Difference between revisions of "Team:Montpellier/Medals"

(Created page with "{{Montpellier}} <html> <body> </body> </html> {{Montpellier/Footer}}")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
<body>
 
<body>
 +
 +
<section>
 +
 +
<h4>The iGEM Montpellier Team has fulfilled medal criteria enabling it to win the iGEM Gold Medal.</h4>
 +
 +
<h4>Bronze</h4>
 +
 +
<p>#1 We registered and attended the Giant Jamboree.</p>
 +
 +
<p>#2 We successfully delivered a wiki, a poster, presented our work at the Giant Jamboree and filled the Judging Form.</p>
 +
 +
<p>#3 We created a section Attributions on our wiki.</p>
 +
 +
<p>#4 We successfully completed the Interlab Measurement study and our data were validated by the Measurement Committee.</p><br/>
 +
 +
 +
<h4>Silver</h4>
 +
 +
<p>#1 We created and characterized parts for our project that worked as expected.</p>
 +
 +
<p>#2 We collaborated with iGEM Toulouse for the design of a project combining both our projects. We collaborated with iGEM Sorbonne Université to give a class and have practical work with highschool students.</p>
 +
 +
<p>#3 We investigated the impact of our work on the lab and considered the people opinion for our Human Practices work.</p><br/>
 +
 +
 +
<h4>Gold</h4>
 +
 +
<p>#1 We successfully took into account our Human Practices for the design of the project and for the future of the project.</p>
 +
 +
<p>#3 With bioinformatic tools we predicted the role of certain sequences useful for the toolbox of our project.</p>
 +
 +
<p>#4 We proved the efficiency of peptides for antisperm activity proving the relevance of using such peptides for our project.</p>
 +
 +
</section>
  
 
</body>
 
</body>

Revision as of 18:03, 2 December 2018

The iGEM Montpellier Team has fulfilled medal criteria enabling it to win the iGEM Gold Medal.

Bronze

#1 We registered and attended the Giant Jamboree.

#2 We successfully delivered a wiki, a poster, presented our work at the Giant Jamboree and filled the Judging Form.

#3 We created a section Attributions on our wiki.

#4 We successfully completed the Interlab Measurement study and our data were validated by the Measurement Committee.


Silver

#1 We created and characterized parts for our project that worked as expected.

#2 We collaborated with iGEM Toulouse for the design of a project combining both our projects. We collaborated with iGEM Sorbonne Université to give a class and have practical work with highschool students.

#3 We investigated the impact of our work on the lab and considered the people opinion for our Human Practices work.


Gold

#1 We successfully took into account our Human Practices for the design of the project and for the future of the project.

#3 With bioinformatic tools we predicted the role of certain sequences useful for the toolbox of our project.

#4 We proved the efficiency of peptides for antisperm activity proving the relevance of using such peptides for our project.