JackDeKloe (Talk | contribs) |
JackDeKloe (Talk | contribs) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
+ | <style> | ||
+ | .column li { | ||
+ | list-style-type: decimal; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </style> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Line 34: | Line 39: | ||
<div class="column two_third_size"> | <div class="column two_third_size"> | ||
− | < | + | <h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Introduction</strong></h2> |
<p><br> | <p><br> | ||
Line 77: | Line 82: | ||
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Results</strong></h2> | <h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Results</strong></h2> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | Using Gibson assembly proved difficult for this project. To remove an EcoRI site, the toggle switch was cloned out in two pieces and mixed with the vector in a Gibson Reaction. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="text-align:center;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a1/T--Edinburgh_OG--JackNotebookFigure9.png" style="max-width: 60%; max-height: 70%;"><figcaption><p style="text-align:center; font-size:14px;"><b>Figure 3 </b> Colony PCR of more colonies from the Gibson reactions plated in Table 1 using the VF and VR2 primers. 1kb DNA ladder from Promega. Lane 16 contains the (+) control(pSB1C3:rfp) and lane 22 contains (-) PCR (dH2O) control. Lane 12 contains a band of ~ 1.7 kb while lane 16 contains a band of ~ 1 kb.</figcaption> | <p style="text-align:center;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a1/T--Edinburgh_OG--JackNotebookFigure9.png" style="max-width: 60%; max-height: 70%;"><figcaption><p style="text-align:center; font-size:14px;"><b>Figure 3 </b> Colony PCR of more colonies from the Gibson reactions plated in Table 1 using the VF and VR2 primers. 1kb DNA ladder from Promega. Lane 16 contains the (+) control(pSB1C3:rfp) and lane 22 contains (-) PCR (dH2O) control. Lane 12 contains a band of ~ 1.7 kb while lane 16 contains a band of ~ 1 kb.</figcaption> | ||
Line 86: | Line 91: | ||
<p style="text-align:center;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a6/T--Edinburgh_OG--JackNotebookFigure13.png" style="max-width: 60%; max-height: 70%;"><figcaption><p style="text-align:center; font-size:14px;"><b>Figure 4 </b> Plated colonies of Gibson reaction using linearized pSB1C3:Fragment 1 and Fragment 2. 1kb DNA ladder from Promega. Negative controls of transformations using only linear SB1C3:Fragment 1 contain similar number of colonies compared to reaction using SB1C3:Fragment1 + Fragment 2. Plates are imaged on a light box with emission centered around 470 nm.</figcaption> | <p style="text-align:center;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a6/T--Edinburgh_OG--JackNotebookFigure13.png" style="max-width: 60%; max-height: 70%;"><figcaption><p style="text-align:center; font-size:14px;"><b>Figure 4 </b> Plated colonies of Gibson reaction using linearized pSB1C3:Fragment 1 and Fragment 2. 1kb DNA ladder from Promega. Negative controls of transformations using only linear SB1C3:Fragment 1 contain similar number of colonies compared to reaction using SB1C3:Fragment1 + Fragment 2. Plates are imaged on a light box with emission centered around 470 nm.</figcaption> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Because half of the toggle switch was inserted into the plasmid, another Gibson reaction using a linear plasmid and Fragment 1 could be used as the vector and Fragment 2 could be added in a higher ratio. Fragment 1:pSB1C3 was linearized using the plasmid Fwd primer and Fragment 1 Rev primer. This was used in a Gibson reaction along with Fragment 2 and DH5α was transformed using this reaction (<b>Figure 4</b>). These colonies were all red, but the number of colonies seemed to be only largely between the DH5α samples if Fragment 2 was added or not. This was as expected because Fragment 1:pSB1C3 can circularize as seen in the original colony. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Conclusion</strong></h2> | <h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Conclusion</strong></h2> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
+ | This project set out to create a new biobrick for the 2018 iGEM competition. This strategy involved removing an EcoRI site from the starting toggle switch and then placing that control element into pSB1C3. Gibson assembly of the two fragments and the backbone proved mostly unsuccessful as it appears that only Fragment 1 successfully ligated into the plasmid for one colony during the Gibson assembly. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p>To continue to benefit the team it would be useful to try to combine some or a few of our projects into one system to test the efficiency of producing PHBV. Ideally this Biobrick would be able to act as another modular promoter and allow future iGEM teams to only use glucose concentration modulation for simple protein production or for the production of enzymes that would construct a metabolic pathway. | ||
+ | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>References</strong></h2> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Bothfeld, W., Kapov, G., Tyo, K.E.J., 2017. A Glucose-Sensing Toggle Switch for Autonomous, High Productivity Genetic Control. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00257 | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>Briand, L., Marcion, G., Kriznik, A., Heydel, J.M., Artur, Y., Garrido, C., Seigneuric, R., Neiers, F., 2016. A self-inducible heterologous protein expression system in Escherichia coli. Scientific Reports 6, 33037. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33037 | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>Huergo, L.F., Dixon, R., 2015. The Emergence of 2-Oxoglutarate as a Master Regulator Metabolite. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00038-15 | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>Miroux, B., Walker, J.E., 1996. Over-production of Proteins inEscherichia coli: Mutant Hosts that Allow Synthesis of some Membrane Proteins and Globular Proteins at High Levels. Journal of Molecular Biology 260, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0399 | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>Soini, J., Ukkonen, K., Neubauer, P., 2008. High cell density media for Escherichia coli are generally designed for aerobic cultivations – consequences for large-scale bioprocesses and shake flask cultures. Microbial Cell Factories 7, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-7-26 | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 02:59, 18 October 2018