Nabilakhyar (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">Modern life is reliant on the use of plastics, and since their production began on a large scale over 8.3 million tons have been produced, of which over 6.3 million tons has been thrown away, with the majority accumulating in landfill, or the environment (Geyer et al., 2017). Drawn by increasing demand of plastics and sustainable development request, the general mindset was shifted towards developing completely natural biodegradable plastics. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) is a huge family of bio-derived and biodegradable polymers belonging to the polyesters class that are also termed “Microbial Plastics” (Bonartsev et al., 2017). The biopolymers are commonly produced among a wide array of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria but the highest occurrence has been attributed to <em>Cupriavidus necator</em> (<em>C. necator</em>, previously known as <em>Rastonia eutropha</em>), which is the main chassis for current commercial production of PHA-based bioplastics. | <p style="text-align: justify;">Modern life is reliant on the use of plastics, and since their production began on a large scale over 8.3 million tons have been produced, of which over 6.3 million tons has been thrown away, with the majority accumulating in landfill, or the environment (Geyer et al., 2017). Drawn by increasing demand of plastics and sustainable development request, the general mindset was shifted towards developing completely natural biodegradable plastics. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) is a huge family of bio-derived and biodegradable polymers belonging to the polyesters class that are also termed “Microbial Plastics” (Bonartsev et al., 2017). The biopolymers are commonly produced among a wide array of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria but the highest occurrence has been attributed to <em>Cupriavidus necator</em> (<em>C. necator</em>, previously known as <em>Rastonia eutropha</em>), which is the main chassis for current commercial production of PHA-based bioplastics. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Because of the characteristics of being water insoluble, nontoxic and degradable, poly(3- hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) became two major members of this family that have attracted our attentions most (Zakaria et al., 2010). PHB is the most prevalent biopolymer of this family and has been investigated fervently as a bio-based alternative to petrochemical-derived plastics. Within specific conditions of nutrients and carbon sources, co-polymers – that is, polyesters comprising of more than one type of monomer – can also be synthesized. PHB is frequently the predominant monomer but various co-polymers exist that are built up from larger species (i.e. polyhydroxyvalerate, polyhydroxyhexanoate, etc.). PHA co-polymers are currently an area of interest due to the diversity of properties (e.g. elasticity, crystallinity, melting point, etc.) that emerge as a result of their relative monomer compositions and their corresponding side chain moieties. It has been shown that a higher molar ratio of the hydroxyvalerate component resulted in increased ductility, strength and a larger thermal processing window. Effectively this means that across a range of monomer compositions, PHBV can be modified to become usable in 3D printers (which operate within specific melting temperatures of the bioplastic “ink), used in consumer packaging or even applied in the biomedical context as components of slow-release drug formulations and orthopedic devices. |
− | Because of the characteristics of being water insoluble, nontoxic and degradable, poly(3- hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) became two major members of this family that have attracted our attentions most (Zakaria et al., 2010). PHB is the most prevalent biopolymer of this family and has been investigated fervently as a bio-based alternative to petrochemical-derived plastics. Within specific conditions of nutrients and carbon sources, co-polymers – that is, polyesters comprising of more than one type of monomer – can also be synthesized. PHB is frequently the predominant monomer but various co-polymers exist that are built up from larger species (i.e. polyhydroxyvalerate, polyhydroxyhexanoate, etc.). PHA co-polymers are currently an area of interest due to the diversity of properties (e.g. elasticity, crystallinity, melting point, etc.) that emerge as a result of their relative monomer compositions and their corresponding side chain moieties. It has been shown that a higher molar ratio of the hydroxyvalerate component resulted in increased ductility, strength and a larger thermal processing window. Effectively this means that across a range of monomer compositions, PHBV can be modified to become usable in 3D printers (which operate within specific melting temperatures of the bioplastic “ink), used in consumer packaging or even applied in the biomedical context as components of slow-release drug formulations and orthopedic devices. | + | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;"> </p> | <p style="text-align: justify;"> </p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<h4 style=" font-size:150% " ">Investigation of the optimised culture conditions for <em>E.coli</em> harbouring <em>phaCAB</em> operon on growth and PHA production</h4> | <h4 style=" font-size:150% " ">Investigation of the optimised culture conditions for <em>E.coli</em> harbouring <em>phaCAB</em> operon on growth and PHA production</h4> | ||
Line 69: | Line 64: | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the experiment, recombinant <em>E. coli</em> harbouring <em>phaCAB</em> were used to culture with different conditions up to 56 hours.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">In the experiment, recombinant <em>E. coli</em> harbouring <em>phaCAB</em> were used to culture with different conditions up to 56 hours.</p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | <h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">The iGEM Edinburgh OG 2018 team decided to characterize the ideal glucose concentration for Hybrid promoter with PHA operon. E. coli cells were cultured with different concentrations of glucose at 37 ℃ and optical density was measured at cultivation time of 6 hours, 24 hours, 30 hours 48 hours, 56 hours and 72 hours. In order to assess the Real-time PHA detection by Semi-quantitative analysis (Nile Red Fluorescent intensity-through using Image J program). Cell cultures were harvested at different cultivation hours including 6 hours, 24 hours, 30 hours and 48 hours. The bars in blue and orange represented signal intensity of cells harboured pSB1C3-phaCAB and pSB1C3 respectively. The bars in yellow represented signal intensity resulting from PHA, which were calculated from the difference between intensity of pSB1C3-phaCAB and intensity of pSB1C3. The team then decided to determine the influence of glucose availability on PHA production level, in addition to the growth curves with different glucose concentrations.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">The iGEM Edinburgh OG 2018 team decided to characterize the ideal glucose concentration for Hybrid promoter with PHA operon. E. coli cells were cultured with different concentrations of glucose at 37 ℃ and optical density was measured at cultivation time of 6 hours, 24 hours, 30 hours 48 hours, 56 hours and 72 hours. In order to assess the Real-time PHA detection by Semi-quantitative analysis (Nile Red Fluorescent intensity-through using Image J program). Cell cultures were harvested at different cultivation hours including 6 hours, 24 hours, 30 hours and 48 hours. The bars in blue and orange represented signal intensity of cells harboured pSB1C3-phaCAB and pSB1C3 respectively. The bars in yellow represented signal intensity resulting from PHA, which were calculated from the difference between intensity of pSB1C3-phaCAB and intensity of pSB1C3. The team then decided to determine the influence of glucose availability on PHA production level, in addition to the growth curves with different glucose concentrations.</p> | ||
− | |||
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/01/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen1.png" /> | <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/01/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen1.png" /> | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 1 </strong>Comparison of growth curve of recombinant E. coli harbouring pSB1C3-phaCAB for different concentration of glucose.</p> | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 1 </strong>Comparison of growth curve of recombinant E. coli harbouring pSB1C3-phaCAB for different concentration of glucose.</p> | ||
− | + | <p> </p> | |
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/ca/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen3.png" /> | <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/ca/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen3.png" /> | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 2 </strong>The fluorescent intensity of PHA produced with different glucose concentrations. (48 hours cultivation). Error bars represented standard deviations.</p> | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 2 </strong>The fluorescent intensity of PHA produced with different glucose concentrations. (48 hours cultivation). Error bars represented standard deviations.</p> | ||
− | + | <p> </p> | |
+ | <p style= "text align:center;"><strong>Table 1</strong> Yield of PHA of pSB1C3-phaCAB with different glucose concentrations</p> | ||
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/8/81/T--Edinburgh_OG--2018--mingowen1.png" /> | <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/8/81/T--Edinburgh_OG--2018--mingowen1.png" /> | ||
− | + | <p> </p> | |
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/c2/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen2.png" /> | <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/c2/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen2.png" /> | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 3. </strong>Fluorescent intensity of cells harboured pSB1C3 or pSB1C3-phaCAB at different cultivation time.</p> | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 3. </strong>Fluorescent intensity of cells harboured pSB1C3 or pSB1C3-phaCAB at different cultivation time.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
− | <p>In order to determine the tolerance of propionic acid, which allow the later investigation with the <em>Bktb</em> gene, E. coli harbouring pSB1C3-phaCAB plasmids were cultured with different concentration of glucose and propionic acid for 56 hours. </p> | + | <p style= "text align:justify;">In order to determine the tolerance of propionic acid, which allow the later investigation with the <em>Bktb</em> gene, E. coli harbouring pSB1C3-phaCAB plasmids were cultured with different concentration of glucose and propionic acid for 56 hours. </p> |
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e9/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen4.png" /> | <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e9/T--Edinburgh_OG--MingPHAimprovementowen4.png" /> | ||
Line 129: | Line 120: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><strong>Construct establishment</strong></li> | <li><strong>Construct establishment</strong></li> | ||
− | |||
<p style="text-align: justify;">All the gene fragments with different overhangs were amplified by PCR amplification. Then Gibson Master Mix was used to assemble all the fragments and build constructs in new gene orders.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">All the gene fragments with different overhangs were amplified by PCR amplification. Then Gibson Master Mix was used to assemble all the fragments and build constructs in new gene orders.</p> | ||
<p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d8/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_2.png" /> | <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d8/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_2.png" /> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 5 </strong>The workflow of Gibson assembly - Fragments are amplified with overlap, followed by incubation at 50˚C for 15-60 min, with Gibson Assembly Master Mix, which includes three essential enzymes (5´ exonuclease, DNA polymerase and DNA ligase). Those essential enzymes enable new construct to be assembled (Chan).</p> |
− | + | ||
<li><strong>PHB production confirmation and measurement</strong></li> | <li><strong>PHB production confirmation and measurement</strong></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 139: | Line 128: | ||
<h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | <h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">Four constructs including <em>phaCAB</em>, <em>phaCBA</em>, <em>phaACB</em> and <em>phaBCA</em> were successfully constructed while the establishment of <em>phaACB</em> and <em>phaBAC</em> failed due to the inappropariate primers design. <strong> </strong>Nile red plate staining confirmed PHB production from cells that harboured four new constructs (<em>phaCAB</em>, <em>phaCBA</em>, <em>phaACB</em> and <em>phaBCA</em>). By measuring the yield of produced PHB, the most balanced PHB production is from <em>E. coli</em> that harboured original <em>phaCAB </em> operon and <em>phaACB</em> operon.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">Four constructs including <em>phaCAB</em>, <em>phaCBA</em>, <em>phaACB</em> and <em>phaBCA</em> were successfully constructed while the establishment of <em>phaACB</em> and <em>phaBAC</em> failed due to the inappropariate primers design. <strong> </strong>Nile red plate staining confirmed PHB production from cells that harboured four new constructs (<em>phaCAB</em>, <em>phaCBA</em>, <em>phaACB</em> and <em>phaBCA</em>). By measuring the yield of produced PHB, the most balanced PHB production is from <em>E. coli</em> that harboured original <em>phaCAB </em> operon and <em>phaACB</em> operon.</p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Table | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Table 2 </strong>The yield of produced PHB</p> |
<table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 620.5px;"> | <table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 620.5px;"> | ||
<tbody> | <tbody> | ||
Line 232: | Line 221: | ||
<h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Future Works</strong></h3> | <h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Future Works</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">Further study about new constructs is remained be performed. For instance, the enzyme activities assays help to figure out how enzyme activities effected by the different gene order.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">Further study about new constructs is remained be performed. For instance, the enzyme activities assays help to figure out how enzyme activities effected by the different gene order.</p> | ||
+ | |||
<h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>References</strong> </h3> | <h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>References</strong> </h3> | ||
− | |||
<li style="text-align: justify;">Geyer, R., Jambeck, J.R. and Law, K.L., 2017. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science advances</em>, 3(7), p.e1700782.</li> | <li style="text-align: justify;">Geyer, R., Jambeck, J.R. and Law, K.L., 2017. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science advances</em>, 3(7), p.e1700782.</li> | ||
<li style="text-align: justify;">Bonartsev, A.P., Zharkova, I.I., Yakovlev, S.G., Myshkina, V.L., Mahina, T.K., Voinova, V.V., Zernov, A.L., Zhuikov, V.A., Akoulina, E.A., Ivanova, E.V. and Kuznetsova, E.S., 2017. Biosynthesis of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) copolymers by Azotobacter chroococcum 7B: A precursor feeding strategy. <em>Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology</em>, 47(2), pp.173-184.</li> | <li style="text-align: justify;">Bonartsev, A.P., Zharkova, I.I., Yakovlev, S.G., Myshkina, V.L., Mahina, T.K., Voinova, V.V., Zernov, A.L., Zhuikov, V.A., Akoulina, E.A., Ivanova, E.V. and Kuznetsova, E.S., 2017. Biosynthesis of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) copolymers by Azotobacter chroococcum 7B: A precursor feeding strategy. <em>Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology</em>, 47(2), pp.173-184.</li> | ||
Line 260: | Line 249: | ||
<p><strong><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/76/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_3.png" width="689" height="130" /></strong></p> | <p><strong><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/76/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_3.png" width="689" height="130" /></strong></p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 6 </strong>Schematic illustration of the pathways leading to the PHBV biosynthesis</p> |
<h3><strong>Background</strong></h3> | <h3><strong>Background</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">As a typical role in the PHAs family, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3- hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) is more likely to be a potential candidate for thermoplastic because of its higher thermal stability and flexibility which could be optimised by adjusting 3-hydroxyvalerate (3HV) fractions (Yu et al., 2005). <em>Escherichia coli</em> is one of the best-studied bacteria and is used as an ideal host for PHB and PHBV production because of its well-studied genetics and metabolism. In addition, a high-cell-density cultivation strategy contributed to improve polymer yield and productivity (Shojaosadati et al., 2008). Whole genome analysis of <em>R. eutropha</em> H16 identified several genes as paralogous to the <em>phaA</em>, and the <em>bktB</em> was isolated from <em>R. eutropha</em> H16 as the most important paralogous gene for PHBV production since it showed higher substrate specificity to the C5 monomer and used 3-ketovaleryl-CoA more efficiently (Mifune et al., 2010). </p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">As a typical role in the PHAs family, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3- hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) is more likely to be a potential candidate for thermoplastic because of its higher thermal stability and flexibility which could be optimised by adjusting 3-hydroxyvalerate (3HV) fractions (Yu et al., 2005). <em>Escherichia coli</em> is one of the best-studied bacteria and is used as an ideal host for PHB and PHBV production because of its well-studied genetics and metabolism. In addition, a high-cell-density cultivation strategy contributed to improve polymer yield and productivity (Shojaosadati et al., 2008). Whole genome analysis of <em>R. eutropha</em> H16 identified several genes as paralogous to the <em>phaA</em>, and the <em>bktB</em> was isolated from <em>R. eutropha</em> H16 as the most important paralogous gene for PHBV production since it showed higher substrate specificity to the C5 monomer and used 3-ketovaleryl-CoA more efficiently (Mifune et al., 2010). </p> | ||
Line 270: | Line 259: | ||
<p><em>E. coli</em> strain BL21 (DE3) that harboured these two plasmids was spread on the Nile red agar plates with negative control (pSB1C3) respectively, and the two plates were exposed to blue light. Compared with negative control, strong Nile red fluorescence observed from strains that harboured either pSB1C3-<em>phaCAB</em>-<em>bktB</em> or pSB1C3-<em>phaCB</em>-<em>bktB</em> indicated that PHA (PHB and PHBV) production was assessed after 24 hours.</p> | <p><em>E. coli</em> strain BL21 (DE3) that harboured these two plasmids was spread on the Nile red agar plates with negative control (pSB1C3) respectively, and the two plates were exposed to blue light. Compared with negative control, strong Nile red fluorescence observed from strains that harboured either pSB1C3-<em>phaCAB</em>-<em>bktB</em> or pSB1C3-<em>phaCB</em>-<em>bktB</em> indicated that PHA (PHB and PHBV) production was assessed after 24 hours.</p> | ||
<p><img src="https://2018.igem.org/File:T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_nile_red_agar_plate_detection.png" alt="" /><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f1/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_nile_red_agar_plate_detection.png" width="529" height="270" /></p> | <p><img src="https://2018.igem.org/File:T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_nile_red_agar_plate_detection.png" alt="" /><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f1/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_nile_red_agar_plate_detection.png" width="529" height="270" /></p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 7 </strong>Nile red agar plate detection of PHA production - Paralogous gene <em>bktB</em> represented similar function with <em>phaA</em> gene in the pathway, which showed higher specificity to C5 monomers contributed to the PHBV productivity and 3HV fraction. Although Gas Chromatography remained to be done to analyse PHBV composition, lower melting temperature still gave strong suggestion that replacing <em>phaA</em> gene with <em>bktB</em> could significantly increase the PHBV content in PHA production and co-expression of two genes would show small increase of PHBV production. Combined with the culture condition optimisation, cells harbouring pSB1C3-<em>phaCB</em>-<em>bktB </em>showed great potential to improve production of PHBV with higher 3HV fraction.</p> |
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Table | + | <p? </p> |
+ | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Table 3 </strong>Melting temperatures of PHA from various sources</p> | ||
<table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" width="0"> | <table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" width="0"> | ||
<tbody> | <tbody> | ||
Line 413: | Line 403: | ||
<h3><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | <h3><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">The stop codon between <em>phaP</em> and <em>hlyA</em> was removed forming a part for new Biobrick that could be submitted to the iGEM registry. The results obtained from cell viability assay demonstrated that the expression of <em>phaCAB</em> operon was likely to pose extra pressure on cells, while the regulation of <em>PhaR</em> and phasin can release the burden in some extent. The PHB produced by <em>E. coli</em> that harboured pSB3T5-<em>ProR</em>-<em>phaR</em>-<em>ProP</em>-<em>phaP</em>-<em>hlyA</em> is the highest. And the comparison of PHB yield listed below, indicating that the presence of <em>PhaR</em> regulator effectively regulate the expression of phasin and moderate the biosynthesis of PHB.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">The stop codon between <em>phaP</em> and <em>hlyA</em> was removed forming a part for new Biobrick that could be submitted to the iGEM registry. The results obtained from cell viability assay demonstrated that the expression of <em>phaCAB</em> operon was likely to pose extra pressure on cells, while the regulation of <em>PhaR</em> and phasin can release the burden in some extent. The PHB produced by <em>E. coli</em> that harboured pSB3T5-<em>ProR</em>-<em>phaR</em>-<em>ProP</em>-<em>phaP</em>-<em>hlyA</em> is the highest. And the comparison of PHB yield listed below, indicating that the presence of <em>PhaR</em> regulator effectively regulate the expression of phasin and moderate the biosynthesis of PHB.</p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"> <strong>Table | + | <p style="text-align: center;"> <strong>Table 4 </strong>The yield of PHB production</p> |
<table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 820px;"> | <table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 820px;"> | ||
<tbody> | <tbody> | ||
Line 557: | Line 547: | ||
<h4 style=" font-size:150% " ">Construction of plasmids harbouring the Sleeping Beauty Mutase operon, and methylmalonyl CoA epimerase for producing propionate for PHBV production</h4> | <h4 style=" font-size:150% " ">Construction of plasmids harbouring the Sleeping Beauty Mutase operon, and methylmalonyl CoA epimerase for producing propionate for PHBV production</h4> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: justify;">Methylmalonyl-CoA Epimerase (MCE) was introduced in the proposed pathway (as shown in Figure | + | <p style="text-align: justify;">Methylmalonyl-CoA Epimerase (MCE) was introduced in the proposed pathway (as shown in Figure 8) resulting to high production of propionate. By expressing the Sleeping Beauty Mutase (SBM) operon and MCE with genes for PHA production in <em>E. coli</em> would result in the production of PHBV with a high ratio of valerate to butyrate. In this study, vectors harbouring the SBM operon with and without MCE was achieved.</p> |
Line 575: | Line 565: | ||
<h3><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | <h3><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d0/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_6.png" width="279" height="359" /></strong></p> | <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d0/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_6.png" width="279" height="359" /></strong></p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 9 </strong>Analytical digest of pSB3T5: SBM using <em>Xba</em>I and <em>Spe</em>I, followed by gel electrophoresis – Uncut sample showed 2 bands, one above 10kbp, and one between 8kbp – 6kbp. XbaI and SpeI single digests show a single band of 8790bp. XbaI and SpeI double digest shows two bands: a pSB3T5 backbone at 3250bp, and the SBM operon at 5540bp</p> |
<p><strong><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cd/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_7.png" width="504" height="332" /></strong></p> | <p><strong><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cd/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_7.png" width="504" height="332" /></strong></p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 10 </strong>Colony PCR of 7 colonies of pSB3T5: MCE: SBM – Samples 5, 6, and 7 all have bands between 6kbp – 8kbp, suggesting that they do possess PSB3T5: MCE: Sbm, but would have to be verified by sequencing. </p> |
<h3><strong>Future Work</strong></h3> | <h3><strong>Future Work</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">In this work, constructs containing the SBM operon and MCE were developed. The constructs produced in this work need to be verified by sequencing, in order to determine whether there are any mutations that may impact their function.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">In this work, constructs containing the SBM operon and MCE were developed. The constructs produced in this work need to be verified by sequencing, in order to determine whether there are any mutations that may impact their function.</p> | ||
Line 613: | Line 603: | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">The presence of <em>sucCD</em> enable strains adapt environments with propionate meanwhile enhances the propionate utilization ability, thereby resulting in better PHBV production compared to existence of <em>sucAB</em> gene. The amount of propionic acid up taken by cell reflects the propionate utilization capacity of each strains in some extent, it can be told that all three strains present similar property in terms of propionic acid absorption, when the concentration is 0.03 M, every strain has peak absorption.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">The presence of <em>sucCD</em> enable strains adapt environments with propionate meanwhile enhances the propionate utilization ability, thereby resulting in better PHBV production compared to existence of <em>sucAB</em> gene. The amount of propionic acid up taken by cell reflects the propionate utilization capacity of each strains in some extent, it can be told that all three strains present similar property in terms of propionic acid absorption, when the concentration is 0.03 M, every strain has peak absorption.</p> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;"><br /><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d7/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_8.png" width="457" height="247" /></p> | <p style="text-align: justify;"><br /><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d7/T--Edinburgh_OG--PHBV_prodxn_-_8.png" width="457" height="247" /></p> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Figure 11 </strong>Propionic acid absorbed by three recombinant <em>E. coli </em>of pSB3T5-AB+<em> phaCAB</em>, pSB3T5-CD+<em>phaCAB</em> and pSB3T5+<em>phaCAB</em> operon</p> |
<h3><strong>Future Works</strong></h3> | <h3><strong>Future Works</strong></h3> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify;">This investigation will be meaningful for practical issues like environment protection as well as industrial applications, for example, pot ale, a by-product from whisky distillery is rich in propionate. Currently, selling to local farmers and applying as fertilizer is the main by-products treatment method, PHBV production via recombinant strains fed with pot ale potentially can be a more environmentally-friendly and cost-effective alternative.</p> | <p style="text-align: justify;">This investigation will be meaningful for practical issues like environment protection as well as industrial applications, for example, pot ale, a by-product from whisky distillery is rich in propionate. Currently, selling to local farmers and applying as fertilizer is the main by-products treatment method, PHBV production via recombinant strains fed with pot ale potentially can be a more environmentally-friendly and cost-effective alternative.</p> |
Revision as of 00:20, 18 October 2018