Difference between revisions of "Team:NTNU Trondheim/Parts"

 
(28 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
 +
<div class="clickable">
 +
<div class="header-img hide-on-med-and-down">
 +
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f5/T--NTNU_Trondheim--greenpartsheader.png">
 +
    <div class="centered floating hide-on-med-and-down">
 +
    <i class="fas fa-angle-down fa-2x"></i>
 +
  </div>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
  
−
<div class="column full_size">
+
<div class="clickable">
−
<h1>Parts</h1>
+
<div class="header-img hide-on-large-only ">
 +
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/archive/b/b0/20180802073404%21T--NTNU_Trondheim--partsheadermobile.png">
 +
  <div class="centered-mobile floating hide-on-large-only">
 +
    <i class="fas fa-angle-down fa-2x"></i>
 +
  </div>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
  
−
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0f/T--NTNU_Trondheim--partsicon.png" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width:150px">
 
  
−
<center><table style="width:65%">
+
<div class="container">
 +
<h2 class="parts-color"> Parts overview </h2>
 +
<p>
 +
The team has submitted two parts to the iGEM parts registry: dCas9 regulated by a TetR inducible promoter and RRvT with lacI promoter: </p>
  
 +
<center><table style="width:65%">
 +
<caption><b>Table 1:Parts submitted to the iGEM Parts Registry</b></caption>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
 
     <th>Medal</th>  
 
     <th>Medal</th>  
Line 18: Line 36:
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
     <td>1.1</td>
+
     <td>Silver</td>
−
     <td>195</td>
+
     <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2754000"> BBa_K2754000</a></td>
−
     <td>6</td>  
+
     <td>Composite</td>  
−
     <td>1</td>
+
     <td>dCas9 regulated by a TetR inducible promoter</td>
−
     <td>1</td>
+
     <td>4978</td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
     <td>1.2</td>
+
     <td>Silver</td>
−
     <td>185</td>  
+
     <td> <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2754001"> BBa_K2754001</a></td>  
−
     <td>2</td>
+
     <td>Composite</td>
−
     <td>0</td>
+
     <td>RRvT with lacI promoter</td>
−
     <td>1</td>
+
     <td>1908</td>
 
</table> </center>
 
</table> </center>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
<p>Each team will make new parts during iGEM and will submit them to the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. The iGEM software provides an easy way to present the parts your team has created. The <code>&lt;groupparts&gt;</code> tag (see below) will generate a table with all of the parts that your team adds to your team sandbox.</p>
 
−
<p>Remember that the goal of proper part documentation is to describe and define a part, so that it can be used without needing to refer to the primary literature. Registry users in future years should be able to read your documentation and be able to use the part successfully. Also, you should provide proper references to acknowledge previous authors and to provide for users who wish to know more.</p>
 
−
 
−
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
−
<div class="column full_size">
 
−
<div class="highlight decoration_background">
 
−
<h3>Note</h3>
 
−
<p>Note that parts must be documented on the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Main_Page"> Registry</a>. This page serves to <i>showcase</i> the parts you have made. Future teams and other users and are much more likely to find parts by looking in the Registry than by looking at your team wiki.</p>
 
−
</div>
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
−
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
 
−
<div class="line_divider"></div>
 
−
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
 
−
 
  
 +
<h2 class="parts-color">dCas9 regulated by a TetR inducible promoter</h2>
  
 +
<p>
 +
The new biobrick that we submitted to the iGEM Registry was a dCas9 sequence with a tetracycline inducible promoter (= TetR/TetA). The part also includes a TetR sequence upstream of the dCas9 and the promoter sequence, which is required for controlling the inducibility of the promoter. You can read more about the function of this part in the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:NTNU_Trondheim">Design </a> page.</p>
 +
<p>
 +
The original sequence was ordered from Addgene, but we noticed that it did not meet the iGEM requirements for new biological parts due to having three illegal restriction cut sites. We therefore needed to remove these cut sites by switching some nucleotides while ensuring that the amino acid sequence remained the same. In addition, we also needed to include a specific prefix sequence in front of the biobrick and a suffix sequence at the end. This was necessary to be able to ligate the biobrick into a the pSB1C3 backbone that iGEM requests that we submit the biobrick in. The elimination of the illegal cut sites and the insert of prefix and suffix was done by Gibson Assembly and Site-Directed Mutagenesis. After this, we had to cut the biobrick and the plasmid backbone with specific restriction enzymes which have cut sites in the prefix and suffix. </p>
  
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/aa/T--NTNU_Trondheim--dcas9.png">
 +
<figcaption><center><b>Figure 1:</b> Overview of the dCas9 biobrick</center></figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<h2 class="parts-color">RRvT with lacI promoter</h2>
 +
<p>
 +
One of the gold medal criteria for the iGEM Competition is improving a biobrick that already exists in the iGEM Registry. The new and improved part also needs to be characterized to document that it is indeed better than the original part, as well as submitted to the iGEM Registry. To fulfill this criterion, we decided to improve a biobrick encoding the red fluorescent protein <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450"> mRFP1 (BBa_J04450)</a> designed by Tamar Odle. The original biobrick is a composite part with a lac promoter, a ribosome binding site, a coding sequence for the mRFP1 protein and a terminator. The improvement was done by replacing the mRFP1 sequence with a sequence for another red fluorescent protein, called RRvT.</p>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/77/T--NTNU_Trondheim--RRvT-RFP.jpeg">
 +
<figcaption><b>Figure 2:</b> The improved biobrick was designed by replacing the mRFP sequence with the sequence for the RRvT.</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<p>
 +
The RRvT is supposed to be brighter than the original mRFP1, and it also has a low acid sensitivity which theoretically should make it an improvement of the mRFP1 biobrick. We have ordered and received the RRvT biobrick from IDT. After failing to incorporate the RRvT biobrick into the iGEM plasmid backbone through traditional restricting cutting and ligating, we ordered primers for inserting the biobrick into the backbone by Gibson Assembly. The RRvT sequence and the backbone have been PCR amplified with the Gibson primers and assembled by Gibson Assembly. It was then transformed into <i>E.coli</i> DH5&alpha; cells. A plate reader was used to create a growth curve showing the development of absorbance and fluorescence in the cells over time, and a flow cytometer to measure light intensity per cell. The measurement of our new biobrick was done in paralell with the original mRFP1 biobrick to ensure that both parts have a similar experimental environment. This made the comparison between the two more accurate. Unfortunately, the improvement did not work as intended. We could not characterise the improvement. However we obtained fluorescence data from the biobrick. </p>
  
−
<div class="column two_thirds_size">
 
−
<div class="highlight decoration_B_full">
 
  
−
<h3>Adding parts to the registry</h3>
+
<figure>
−
<p>You can add parts to the Registry at our <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Add_a_Part_to_the_Registry">Add a Part to the Registry</a> link.</p>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/16/T--NTNU_Trondheim--RRvT.png">
 +
<figcaption><center><b>Figure 3:</b> Overview of the RRvT biobrick</center></figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
−
<p>We encourage teams to start completing documentation for their parts on the Registry as soon as you have it available. The sooner you put up your parts, the better you will remember all the details about your parts. Remember, you don't need to send us the DNA sample before you create an entry for a part on the Registry. (However, you <b>do</b> need to send us the DNA sample before the Jamboree. If you don't send us a DNA sample of a part, that part will not be eligible for awards and medal criteria.)</p>
 
−
<div class="button_link">
 
−
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Add_a_Part_to_the_Registry">
 
−
ADD PARTS
 
−
</a>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
−
</div>
+
<script type="text/javascript">
−
</div>
+
$('.clickable').click(function() {
−
 
+
  $('html, body').animate({ scrollTop: $('.container').offset().top-20}, 'slow');
−
 
+
  });
−
 
+
</script>
−
<div class="column third_size">
+
−
<div class="highlight decoration_A_full">
+
−
<h3>Inspiration</h3>
+
−
<p>We have a created  a <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Well_Documented_Parts">collection of well documented parts</a> that can help you get started.</p>
+
−
 
+
−
<p> You can also take a look at how other teams have documented their parts in their wiki:</p>
+
−
<ul>
+
−
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:MIT/Parts"> 2014 MIT </a></li>
+
−
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg/Parts"> 2014 Heidelberg</a></li>
+
−
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Parts">2014 Tokyo Tech</a></li>
+
−
</ul>
+
−
</div>
+
−
</div>
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
<div class="column full_size">
+
−
 
+
−
<h3>What information do I need to start putting my parts on the Registry?</h3>
+
−
<p>The information needed to initially create a part on the Registry is:</p>
+
−
<ul>
+
−
<li>Part Name</li>
+
−
<li>Part type</li>
+
−
<li>Creator</li>
+
−
<li>Sequence</li>
+
−
<li>Short Description (60 characters on what the DNA does)</li>
+
−
<li>Long Description (Longer description of what the DNA does)</li>
+
−
<li>Design considerations</li>
+
−
</ul>
+
−
 
+
−
<p>
+
−
We encourage you to put up <em>much more</em> information as you gather it over the summer. If you have images, plots, characterization data and other information, please also put it up on the part page. </p>
+
−
 
+
−
</div>
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
+
−
<div class="line_divider"></div>
+
−
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
+
−
 
+
−
<div class="column full_size">
+
−
<h3>Part Table </h3>
+
−
 
+
−
<p>Please include a table of all the parts your team has made during your project on this page. Remember part characterization and measurement data must go on your team part pages on the Registry. </p>
+
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
−
<groupparts>iGEM18 NTNU_Trondheim</groupparts>
 
−
<html>
 
−
</div>
 
  
−
 
+
{{:Team:NTNU_Trondheim/Footer}}
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
</html>
+

Latest revision as of 03:58, 18 October 2018

Parts overview

The team has submitted two parts to the iGEM parts registry: dCas9 regulated by a TetR inducible promoter and RRvT with lacI promoter:

Table 1:Parts submitted to the iGEM Parts Registry
Medal Part name Type Description Length (bp)
Silver BBa_K2754000 Composite dCas9 regulated by a TetR inducible promoter 4978
Silver BBa_K2754001 Composite RRvT with lacI promoter 1908


dCas9 regulated by a TetR inducible promoter

The new biobrick that we submitted to the iGEM Registry was a dCas9 sequence with a tetracycline inducible promoter (= TetR/TetA). The part also includes a TetR sequence upstream of the dCas9 and the promoter sequence, which is required for controlling the inducibility of the promoter. You can read more about the function of this part in the Design page.

The original sequence was ordered from Addgene, but we noticed that it did not meet the iGEM requirements for new biological parts due to having three illegal restriction cut sites. We therefore needed to remove these cut sites by switching some nucleotides while ensuring that the amino acid sequence remained the same. In addition, we also needed to include a specific prefix sequence in front of the biobrick and a suffix sequence at the end. This was necessary to be able to ligate the biobrick into a the pSB1C3 backbone that iGEM requests that we submit the biobrick in. The elimination of the illegal cut sites and the insert of prefix and suffix was done by Gibson Assembly and Site-Directed Mutagenesis. After this, we had to cut the biobrick and the plasmid backbone with specific restriction enzymes which have cut sites in the prefix and suffix.

Figure 1: Overview of the dCas9 biobrick

RRvT with lacI promoter

One of the gold medal criteria for the iGEM Competition is improving a biobrick that already exists in the iGEM Registry. The new and improved part also needs to be characterized to document that it is indeed better than the original part, as well as submitted to the iGEM Registry. To fulfill this criterion, we decided to improve a biobrick encoding the red fluorescent protein mRFP1 (BBa_J04450) designed by Tamar Odle. The original biobrick is a composite part with a lac promoter, a ribosome binding site, a coding sequence for the mRFP1 protein and a terminator. The improvement was done by replacing the mRFP1 sequence with a sequence for another red fluorescent protein, called RRvT.

Figure 2: The improved biobrick was designed by replacing the mRFP sequence with the sequence for the RRvT.

The RRvT is supposed to be brighter than the original mRFP1, and it also has a low acid sensitivity which theoretically should make it an improvement of the mRFP1 biobrick. We have ordered and received the RRvT biobrick from IDT. After failing to incorporate the RRvT biobrick into the iGEM plasmid backbone through traditional restricting cutting and ligating, we ordered primers for inserting the biobrick into the backbone by Gibson Assembly. The RRvT sequence and the backbone have been PCR amplified with the Gibson primers and assembled by Gibson Assembly. It was then transformed into E.coli DH5α cells. A plate reader was used to create a growth curve showing the development of absorbance and fluorescence in the cells over time, and a flow cytometer to measure light intensity per cell. The measurement of our new biobrick was done in paralell with the original mRFP1 biobrick to ensure that both parts have a similar experimental environment. This made the comparison between the two more accurate. Unfortunately, the improvement did not work as intended. We could not characterise the improvement. However we obtained fluorescence data from the biobrick.

Figure 3: Overview of the RRvT biobrick