Difference between revisions of "Team:Valencia UPV/Human Practices"

Line 168: Line 168:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<p>Thus, our main concern was how to fulfill the <b>stakeholders demands</b>. Following our <b>interdisciplinary spirit</b>, we searched for continuos input from professionals with different backgrounds, so we could ensure we were designing a <b>useful</b> synbio device.  
 
<p>Thus, our main concern was how to fulfill the <b>stakeholders demands</b>. Following our <b>interdisciplinary spirit</b>, we searched for continuos input from professionals with different backgrounds, so we could ensure we were designing a <b>useful</b> synbio device.  
<p>To get first-hand feedback, our human practices team conducted several interviews with each target group, so we could  realize which were the real <b>user necessities</b> in relation to topics such as software functionalities, external design and safety measurements. We also received feedback from an open-talk with <b>high school students</b>, one of the most highlighted potential users. In the same way, our microfluidic system was thoughtfully developed with the advice of <b>electronic engineering professionals</b> from the <b>microfluidic</b> area.
+
<p>To get first-hand feedback, our human practices team conducted several interviews with each target group, so we could  realize which were the real <b>user necessities</b> in relation to topics such as software functionalities, external design and safety measurements. We also received feedback from an open-talk with <b>high school students</b>, one of the most highlighted potential users. In the same way, our microfluidic system was thoughtfully developed with the advice of <b>electronic engineering professionals</b> from the <b>microfluidic</b> area.  
 
     <p> However, we realized such a great amount of information needed to be classificated previously to its integration into Printeria. As a result, we decided to employ the <b>Kano model</b>, a theory for product development and customer satisfaction, to classify Printeria potential improvements and so be an example of this model implementation for future iGEMs teams.  
 
     <p> However, we realized such a great amount of information needed to be classificated previously to its integration into Printeria. As a result, we decided to employ the <b>Kano model</b>, a theory for product development and customer satisfaction, to classify Printeria potential improvements and so be an example of this model implementation for future iGEMs teams.  
  
<p>To know how the <b>feedback receiving</b> was designed and how it was integrated to finally create Printeria as <b>nowadays</b> is, you can further read our <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Integrated_Human" target="_blank">Integrated Human page</a>. </p>
+
<p>To know how the <b>feedback receiving</b> was carried out and how it was integrated to finally create Printeria as <b>nowadays</b> is, you can further read our <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Integrated_Human" target="_blank">Integrated Human page</a>. </p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 +
h4><b><i>Is your work good enough for the world?</i></b></h4>
 
                 <a class="anchorOffset" id="Social"></a>
 
                 <a class="anchorOffset" id="Social"></a>
 
               <h4><b>Printeria: introducing SynBio to the world</b></h4>
 
               <h4><b>Printeria: introducing SynBio to the world</b></h4>
Line 186: Line 187:
 
                
 
                
 
                    
 
                    
 
+
<h4><b><i>Is your work safe enough for the world?</i></b></h4>
 
                 <a class="anchorOffset" id="Biosafety"></a>
 
                 <a class="anchorOffset" id="Biosafety"></a>
 
             <h4> Biosafety </h4>
 
             <h4> Biosafety </h4>

Revision as of 05:58, 12 October 2018

Stack Multipurpose HTML Template

Human Practices

Science and technology have always been prompted by a desire of solving social issues. Thus, science would be nothing if it doesn’t exist a relationship with people.

How your project affects the world and how the world affects it?

Feedback receiving: the key to the success

When creating a new scientific device, the existence of political, economic and social frameworks leads into the necessity of an in-depth analysis of how your creation would affect the world and how the world affects it.

As a result, our first step was to identify the real-life problems that could be solved with Printeria. We then classified its target fields as:

  • Research groups. Printeria automatizes time-consuming protocols, so it enhances the intellectual task and eases experiments reproducibility.

  • Education. With a friendly-user software, Printeria is designed to be an educational tool.

  • Bio Art. Printeria offers a compact and friendly toolkit for the bioartist entire disposal.

Thus, our main concern was how to fulfill the stakeholders demands. Following our interdisciplinary spirit, we searched for continuos input from professionals with different backgrounds, so we could ensure we were designing a useful synbio device.

To get first-hand feedback, our human practices team conducted several interviews with each target group, so we could realize which were the real user necessities in relation to topics such as software functionalities, external design and safety measurements. We also received feedback from an open-talk with high school students, one of the most highlighted potential users. In the same way, our microfluidic system was thoughtfully developed with the advice of electronic engineering professionals from the microfluidic area.

However, we realized such a great amount of information needed to be classificated previously to its integration into Printeria. As a result, we decided to employ the Kano model, a theory for product development and customer satisfaction, to classify Printeria potential improvements and so be an example of this model implementation for future iGEMs teams.

To know how the feedback receiving was carried out and how it was integrated to finally create Printeria as nowadays is, you can further read our Integrated Human page.

h4>Is your work good enough for the world?

Printeria: introducing SynBio to the world

Printeria was born with the aim of knocking down the barriers that prevent people from coming into Synthetic Biology. However, these barriers are not only related with the high-cost technology, but also with the society lack of awareness. The lay-public do not usually know what SynBio and, when having heard about it, several misconceptions are commonly extended.

Thus, we decided it was completely necessary to encourage a willing atmosphere in which Printeria could be then used as an educational tool to bring SynBio closer.

But, how to do so?

While developing our project, we had the opportunity to explore the vast applications of the BioArt world. Then, we realized we had there an attractive way to introduce SynBio to the world: promoting the BioArt field and so using an non-usual approach to get to the pubic. Moreover, we always conceibed Printeria as an educational toolfor the next generations raising. As a result, we decided to exemplificate Printeria possible artistic applications with artists advice and high schools students participation. On the other hand, several open-talks were given to divulge SynBio and so fight against common misinformation.

To know more about our Social outreach concept, see our Education and Public Engagement page by clickingE here.

Is your work safe enough for the world?

Biosafety

Biosafety measurements are completely necessary during any lab research. Moreover, considerations in relation to Printeria sterilization and biocontention measurements are essential if we want to introduce a bio-engineering device as Printeria is in non-scientific places.

Thus, we realized we had to ensure Printeria biosafety. You can all read the biosafety measurements we have finally implemented in Printeria by going to the Safety page.

Collaborations

Synthetic biology builds are the result of collaborations across many fields, including institutional, industrial, scientific, and technical developments (1). In the same way, sharing and collaborating are some of the core values of the iGEM community.

We were delighted to part of this collaborative approach, so you can all read the collaborations we have made with other iGEM teams by going to our Collaborations page.

References

(1) Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council. Positioning Synthetic Biology to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century: Summary Report of a Six Academies Symposium Series. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Aug 5. 2, Synthetic Biology: Science and Technology for the New Millennium.

CONTACT US igem.upv.2018@gmail.com