Difference between revisions of "Team:NCHU Taichung/Design"

 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
         <div class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
         <div class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/7f/T--NCHU_Taichung--siderophoreNtcdd.png">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/7f/T--NCHU_Taichung--siderophoreNtcdd.png">
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure n. Dioxin Structure (a) and Prototypical catechol-type siderophore (b). Modified from (Neilands1995)</div>
+
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure 1. Dioxin Structure (a) and Prototypical catechol-type siderophore (b). Modified from<sup>[10]</sup></div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
         <h3 class="ui header">HAD</h3>
 
         <h3 class="ui header">HAD</h3>
         <p class="longP">Haloacid dehalogenases (HAD) are a family of bacterial enzymes. Generally, most of HAD superfamily members catalyze
+
         <p class="longP">Haloacid dehalogenases (HAD) are a family of bacterial enzymes. Generally, most of HAD superfamily members catalyze the dephosphorylation of various compounds, but the catalyzation of carbon group transfer is unique<sup>[15]</sup>. 2-haloacid dehalogenase, which we used in our project, is a representative of haloacid dehalogenase (HAD) superfamily, that can catalyze the cleavage of carbon-halogen bonds of halogenated compounds, which are produced worldwide in a large amount of served human usages as solvents, synthetic precursors, agrochemicals, etc<sup>[16]</sup>. The catalyzation by 2-HAD needs without a metal ion cofactor while other HAD enzymes need, and that a water nucleophile attacks the Asp C=O in the hydrolysis partial reaction<sup>[15]</sup>.</p>
          the dephosphorylation of various compounds, but the catalyzation of carbon group transfer is unique. (Burroughs
+
         <p class="longP">2-HADs are classified into three kinds based on substrate specificities, including L-2-haloacid dehalogenase, D-2-haloacid dehalogenase and DL-2-haloacid dehalogenase<sup>[17]</sup>. There are two reaction mechanisms proposed for L-2-haloacid dehalogenase. For the first reaction mechanism in Fig. N-A, a carboxylate group of the enzyme attacks the α-carbon atom of the substrate to release the halogen atom to form an ester intermediate. After that, the ester intermediate is hydrolyzed to produce D-2-hydroxyalkanoic acid and regenerate the enzyme. As for the second mechanism, a water molecule directly attacks the substrate to expel the halogen atom in the single step in Figure 2 below<sup>[17]</sup>.</p>
          et al., 2006) 2-haloacid dehalogenase, which we used in our project, is a representative of haloacid dehalogenase
+
          (HAD) superfamily, that can catalyze the cleavage of carbon-halogen bonds of halogenated compounds, which are produced
+
          worldwide in a large amount of served human usages as solvents, synthetic precursors, agrochemicals, etc. (Kurihara,
+
          2011). The catalyzation by 2-HAD needs without a metal ion cofactor while other HAD enzymes need, and that a water
+
          nucleophile attacks the Asp C=O in the hydrolysis partial reaction (Burroughs et al., 2006).</p>
+
         <p class="longP">2-HADs are classified into three kinds based on substrate specificities, including L-2-haloacid dehalogenase, D-2-haloacid
+
          dehalogenase and DL-2-haloacid dehalogenase. (Kurihara et al., 2000). There are two reaction mechanisms proposed
+
          for L-2-haloacid dehalogenase. For the first reaction mechanism in Fig. N-A, a carboxylate group of the enzyme
+
          attacks the α-carbon atom of the substrate to release the halogen atom to form an ester intermediate. After that,
+
          the ester intermediate is hydrolyzed to produce D-2-hydroxyalkanoic acid and regenerate the enzyme. As for the
+
          second mechanism, a water molecule directly attacks the substrate to expel the halogen atom in the single step
+
          in Fig. 5- B (Kurihara et al., 2000).</p>
+
 
         <div class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
         <div class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/14/T--NCHU_Taichung--HADmechan.png">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/14/T--NCHU_Taichung--HADmechan.png">
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure n.</div>
+
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure 2. HAD Mechanism. Modified from<sup>[17]</sup></div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
         <p class="longP">Since numerous haloacid dehalogenases isolated from various bacteria species, the potential of bacteria using HAD
 
         <p class="longP">Since numerous haloacid dehalogenases isolated from various bacteria species, the potential of bacteria using HAD
Line 80: Line 68:
 
           class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
           class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/a8/T--NCHU_Taichung--operooooooon.png">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/a8/T--NCHU_Taichung--operooooooon.png">
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure n.</div>
+
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure 3.</div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
         <h2 class="ui dividing header" id="Shuttlevectors">Shuttle vectors</h2>
 
         <h2 class="ui dividing header" id="Shuttlevectors">Shuttle vectors</h2>
Line 87: Line 75:
 
           class="longP">We decided to replace the ori from pSB1C3 with the replication-related proteins and ori on the shuttle vectors. After
 
           class="longP">We decided to replace the ori from pSB1C3 with the replication-related proteins and ori on the shuttle vectors. After
 
           we searched for the restriction sites, we decide to add BamHI and HindIII by PCR on the shuttle vectors and pSB1C3,
 
           we searched for the restriction sites, we decide to add BamHI and HindIII by PCR on the shuttle vectors and pSB1C3,
           then, digest it and ligate it (Figure n). </p>
+
           then, digest it and ligate it (Figure 4). </p>
 
         <div class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
         <div class="ui fluid image" id="labelImg">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/9/95/T--NCHU_Taichung--EngVectorprocess.png">
 
           <img class="ui image clmnImg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/9/95/T--NCHU_Taichung--EngVectorprocess.png">
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure n. Shuttle vectors construction process.</div>
+
           <div class="ui pointing label">Figure 4. Shuttle vectors construction process.</div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
         <p class="longP">
 
         <p class="longP">
           <b>pME6010</b> is a small, stable, high copy number (n = 5.9 ± 1.8) shuttle vector based on the minimal pVS1 replicon
+
           <b>pME6010</b> is a small, stable, high copy number (n = 5.9 ± 1.8) shuttle vector based on the minimal pVS1 replicon for use in gram-negative especially plant-associated bacteria with tetracycline resistance. The vector we used was originally from Dr. Herman Spaink’s Lab, Leiden University. We bought it from addgene as the name, pMP4657, which contains pLacZ-EGFP<sup>[4,12]</sup>.</p>
          for use in gram-negative especially plant-associated bacteria with tetracycline resistance. The vector we used
+
          was originally from Dr. Herman Spaink’s Lab, Leiden University. We bought it from addgene as the name, pMP4657,
+
          which contains pLacZ-EGFP (stuurman2000).</p>
+
 
         <h3 class="ui header">pBBR1</h3>
 
         <h3 class="ui header">pBBR1</h3>
         <p class="longP">pBBR1 is relatively small(
+
         <p class="longP">pBBR1 is relatively smaller in size (<5.3kb), and they possess an extended multiple cloning site (MCS). They have the LacZα peptide that allow direct selection of recombinant plasmid in <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Moreover, pBBR1 provide four different antibiotics including kanamycin, ampicillin, tetracycline, gentamycin. This let pBBR1 broaden it usage. The plasmids have been tested and found to replicate in <i> Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>. According <i>Burkholderia </i> genus and <i> Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> are close, pBBR1 can express in <i>Burkholderia </i> genus<sup>[7]</sup>.</p>
          <5.3kb), and they possess an extended multiple cloning site (MCS). They have the LacZα
+
            peptide that allow direct selection of recombinant plasmid in <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Moreover, pBBR1 provide four different antibiotics including kanamycin, ampicillin, tetracycline,
+
            gentamycin. This let pBBR1 broaden it usage. The plasmids have been tested and found to replicate in
+
            <i> Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>.(kovach1995) According
+
            <i>Burkholderia </i> genus and
+
            <i> Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> are close, pBBR1 can express in
+
            <i>Burkholderia </i> genus.</p>
+
 
         <table class="ui celled table">
 
         <table class="ui celled table">
 
           <thead>
 
           <thead>
Line 120: Line 98:
 
                 <br> BBaddHin R
 
                 <br> BBaddHin R
 
                 <br> CCCAAGCTTGGGgtattaccgcctttgag
 
                 <br> CCCAAGCTTGGGgtattaccgcctttgag
                 <br> tr</td>
+
                 <br> </td>
 
             </tr>
 
             </tr>
 
             <tr>
 
             <tr>
Line 144: Line 122:
 
         </table>
 
         </table>
 
         <h2 class="ui dividing header" id="ExperimentalPlan">Experimental Plan</h2>
 
         <h2 class="ui dividing header" id="ExperimentalPlan">Experimental Plan</h2>
 +
<p class="longP">
 +
We use 3A method to construct the gene circuit. For the functional test, we use pET24a and pET21b expression vector to test growth curve with and without dioxin and purify proteins. Not only doing HAD activity test, the purified protein was tested by MTT assay for testing the toxicology-cell viability. We use <i>Vetiver</i> and <i>Arabidopsis</i> to analyze TCDD concentration in plants.
 +
 +
</p>
 +
 
         <h2 class="ui dividing header" id="Reference">Reference</h2>
 
         <h2 class="ui dividing header" id="Reference">Reference</h2>
 
         <ol>
 
         <ol>

Latest revision as of 03:52, 18 October 2018

NCHU_Taichung

Design

Our motivation is to solve large area soil contamination using plant-endophyte synergism. We combine phytoremediation and our engineered endophyte together to clean dioxin in soil. Two of our genes are derived from the transcriptomic data of Burkholderia cenocepacia 869T2 under dioxin-containing condition.

Genes

TonB

TonB-dependent receptors are membrane bound proteins of Gram-negative bacteria that can actively transport the ferric ion carrier, siderophore, which is similar in structure with dioxin[3].

Researches have shown that, some macromolecule such as carbonhydrate, heme or vitamin B12 can permeate TonB-dependent receptor[1,6].

Our TonB protein is derived from transcriptomic data under dioxin-stressed condition of Burkholderia cenocepacia 869T2. It is up-regulated during early growth period (pre-log phase)[2,13]. It can be also found in famous dioxin degradable bacteria, Sphingomonas wittichii RW1[9].

The docking results have shown that the protein structure can allow the passage of TCDD and some other dioxin compound.

Figure 1. Dioxin Structure (a) and Prototypical catechol-type siderophore (b). Modified from[10]

HAD

Haloacid dehalogenases (HAD) are a family of bacterial enzymes. Generally, most of HAD superfamily members catalyze the dephosphorylation of various compounds, but the catalyzation of carbon group transfer is unique[15]. 2-haloacid dehalogenase, which we used in our project, is a representative of haloacid dehalogenase (HAD) superfamily, that can catalyze the cleavage of carbon-halogen bonds of halogenated compounds, which are produced worldwide in a large amount of served human usages as solvents, synthetic precursors, agrochemicals, etc[16]. The catalyzation by 2-HAD needs without a metal ion cofactor while other HAD enzymes need, and that a water nucleophile attacks the Asp C=O in the hydrolysis partial reaction[15].

2-HADs are classified into three kinds based on substrate specificities, including L-2-haloacid dehalogenase, D-2-haloacid dehalogenase and DL-2-haloacid dehalogenase[17]. There are two reaction mechanisms proposed for L-2-haloacid dehalogenase. For the first reaction mechanism in Fig. N-A, a carboxylate group of the enzyme attacks the α-carbon atom of the substrate to release the halogen atom to form an ester intermediate. After that, the ester intermediate is hydrolyzed to produce D-2-hydroxyalkanoic acid and regenerate the enzyme. As for the second mechanism, a water molecule directly attacks the substrate to expel the halogen atom in the single step in Figure 2 below[17].

Figure 2. HAD Mechanism. Modified from[17]

Since numerous haloacid dehalogenases isolated from various bacteria species, the potential of bacteria using HAD to do bioremediation and utilize these compounds as its carbon source increases.

Laccase

The laccase we adopt in this system is from a symbiotic fungus of termite ( Odontotermes formosanus), Termitomyces T984, which was isolated from fecal material and responsible for lignin degradation where laccase plays a crucial role.

The laccase are a kind of peroxidase that has great oxidation ability and has potential to degrade organic compound such as diesel, pesticide, antibiotics, PCBs, dioxins etc. In former research, the laccase we use has shown

which can attack the ring structure on the dioxin and turn it into some products that can enter lower metabolic pathway of bacteria. (Mathew2013, Jiang2016, Zhang2012)

Circuit

We use constitutive Anderson promoter J23100 and strong RBS B0034 to express our genes as a polygene (polycistronic) circuit. Since the total length of our genes is short enough (less than 5000) we can express it right away.

Figure 3.

Shuttle vectors

To express our genes in endophyte, we found some broad host range shuttle vector and get it from addgene.

We decided to replace the ori from pSB1C3 with the replication-related proteins and ori on the shuttle vectors. After we searched for the restriction sites, we decide to add BamHI and HindIII by PCR on the shuttle vectors and pSB1C3, then, digest it and ligate it (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Shuttle vectors construction process.

pME6010 is a small, stable, high copy number (n = 5.9 ± 1.8) shuttle vector based on the minimal pVS1 replicon for use in gram-negative especially plant-associated bacteria with tetracycline resistance. The vector we used was originally from Dr. Herman Spaink’s Lab, Leiden University. We bought it from addgene as the name, pMP4657, which contains pLacZ-EGFP[4,12].

pBBR1

pBBR1 is relatively smaller in size (<5.3kb), and they possess an extended multiple cloning site (MCS). They have the LacZα peptide that allow direct selection of recombinant plasmid in Escherichia coli. Moreover, pBBR1 provide four different antibiotics including kanamycin, ampicillin, tetracycline, gentamycin. This let pBBR1 broaden it usage. The plasmids have been tested and found to replicate in Pseudomonas fluorescens. According Burkholderia genus and Pseudomonas fluorescens are close, pBBR1 can express in Burkholderia genus[7].

Template Primers
pSB1C3 or pSB series plasmid backbone BBaddBam F
CGCGGATCCGCGcgaaaactcacgttaagg
BBaddHin R
CCCAAGCTTGGGgtattaccgcctttgag
pMP4657 (pME6010 with GFP) V4657addBamF
CGCGGATCCgcggctgcatgaaatcct
V4657addHinR
CCCAAGCTTgggtgtcagtgaagtgct
pBBR1MCS BBRaddBamF
CGCGGATCCgcgccatcagatccttg
BBRaddBamF2
CGCGGATCCgcgggccactcaatgctt
BBRaddHinR
CCCAAGCTTgggcagggtcgttaaatag

Experimental Plan

We use 3A method to construct the gene circuit. For the functional test, we use pET24a and pET21b expression vector to test growth curve with and without dioxin and purify proteins. Not only doing HAD activity test, the purified protein was tested by MTT assay for testing the toxicology-cell viability. We use Vetiver and Arabidopsis to analyze TCDD concentration in plants.

Reference

  1. Blanvillain, Servane, Meyer, Damien, Boulanger, Alice, Lautier, Martine, Guynet, Catherine, Denancé, Nicolas, . . . Arlat, Matthieu. (2007). Plant carbohydrate scavenging through TonB-dependent receptors: a feature shared by phytopathogenic and aquatic bacteria. PLoS one, 2(2), e224.
  2. Chang, Kung-Hao. (2016). To study the change in transcriptome of Burkholderia cenocepacia 869T2, when exposed to dioxin, and to predict the relationship between TonB-dependent siderophore receptor and dioxin. Master Thesis from the National Chung Hsing University.
  3. Chimento, David P, Kadner, Robert J, & Wiener, Michael C. (2003). The Escherichia coli outer membrane cobalamin transporter BtuB: structural analysis of calcium and substrate binding, and identification of orthologous transporters by sequence/structure conservation. Journal of molecular biology, 332(5), 999-1014.
  4. Heeb, S., Itoh, Y., Nishijyo, T., Schnider, U., Keel, C., Wade, J., ... & Haas, D. (2000). Small, stable shuttle vectors based on the minimal pVS1 replicon for use in gram-negative, plant-associated bacteria. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 13 (2), 232-237.
  5. Jiang, Yu-Han. (2016).The possibility of the degradation of dioxin with recombinant Laccase protein from Odontotermes formosanus symbiosis strain Termitomyces T984. Master Thesis from the National Chung Hsing University.
  6. Kai Tang, Nianzhi Jiao, Keshao Liu, Yao Zhang and Shuhui Li. (2012). Distribution and Functions of TonB-Dependent Transporters in Marine Bacteria and Environments: Implications for Dissolved Organic Matter Utilization. PLoS ONE, 7(7).
  7. Kovach, M. E., Elzer, P. H., Hill, D. S., Robertson, G. T., Farris, M. A., Roop, R. M., & Peterson, K. M. (1995). Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene, 166(1), 175-176.
  8. Mathew, G. M., Mathew, D. C., Lo, S. C., Alexios, G. M., Yang, J. C., Sashikumar, J. M., ... & Huang, C. C. (2013). Synergistic collaboration of gut symbionts in Odontotermes formosanus for lignocellulosic degradation and bio-hydrogen production. Bioresource technology, 145, 337-344.
  9. Miller, T. R., Delcher, A. L., Salzberg, S. L., Saunders, E., Detter, J. C., & Halden, R. U. (2010). Genome sequence of the dioxin-mineralizing bacterium Sphingomonas wittichii RW1. Journal of bacteriology, 192(22), 6101-6102.
  10. Neilands, J. B. (1995). Siderophores: structure and function of microbial iron transport compounds. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270(45), 26723-26726.
  11. Nguyen, Thi Bao Anh. (2017). Biodegradation of dioxins by the endophytic bacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia 869T2: Role of 2-haloacid dehalogenase in dehalogenation. Master Thesis from the National Chung Hsing University.
  12. Stuurman, N., Bras, C. P., Schlaman, H. R., Wijfjes, A. H., Bloemberg, G., & Spaink, H. P. (2000). Use of green fluorescent protein color variants expressed on stable broad-host-range vectors to visualize rhizobia interacting with plants. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 13(11), 1163-1169.
  13. Tsai, Chia-Jung. (2018). Transcriptomic analysis of endophytic bacterium Burkholderia sp. 869T2 during 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin decomposing. Master Thesis from the National Chung Hsing University.
  14. Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Pan, B., Hua, M., & Zhao, X. (2012). Simple fabrication of polymer-based Trametes versicolor laccase for decolorization of malachite green. Bioresource technology, 115, 16-20.
  15. Burroughs, A. M., Allen, K. N., Dunaway-Mariano, D., & Aravind, L. (2006). Evolutionary genomics of the HAD superfamily: understanding the structural adaptations and catalytic diversity in a superfamily of phosphoesterases and allied enzymes. Journal of molecular biology, 361(5), 1003-1034.
  16. Kurihara, T. (2011). A mechanistic analysis of enzymatic degradation of organohalogen compounds. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry, 75(2), 189-198.
  17. Kurihara, T., Esaki, N., & Soda, K. (2000). Bacterial 2-haloacid dehalogenases: structures and reaction mechanisms. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 10(1-3), 57-65.