did a macro experiment. We put Metarhizium in an L-Tryptophan concentration gradient Petrie dishes from 0.05% to 0.14%. with solid and liquid czapek. After six days of cultivation, it can be seen in the | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 399: | Line 448: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<p> | <p> | ||
We can see the ten photos that, in the solid czapek, the Metarhizium can stay alive at the L-Trp concentration of 0.09% or higher while it could not grow well or die at a lower concentration. We can also see that Metarhizium could not survive without L-Tryptophan. | We can see the ten photos that, in the solid czapek, the Metarhizium can stay alive at the L-Trp concentration of 0.09% or higher while it could not grow well or die at a lower concentration. We can also see that Metarhizium could not survive without L-Tryptophan. | ||
Line 454: | Line 500: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
[3] Wang C, St Leger RJ,A collagenous protective coat enables <i>Metarhizium anisopliae</i> to evade insect immune responses.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25; 103(17):6647-52. | [3] Wang C, St Leger RJ,A collagenous protective coat enables <i>Metarhizium anisopliae</i> to evade insect immune responses.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25; 103(17):6647-52. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 465: | Line 513: | ||
<a class="nav-link" href="#Immune_avoidance">Immune avoidance: MCL1</a> | <a class="nav-link" href="#Immune_avoidance">Immune avoidance: MCL1</a> | ||
<a class="nav-link" href="#switch">Suicide switch</a> | <a class="nav-link" href="#switch">Suicide switch</a> | ||
+ | <a class="nav-link" href="#References">References</a> | ||
</nav> | </nav> |
Revision as of 06:54, 17 October 2018
Results
This year, in our project, we constructed a new expression vector working effectively in the fungus and submitted our parts and transforred into Metarhizium anisopliae 128 to increase the adhesion, penetration and immune avoidance capacity of the modified Metarhizium anisopliae. Therefore, we performed experiment on three aspects and the experimental characterizations of our parts are shown as follow.
Adhesion:HsbA
In this part, a strong promoter, PgpdA allows the HsbA protein to be expressed without induction.
The HsbA( BBa_K2788000 ) from Beauveria bassiana encodes a kind of membrane surface hydrophobic protein which helps our spores adhere to the wax on the cockroach body surface. Moreover, with the overexpression of HsbA, our spores can more effectively adhere to the cockroach. Then it will follow as spores’ germination, germinal tube, appressorium and the next penetrating process.
This part was insert into the expression vector by restriction sites EcoRI and PstI (Fig.1), and the correct construction of this recombinant plasmid was confirmed by PCR identification and sequencing of the PCR products.
We transformed the expression vectors into Metarhizium anisopliae 128 by the method of Xiaoling Wang, and the positive clone was confirmed by G418 sulfate screening and nucleic acid electrophoresis.
The transformed strain Metarhizium anisopliae 128 was grown in 1/4 SDAY liquid medium, and obtain total protein by FastPrep and ultrasonic crushing. The lysate was then centrifuged and the supernate were electrophoresed on a sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)-12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel, followed by Coomassie blue staining.(Fig.3)
Besides, by using the method of compared four areas of each wing in the scanning electron microscope before and after treatment which is ‘put the petri dishes on WD-9405B horizontal shaking table and opened the lowest rolling speed for 10min (to make the spores on the wings evenly impacted by the water flow)’ in the HsbA macro verification protocol, we can finally compared whether there was any change in the position and number of spores in the observing area. (illustrated with Fig.4 and Fig.5)
It’s obvious that it happens great change(circle in red)in the position and number of spores in the observing area of wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128 experimental groups.
It’s obvious that it almost happens no change except the place (circled in red) in the position and number of spores in the observing area of Metarhizium anisopliae HsbA transformant experimental groups.
Finally, the following chart (Fig.6) can be obtained by statistical data of four areas in all experimental groups.
In conclusion, this result well confirmed that Metarhizium anisopliae HsbA transformant certainly enhanced the capacity of adhesion.
Penetration: Bbchit
In order to make Metarhizium anisopliae penetrate the corpus callosum more efficiently, we transferred Bbchit( BBa_K2788001 ), a chitinase gene from Beauveria bassiana ARSEF 2860, which encodes a chitinase that can be secreted extracellularly. The chitin of the body surface decomposes, thereby destroying the wall of the corpus callosum, so that the genus Metarhizium enters the sputum.(Fig.7)
We have a part encoding Chitinase, the Bbchit express and function intracellularly. We constructed a shuttle vector to transform this part and the positive clone was confirmed by G418 sulfate screening and nucleic acid electrophoresis.(Fig.8)
The crude enzyme solution was obtained by cell disruption using ultrasonic, followed by SDS-PAGE protein electrophoresis and Coomassie blue staining.(Fig.9)
To determine the activity of chitinase, we improved it according to the DNS colorimetric method of Kan Zhuo, Xiaozhen Shi. First, the standard curve was drawn with different concentration gradients of glucose solution, and 0.5 ml of the wild-type and transformed type 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 12 days of culture solution were respectively taken for enzyme activity test: the crude enzyme obtained after filtering the culture solution was used. The solution was mixed with 0.5 ml of 1% chitin colloid, reacted at 37 ° C for 60 min, and then added to a 0.5 ml DNS boiling water bath for 10 min. The absorbance of the obtained product was measured and the enzyme activity was calculated. There were three groups of wild-type and transformed type. Parallel, three parallel experiments were performed in each group, and the final data were averaged.
We calculate activity based on the standard curve formula: U=(A540+0.03279)/2.202 (Fig.10), a summary of the data at different times is made into a line chart as follows.We can see that after 12 days the transformed type’s enzyme activity is still growing and the wild-type is falling.(Fig. 11)
In order to verify the function of Bbchit from a macro level, we improved Kan Zhuo's chitin transparent circle method for verification. We stained the czapek solid medium without chitin colloids in red with 0.1% Congo red dye solution and then cultured wild-type and transformed Metarhizium. Compared with the size of the colony, the size of the transparent circle was compared to obtain the transformed type. The size of the transparent circle is the diameter of the chitin transparent ring (R2) and colonies. The ratio of the diameter (R1), expressed as R2/R1.The conclusion that the chitinase activity of Metarhizium anisopliae is enhanced.
Therefore, these results well confirmed that the chitinase activity of Metarhizium anisopliae Bbchit transformant is about 1.3 times that of wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128. Our modified fungus certainly enhanced the capacity of penetration.
Immune avoidance: MCL1
During evolution, insects have developed a very strong immune system against entomopathogenic fungi[1] In hemolymph, hemocytes, and plasma play important roles in eliminating the fungi that are present in the hemolymph,[2] But arm race between parasitic fungi and their insect hosts never stops. The fungus has mechanisms to overcome the immune systems of insects.,for example, the lower level of β-1,3-glucan in the cell surface does not stimulate the host immune response[3]. We extract a gene named MCL1 from Metarhizium robertsiiARSEF 23, which encodes collagen-like protein to combine and block β-1,3,-glucan.[3]This gene works like putting an “invisible cloak ”on the fungus so that immune avoidance can happen.
In this part, PgpdA is a strong promoter that allows MCL1 to be expressed without induction. of hemolymph.
We transferred the expression vector MCL1-pBC by CaCl ₂ -PEG induction method, then screen transformant by G418 resistance genes and colony PCR.PCR product was identified by agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig.14)
The transformed strain Metarhizium anisopliae 128 was grown in 1/4 SDAY liquid medium, and obtain total RNA by using RNAiso Plus(TAKARA), reverse transcription by using TAKARA PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit, then perform quantitative PCR. (Fig.15)
We gain the total protein by FastPrep and ultrasonic crushing. The lysate was then centrifuged and the supernate was electrophoresed on a sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)-12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel, followed by Coomassie blue staining.
In order to verify the ability of immune-avoidance of M.anasopliae,we inject hyphae homogenate into cockroaches as experimental groups and normal saline as control groups, then extract hemolymph in 0.5h, 1h , 2h, 4h, 8h, 12h and 24h. Meanwhile extract hemolymph from cockroaches that were not injected as group 0h. Count the nodules formed of hemocytes(Criteria: more than 10 hemocytes assemble closely)(Fig.17) and observe hemolymph smear under phase contrast microscope(Fig.18) <4>
Fig.18. Immune response of cockroaches’hemocytes to Metarhizium anisopliae spores under phase contrast microscope.A.B.C. hemolymph without injection. The number of hemocytes is relatively large and the shape is normal. Almost no nodule formation; D,G,J,M,P,S,V:control,almost no nodules formed; E:0.5h of WT injection,blood cells aggregated to form nodules,which means immune response on hypha;F: 0.5h of transformant injection,almost no nodule formed;H:1h of WT injection,more nodules was formed;I :1h of transformant injection, nodules started to form but was less than WT group;K:2h of WT injection , nodules were becoming larger;L:2h of transformant injection, nodules were smaller than WT group;N:4h of WT injection, nodules were less and smaller than 2h;O:4h of transformant injection, almost no nodules formed;Q:8h of WT injection, nodules were Most disintegrating.R:8h of transformant injection, Metarhizium anisopliae was growing in the shape of yeast;T:12h of WT injection, the number of hemocytes and nodules decreased; U:12h of transformant injection, blood cells were destroyed and cell debris can be seen;W:24h of WT injection, blood cells’ structure were destroyed, a large amount of cell debris cen be seen; X:24h of transformant injection, Metarhizium aerated in large numbers and few blood cells left. Wild-type M.anasoplise triggers more intense immune response than MCL1 transformant, while hemocytes degraded more in transformant groups.
In conclusion, MCL1 could trigger host immune response less and promote immune-avoidance.
Suicide switch
In order to confirm the limited concentration of Tryptophan, we did a macro experiment. We put Metarhizium in an L-Tryptophan concentration gradient Petrie dishes from 0.05% to 0.14%. with solid and liquid czapek. After six days of cultivation, it can be seen in the
We can see the ten photos that, in the solid czapek, the Metarhizium can stay alive at the L-Trp concentration of 0.09% or higher while it could not grow well or die at a lower concentration. We can also see that Metarhizium could not survive without L-Tryptophan.
We put the Metarhizium in 100mL liquid czapek with different concentration L-Tryptophan, after 6 days of cultivation, here is the result:
We can see the chart and graph that, in the liquid czapek, the Dry Weight of Metarhizium stay in a stable level from 0% of [Trp] to 0.08% of [Trp], because it didn’t grow at this low concentration. At the L-Trp concentration of 0.09% or higher, its dry weight grow as the concentration of L-Tryptophan grow.
From our experiment we can see that, the limited Tryptophan concentration for Metarhizium to survive is 0.9% of Tryptophan.
Reference
[1] Gottar M, Gobert V, Matskevich AA, Reichhart JM, Wang CS, Butt TM, et al. Dual detection of fungal infections in Drosophila through recognition of microbial structures and sensing of virulence factors. Cell. 2007; 127(7): 1425–1437.
[2] Glupov VV. Mechanisms of resistance of insects, in: Glupov V. V. (ed.) Insect Pathogens: structural and functional aspects, Moscow, Kruglyi god, 2001, pp 475–557
[3] Wang C, St Leger RJ,A collagenous protective coat enables Metarhizium anisopliae to evade insect immune responses.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25; 103(17):6647-52.