Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Darmstadt/Notebook/LJ-Colis"

Line 7: Line 7:
 
<b> Week 3 (16<sup>th</sup> of April – 22<sup>nd</sup> of April) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 3 (16<sup>th</sup> of April – 22<sup>nd</sup> of April) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 4 (23<sup>rd</sup> of April – 29<sup>th</sup> of April) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 4 (23<sup>rd</sup> of April – 29<sup>th</sup> of April) </b><br>
 
+
<br>
 
<b><u> May </u></b><br>
 
<b><u> May </u></b><br>
 
<b> Week 5 (30<sup>th</sup> of April – 6<sup>th</sup> of Mai) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 5 (30<sup>th</sup> of April – 6<sup>th</sup> of Mai) </b><br>
To get our coding gene <i>aceA</i> out of <i>E. coli</i> we designed our own primers (in total eight), which we mixed partially together. Due this we differentiate between seven samples A to G. The samples are as followed:
+
To get our coding gene <i>aceA</i> out of <i>E. coli</i> we designed our own primers (in total eight), which we mixed partially together. Due this we differentiate between seven samples A to G. The samples are as followed:<br>
 
Sample Primer
 
Sample Primer
 
A AceA-fw + AceA-rev
 
A AceA-fw + AceA-rev
Line 19: Line 19:
 
F AceA-rev + BB prefix-His tag-fw
 
F AceA-rev + BB prefix-His tag-fw
 
G AceA-rev + BB prefix-RBS-His-fw
 
G AceA-rev + BB prefix-RBS-His-fw
 
+
<br>
 
<b> Week 6 (7<sup>th</sup> of May – 13<sup>th</sup> of May) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 6 (7<sup>th</sup> of May – 13<sup>th</sup> of May) </b><br>
We finally started with labwork. At first we performed a PCR with our samples A, C and D and was followed by a PCR Clean-up of these samples.
+
We finally started with labwork. At first we performed a PCR with our samples A, C and D and was followed by a PCR Clean-up of these samples.<br>
 
<b> Week 7 (14<sup>th</sup> of May – 20<sup>th</sup> of May) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 7 (14<sup>th</sup> of May – 20<sup>th</sup> of May) </b><br>
In this week, we performed a restriction digest of sample A and pSB1C3 with EcoRI and PstI. The backbone of pSB1C3 was dephosphorylated. We then ligated the sample A into the plasmid pSB1C3 via the standard T4 ligation protocol. Thereafter a transformation of the ligation product into <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10 was performed.   
+
In this week, we performed a restriction digest of sample A and pSB1C3 with EcoRI and PstI. The backbone of pSB1C3 was dephosphorylated. We then ligated the sample A into the plasmid pSB1C3 via the standard T4 ligation protocol. Thereafter a transformation of the ligation product into <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10 was performed.  <br>
 
<b> Week 8 (21<sup>st</sup> of May – 27<sup>th</sup> of May) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 8 (21<sup>st</sup> of May – 27<sup>th</sup> of May) </b><br>
First, we performed a colony PCR (cPCR) on sample A-transformed colonies. However, an agarose gel-electrophoresis showed that that none of the screened colonies was transformed with the correct ligation product. To examine the transformed ligation product closer, we subsequently prepared an overnight culture and extracted and purified plasmids the following day. To check our restriction digest we performed a restriction analyze of the sample A with the restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI. The gel-electrophoreses showed that a re-ligation of PsB1C3 happened.  
+
First, we performed a colony PCR (cPCR) on sample A-transformed colonies. However, an agarose gel-electrophoresis showed that that none of the screened colonies was transformed with the correct ligation product. To examine the transformed ligation product closer, we subsequently prepared an overnight culture and extracted and purified plasmids the following day. To check our restriction digest we performed a restriction analyze of the sample A with the restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI. The gel-electrophoreses showed that a re-ligation of PsB1C3 happened. <br>
 
+
<br>
 
<b><u> June </u></b><br>
 
<b><u> June </u></b><br>
 
<b> Week 9 (28<sup>th</sup> of May – 3<sup>rd</sup> of June) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 9 (28<sup>th</sup> of May – 3<sup>rd</sup> of June) </b><br>
A transformation with our sample A in <i>E. coli</i> was at first performed. Colonies were screened via colony PCR. A gel-electrophoresis showed that the cPCR was not successful. We then prepared an overnight culture, followed by a plasmid preparation. To check our restriction digest we performed a restriction analyze of the sample A with EcoRI, PstI, XbaI and SpeI. A gel-electrophoresis showed that only the backbone pSB1C3 was cut properly.
+
A transformation with our sample A in <i>E. coli</i> was at first performed. Colonies were screened via colony PCR. A gel-electrophoresis showed that the cPCR was not successful. We then prepared an overnight culture, followed by a plasmid preparation. To check our restriction digest we performed a restriction analyze of the sample A with EcoRI, PstI, XbaI and SpeI. A gel-electrophoresis showed that only the backbone pSB1C3 was cut properly.<br>
 
<b> Week 10 (4<sup>th</sup> of June – 10<sup>th</sup> of June) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 10 (4<sup>th</sup> of June – 10<sup>th</sup> of June) </b><br>
In this week we performed several PCR with the samples A, B and E with different settings to screen for feasible conditions, until we obtained positive results. The respective samples were purified and PCRs for sample were repeated.
+
In this week we performed several PCR with the samples A, B and E with different settings to screen for feasible conditions, until we obtained positive results. The respective samples were purified and PCRs for sample were repeated.<br>
 
<b> Week 11 (11<sup>th</sup> of June – 17<sup>th</sup> of June) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 11 (11<sup>th</sup> of June – 17<sup>th</sup> of June) </b><br>
We started working on our second gene <i>ycdW</i> by performing a PCR this week. A agarose gel electrophoresis showed that this was not successful. For the gene <i>aceA</i> we performed a restriction digest of purified PCR products from last week with EcoRI-Hf and PstI-Hf. We were troubleshooting about the ligation of <i>aceA</i> into pSB1C3 and concluded to try the ligtaion with different insert-backbone ratios (6:1 and 3:1). The ligation product was then transformed in <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10 and positive colonies were screened for via cPCR. Subsequently we performed a DNA-preparation with the positive samples and send it for DNA sequencing.
+
We started working on our second gene <i>ycdW</i> by performing a PCR this week. A agarose gel electrophoresis showed that this was not successful. For the gene <i>aceA</i> we performed a restriction digest of purified PCR products from last week with EcoRI-Hf and PstI-Hf. We were troubleshooting about the ligation of <i>aceA</i> into pSB1C3 and concluded to try the ligtaion with different insert-backbone ratios (6:1 and 3:1). The ligation product was then transformed in <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10 and positive colonies were screened for via cPCR. Subsequently we performed a DNA-preparation with the positive samples and send it for DNA sequencing.<br>
 
<b> Week 12 (18<sup>th</sup> of June – 24<sup>th</sup> of June) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 12 (18<sup>th</sup> of June – 24<sup>th</sup> of June) </b><br>
 
For our <i>ycdW</i> construct, we digested the encoding gBock with EcoRI and PstI. The digestion product was ligated into a dephosphorylated pSB1C3 backbone. We transformed <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10 with the ligation product, screened for positive transformants via cPCR and subsequent agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products. Positive colonies were inoculated in overnight cultures and respective plasmids were extracted and purified the following day. Sequence integrity was validated via DNA sequencing.  
 
For our <i>ycdW</i> construct, we digested the encoding gBock with EcoRI and PstI. The digestion product was ligated into a dephosphorylated pSB1C3 backbone. We transformed <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10 with the ligation product, screened for positive transformants via cPCR and subsequent agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products. Positive colonies were inoculated in overnight cultures and respective plasmids were extracted and purified the following day. Sequence integrity was validated via DNA sequencing.  
For <i>aceA</i> we have done a PCR of sample G and E, which was not successful.
+
For <i>aceA</i> we have done a PCR of sample G and E, which was not successful.<br><br>
  
 
<b><u> July </u></b><br>
 
<b><u> July </u></b><br>
 
<b> Week 13 (25<sup>th</sup> of June – 1<sup>st</sup> of July) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 13 (25<sup>th</sup> of June – 1<sup>st</sup> of July) </b><br>
This week we have done a few PCRs with the samples D and E from <i>aceA</i>, as well as overnight cultures of pSB1C3-<i>ycdW</i>.
+
This week we have done a few PCRs with the samples D and E from <i>aceA</i>, as well as overnight cultures of pSB1C3-<i>ycdW</i>.<br>
 
<b> Week 14 (2<sup>nd</sup> of July – 8<sup>th</sup> of July) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 14 (2<sup>nd</sup> of July – 8<sup>th</sup> of July) </b><br>
After positive sequencing results of pSB1C3-<i>ycdW</i> returned we made glycerol stocks.
+
After positive sequencing results of pSB1C3-<i>ycdW</i> returned we made glycerol stocks. <br>
 
<b> Week 15 (9<sup>th</sup> of July – 15<sup>th</sup> of July) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 15 (9<sup>th</sup> of July – 15<sup>th</sup> of July) </b><br>
This week we took a break from the lab and learned for our exams.
+
This week we took a break from the lab and learned for our exams. <br>
 
<b> Week 16 (16<sup>th</sup> of July – 22<sup>nd</sup> of July) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 16 (16<sup>th</sup> of July – 22<sup>nd</sup> of July) </b><br>
The exams were still ongoing.
+
The exams were still ongoing. <br>
 
<b> Week 17 (23<sup>rd</sup> of July – 29<sup>th</sup> of July) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 17 (23<sup>rd</sup> of July – 29<sup>th</sup> of July) </b><br>
We returned to the lab to clone <i>aceA</i> from a gBlock into pSB1C3 and transformed it into <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10. We checked it via cPCR and gel-electrophoresis. The positive samples we send in for sequencing.
+
We returned to the lab to clone <i>aceA</i> from a gBlock into pSB1C3 and transformed it into <i>E. coli</i> TOP 10. We checked it via cPCR and gel-electrophoresis. The positive samples we send in for sequencing. <br>
 
+
<br>
 
<b><u> August </u></b><br>
 
<b><u> August </u></b><br>
 
<b> Week 18 (30<sup>th</sup> of July – 5<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 18 (30<sup>th</sup> of July – 5<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
This week, we prepared everything to analyze gene expression of <i>ycdW</i> in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 via SDS-PAGE. Therefore, we transformed pSB1C3-<i>ycdW</i> into <i>E. coli</i> BL21 and inoculate the starter and main culture.
+
This week, we prepared everything to analyze gene expression of <i>ycdW</i> in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 via SDS-PAGE. Therefore, we transformed pSB1C3-<i>ycdW</i> into <i>E. coli</i> BL21 and inoculate the starter and main culture. <br>
 
<b> Week 19 (6<sup>th</sup> of August – 12<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 19 (6<sup>th</sup> of August – 12<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
This week, we verified <i>ycdW</i> via SDS-PAGE.  To see if induction of 1mM IPTG has an impact and to verify our SDS-PAGE again we set on a new preparation for a new SDS-Page. A second SDS-Page was made, which proves the positive results from before. Beside this we repeated the cloning of <i>aceA</i> into pSB1C3 using a gBlock and send the samples for sequencing.
+
This week, we verified <i>ycdW</i> via SDS-PAGE.  To see if induction of 1mM IPTG has an impact and to verify our SDS-PAGE again we set on a new preparation for a new SDS-Page. A second SDS-Page was made, which proves the positive results from before. Beside this we repeated the cloning of <i>aceA</i> into pSB1C3 using a gBlock and send the samples for sequencing. <br>
 
<b> Week 20 (13<sup>th</sup> of August – 19<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 20 (13<sup>th</sup> of August – 19<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
After positive sequencing results of <i>aceA</i> returned, we prepared glycerol stocks of <i>E. coli</i> TOP10 as well as <i>E. coli</i> BL21. Subsequently, we performed a SDS-PAGE with <i>aceA</i> with and without inducing 0.5mM IPTG. And it proves the activity of our cloned <i>aceA</i>.
+
After positive sequencing results of <i>aceA</i> returned, we prepared glycerol stocks of <i>E. coli</i> TOP10 as well as <i>E. coli</i> BL21. Subsequently, we performed a SDS-PAGE with <i>aceA</i> with and without inducing 0.5mM IPTG. And it proves the activity of our cloned <i>aceA</i>.<br>
 
<b> Week 21 (20<sup>th</sup> of August – 26<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 21 (20<sup>th</sup> of August – 26<sup>th</sup> of August) </b><br>
To specifically confirm the functional protein expression from the previous SDS-PAGE with both enzymes, we now performed our first Western Blot, which succeeded.
+
To specifically confirm the functional protein expression from the previous SDS-PAGE with both enzymes, we now performed our first Western Blot, which succeeded. <br>
 
<b><u> September </u></b><br>
 
<b><u> September </u></b><br>
 
<b> Week 22 (27<sup>th</sup> of August – 2<sup>nd</sup> of September) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 22 (27<sup>th</sup> of August – 2<sup>nd</sup> of September) </b><br>
Due the positive results from the previous SDS-PAGE and western blot, we purified our AceA and YcdW via Äkta pure. Subsequently the enzyme buffer was exchange via Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters.  
+
Due the positive results from the previous SDS-PAGE and western blot, we purified our AceA and YcdW via Äkta pure. Subsequently the enzyme buffer was exchange via Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters. <br>
 
<b> Week 23 (3<sup>rd</sup> of September – 9<sup>th</sup> of September) </b><br>  
 
<b> Week 23 (3<sup>rd</sup> of September – 9<sup>th</sup> of September) </b><br>  
We analyzed our purified proteins AceA and YcdW via SDS-PAGE and western blot.
+
We analyzed our purified proteins AceA and YcdW via SDS-PAGE and western blot. <br>
 
<b> Week 25 (10<sup>th</sup> of September – 16<sup>th</sup> of September) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 25 (10<sup>th</sup> of September – 16<sup>th</sup> of September) </b><br>
This is the week we started with our enzyme assays. Therefore, we buffer exchanged YcdW via PD-10 Desalting Columns. Subsequently we started with the NADPH-dependent assay. This assay was repeated twice to verify our results. To see if <i>E. coli</i> can metabolize glycolic acid, we performed a M9Minimal Media assay. Besides, we repeated the western blot with and without induction of <i>aceA</i> and <i>ycdW</i> with 1mM IPTG.  
+
This is the week we started with our enzyme assays. Therefore, we buffer exchanged YcdW via PD-10 Desalting Columns. Subsequently we started with the NADPH-dependent assay. This assay was repeated twice to verify our results. To see if <i>E. coli</i> can metabolize glycolic acid, we performed a M9Minimal Media assay. Besides, we repeated the western blot with and without induction of <i>aceA</i> and <i>ycdW</i> with 1mM IPTG. <br>
 
<b> Week 26 (17<sup>th</sup> of September – 23<sup>rd</sup> of September) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 26 (17<sup>th</sup> of September – 23<sup>rd</sup> of September) </b><br>
We continued with our enzyme assays. First, we performed the M9 –assay for <i>ycdW</i> about three times. Afterwards we repeated the NADPH assay with an enhanced NADPH concentration. For AceA we conducted phenylhydrazin-dependent assay with three replicates.
+
We continued with our enzyme assays. First, we performed the M9 –assay for <i>ycdW</i> about three times. Afterwards we repeated the NADPH assay with an enhanced NADPH concentration. For AceA we conducted phenylhydrazin-dependent assay with three replicates. <br>
 
<b> Week 27 (24<sup>th</sup> of September – 30<sup>th</sup> of September) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 27 (24<sup>th</sup> of September – 30<sup>th</sup> of September) </b><br>
We recorded the calibration curve for the enzyme assays of AceA and YcdW. We then buffer exchanged AceA into a potassium phosphate buffer.
+
We recorded the calibration curve for the enzyme assays of AceA and YcdW. We then buffer exchanged AceA into a potassium phosphate buffer. <br><br>
 
<b><u> October </u></b><br>
 
<b><u> October </u></b><br>
 
<b> Week 28 (1<sup>st</sup> of October – 7<sup>th</sup> of October) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 28 (1<sup>st</sup> of October – 7<sup>th</sup> of October) </b><br>
We finally purified our last plasmids and checked their sequence integrity via DNA sequencing. We also shipped our plasmids to Boston, to submit them to the iGEM registry. Furthermore, we run an <i>in vivo</i> assay to produce glycolic acid and analyzed production via HPLC. We also recorded growth curves of <i>aceA</i> and <i>ycdW</i> in <i>E. coli</i>.
+
We finally purified our last plasmids and checked their sequence integrity via DNA sequencing. We also shipped our plasmids to Boston, to submit them to the iGEM registry. Furthermore, we run an <i>in vivo</i> assay to produce glycolic acid and analyzed production via HPLC. We also recorded growth curves of <i>aceA</i> and <i>ycdW</i> in <i>E. coli</i>.<br>
 
<b> Week 29 (8<sup>th</sup> of October – 14<sup>th</sup> of October) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 29 (8<sup>th</sup> of October – 14<sup>th</sup> of October) </b><br>
We are totally done.
+
We are totally done. <br>
 
<b> Week 30 (15<sup>th</sup> of October – 21<sup>st</sup> of October) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 30 (15<sup>th</sup> of October – 21<sup>st</sup> of October) </b><br>
… and cleaning of the Lab
+
… and cleaning of the Lab<br><br>
 
<b> Week 31 (22<sup>nd</sup> of October – 28<sup>th</sup> of October) </b><br>
 
<b> Week 31 (22<sup>nd</sup> of October – 28<sup>th</sup> of October) </b><br>
 
Flying to Boston and attend the Giant Jamboree!
 
Flying to Boston and attend the Giant Jamboree!
 +
  
  

Revision as of 09:09, 15 October 2018

Production of glycolic acid in E. coli

April
Week 1 (2nd of April – 8th of April)
Week 2 (9th of April – 15th of April)
Week 3 (16th of April – 22nd of April)
Week 4 (23rd of April – 29th of April)

May
Week 5 (30th of April – 6th of Mai)
To get our coding gene aceA out of E. coli we designed our own primers (in total eight), which we mixed partially together. Due this we differentiate between seven samples A to G. The samples are as followed:
Sample Primer A AceA-fw + AceA-rev B AceA-rev + BB prefix C AceA-rev + BB suffix D AceA-rev + GS linker-AceA-fw E AceA-rev + His-GS linker-fw F AceA-rev + BB prefix-His tag-fw G AceA-rev + BB prefix-RBS-His-fw
Week 6 (7th of May – 13th of May)
We finally started with labwork. At first we performed a PCR with our samples A, C and D and was followed by a PCR Clean-up of these samples.
Week 7 (14th of May – 20th of May)
In this week, we performed a restriction digest of sample A and pSB1C3 with EcoRI and PstI. The backbone of pSB1C3 was dephosphorylated. We then ligated the sample A into the plasmid pSB1C3 via the standard T4 ligation protocol. Thereafter a transformation of the ligation product into E. coli TOP 10 was performed.
Week 8 (21st of May – 27th of May)
First, we performed a colony PCR (cPCR) on sample A-transformed colonies. However, an agarose gel-electrophoresis showed that that none of the screened colonies was transformed with the correct ligation product. To examine the transformed ligation product closer, we subsequently prepared an overnight culture and extracted and purified plasmids the following day. To check our restriction digest we performed a restriction analyze of the sample A with the restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI. The gel-electrophoreses showed that a re-ligation of PsB1C3 happened.

June
Week 9 (28th of May – 3rd of June)
A transformation with our sample A in E. coli was at first performed. Colonies were screened via colony PCR. A gel-electrophoresis showed that the cPCR was not successful. We then prepared an overnight culture, followed by a plasmid preparation. To check our restriction digest we performed a restriction analyze of the sample A with EcoRI, PstI, XbaI and SpeI. A gel-electrophoresis showed that only the backbone pSB1C3 was cut properly.
Week 10 (4th of June – 10th of June)
In this week we performed several PCR with the samples A, B and E with different settings to screen for feasible conditions, until we obtained positive results. The respective samples were purified and PCRs for sample were repeated.
Week 11 (11th of June – 17th of June)
We started working on our second gene ycdW by performing a PCR this week. A agarose gel electrophoresis showed that this was not successful. For the gene aceA we performed a restriction digest of purified PCR products from last week with EcoRI-Hf and PstI-Hf. We were troubleshooting about the ligation of aceA into pSB1C3 and concluded to try the ligtaion with different insert-backbone ratios (6:1 and 3:1). The ligation product was then transformed in E. coli TOP 10 and positive colonies were screened for via cPCR. Subsequently we performed a DNA-preparation with the positive samples and send it for DNA sequencing.
Week 12 (18th of June – 24th of June)
For our ycdW construct, we digested the encoding gBock with EcoRI and PstI. The digestion product was ligated into a dephosphorylated pSB1C3 backbone. We transformed E. coli TOP 10 with the ligation product, screened for positive transformants via cPCR and subsequent agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products. Positive colonies were inoculated in overnight cultures and respective plasmids were extracted and purified the following day. Sequence integrity was validated via DNA sequencing. For aceA we have done a PCR of sample G and E, which was not successful.

July
Week 13 (25th of June – 1st of July)
This week we have done a few PCRs with the samples D and E from aceA, as well as overnight cultures of pSB1C3-ycdW.
Week 14 (2nd of July – 8th of July)
After positive sequencing results of pSB1C3-ycdW returned we made glycerol stocks.
Week 15 (9th of July – 15th of July)
This week we took a break from the lab and learned for our exams.
Week 16 (16th of July – 22nd of July)
The exams were still ongoing.
Week 17 (23rd of July – 29th of July)
We returned to the lab to clone aceA from a gBlock into pSB1C3 and transformed it into E. coli TOP 10. We checked it via cPCR and gel-electrophoresis. The positive samples we send in for sequencing.

August
Week 18 (30th of July – 5th of August)
This week, we prepared everything to analyze gene expression of ycdW in E. coli BL21 via SDS-PAGE. Therefore, we transformed pSB1C3-ycdW into E. coli BL21 and inoculate the starter and main culture.
Week 19 (6th of August – 12th of August)
This week, we verified ycdW via SDS-PAGE. To see if induction of 1mM IPTG has an impact and to verify our SDS-PAGE again we set on a new preparation for a new SDS-Page. A second SDS-Page was made, which proves the positive results from before. Beside this we repeated the cloning of aceA into pSB1C3 using a gBlock and send the samples for sequencing.
Week 20 (13th of August – 19th of August)
After positive sequencing results of aceA returned, we prepared glycerol stocks of E. coli TOP10 as well as E. coli BL21. Subsequently, we performed a SDS-PAGE with aceA with and without inducing 0.5mM IPTG. And it proves the activity of our cloned aceA.
Week 21 (20th of August – 26th of August)
To specifically confirm the functional protein expression from the previous SDS-PAGE with both enzymes, we now performed our first Western Blot, which succeeded.
September
Week 22 (27th of August – 2nd of September)
Due the positive results from the previous SDS-PAGE and western blot, we purified our AceA and YcdW via Äkta pure. Subsequently the enzyme buffer was exchange via Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters.
Week 23 (3rd of September – 9th of September)
We analyzed our purified proteins AceA and YcdW via SDS-PAGE and western blot.
Week 25 (10th of September – 16th of September)
This is the week we started with our enzyme assays. Therefore, we buffer exchanged YcdW via PD-10 Desalting Columns. Subsequently we started with the NADPH-dependent assay. This assay was repeated twice to verify our results. To see if E. coli can metabolize glycolic acid, we performed a M9Minimal Media assay. Besides, we repeated the western blot with and without induction of aceA and ycdW with 1mM IPTG.
Week 26 (17th of September – 23rd of September)
We continued with our enzyme assays. First, we performed the M9 –assay for ycdW about three times. Afterwards we repeated the NADPH assay with an enhanced NADPH concentration. For AceA we conducted phenylhydrazin-dependent assay with three replicates.
Week 27 (24th of September – 30th of September)
We recorded the calibration curve for the enzyme assays of AceA and YcdW. We then buffer exchanged AceA into a potassium phosphate buffer.

October
Week 28 (1st of October – 7th of October)
We finally purified our last plasmids and checked their sequence integrity via DNA sequencing. We also shipped our plasmids to Boston, to submit them to the iGEM registry. Furthermore, we run an in vivo assay to produce glycolic acid and analyzed production via HPLC. We also recorded growth curves of aceA and ycdW in E. coli.
Week 29 (8th of October – 14th of October)
We are totally done.
Week 30 (15th of October – 21st of October)
… and cleaning of the Lab

Week 31 (22nd of October – 28th of October)
Flying to Boston and attend the Giant Jamboree!