Nabilakhyar (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Westminster iGEM 2018 team</strong></h2> | <h2 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Westminster iGEM 2018 team</strong></h2> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">Over the course of the summer we had the pleasure to meet and talk with teams from around UK. During the UK Meetup we learnt about an amazing project developed by the Westminster iGEM team, which was also tackling the problem of plastic waste! </p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">Over the course of the summer we had the pleasure to meet and talk with teams from around UK. During the UK Meetup we learnt about an amazing project developed by the Westminster iGEM team, which was also tackling the problem of plastic waste! </p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: justify;">Although we had chosen to use very different approaches we had lots in common because we were inspired by the same aim. We therefore chose to develop a collaboration with a focus on sustainability. As we had found Life Cycle Assessment an incredibly helpful tool in the design of our PHBV production process, we wanted to share the experience and knowledge gained during our summer and provide them with an LCA for their project. Westminster sent us with all data we requested and we used LCA as a model to identify the environmental hot spots of their process. Our work is detailed on our Life Cycle Assessment page under <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/life_cycle_assessment">ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO – EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE. | + | <p style="text-align: justify;">Although we had chosen to use very different approaches we had lots in common because we were inspired by the same aim. We therefore chose to develop a collaboration with a focus on sustainability. As we had found Life Cycle Assessment an incredibly helpful tool in the design of our PHBV production process, we wanted to share the experience and knowledge gained during our summer and provide them with an LCA for their project. Westminster sent us with all data we requested and we used LCA as a model to identify the environmental hot spots of their process. Our work is detailed on our Life Cycle Assessment page under <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/life_cycle_assessment">ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO – EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE</a>. From our collaboration we learnt that perhaps in future, our own project could actually contribute in a new way to solve the plastic problem, by degrading the polystyrene and converting it into bioplastics as there is a monomer common to both processes. If you want to know more about the LCA tool, and how we successfully adapted it for another iGEM project please visit <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/life_cycle_assessment">LCA page</a>.</p> |
− | From our collaboration we learnt that perhaps in future, our own project could actually contribute in a new way to solve the plastic problem, by degrading the polystyrene and converting it into bioplastics as there is a monomer common to both processes. If you want to know more about the LCA tool, and how we successfully adapted it for another iGEM project please visit <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/life_cycle_assessment">LCA page</a>.</p> | + | |
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--Edinburgh_OG--Collab_-_3.png" width="646" height="356" /></p> | <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--Edinburgh_OG--Collab_-_3.png" width="646" height="356" /></p> | ||
Line 55: | Line 54: | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 2. </strong>The designated pathway through which our team expects to detect the production of propionyl-CoA from our <em>sbm+</em> (woke AF) <em>E. coli</em>. This is taken from one of the potential pathways that a 3HP biosensor can be developed: by converting 3HP to 2-methylcitrate, fluorescence output can be quantified. Given this possibility, a modified biosensor (comprising <em>prpC</em>) may be used to detect the production of propionyl-CoA directly through a similar means of fluorescence readout.</p> | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 2. </strong>The designated pathway through which our team expects to detect the production of propionyl-CoA from our <em>sbm+</em> (woke AF) <em>E. coli</em>. This is taken from one of the potential pathways that a 3HP biosensor can be developed: by converting 3HP to 2-methylcitrate, fluorescence output can be quantified. Given this possibility, a modified biosensor (comprising <em>prpC</em>) may be used to detect the production of propionyl-CoA directly through a similar means of fluorescence readout.</p> | ||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify;">We shipped the Sbm operon to the Iowa Team who kindly help us to try if their device can sense the presence of the precursor. However, when they tested with the supernatant there was no signal detected. We hypothesised that the precursor should be inside the cell and therefore the next step would check the lysis cell material. However, due to time constrictions, this last step was not finalised. </p> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:05, 17 October 2018