Team:Valencia UPV/Improve

Stack Multipurpose HTML Template

Part Improvement

During the development of the iGEM project, when designing our Part Collection, we decided to offer Printeria users a wide range of reporter proteins that they could use in their experiments. Of all of them, it calls our attention that some reporter proteins such as the YFP did not present much information about their use and experimentation, compared to the well-known GFP or sfGFP.

Because of this reason, the Printeria team has carried out several experiments using YFP as a reporter protein in order to better characterize it, obtaining the maximum information about that part. Throughout the project we have obtained its excitation and emission spectra, as well as the MEFL/cell factor that allows us to convert FOD into equivalent molecules (MEFL).

However, we decided to go a step further and design a new part by adding a degradation LVA tag to YFP sequence, which increases the action of proteases and causes faster degradation. The BioBrick chosen to be improved was the YFP coding sequence: BBa_K592101. To do this, we first standardized the part to be compatible with the GoldenBraid 3.0 assembly method creating the part BBa_K2656021. Then, we created the part BBa_K2656020. This part is the CDS of the YFP with the addition of the degradation tag ssRA LVA.

To test the effect of the degradation tag, we designed an experiment with which we measured the increase in protein degradation due to this tag. To perform this experiment, we assembled two composite parts with the same promoter, RBS and terminator:

BBa_K2656112:

BBa_K2656004: the J23106 promoter in its GoldenBraid compatible version from our Part Collection
BBa_K2656009: the B0030 ribosome biding site in its GoldenBraid compatible version from our Part Collection
BBa_K2656021: The original part BBa_K592101 compatible with the GoldenBraid assembly method
BBa_K2656026: the B0015 transcriptional terminator in its GoldenBraid compatible version from our Part Collection

BBa_K2656111:

BBa_K2656004
BBa_K2656009
BBa_K2656020: The original part with the added LVA ssRA degradation tag compatible with the GoldenBraid assembly method
BBa_K2656026

Once the experiment was carried out, the results were plotted and Figure 1 was obtained, in which we can observe that the growth of the bacteria with both constructions was very similar, while the fluorescence had a clear variation.

Figure 1. Experimental results of the fluorescence comparison experiment between the transcriptional unit with BBa_K2656021 and the one with BBa_K2656020.

These data were optimized with our model and the parameters from Table 1 were obtained. With these parameters it is possible to obtain that the protein degradation of the protein with the LVA degradation tag is around twice as much as without the LVA degradation tag.

Table 1. Optimized values of translation rate, degradation rate and dilution rate from experimental data

Optimized parameters

Values

Translation rate p

For YFP with LVA tag BBa_K2656020: p = 0.4622 min^-1
For YFP without LVA tag BBa_K2656021: p = 1.053 min^-1

PoI degradation rate d_p

For YFP with LVA tag BBa_K2656020: d_p = 0.01492 min^-1
For YFP without LVA tag BBa_K2656021: d_p = 0.0080 min^-1

Dilution rate μ

For YFP with LVA tag BBa_K2656020: μ = 0.01166 min^-1
For YFP without LVA tag BBa_K2656021: μ = 0.01307 min^-1