Difference between revisions of "Team:Edinburgh OG/Collaborations"

(Prototype team page)
 
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Edinburgh_OG}}
 
{{Edinburgh_OG}}
 +
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
 
+
<style>
 
+
.column li {
<div class="column full_size judges-will-not-evaluate">
+
    list-style-type: decimal;
<h3>★  ALERT! </h3>
+
}
<p>This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Medals">medal criterion</a> or <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Awards"> award listed below</a>. </p>
+
</style>
<p> Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Pages_for_Awards"> Instructions for Pages for awards</a>.</p>
+
<div>
 +
<div>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
<div>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
<div>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
<div>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
<div>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="clear"></div>
 
 
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<h1>Collaborations</h1>
 
 
<p>
 
Sharing and collaboration are core values of iGEM. We encourage you to reach out and work with other teams on difficult problems that you can more easily solve together.
 
</p>
 
 
<h3>Silver Medal Criterion #2</h3>
 
<p>
 
Complete this page if you intend to compete for the silver medal criterion #2 on collaboration. Please see the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Medals">2018 Medals Page</a> for more information.
 
</p>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div class="column two_thirds_size">
+
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Collaborations</strong></h1>
 +
<div class="column two_third_size">
  
<h4> Which other teams can we work with? </h4>
+
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Westminster iGEM 2018 team</strong></h2>
<p>  
+
<p style="text-align: justify;">Over the course of the summer we had the pleasure to meet and talk with teams from around UK. During the UK Meetup we learnt about an amazing project developed by the Westminster iGEM team, which was also tackling the problem of plastic waste! </p>
You can work with any other team in the competition, including software, hardware, high school and other tracks. You can also work with non-iGEM research groups, but they do not count towards the iGEM team collaboration silver medal criterion.
+
<p style="text-align: justify;">Although we had chosen to use very different approaches we had lots in common because we were inspired by the same aim. We therefore chose to develop a collaboration with a focus on sustainability. As we had found Life Cycle Assessment an incredibly helpful tool in the design of our PHBV production process, we wanted to share the experience and knowledge gained during our summer and provide them with an LCA for their project. Westminster sent us with all data we requested and we used LCA as a model to identify the environmental hot spots of their process. Our work is detailed on our Life Cycle Assessment page under <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/life_cycle_assessment">ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO – EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE</a>. From our collaboration we learnt that perhaps in future, our own project could actually contribute in a new way to solve the plastic problem, by degrading the polystyrene and converting it into bioplastics as there is a monomer common to both processes. If you want to know more about the LCA tool, and how we successfully adapted it for another iGEM project please visit <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/life_cycle_assessment">LCA page</a>.</p>
</p>
+
  
<p>
+
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--Edinburgh_OG--Collab_-_3.png" width="646" height="356" /></p>
In order to meet the silver medal criteria on helping another team, you must complete this page and detail the nature of your collaboration with another iGEM team.
+
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 3</strong>&nbsp;Proposed route of PHA synthesis in <em>P. putida</em>.&nbsp; Above is the TOD pathway for styrene degradation (Westminster iGEM Team). Below is the PHA operon for PHA. The PHA responsible production genes have their homologues in <em>P. putida</em> according to O&rsquo;Leary, et al., 2005.</p>
</p>
+
  
</div>
+
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Iowa iGEM 2018 Team</strong></h2>
 +
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the spirit of collaboration, our team is excited to be working with the University of Iowa iGEM team this year. The Iowa 2018 team is developing a biosensor for the detection and quantification of 3-hydroxypropionate (3HP), a natural plastic precursor with considerable importance in the industrial production of bioplastics.</p>
 +
<p style="text-align: justify;">In order to produce a co-polymer such as polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate PHBV, the monomer 3-hydroxyvaleryl-CoA (3HV) can be introduced via the precursor propionyl-CoA. Currently, the necessity of propionate or propionyl-CoA is a limiting factor in production of PHBV, which has potential to become a versatile polymer in the commercial setting today. With our metabolic engineering strategy inspired by that of Srirangan et al. (2016), the <em>E. coli</em> can be modified to produce PHBV from substrates such as glucose or glycerol, exempting the need for direct feed with propionic acid. This requires the activation of a cluster of genes called the Sleeping Beauty Mutase (SBM) operon, which has been inactivated through multiple evolutionary selections, that encodes for the net conversion of succinyl-CoA into propionyl-CoA (Figure 1).</p>
 +
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cc/T--Edinburgh_OG--Collab_-_proposed_mechanism.png" width="692" height="393" /></p>
 +
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 1. </strong>Proposed mechanism for propionate synthesis via the evolutionarily dormant Sleeping Beauty mutase operon (SBM) and a complementary methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase (MCE). Succinyl-CoA is converted into (<em>R</em>)-methylmalongyl-CoA by the methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (encoded by <em>scpA</em>). The compound is then converted into its stereoisomer (<em>S</em>)-methylmalonyl-CoA via MCE. The isomer is the form required for the stereospecific conversion into propionyl-CoA by methylmalonyl-CoA carboxylase (<em>scpB</em>). The CoA from propionyl-CoA is transferred onto succinate from the citric acid cycle by the propionyl-CoA: succinate CoA transferase (<em>scpC</em>), culminating in the biosynthesis of propionate and succinyl-CoA.</p>
 +
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, even if the conversion is successful it is difficult to verify a successful trial due to limitations in the capacity to detect production of the precursors culminating in the 3HV monomer. An assay that our team has developed to measure the quantity of propionate produced informed by the work of Phechkrajang &amp; Yooyong (2017) was ultimately unsuccessful.</p>
 +
<p style="text-align: justify;">To our joy, we were happy to discover that the Iowa team may have just the answer to our prayers! As can be seen in Figure 2, the 3HP biosensor they have developed may be applicable in the direct detection of the propionyl-CoA synthesized via the SBM pathway. Motivated by a 2016 paper by Rogers &amp; Church, we surmised that a 3HP biosensor that relies on the conversion of 3HP via <em>pcs </em>and <em>prpC </em>into a quantifiable fluorescence readout may be modified to directly quantify the biogenesis of propionyl-CoA, one of the intermediate compounds in this pathway!</p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/2f/T--Edinburgh_OG--Collab_-_expectation.png" alt="" width="689" height="243" /></p>
 +
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 2. </strong>The designated pathway through which our team expects to detect the production of propionyl-CoA from our <em>sbm+</em> (woke AF) <em>E. coli</em>.&nbsp; This is taken from one of the potential pathways that a 3HP biosensor can be developed: by converting 3HP to 2-methylcitrate, fluorescence output can be quantified. Given this possibility, a modified biosensor (comprising <em>prpC</em>) may be used to detect the production of propionyl-CoA directly through a similar means of fluorescence readout.</p>
  
 +
<p style="text-align: justify;">We shipped the Sbm operon to the Iowa Team who kindly help us to try if their device can sense the presence of the precursor. However, when they tested with the supernatant there was no signal detected. We hypothesised that the precursor should be inside the cell and therefore the next step would check the lysis cell material. However, due to time constrictions, this last step was not finalised. </p>
  
  
<div class="column third_size">
+
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>References</strong></h2>
<p>
+
Here are some suggestions for projects you could work on with other teams:
+
</p>
+
 
+
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li> Improve the function of another team's BioBrick Part or Device</li>
+
<li>Phechkrajang, C.M. &amp; Yooyong, S., 2017. Fast and simple method for semiquantitative determination of calcium propionate in bread samples. <em>Journal of Food and Drug Analysis</em>, 25(2), pp.254&ndash;259. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1021949816300552.</li>
<li> Characterize another team's part </li>
+
<li>Rogers, J.K. &amp; Church, G.M., 2016. Genetically encoded sensors enable real-time observation of metabolite production. <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em>, 113(9), pp.2388&ndash;2393. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1600375113.</li>
<li> Debug a construct </li>
+
<li>Srirangan, K. et al., 2016. Engineering of <em>Escherichia coli</em> for direct and modulated biosynthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) copolymer using unrelated carbon sources. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, 6(October), pp.1&ndash;11. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36470.</li>
<li> Model or simulate another team's system </li>
+
<li>O'Leary, N. D., O'Connor, K. E., Ward, P., Goff, M., &amp; Dobson, A. D. (2005). Genetic characterization of accumulation of polyhydroxyalkanoate from styrene in <em>Pseudomonas putida</em>&nbsp; CA-3.&nbsp;<em>Applied and environmental microbiology</em>,&nbsp;<em>71</em>(8), 4380-4387.</li>
<li> Test another team's software</li>
+
<li> Help build and test another team's hardware project</li>
+
<li> Mentor a high-school team</li>
+
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
</div>
 
  
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 12:05, 17 October 2018

PhagED: a molecular toolkit to re-sensitise ESKAPE pathogens

 

 

 

 

 

Collaborations

Westminster iGEM 2018 team

Over the course of the summer we had the pleasure to meet and talk with teams from around UK. During the UK Meetup we learnt about an amazing project developed by the Westminster iGEM team, which was also tackling the problem of plastic waste!

Although we had chosen to use very different approaches we had lots in common because we were inspired by the same aim. We therefore chose to develop a collaboration with a focus on sustainability. As we had found Life Cycle Assessment an incredibly helpful tool in the design of our PHBV production process, we wanted to share the experience and knowledge gained during our summer and provide them with an LCA for their project. Westminster sent us with all data we requested and we used LCA as a model to identify the environmental hot spots of their process. Our work is detailed on our Life Cycle Assessment page under ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO – EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE. From our collaboration we learnt that perhaps in future, our own project could actually contribute in a new way to solve the plastic problem, by degrading the polystyrene and converting it into bioplastics as there is a monomer common to both processes. If you want to know more about the LCA tool, and how we successfully adapted it for another iGEM project please visit LCA page.

Figure 3 Proposed route of PHA synthesis in P. putida.  Above is the TOD pathway for styrene degradation (Westminster iGEM Team). Below is the PHA operon for PHA. The PHA responsible production genes have their homologues in P. putida according to O’Leary, et al., 2005.

Iowa iGEM 2018 Team

In the spirit of collaboration, our team is excited to be working with the University of Iowa iGEM team this year. The Iowa 2018 team is developing a biosensor for the detection and quantification of 3-hydroxypropionate (3HP), a natural plastic precursor with considerable importance in the industrial production of bioplastics.

In order to produce a co-polymer such as polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate PHBV, the monomer 3-hydroxyvaleryl-CoA (3HV) can be introduced via the precursor propionyl-CoA. Currently, the necessity of propionate or propionyl-CoA is a limiting factor in production of PHBV, which has potential to become a versatile polymer in the commercial setting today. With our metabolic engineering strategy inspired by that of Srirangan et al. (2016), the E. coli can be modified to produce PHBV from substrates such as glucose or glycerol, exempting the need for direct feed with propionic acid. This requires the activation of a cluster of genes called the Sleeping Beauty Mutase (SBM) operon, which has been inactivated through multiple evolutionary selections, that encodes for the net conversion of succinyl-CoA into propionyl-CoA (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Proposed mechanism for propionate synthesis via the evolutionarily dormant Sleeping Beauty mutase operon (SBM) and a complementary methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase (MCE). Succinyl-CoA is converted into (R)-methylmalongyl-CoA by the methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (encoded by scpA). The compound is then converted into its stereoisomer (S)-methylmalonyl-CoA via MCE. The isomer is the form required for the stereospecific conversion into propionyl-CoA by methylmalonyl-CoA carboxylase (scpB). The CoA from propionyl-CoA is transferred onto succinate from the citric acid cycle by the propionyl-CoA: succinate CoA transferase (scpC), culminating in the biosynthesis of propionate and succinyl-CoA.

However, even if the conversion is successful it is difficult to verify a successful trial due to limitations in the capacity to detect production of the precursors culminating in the 3HV monomer. An assay that our team has developed to measure the quantity of propionate produced informed by the work of Phechkrajang & Yooyong (2017) was ultimately unsuccessful.

To our joy, we were happy to discover that the Iowa team may have just the answer to our prayers! As can be seen in Figure 2, the 3HP biosensor they have developed may be applicable in the direct detection of the propionyl-CoA synthesized via the SBM pathway. Motivated by a 2016 paper by Rogers & Church, we surmised that a 3HP biosensor that relies on the conversion of 3HP via pcs and prpC into a quantifiable fluorescence readout may be modified to directly quantify the biogenesis of propionyl-CoA, one of the intermediate compounds in this pathway!

 

Figure 2. The designated pathway through which our team expects to detect the production of propionyl-CoA from our sbm+ (woke AF) E. coli.  This is taken from one of the potential pathways that a 3HP biosensor can be developed: by converting 3HP to 2-methylcitrate, fluorescence output can be quantified. Given this possibility, a modified biosensor (comprising prpC) may be used to detect the production of propionyl-CoA directly through a similar means of fluorescence readout.

We shipped the Sbm operon to the Iowa Team who kindly help us to try if their device can sense the presence of the precursor. However, when they tested with the supernatant there was no signal detected. We hypothesised that the precursor should be inside the cell and therefore the next step would check the lysis cell material. However, due to time constrictions, this last step was not finalised.

References

  • Phechkrajang, C.M. & Yooyong, S., 2017. Fast and simple method for semiquantitative determination of calcium propionate in bread samples. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 25(2), pp.254–259. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1021949816300552.
  • Rogers, J.K. & Church, G.M., 2016. Genetically encoded sensors enable real-time observation of metabolite production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(9), pp.2388–2393. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1600375113.
  • Srirangan, K. et al., 2016. Engineering of Escherichia coli for direct and modulated biosynthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) copolymer using unrelated carbon sources. Scientific Reports, 6(October), pp.1–11. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36470.
  • O'Leary, N. D., O'Connor, K. E., Ward, P., Goff, M., & Dobson, A. D. (2005). Genetic characterization of accumulation of polyhydroxyalkanoate from styrene in Pseudomonas putida  CA-3. Applied and environmental microbiology71(8), 4380-4387.