Difference between revisions of "Team:Valencia UPV/Modeling"

Models & Experiments

Characterisation procedures

Valencia UPV iGEM team has designed an extensive Part Collection in purpose of allowing the user to design multiple genetic constructions and experiments. One of our main objectives has been to show the user clear and structured information about the pieces that make up the Printeria kit. For this reason, we have considered the characterization of the parts as a priority when developing the project. In this way, we have elaborated some procedures which have allowed us to systematically obtain and structure information from the parts.

• Procedure for obtaining protein spectra

• Comparison between sfGFP and GFP relative fluorescence intensity

Procedure for obtaining protein spectra

Obtaining excitation and emission spectra is a fundamental aspect in the process of characterization of a fluorescent protein. Each protein has a characteristic spectrum, which indicates the energy in which the molecule is excited or emits at a certain wavelength.

The characterization of the reporter proteins by excitation and emission spectra are of great importance in the experimentation. When contrasting experimental information with the theoretical results of mathematical models, we experiment with numerous reporter proteins, such as fluorescence proteins or chromoproteins. However, the >fluorescence data obtained must be corrected applying diferent operations in order to obtain representative fluorescence data:

1. The subtraction of the blank fluorescence:

   F_{subs} = F - F_{blank}

2. The quotient of the fluorescence with the gain:

   F_{gain} = \frac{F_{subs}}{G}

3. The quotient of the fluorescence with excitation and emission efficiency:

   F_{corrected} = \frac{F_{gain}}{\frac{exc(\%)em(\%)}{100}}

Until now, the corrections applied to the experiments performed with these reporter proteins were the subtraction of the fluorescence of the blank, and the division by the gain factor of the measuring equipment. However, with the protein spectra, we can also normalize the fluorescence data to values that would have been obtained with maximum excitation and emission.

Owing to this reason, a protocol has been established in the lab by Lab and Modeling team to obtain the spectrum of any reporter protein.

Materials:

• Measuring equipment: Biotek Cytation3

• 96 well plate

• MATLAB 2018a software

Procedure:

1. We look for the theoretical spectraof the protein to be measured (or similar molecules) to determine the wavelength at which the protein is excited or emitted at maximum energy, i.e. where the theoretical spectral peaks occur.

2. We define the protocol of our equipment to get the absorbance and fluorescence dataset. In our protocol, the most important parameters to be established are summarized in the following Table.

   Parameters	Description
   Number of samples	From 3 to 6 samples of reporter protein and 3 samples of blank (BLK)
   Temperature	37 ºC
   Shake	Double Orbital. 01:00 (MM:SS)
   Absorbance. Optical Density (OD)	Wavelenght at 600 nm emission
   Excitacion and emission scans	The scans occur between two wavelength limit values. The established range will depend on the theoretical spectrum of the protein.
   Excitacion and emission wavelengths	These values will depend on the range, and therefore on the spectrum. Values far from the theoretical peak lead to more attenuated fluorescence curves, and values very close to the peak can lead to overlap and error in reading the data. Therefore, a compromise must be reached between curve resolution and reading overlap.
   Gain (G)	Normally the gain value G = 60, although for proteins with lower fluorescence, it is recommended that G takes higher values.

3. The experiment is introduced, and the experimental absorbance data and the fluorescence curves of the samples are obtained with the blank correction applied.

4. The dataset is exported to an Excel file.

5. The MATLAB script spectrum.m for fluorescent proteins is executed:

   1. Dataset is extracted from the Excel file.

   2. The fluorescence curves of all samples are averaged, and the result is normalised (from 0 to 100%).

   3. Graphs of the normalized absorption and emission spectra are plotted. The X-axis represents the wavelength (nm), and the Y-axis represents the normalized fluorescence intensity (%).

sfGFP spectra

>

In practical terms, the protocol has been applied to all of our reporter proteins: GFP, sfGFP, YFP and mRFP. All results can be found in our parts collection as well as in the iGEM catalogue.

In the particular case of a reporter chromoprotein, such as amilCP, we do not measure fluorescence, but absorbance. In this case, in rder to obtain the corrected absorbance curve, we must subtract from the cell absorbance data with the reporter protein the absorbance of a medium with cells without chromoprotein. Once the data have been corrected, we normalize them between values of 0 and 100 and with this we elaborate the graph. The protocol used can be found in the MATLAB script amilCP_spectrum.m.

Finally, we have also obtained the spectra of the fluorescein molecule. These spectra have been used to correct the fluorescence data used in the Interlab Study to obtain the Relative Fluorescence Units (RFU) to Molecules of Equivalent Fluorochrome (MEFL) conversion factor. In addition, the comparison between GFP and sfGFP proteins RFU has been possible thanks to fluorescein spectra.

Comparison between sfGFP and GFP relative fluorescence intensity

One of the main problems we encounter when processing the results of experiments in Synthetic Biology are the units of measurement of fluorescence data. Unlike absorbance, where there is a simple conversion between Optical Density (OD) and cell number, there is no direct relationship between the Relative Units of Fluorescence (RFU) and the number of protein molecules in the cell. Moreover, RFUs vary among reporter fluoroproteins: for example, an RFU of the GFP protein does not have to be equivalent to an RFU of the mRFP protein, sfGFP, etc.

Thanks to initiatives such as the Interlab Study, we have been able to go a step further and obtain a MEFL/RFUGFP factor of equivalence between the RFU of the GFP protein and the Molecules of Equivalent Fluorochrome (MEFL). This relationship is an important breakthrough, as it can give us a more accurate estimate of the amount of GFP molecules in the cell.

However, another of the reporter proteins widely used in the experimentation is the sfGFP. This protein has a much faster folding than GFP, which translates into a higher fluorescence intensity per molecule. In order to obtain the MEFL/RFUsfGFP factor from sfGFP, the Printeria Modeling and Lab teams have designed a comparative experiment between the both proteins. The experiment consists of designing two identical transcriptional units (TU), changing only the CDS sequence so that each TU will produce GFP and sfGFP, respectively. It should be added that this experiment is based on two fundamental assumptions:

1. The number of GFP molecules produced in the cells is equivalent to the number of MEFL.

2. Given two TU with identical promoters, RBS and terminators, but with different CDS, under the same experimental conditions, the number of molecules produced by each TU is the same.

Taking these axioms into account, the materials and procedure followed to calculate the MEFL/RFUsfGFP factor were as follows:

Materials:

• Measuring equipment: Biotek Cytation3

• 96 well plate

• MATLAB 2018a software

Simulation Tool