Difference between revisions of "Team:Montpellier/Medals"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <head> | ||
| + | <style> | ||
| + | |||
| + | .image { | ||
| + | margin: auto; | ||
| + | width: 80%; | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | |||
| + | </style> | ||
| + | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 50: | ||
<p>#4 We proved the efficiency of peptides for antisperm activity proving the relevance of using such peptides for our project.</p> | <p>#4 We proved the efficiency of peptides for antisperm activity proving the relevance of using such peptides for our project.</p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <img class="image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/3b/T--Montpellier--medals_mtp.jpg"/> | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
Revision as of 16:34, 7 December 2018
The iGEM Montpellier Team has fulfilled medal criteria enabling it to win the iGEM Gold Medal.
Bronze
#1 We registered and attended the Giant Jamboree.
#2 We successfully delivered a wiki, a poster, presented our work at the Giant Jamboree and filled the Judging Form.
#3 We created a section Attributions on our wiki.
#4 We successfully completed the Interlab Measurement study and our data were validated by the Measurement Committee.
Silver
#1 We created and characterized parts for our project that worked as expected.
#2 We collaborated with iGEM Toulouse for the design of a project combining both our projects. We collaborated with iGEM Sorbonne Université to give a class and have practical work with highschool students.
#3 We investigated the impact of our work on the lab and considered the people opinion for our Human Practices work.
Gold
#1 We successfully took into account our Human Practices for the design of the project and for the future of the project.
#3 With bioinformatic tools we predicted the role of certain sequences useful for the toolbox of our project.
#4 We proved the efficiency of peptides for antisperm activity proving the relevance of using such peptides for our project.
