JackDeKloe (Talk | contribs) |
JackDeKloe (Talk | contribs) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
+ | <style> | ||
+ | .column li { | ||
+ | list-style-type: decimal; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </style> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Line 34: | Line 39: | ||
<div class="column two_third_size"> | <div class="column two_third_size"> | ||
− | < | + | <h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Introduction</strong></h2> |
<p><br> | <p><br> | ||
Line 77: | Line 82: | ||
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Results</strong></h2> | <h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Results</strong></h2> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | Using Gibson assembly proved difficult for this project. To remove an EcoRI site, the toggle switch was cloned out in two pieces and mixed with the vector in a Gibson Reaction. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="text-align:center;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a1/T--Edinburgh_OG--JackNotebookFigure9.png" style="max-width: 60%; max-height: 70%;"><figcaption><p style="text-align:center; font-size:14px;"><b>Figure 3 </b> Colony PCR of more colonies from the Gibson reactions plated in Table 1 using the VF and VR2 primers. 1kb DNA ladder from Promega. Lane 16 contains the (+) control(pSB1C3:rfp) and lane 22 contains (-) PCR (dH2O) control. Lane 12 contains a band of ~ 1.7 kb while lane 16 contains a band of ~ 1 kb.</figcaption> | <p style="text-align:center;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a1/T--Edinburgh_OG--JackNotebookFigure9.png" style="max-width: 60%; max-height: 70%;"><figcaption><p style="text-align:center; font-size:14px;"><b>Figure 3 </b> Colony PCR of more colonies from the Gibson reactions plated in Table 1 using the VF and VR2 primers. 1kb DNA ladder from Promega. Lane 16 contains the (+) control(pSB1C3:rfp) and lane 22 contains (-) PCR (dH2O) control. Lane 12 contains a band of ~ 1.7 kb while lane 16 contains a band of ~ 1 kb.</figcaption> | ||
Line 89: | Line 94: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | Because half of the toggle switch was inserted into the plasmid, another Gibson reaction using a linear plasmid and Fragment 1 could be used as the vector and Fragment 2 could be added in a higher ratio. Fragment 1:pSB1C3 was linearized using the plasmid Fwd primer and Fragment 1 Rev primer. This was used in a Gibson reaction along with Fragment 2 and DH5α was transformed using this reaction (<b>Figure 4</b>). These colonies were all red, but the | + | Because half of the toggle switch was inserted into the plasmid, another Gibson reaction using a linear plasmid and Fragment 1 could be used as the vector and Fragment 2 could be added in a higher ratio. Fragment 1:pSB1C3 was linearized using the plasmid Fwd primer and Fragment 1 Rev primer. This was used in a Gibson reaction along with Fragment 2 and DH5α was transformed using this reaction (<b>Figure 4</b>). These colonies were all red, but the number of colonies seemed to be only largely between the DH5α samples if Fragment 2 was added or not. This was as expected because Fragment 1:pSB1C3 can circularize as seen in the original colony. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 95: | Line 100: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
This project set out to create a new biobrick for the 2018 iGEM competition. This strategy involved removing an EcoRI site from the starting toggle switch and then placing that control element into pSB1C3. Gibson assembly of the two fragments and the backbone proved mostly unsuccessful as it appears that only Fragment 1 successfully ligated into the plasmid for one colony during the Gibson assembly. | This project set out to create a new biobrick for the 2018 iGEM competition. This strategy involved removing an EcoRI site from the starting toggle switch and then placing that control element into pSB1C3. Gibson assembly of the two fragments and the backbone proved mostly unsuccessful as it appears that only Fragment 1 successfully ligated into the plasmid for one colony during the Gibson assembly. | ||
− | </p> | + | </p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<p>To continue to benefit the team it would be useful to try to combine some or a few of our projects into one system to test the efficiency of producing PHBV. Ideally this Biobrick would be able to act as another modular promoter and allow future iGEM teams to only use glucose concentration modulation for simple protein production or for the production of enzymes that would construct a metabolic pathway. | <p>To continue to benefit the team it would be useful to try to combine some or a few of our projects into one system to test the efficiency of producing PHBV. Ideally this Biobrick would be able to act as another modular promoter and allow future iGEM teams to only use glucose concentration modulation for simple protein production or for the production of enzymes that would construct a metabolic pathway. | ||
Line 104: | Line 108: | ||
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>References</strong></h2> | <h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong>References</strong></h2> | ||
− | < | + | <ul> |
<li>Bothfeld, W., Kapov, G., Tyo, K.E.J., 2017. A Glucose-Sensing Toggle Switch for Autonomous, High Productivity Genetic Control. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00257 | <li>Bothfeld, W., Kapov, G., Tyo, K.E.J., 2017. A Glucose-Sensing Toggle Switch for Autonomous, High Productivity Genetic Control. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00257 | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 115: | Line 119: | ||
<li>Soini, J., Ukkonen, K., Neubauer, P., 2008. High cell density media for Escherichia coli are generally designed for aerobic cultivations – consequences for large-scale bioprocesses and shake flask cultures. Microbial Cell Factories 7, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-7-26 | <li>Soini, J., Ukkonen, K., Neubauer, P., 2008. High cell density media for Escherichia coli are generally designed for aerobic cultivations – consequences for large-scale bioprocesses and shake flask cultures. Microbial Cell Factories 7, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-7-26 | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | </ | + | </ul> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 02:59, 18 October 2018