Difference between revisions of "Team:Montpellier/L jensenii"

 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
<style>
 
<style>
  
.contener_plates {
+
.floating {
   display: flex;
+
   float: left;
  justify-content: space-around;
+
  width: 100%
+
}
+
 
+
.image_plate {
+
  width: 18%
+
  text-align: center;
+
}
+
 
+
.img_plate {
+
  width: 100%
+
 
}
 
}
  
Line 27: Line 16:
  
 
<body>
 
<body>
 +
 +
<img class="banniere" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/ac/T--Montpellier--banniere_lactobacillus_jensenii.png"/>
  
 
<section>
 
<section>
  
<h1>How to work with <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i>?</h1>
+
<p>For our project, we decided to study <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i> (Figure 1), as it appeared to be a promising candidate for several reasons.</p>
 
+
<p>This toolbox contains all kind of information that can be useful for working with <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i>. First, we provide culture conditions that we used and were proven to be working. Second, it contains a transformation protocol that we optimized and found to be the most efficient of all those we tested. Finally, the toolbox contains all DNA sequences (vectors and biobricks parts including <i>L. jensenii</i> specific promoters) that we used in <i>L. jensenii</i> for our project. We hope that this toolbox will facilitate the use of <i>L. jensenii</i> by other iGEM and research teams. We plan to extend the toolbox in the future by providing the community with a physical distribution of well-characterized vectors and regulatory elements.</p>
+
 
+
<h2>How to grow <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i>?</h2><hr/>
+
 
+
<h3>Strain and medium</h3>
+
 
+
<p>For our project we used the following strain and culture medium :</p>
+
 
+
<h4>Bacteria</h4>
+
 
+
<p><a class="lien" href="http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/products/all/25258.aspx?geo_country=fr" target="_blank"><i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i> Gasser et al. (ATCC® 25258™)</a></p>
+
 
+
<h4>Culture</h4>
+
 
+
<p><a class="lien" href="https://www.fishersci.fr/shop/products/bd-difco-dehydrated-culture-media-lactobacilli-mrs-broth-3/11713553#?keyword=BD+288130&change_lang=true" target="_blank">BD Difco™ <i>Lactobacilli</i> MRS Broth</a></p>
+
 
+
<p>We used this broth for both our liquid and solid culture media. The liquid medium was used to do the solid medium by adding agar to it.  We tested different concentrations of Agar to measure which one was the best.</p>
+
 
+
<div class="contener_plates">
+
 
+
<div class="image_plate">
+
<img class="img_plate" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/97/T--Montpellier--agar5_mtp.jpg"/>
+
<p>5g/L</p>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div class="image_plate">
+
<img class="img_plate" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/87/T--Montpellier--agar7_mtp.jpg"/>
+
<p>7g/L</p>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div class="image_plate">
+
<img class="img_plate" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/30/T--Montpellier--agar10_mtp.jpg"/>
+
<p>10g/L</p>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div class="image_plate">
+
<img class="img_plate" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7e/T--Montpellier--agar12_mtp.jpg"/>
+
<p>12g/L</p>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div class="image_plate">
+
<img class="img_plate" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a4/T--Montpellier--agar15_mtp.jpg"/>
+
<p>15g/L</p>
+
</div>
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
+
<figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 1:</span> The different concentrations of Agar used for solid MRS culture medium and <i>L. jensenii</i> grown on the plates for 24 hours.</figcation>
+
 
+
<p>The plates with 5g/L and 7 g/L of Agar were not showing any colonies. For the three others there were more colonies for 12g/L. From this experiment we decided to use 12g/L of Agar for our experiments.</p>
+
 
+
<h3>Cell culture</h3>
+
 
+
<h4>Growth on solid medium</h4>
+
 
+
<p><i>L. jensenii</i> is a facultative anaerobic bacterium, it does not absolutely need CO<sub>2</sub> to survive but grows way better in anaerobic conditions. For our project we did not have a CO<sub>2</sub> incubator available for growing bacteria. We thus decided to grow our bacteria using an “old school” microbiology method. The goal of the method is to get rid of the Oxygen present in the environment of the bacteria. To do so, we put the plates in a hermetic container and placed a burning candle inside it before closing the lid. The candle consumes all the oxygen and turns it into in CO<sub>2</sub>, until all O<sub>2</sub> is consumed and the candle extinguish.</p>
+
 
+
<p>For our culture we used two kinds of plates and thus two kinds of containers.</p>
+
 
+
<p>As <i>L. jensenii</i> grows in small colonies we usually used small plates (60mm diameter) and put them in a jar (Figure 2) as follows:</p>
+
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img class="image_figure" src=""/>
+
<img class="image_figure_50" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/34/T--Montpellier--lactobacillus_jensenii.jpg"/><br/>
<figcaption><span class="underline"/>Figure 2:</span> Small plates (60mm diameter) are placed in an hermetically closed jar with a burning candle.  Using this method we were able to produce the anaerobic environment required for <i>L. Jensenii</i> growth.</figcaption>
+
<figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 1:</span> <i>L. jensenii</i> strain used for our project under 100x magnification.</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<p>For transformant selection, we needed more colonies so we used normal culture plates (100mm diameter). We put them in an airtight-closing bowl with three candles (Figure 3).</p>
+
<figure class="floating">
 
+
<img class="image_figure_70" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7d/T--Montpellier--vagina_compostion2_mtp.png"/><!--float left-->
<figure>
+
<figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 2:</span> Representation of the vaginal flora composition for the majority of women.</figcaption>
<img class="image_figure" src=""/>
+
<figcaption><span class="underline"/>Figure 3:</span> 100mm plates incubated in a airtight-closing bowl.</figcaption>
+
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<h4>Growth in liquid medium</h4>
+
<p><i>L. jensenii</i> is a normal inhabitant of the lower reproductive tract in healthy women. More than 20 species have been detected in the vagina, but in healthy conditions only one or two of the four main species (mainly <i>L. crispatus</i> and <i>L. iners</i>, but also <i>L. jensenii</i> and <i>L. gasseri</i>) are dominant (Figure 2) <a class="lien" href="#references">[1]</a><a class="lien" href="#references">[2]</a>.</p>
  
<h2>How to transform <i>L. jensenii</i>?</h2>
+
<p>While gynecological studies have found that bacterial population makeup differs around the world (e.g. <i>L. crispatus</i> and <i>L. jensenii</i> are dominant in Caucasian populations while <i>L. crispatus</i> and <i>L. gasseri</i> are dominant in women of Japanese descent) <a class="lien" href="#references">[3]</a>, we believe that the work we do towards developing <i>L. jensenii</i> as an engineering platform will be transferable to similar species. Indeed, if we can demonstrate our concept using <i>L. jensenii</i>,  the same methodology will likely be applicable to other inhabitants of the vaginal microbiota in an effort to improve the effects of our non-hormonal contraception system.</p>
  
<p>To transform <i>L. jensenii</i>, we found several protocols. All of these protocols were specific to <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i> or <i>Lactobacilli</i> in general, but not to <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i>.<br/>
+
<p>Discovered by F. Gasser, M. Mandel, and M. Rogosa in 1969 <a class="lien" href="#references">[4]</a>, <i>L. jensenii</i> is currently used very infrequently in synthetic biology. This bacterium has not been well characterized and few research teams have been working with this strain in the last few decades. Finding information for how to work with this bacterium was arduous for the team. However, we are convinced that future work on this strain can be crucial for women’s health. This is why we decided to create a toolbox for working with <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i>.
We selected different protocols that used or not magnesium in the electroporation buffer. Indeed, our electroporation machine could not stand magnesium, as it can causes electric arcs and damage the machine. We had to find another electroporator at the University of Montpellier. These electroporator had advanced settings such as the resistance.</p>
+
  
<figure>
+
</section>
<img class="" src=""/>
+
<figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 4:</span></figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
  
<p>The three protocols that we chose were one from <a class="lien" href="https://openwetware.org/wiki/Lactobacillus_transformation_(Berthier_1996)" target="_blank">Berthier in 1996</a>, one from <a class="lien" href="" target="_blank">Speer in 2012</a>, and the last one from Chatel [1].<p>
+
<section class="references" id="references">
 
+
  <table class="references_table">
<p>We tried to transform our bacteria several times with these three different protocols. Finally, we decided to focus on Berthier 1996 as we had better results. A reason why Speer 2012 did not work well was the addition of glycine to grow bacteria. It weaken the bacterial wall too much, and inhibited the grow. We did not focus on Chatel because the use of magnesium in the electroporation buffer gave us bad time constants, that means that bacteria were not well transformed.</p>
+
    <tr>
 
+
      <th class="references_title" colspan="2">References</th>
<p>Once we chose the most promising protocol, we had to optimize it. We tried different conditions for the following parameters:
+
    </tr>
<ul>
+
<tr>
  <li>Amount of DNA per reaction: 10ng, 100ng, 1000ng, 5000ng (of pLEM415) ⇒ did not change anything. We decided to add about 1000ng of plasmid per reaction.</li>
+
      <td class="references_left">[1]</td>
  <li>Voltage: 9kV/cm, 10kV/cm, 12.5kV/cm ⇒ we obtained better time constant (closer to 11ms to 13ms as explained in Berthier 1996) with 12.5kV/cm for the electroporation.</li>
+
      <td class="references_right">Reid, G., McGroarty, J. A., Tomeczek, L., & Bruce, A. W. (1996). Identification and plasmid profiles of <i>Lactobacillus</i> species from the vagina of 100 healthy women. <i>FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology</i>, 15(1), 23-26.</td>
  <li>Resistance (ohm Ω): 300Ω, 500Ω, 600Ω ⇒ to reach a time constant between 11ms and 13ms, we decided to follow the protocol and to use 600Ω.</li>
+
    </tr>
  <li>Antibiotic concentration for transformant selection: erythromycin 0.5µg/mL, 5µg/mL ⇒ we chose 0.5µg/mL as it was enough to select the transformants. 0.5µg/mL can kill non-resistant <i>L. jensenii</i>.</li>
+
    <tr>
</ul>
+
      <td class="references_left">[2]</td>
 
+
      <td class="references_right">Zhou, X., Bent, S. J., Schneider, M. G., Davis, C. C., Islam, M. R., & Forney, L. J. (2004). Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. <i>Microbiology</i>, 150(8), 2565-2573.</td>
<p>You can find the exact protocol for transforming <i>L. jensenii</i> on our protocol page: <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Montpellier/Protocols target="_blank">protocol</a>.
+
    </tr>
 
+
    <tr>
<h2><i>L. jensenii</i> plasmid</h2>
+
      <td class="references_left">[3]</td>
 
+
      <td class="references_right">Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S., McCulle, S. L., ... & Brotman, R. M. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108</i>(Supplement 1), 4680-4687.</td>
<p>The choice of the plasmid has been complicated because the strain is little used in synthetic biology. Thus, it has been difficult to find plasmids "free" of intellectual property. Indeed, the only existing plasmids (pOSELp23 and pOSEL144) were created by the company Osel Inc (USA). Unfortunately, we could not obtain the constructs from the company.</p>
+
    </tr>
 
+
    <tr>
<p>We therefore had to find a vector responding to the following specifications:
+
      <td class="references_bottom_left">[4]</td>
<ol>
+
      <td class="references_bottom_right">Gasser, F., Mandel, M., & Rogosa, M. (1970). <i>Lactobacillus jensenii</i> sp. nov., a new representative of the subgenus Thermobacterium. <i>Microbiology</i>, 62(2), 219-222.</td>
  <li>An <i>E. coli</i> specific origin of replication.</li>
+
    </tr>
  <li>n antibiotic  resistance gene for selection in <i>E. coli</i> ⇒ These parts are required to support cloning and propagation of our vectors into <i>E. coli</i> before transforming them into  <i>L. jensenii</i>.</li>
+
  </table>
  <li>A <i>L. jensenii</i> specific origin of replication.</i>
+
  <li>An antibiotic  resistance gene for selection in <i>L. jensenii</i> ⇒ These parts will allow propagation and maintenance of the plasmids in <i>L. jensenii</i>.</li>
+
</ol>
+
 
+
<p>We chose not to create a vector from scratch but to start by trying to reuse different already ones existing. Our choice turned toward specific vector with different origins of replications operating into <i>Lactobacillus</i> species available on the Addgene website. While none of them was previously used for <i>L. jensenii</i>, we hoped that at least  one of these vectors could be functional in <i>L. jensenii</i>:
+
<ul>
+
  <li><a class="lien" href="https://www.addgene.org/71312/" target="_blank">pTRKH2</a></li>
+
  <li><a class="lien" href="https://www.addgene.org/27168/" target="_blank">pTRKH3-slpGFP</a></li>
+
  <li><a class="lien" href="https://www.addgene.org/99842/" target="_blank">pLEM415-ldhL-mRFP1</a></li>
+
  <li><a class="lien" href="https://www.addgene.org/71313/" target="_blank">pTRK669</a></li>
+
  <li><a class="lien" href="https://www.addgene.org/71803/" target="_blank">pTRK892</a></li>
+
</ul>
+
 
+
<p>We were able to transform pLEM415. If we had more time, we would have tested all the plasmids in <i>L. jensenii</i>. Some of them might be functional.</p>
+
  
 
</section>
 
</section>
Line 159: Line 69:
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
Bao, S., Zhu, L., Zhuang, Q., Wang, L., Xu, P. X., Itoh, K., ... & Lin, J. 2013. Distribution dynamics of recombinant <i>Lactobacillus</i> in the gastrointestinal tract of neonatal rats. <i>PloS one</i>, 8(3), e60007.
 
  
 
{{Montpellier/Footer}}
 
{{Montpellier/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 21:31, 16 October 2018

For our project, we decided to study Lactobacillus jensenii (Figure 1), as it appeared to be a promising candidate for several reasons.


Figure 1: L. jensenii strain used for our project under 100x magnification.
Figure 2: Representation of the vaginal flora composition for the majority of women.

L. jensenii is a normal inhabitant of the lower reproductive tract in healthy women. More than 20 species have been detected in the vagina, but in healthy conditions only one or two of the four main species (mainly L. crispatus and L. iners, but also L. jensenii and L. gasseri) are dominant (Figure 2) [1][2].

While gynecological studies have found that bacterial population makeup differs around the world (e.g. L. crispatus and L. jensenii are dominant in Caucasian populations while L. crispatus and L. gasseri are dominant in women of Japanese descent) [3], we believe that the work we do towards developing L. jensenii as an engineering platform will be transferable to similar species. Indeed, if we can demonstrate our concept using L. jensenii, the same methodology will likely be applicable to other inhabitants of the vaginal microbiota in an effort to improve the effects of our non-hormonal contraception system.

Discovered by F. Gasser, M. Mandel, and M. Rogosa in 1969 [4], L. jensenii is currently used very infrequently in synthetic biology. This bacterium has not been well characterized and few research teams have been working with this strain in the last few decades. Finding information for how to work with this bacterium was arduous for the team. However, we are convinced that future work on this strain can be crucial for women’s health. This is why we decided to create a toolbox for working with Lactobacillus jensenii.

References
[1] Reid, G., McGroarty, J. A., Tomeczek, L., & Bruce, A. W. (1996). Identification and plasmid profiles of Lactobacillus species from the vagina of 100 healthy women. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 15(1), 23-26.
[2] Zhou, X., Bent, S. J., Schneider, M. G., Davis, C. C., Islam, M. R., & Forney, L. J. (2004). Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology, 150(8), 2565-2573.
[3] Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S., McCulle, S. L., ... & Brotman, R. M. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 1), 4680-4687.
[4] Gasser, F., Mandel, M., & Rogosa, M. (1970). Lactobacillus jensenii sp. nov., a new representative of the subgenus Thermobacterium. Microbiology, 62(2), 219-222.