Difference between revisions of "Team:Montpellier/L jensenii"
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<style> | <style> | ||
| − | . | + | .floating { |
| − | + | float: left; | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 27: | Line 16: | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <img class="banniere" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/ac/T--Montpellier--banniere_lactobacillus_jensenii.png"/> | ||
<section> | <section> | ||
| − | + | <p>For our project, we decided to study <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i> (Figure 1), as it appeared to be a promising candidate for several reasons.</p> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | <p>For our project we | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | < | + | <figure> |
| − | <img class=" | + | <img class="image_figure_50" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/34/T--Montpellier--lactobacillus_jensenii.jpg"/><br/> |
| − | < | + | <figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 1:</span> <i>L. jensenii</i> strain used for our project under 100x magnification.</figcaption> |
| − | </ | + | </figure> |
| − | < | + | <figure class="floating"> |
| − | <img class=" | + | <img class="image_figure_70" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7d/T--Montpellier--vagina_compostion2_mtp.png"/><!--float left--> |
| − | < | + | <figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 2:</span> Representation of the vaginal flora composition for the majority of women.</figcaption> |
| − | </ | + | </figure> |
| − | < | + | <p><i>L. jensenii</i> is a normal inhabitant of the lower reproductive tract in healthy women. More than 20 species have been detected in the vagina, but in healthy conditions only one or two of the four main species (mainly <i>L. crispatus</i> and <i>L. iners</i>, but also <i>L. jensenii</i> and <i>L. gasseri</i>) are dominant (Figure 2) <a class="lien" href="#references">[1]</a><a class="lien" href="#references">[2]</a>.</p> |
| − | < | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | </ | + | |
| − | < | + | <p>While gynecological studies have found that bacterial population makeup differs around the world (e.g. <i>L. crispatus</i> and <i>L. jensenii</i> are dominant in Caucasian populations while <i>L. crispatus</i> and <i>L. gasseri</i> are dominant in women of Japanese descent) <a class="lien" href="#references">[3]</a>, we believe that the work we do towards developing <i>L. jensenii</i> as an engineering platform will be transferable to similar species. Indeed, if we can demonstrate our concept using <i>L. jensenii</i>, the same methodology will likely be applicable to other inhabitants of the vaginal microbiota in an effort to improve the effects of our non-hormonal contraception system.</p> |
| − | < | + | |
| − | < | + | |
| − | </ | + | |
| − | < | + | <p>Discovered by F. Gasser, M. Mandel, and M. Rogosa in 1969 <a class="lien" href="#references">[4]</a>, <i>L. jensenii</i> is currently used very infrequently in synthetic biology. This bacterium has not been well characterized and few research teams have been working with this strain in the last few decades. Finding information for how to work with this bacterium was arduous for the team. However, we are convinced that future work on this strain can be crucial for women’s health. This is why we decided to create a toolbox for working with <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i>. |
| − | < | + | |
| − | < | + | |
| − | </ | + | |
| − | + | </section> | |
| − | </ | + | <section class="references" id="references"> |
| + | <table class="references_table"> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <th class="references_title" colspan="2">References</th> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="references_left">[1]</td> | ||
| + | <td class="references_right">Reid, G., McGroarty, J. A., Tomeczek, L., & Bruce, A. W. (1996). Identification and plasmid profiles of <i>Lactobacillus</i> species from the vagina of 100 healthy women. <i>FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology</i>, 15(1), 23-26.</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="references_left">[2]</td> | ||
| + | <td class="references_right">Zhou, X., Bent, S. J., Schneider, M. G., Davis, C. C., Islam, M. R., & Forney, L. J. (2004). Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. <i>Microbiology</i>, 150(8), 2565-2573.</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="references_left">[3]</td> | ||
| + | <td class="references_right">Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S., McCulle, S. L., ... & Brotman, R. M. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108</i>(Supplement 1), 4680-4687.</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="references_bottom_left">[4]</td> | ||
| + | <td class="references_bottom_right">Gasser, F., Mandel, M., & Rogosa, M. (1970). <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i> sp. nov., a new representative of the subgenus Thermobacterium. <i>Microbiology</i>, 62(2), 219-222.</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | </table> | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:31, 16 October 2018
For our project, we decided to study Lactobacillus jensenii (Figure 1), as it appeared to be a promising candidate for several reasons.
L. jensenii is a normal inhabitant of the lower reproductive tract in healthy women. More than 20 species have been detected in the vagina, but in healthy conditions only one or two of the four main species (mainly L. crispatus and L. iners, but also L. jensenii and L. gasseri) are dominant (Figure 2) [1][2].
While gynecological studies have found that bacterial population makeup differs around the world (e.g. L. crispatus and L. jensenii are dominant in Caucasian populations while L. crispatus and L. gasseri are dominant in women of Japanese descent) [3], we believe that the work we do towards developing L. jensenii as an engineering platform will be transferable to similar species. Indeed, if we can demonstrate our concept using L. jensenii, the same methodology will likely be applicable to other inhabitants of the vaginal microbiota in an effort to improve the effects of our non-hormonal contraception system.
Discovered by F. Gasser, M. Mandel, and M. Rogosa in 1969 [4], L. jensenii is currently used very infrequently in synthetic biology. This bacterium has not been well characterized and few research teams have been working with this strain in the last few decades. Finding information for how to work with this bacterium was arduous for the team. However, we are convinced that future work on this strain can be crucial for women’s health. This is why we decided to create a toolbox for working with Lactobacillus jensenii.
| References | |
|---|---|
| [1] | Reid, G., McGroarty, J. A., Tomeczek, L., & Bruce, A. W. (1996). Identification and plasmid profiles of Lactobacillus species from the vagina of 100 healthy women. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 15(1), 23-26. |
| [2] | Zhou, X., Bent, S. J., Schneider, M. G., Davis, C. C., Islam, M. R., & Forney, L. J. (2004). Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology, 150(8), 2565-2573. |
| [3] | Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S., McCulle, S. L., ... & Brotman, R. M. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 1), 4680-4687. |
| [4] | Gasser, F., Mandel, M., & Rogosa, M. (1970). Lactobacillus jensenii sp. nov., a new representative of the subgenus Thermobacterium. Microbiology, 62(2), 219-222. |